AzTrials
AzTrials

Basilar Artery OcclusionANGEL-COASTNCT05615038

A Comparison of Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

A study testing Contact aspiration Thrombectomy and Stent retriever thrombectomy in people with Basilar Artery Occlusion and Endovascular Treatment, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 6 sites in China.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Compare the effectiveness and safety of contact aspiration (CA) and stent retriever (SR) in acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Contact aspiration Thrombectomy and Stent retriever thrombectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
338 participants
Where
6 sitesChina
Study dates
7 Nov 2022to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age≥18 years;
  • Acute basilar artery occlusion confirmed by CTA/MRA/DSA;
  • Last known well to puncture time≤24 hours;
  • pc-ASPECTS score≥6 points;
  • Baseline NIHSS score≥10 points;
  • Consent to endovascular treatment;
Show all 25Show fewer
  • Informed consent signed.
  • Clinical Exclusion Criteria:
  • Baseline mRS≥3 points;
  • Known or suspected severe basilar artery stenosis (>70%) or chronic occlusion based on history, imaging, or clinical manifestations;
  • Refractory hypertension that is difficult to be controlled by drugs (defined as persistent systolic blood pressure >185 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg)
  • Genetic or acquired hemorrhagic tendency, coagulation factor deficiency or on anticoagulant therapy and International Normalized Ratio (INR) > 3.0;
  • Laboratory tests: baseline blood glucose <50mg/dl (2.8mmol/L) or >400mg/dl (22.2mmol/L); Baseline platelet count <50×109/L;
  • Known severe allergy (more severe than skin rash) to contrast agents uncontrolled by medications;
  • Females who are pregnant, or those of childbearing, potential with positive urine or serum beta Human Chorionic Gonadotropin test;
  • Other circumstances that the investigator considers inappropriate for participation in the trial or that may pose significant risks to patients (such as inability to understand and/or follow the study procedures and/or follow up due to mental disorders, cognitive or emotional disorders).
  • Imaging Exclusion Criteria:
  • CT or MR evidence of acute intracranial hemorrhage (the presence of microbleeds on MRI is allowed);
  • Midline shift or herniation, mass effect with effacement of the ventricles;
  • Complete cerebellar infarct on CT or MRI with significant mass effect and compression of the 4-th ventricle;
  • Complete bilateral thalamic infarction on CT or MRI;
  • Inability to endovascular treatment due to Excessive tortuosity, variation, or dissection of the artery;
  • Subjects with occlusions in both intracranial vertebral arteries;
  • Subjects with occlusions in both anterior and posterior circulation;
  • Evidence of intracranial tumor (except small meningioma).

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

China6 sites
  • Anyang People's Hospital

    Anyang, Henan

  • Baotou Center Hospital

    Baotou, Neimenggu

  • Beijing Anzhen Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

  • Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University

    Hefei, Anhui

  • Zhangzhou Municipal Hospital

    Zhangzhou, Henan

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of Contact Aspiration Versus Stent Retriever for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion: A Multicentre, Prospective, Open-label, Blind Endpoint, Randomized Controlled Trial

Compare the effectiveness and safety of contact aspiration (CA) and stent retriever (SR) in acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion.

Being tested
Contact aspiration Thrombectomy, Stent retriever thrombectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Contact aspiration ThrombectomyProcedure or surgery

    Contant aspiration is an approach that utilizes the advantages of large-bore aspiration catheters that can be easily tracked and introduced into the cerebral circulation to directly remove the thrombus via negative pressure aspiration.

  • Stent retriever thrombectomyProcedure or surgery

    Stent retriever thrombetomy is an approach that utilize sself-expandable stent for thrombectomy. The stent retriever is expanded to capture the thrombus, which immediately may restore blood flow.

Study groups in NCT05615038
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Contact aspiration first line thrombectomyExperimentalPatients will have the mechanical thrombectomy by first-line contact aspiration
Receives: Procedure: Contact aspiration Thrombectomy
Stent retriever first line thrombectomyActive comparatorPatients will have the mechanical thrombectomy by first-line stent retriever
Receives: Procedure: Stent retriever thrombectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of first pass effect (FPE)

    [The definition of FPE: 1) single pass/use of the device; 2)recanalization of the large vessel occlusion to eTICI 2C/3;3) no use of rescue therapy.]

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Rate of complete reperfusion (eTICI 3) after first-line thrombectomy strategy and at the end of endovascular procedure

    eTICI: grade 0: no perfusion noted (0% reperfusion) grade 1: reduction in thrombus but without any resultant filling of distal arterial branches grade 2 grade 2a: reperfusion of 1-49% of the territory grade 2b50: reperfusion of 50-66% of the territory grade 2b67: reperfusion of 67-89% of the territory grade 2c: extensive reperfusion of 90-99% of the territory grade 3: complete or full reperfusion (100% reperfusion)

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Rate of near to complete reperfusion (eTICI 2c/3) after first-line thrombectomy strategy and at the end of endovascular procedure

    eTICI: grade 0: no perfusion noted (0% reperfusion) grade 1: reduction in thrombus but without any resultant filling of distal arterial branches grade 2 grade 2a: reperfusion of 1-49% of the territory grade 2b50: reperfusion of 50-66% of the territory grade 2b67: reperfusion of 67-89% of the territory grade 2c: extensive reperfusion of 90-99% of the territory grade 3: complete or full reperfusion (100% reperfusion)

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Rate of successful reperfusion (eTICI 2b/2c/3) after first-line thrombectomy strategy and at the end of endovascular procedure

    eTICI: grade 0: no perfusion noted (0% reperfusion) grade 1: reduction in thrombus but without any resultant filling of distal arterial branches grade 2 grade 2a: reperfusion of 1-49% of the territory grade 2b50: reperfusion of 50-66% of the territory grade 2b67: reperfusion of 67-89% of the territory grade 2c: extensive reperfusion of 90-99% of the territory grade 3: complete or full reperfusion (100% reperfusion)

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Rate of Arterial Occlusive Lesion (AOL) recanalization score 3 after first-line thrombectomy strategy and at the end of endovascular procedure

    AOL recanalization score is evaluated between 0 to 3:

    0 indicates no recanalization of the primary occlusive lesion;

    1. indicates incomplete or partial recanalization of the primary occlusive lesion with no distal flow;
    2. indicates incomplete or partial recanalization of the primary occlusive lesion with any distal flow;
    3. indicates complete recanalization of the primary occlusive with any distal flow.

    Measured: 24 hours

  5. Groin puncture time to successful reperfusion time (min)

    evaluated in minutes

    Measured: 24 hours

  6. The difference of NIHSS score between 24-hour and baseline

    NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score is evaluated between 0-42 0 is normal and 42 maximal gravity

    Measured: 24 hours

  7. Modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90±14 days (shift analysis)

    mRS is evaluated between 0 to 6. A score of 0 indicates that there is no disability and a score of 6 indicates death.

    Measured: 90 days

  8. Rate of mRS 0-1 at at 90±14 days

    mRS is evaluated between 0 to 6. A score of 0 indicates that there is no disability and a score of 6 indicates death.

    Measured: 90 days

  9. Rate of mRS 0-2 at at 90±14 days

    mRS is evaluated between 0 to 6. A score of 0 indicates that there is no disability and a score of 6 indicates death.

    Measured: 90 days

  10. Rate of mRS 0-3 at at 90±14 days

    mRS is evaluated between 0 to 6. A score of 0 indicates that there is no disability and a score of 6 indicates death.

    Measured: 90 days

  11. Quality of life at 90±14 days assessed by EuroQol 5D-5L scale

    EuroQol 5D-5L comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions.

    This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

    Measured: 90 days

  12. Rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours (according to Heidelberg Bleeding Classification)

    Heidelberg Bleeding Classification:

    1. Hemorrhagic transformation of infarcted brain tissue 1a HI1 Scattered small petechiae, no mass effect 1b HI2 Confluent petechiae, no mass effect 1c PH1 Hematoma within infarcted tissue, occupying <30%, no substantive mass effect 2 Intracerebral hemorrhage within and beyond infarcted brain tissue PH2 Hematoma occupying 30% or more of the infarcted tissue, with obvious mass effect 3 Intracerebral hemorrhage outside the infarcted brain tissue or intracranial-extracerebral hemorrhage 3a Parenchymal hematoma remote from infarcted brain tissue 3b Intraventricular hemorrhage 3c Subarachnoid hemorrhage 3d Subdural hemorrhage

    Measured: 48 hours

  13. Rate of any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours (according to Heidelberg Bleeding Classification)

    Heidelberg Bleeding Classification:

    1. Hemorrhagic transformation of infarcted brain tissue 1a HI1 Scattered small petechiae, no mass effect 1b HI2 Confluent petechiae, no mass effect 1c PH1 Hematoma within infarcted tissue, occupying <30%, no substantive mass effect 2 Intracerebral hemorrhage within and beyond infarcted brain tissue PH2 Hematoma occupying 30% or more of the infarcted tissue, with obvious mass effect 3 Intracerebral hemorrhage outside the infarcted brain tissue or intracranial-extracerebral hemorrhage 3a Parenchymal hematoma remote from infarcted brain tissue 3b Intraventricular hemorrhage 3c Subarachnoid hemorrhage 3d Subdural hemorrhage

    Measured: 48 hours

  14. Rate of procedure-related complications, included arterial dissection, embolization in a new territory, arterial perforation and subarachnoid haemorrhage

    Measured: 24 hours

  15. All cause of mortality at 90±14 days

    Measured: 90 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2022
  2. Study start7 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion21 Feb 2025
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
338 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05615038
Sponsor's protocol ID
KY2022-123-03
Acronym
ANGEL-COAST
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
7 Nov 2022
Last updated
27 Apr 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Xuan S, Yang M, Sun D, Song L, Gao F, Mo D, Ma N, Pan Y, Liu L, Zhao X, Wang Y, Wang Y, Nogueira R, Miao Z. Contact aspiration versus stent retriever thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion (ANGEL-COAST): rationale and design of a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2026 Jun 29;11(3):381-388. doi: 10.1136/svn-2025-004232.

    PubMed 41151802

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in