AzTrials
AzTrials

Degenerative Disc DiseaseIPADNCT05615597

Evaluating the Efficacy of Para-discal Infiltration in Patients With Lateralized MODIC 1 Inflammatory Disc Disease

A study testing Para-discal injection of corticoid in people with Degenerative Disc Disease and Inflammation, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a major cause of chronic low back pain (> 40%). It can be defined by specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, with a strong correlation between pain and the inflammatory aspect of the disc, resulting in active disc disease (AD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Para-discal injection of corticoid
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
22 Dec 2022to 22 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient 18 years of age or older
  • Patient with Modic I lateralized disc disease seen on an MRI less than 6 months old.
  • Chronic medial or lateralized (same side as MODIC 1) low back pain for at least 3 months with a mean pain intensity ≥ 40/100 mm on a VAS.
  • Effective contraception for women of childbearing age, at least 6 months after injection (surgical sterilisation, approved hormonal contraceptives, barrier methods, intrauterine intrauterine device)

Who cannot join

  • Patient with MODIC 1 in both underlying and overlying vertebral spaces.
  • Patient with an inflammatory signal abnormality of the vertebral body plateau related to non-mechanical pathology (e.g. spondyloarthritis).
  • Patients with a history of lumbar spine surgery.
  • Patient with suspected spondylodiscitis or other infection.
  • Patients on anticoagulant or antiaggregant therapy, or with a coagulation disorder.
  • Patients with an allergy to iodine or to any of the components of Xylocaine.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Patients with an allergy to prednisolone or to any component of Hydrocortancyl® or Dexamethasone®..
  • Patient with severe uncontrolled disease (i.e. cardiac gastrointestinal, neurological, endocrine, autoimmune) that limits patient safety (as determined by the safety (as judged by the investigator).
  • Prior to the treatment visit :
  • current and recent morphine use (< 1 month)
  • recent systemic or local corticosteroid therapy (< 1 month).
  • Patient with sphincter disturbances indicative of cauda equina syndrome.
  • Psychotic state not controlled by treatment
  • Pregnancy (βHCG positive), breastfeeding
  • Vulnerable patient protected by law
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient participating in an interventional study
  • Patient unable to read and/or write

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Catherine CYTEVAL, MD, PhD contact

c-cyteval@chu-montpellier.fr

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Departement of Medical Imaging

    Montpellier, Occitanie, 34295

    Celine ENGRAND, c-engrand@chu-montpellier.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluating the Efficacy of Para-discal Infiltration in Patients With Lateralized MODIC 1 Inflammatory Disc Disease: Pilot Study (IPAD)

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a major cause of chronic low back pain (> 40%). It can be defined by specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, with a strong correlation between pain and the inflammatory aspect of the disc, resulting in active disc disease (AD). The Modic classification based on MRI of the lumbar spine is considered a reference.

The management of low back pain in patients with inflammatory disc disease generally involves intra-disc corticosteroid infiltration, which has been widely proven to be effective in reducing pain [4-6]. However, this procedure can be painful and invasive and sometimes impossible to perform due to severe disc impingement.

Read more

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy on pain of para-disc infiltration of corticosteroids in contact with the inflammatory MRI signal abnormality (Modic 1) when it is lateralized.

This variant of infiltration is easier to perform (no catheterisation of the disc and therefore quicker), would entail less risk of disc infection and would be accessible to more radiologists.

It is already practised but, to our knowledge, has never been the subject of a study to evaluate its effectiveness on pain.

If successful, more patients could be treated and the range of treatment could be extended.

Being tested
Para-discal injection of corticoid
Keywords
Low back pain, Injections, Degenerative Disc Disease, Inflammation
Medical subject headings
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, Inflammation, Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Para-discal injection of corticoidProcedure or surgery

    In this pilot study, all patients underwent the same procedure: a corticosteroid infiltration via a para-discal approach. The infiltrations were performed under CT or scopy.

Study groups in NCT05615597
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Para-discal infiltrationOtherSingle arm study
Receives: Procedure: Para-discal injection of corticoid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 month

    VAS pain is a subjective but simple and reproducible criterion and one of the most widely used to evaluate the effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy in chronic low back pain.

    0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: 1 month after intervention

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Concomitant treatments (analgesics/NSAIDs)

    he use of analgesics or NSAIDs will be recorded throughout the study by direct questioning of the patient and/or through their medical records.

    Measured: up to 6 months

  2. Change from The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 month

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a validated questionnaire (Fairbank and Pynsent 2000). We will consider a patient as responder if he/she manages to achieve at least 30% improvement in ODI score between baseline and 1 month. This percentage of minimal improvement (30%) was judged to be a clinically relevant threshold by an international consensus conference (Ostelo et al. 2008).

    Measured: 1 month after intervention

  3. Change from Baseline Pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 7 days

    VAS pain is a subjective but simple and reproducible criterion and one of the most widely used to evaluate the effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy in chronic low back pain.

    0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: 7 days after intervention

  4. Change from Baseline Pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 3 months

    VAS pain is a subjective but simple and reproducible criterion and one of the most widely used to evaluate the effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy in chronic low back pain.

    0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: 3 months after intervention

  5. Change from Baseline Pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 months

    VAS pain is a subjective but simple and reproducible criterion and one of the most widely used to evaluate the effectiveness of a therapeutic strategy in chronic low back pain.

    0 represents no pain and 100 represents the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: 6 months after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Nov 2022
  2. Study start22 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion22 Jul 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion22 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05615597
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL22_0230
Acronym
IPAD
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
27 Oct 2022
Last updated
29 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Para-discal injection of corticoid in people with Degenerative Disc Disease and Inflammation, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Arthur HAMEL SENECAL, MD (0467338946 ext. +33, arthur.hamelsenecal@chu-montpellier.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 1 month (time frame: 1 month after intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in