Performance of ColonoscopyNCT05617521
Abdominal Binder in Colonoscopies Performed by Trainees
A study testing Abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) and Loose abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) in people with Performance of Colonoscopy and Tolerance of Colonoscopy, run by Hospital Central Norte PEMEX at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
This randomized trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an abdominal binder use during colonoscopy performed by gastrointestinal endoscopy fellow trainees. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Performance of Colonoscopy, Tolerance of Colonoscopy
- What is being tested?
- Abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) and Loose abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 211 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2022to 28 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male and female adults between the ages of 20-80
- Participants with ASA I-III (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class)
- Undergoing a colonoscopy at any of the study locations for:
- CRC screening (first colonoscopy or 10 years follow up of negative exam). II. Surveillance (prior colonoscopy with polyps). III. Diagnostic colonoscopy performed to evaluate symptoms such as abdominal pain or rectal bleeding.
- Participants must have completed the full prescribed colonoscopy purgative preparation prior to their procedure and describe adequate cleansing.
Who cannot join
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Patients with known or suspected pregnancy.
- Patients undergoing multiple procedures (e.g., upper and lower endoscopy).
- Previous colon resection surgery.
- History of problems with sedation or anesthesia.
- Patients with known or suspected diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease).
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients with a history of colorectal cancer or other intra-abdominal malignancy.
- Patients with open or recent wounds or skin rash on the anterior abdominal wall.
- History of cirrhosis or ascites.
- Patients who are medically unstable (American Society of Anesthesiology Class IV or above).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Use of Abdominal Binder in Colonoscopies Performed by Trainees in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Trial
This randomized trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an abdominal binder use during colonoscopy performed by gastrointestinal endoscopy fellow trainees. The investigators hypothesized that the abdominal binder use would facilitate and increase the effectiveness of the colonoscopy for inexperienced operators.
Read the detailed description
It will be a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. The trial will be performed at a single-center, Hospital Central Norte PEMEX, a tertiary center with a gastrointestinal endoscopy fellow trainee program with more than 10 years of experience. This trial will be conducted in accordance with the most recent version of the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial has been approved by the local ethical committee and research committee with the number DCAS-SSS GSM-HCN-INV-0043-2022. Written informed consent will be obtained from all the patients before participation. This manuscript will be reported in accordance with CONSORT guidelines.
Prior to the procedure, age, sex, height, weight, waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), and colonoscopy indication of all participants will be recorded. Once enrolled, patients will be randomized to either the abdominal binder (AB) group or the sham binder (SB) group in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be performed using a web-based computer system (Research Randomizer, Geoffrey C. Urbaniak and Scott Plous) by an independent statistician who had no other intervention in the study. An independent operator will print the randomization number and group for each participant (either the AB or SB group) in individual cards, which will be hidden in a locked black box by the same independent operator. Only the nurse, who will fit the abdominal binder to all the patients in a private space, will have access to the cards. Randomized data and cards will be concealed to study coordinators, endoscopists, clinical staff, and participants.
The abdominal binder to be used for the patients allocated in the AB group was the Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA). Its price is $29.96. The device is manufactured in two sizes, One Size and X-Large. For the patients with a waist circumference >110 cm it will be used the X-Large model. The three belts that make up the binder will be fitted to all the participants. Once placed, the binder will be adjusted to be located between the subcostal border and the anterior superior iliac spine. The participants will be asked to confirm that the binder is fastened tightly but not uncomfortably. For the participants in the SB group the same binder will be fitted, but once the patient is sedated, it will be loosened by the same nurse. The participants will wear a non-transparent gown over the binder so that it will not be visible to the endoscopists.
Bowel preparation with 4 L of polyethylene glycol solution in split-dose (2 L in the afternoon of the day before and 5 h before the colonoscopy) will be used in all the participants. In this trial, all colonoscopy procedures will be performed by two second-year fellow trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
A standard video-colonoscope (EC-3890Li, PENTAX Co., Tokyo, Japan) will be used. All the patients will be placed in the left lateral decubitus position. Manual abdominal compression and postural change will be conducted by a technician when required by the endoscopy trainee or the attending endoscopist. Endoscopist or anesthesiology will be allowed to remove the binder at any time during the procedure if they resolve it was necessary for safety. Air insufflation will be used during colonoscopy.
Sample size was estimated over the primary outcome of the study based on pre-experimental data estimation and previously reported CIT and SD of similar studies with fellows' participation. It was calculated that 142 participants were needed to detect a 60-second difference in CIT (SD 110 sec), with 90% power and two-side alpha 0.05. Moreover, it was also calculated based on the frequency of ancillary maneuvers, using pre-experimental data estimation and literature data. It was found that 186 participants (93 per group) were needed to detect a 20% reduction in the use of ancillary maneuvers, with 90% power and two-side alpha 0.05. As a preventive measure in case of withdrawal or exclusion, the sample was expanded by 10%, a total of 206 patients, 103 in each group were included in the study.
Descriptive statistical analysis, including mean, mode, and frequencies will be performed for the description of the study data. The comparative analysis of the quantitative data will be previously subjected to normality evaluation by the Shapiro-Wilk test and graphical analyses. According to the normality, data comparative analysis will be performed either with a two-way Student's test or U Mann-Whitney test. For the comparative analyses of the categorical data (e.g., manual abdominal compression, postural change, need for intervention by the attending endoscopist) will be used chi-square or Fisher' exact test. A p value of <0.05 will be accepted as statistical significance. Statistical inferential analysis will be performed using RStudio® (R Core Team v.1.2.5033; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and SPSS® Statistics for Windows Version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RStudio® (R Core Team v.1.2.5033) will be also used for drawing graphics. The study biostatistician (SA) will be blinded to the randomization phase and recollection data process.
- Being tested
- Abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt), Loose abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt)
- Keywords
- abdominal binder, colonoscopy, looping
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt)Device
Also called Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA), Revive 3-in-1 abdominal binder
Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA). An abdominal binder is a kind of elastic abdominal compression device
Loose abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt)Device
Also called Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA), Revive 3-in-1 abdominal binder
Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA). An abdominal binder is a kind of elastic abdominal compression device. It will be loosened just prior the procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | Experimental | Patients randomized to the Abdominal Binder Intervention Group will have the abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) secured firmly between the subcostal border and the anterior superior iliac spine area to the abdomen just prior the colonoscopy. Receives: Device: Abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) |
| Sham Group | Sham comparator | Sham Group will have the abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) secured firmly between the subcostal border and the anterior superior iliac spine area to the abdomen just prior the colonoscopy but it will be loosened just prior the procedure. Receives: Device: Loose abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Cecal Intubation Time
Cecal intubation time will be defined as the time from insertion of the colonoscope into the rectum to identification of the base of the cecum
Measured: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Secondary outcomes (12)
Frequency of Use of Abdominal Pressure
Binary data indicating individually when the abdominal pressure was used during the insertion phase of the procedure will be recorded.
Measured: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Length of Cecal Intubation
The length of the colonoscope required to reach de cecum from the anus will be measured.
Measured: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Frequency of Intervention by the Attending Endoscopist
Binary data indicating individually if intervention by the attending endoscopist was required during the insertion phase of the procedure will be recorded.
Measured: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Colonoscopy Completion Rate
Dichotomous outcome indicating if the procedure was complete.
Measured: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Number of Participants With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Procedural Difficulty as Assessed by Trainees
Immediately following completion of procedure, the study assistant will obtain the trainee's assessment of procedural difficulty according to three grades of severity: mild, moderate, and severe.
*We found the 5-point scale more difficult to use in the dynamic of the endoscopy room. The Operator's Assessment of Procedural Difficulty scale was not used. The difficulty was rated as mild when the colonoscope was smoothly inserted, moderate when there were some difficulties quickly solved (less than 60 seconds), and severe when the difficulties were more difficult requiring a longer time (more than 60 seconds).
Measured: Immediately following completion of procedure when scope is removed from rectum, an average of 10 minutes after completion of the procedure.
Number of Participants According to Colonoscopy Findings
Findings such as polyps, cancer, diverticulum, and IBD (inflammatory bowel disease) detected during colonoscopy will be recorded.
Measured: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Operator Perception of Patient Discomfort
Immediately following completion of procedure, the study assistant will obtain operator's perception of patient discomfort during procedure according to the Gloucester score. The Gloucester score will be used. It is a comfort grading scale ranging from 1 to 5 points, with 1 point if no discomfort is present during the colonoscopy and 5 if there is extreme discomfort during the colonoscopy.
Measured: Immediately following completion of procedure when scope is removed from rectum, an average of 10 minutes after completion of the procedure.
Additional Analgesic Drug Required to Complete Procedure
Whether the patient needs an additional dose of analgesic drug to complete the colonoscopy.
Measured: During colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into de rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum, an average of 30 minutes.
Patient Pain at Discharge
The study assistant will interview patient just prior to discharge and obtain responses for pain according to a 10-point visual analog scale. The Visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used. It is a pain grading scale ranging from 0 to 10 points, with 0 if no pain and 10 if worst pain possible.
Measured: At single time point occurring after the colonoscopy, just prior to the patient being discharged from facility, an average of 90 minutes after completion of the procedure.
Patient Satisfaction at Discharge
The study assistant will interview patient just prior to discharge and obtain responses for satisfaction according to a 5-point Likert scale. The Satisfaction Likert scale will be used. It is a satisfaction grading scale ranging from 1 to 5 points, with 1 if very poor satisfaction and 5 if excellent satisfaction.
Measured: At single time point occurring after the colonoscopy, just prior to the patient being discharged from facility, an average of 90 minutes after completion of the procedure.
Frequency of Use of Position Change
Binary data indicating when the patient position change was used during the insertion phase of the procedure will be recorded.
Measured: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Additional Anesthetic Drug Required to Complete Procedure
Whether the patient needs an additional dose of anesthetic drug to complete the colonoscopy.
Measured: During colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into de rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum, an average of 30 minutes.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2022
- Study start15 Nov 2022
- Primary completion25 Jan 2023
- Study completion28 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Performance of ColonoscopyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Once enrolled, patients will be randomized to either the abdominal binder (AB) group or the sham binder (SB) group in a 1:1 ratio.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 211 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Central Norte PEMEX
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Antonio Marmolejo, Hospital Central Norte PEMEX
- Investigators
- Monica Arellano, M.D, Study chair, Ethical committee president of the Hospital Central Norte PEMEX
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05617521
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DCAS-SSS GSM-HCN-INV-0043-2022
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2022
- Last updated
- 1 May 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: all IPD that underlie results in a publication
Publications
Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG 2nd, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Dec 2. No abstract available.
PubMed 25480100Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T, Sakitani K, Yamakawa T, Yoshida S, Fukagawa K, Hata K, Ishihara S, Suzuki H. Colonoscopy using back brace support belt: A randomized, prospective trial. JGH Open. 2019 Nov 7;4(3):441-445. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12276. eCollection 2020 Jun.
PubMed 32514451Crockett SD, Cirri HO, Kelapure R, Galanko JA, Martin CF, Dellon ES. Use of an Abdominal Compression Device in Colonoscopy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jun;14(6):850-857.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.039. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
PubMed 26767313
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of Abdominal Binder in Colonoscopies Performed by Trainees in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05617521
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DCAS-SSS GSM-HCN-INV-0043-2022
- Keywords
- abdominal binder, colonoscopy, looping
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 211 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Central Norte PEMEXUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 May 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized trial will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an abdominal binder use during colonoscopy performed by gastrointestinal endoscopy fellow trainees. The investigators hypothesized that the abdominal binder use would facilitate and increase the effectiveness of the colonoscopy for inexperienced operators.
Detailed description
It will be a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. The trial will be performed at a single-center, Hospital Central Norte PEMEX, a tertiary center with a gastrointestinal endoscopy fellow trainee program with more than 10 years of experience. This trial will be conducted in accordance with the most recent version of the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial has been approved by the local ethical committee and research committee with the number DCAS-SSS GSM-HCN-INV-0043-2022. Written informed consent will be obtained from all the patients before participation. This manuscript will be reported in accordance with CONSORT guidelines.
Prior to the procedure, age, sex, height, weight, waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), and colonoscopy indication of all participants will be recorded. Once enrolled, patients will be randomized to either the abdominal binder (AB) group or the sham binder (SB) group in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization will be performed using a web-based computer system (Research Randomizer, Geoffrey C. Urbaniak and Scott Plous) by an independent statistician who had no other intervention in the study. An independent operator will print the randomization number and group for each participant (either the AB or SB group) in individual cards, which will be hidden in a locked black box by the same independent operator. Only the nurse, who will fit the abdominal binder to all the patients in a private space, will have access to the cards. Randomized data and cards will be concealed to study coordinators, endoscopists, clinical staff, and participants.
The abdominal binder to be used for the patients allocated in the AB group was the Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA). Its price is $29.96. The device is manufactured in two sizes, One Size and X-Large. For the patients with a waist circumference >110 cm it will be used the X-Large model. The three belts that make up the binder will be fitted to all the participants. Once placed, the binder will be adjusted to be located between the subcostal border and the anterior superior iliac spine. The participants will be asked to confirm that the binder is fastened tightly but not uncomfortably. For the participants in the SB group the same binder will be fitted, but once the patient is sedated, it will be loosened by the same nurse. The participants will wear a non-transparent gown over the binder so that it will not be visible to the endoscopists.
Bowel preparation with 4 L of polyethylene glycol solution in split-dose (2 L in the afternoon of the day before and 5 h before the colonoscopy) will be used in all the participants. In this trial, all colonoscopy procedures will be performed by two second-year fellow trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
A standard video-colonoscope (EC-3890Li, PENTAX Co., Tokyo, Japan) will be used. All the patients will be placed in the left lateral decubitus position. Manual abdominal compression and postural change will be conducted by a technician when required by the endoscopy trainee or the attending endoscopist. Endoscopist or anesthesiology will be allowed to remove the binder at any time during the procedure if they resolve it was necessary for safety. Air insufflation will be used during colonoscopy.
Sample size was estimated over the primary outcome of the study based on pre-experimental data estimation and previously reported CIT and SD of similar studies with fellows' participation. It was calculated that 142 participants were needed to detect a 60-second difference in CIT (SD 110 sec), with 90% power and two-side alpha 0.05. Moreover, it was also calculated based on the frequency of ancillary maneuvers, using pre-experimental data estimation and literature data. It was found that 186 participants (93 per group) were needed to detect a 20% reduction in the use of ancillary maneuvers, with 90% power and two-side alpha 0.05. As a preventive measure in case of withdrawal or exclusion, the sample was expanded by 10%, a total of 206 patients, 103 in each group were included in the study.
Descriptive statistical analysis, including mean, mode, and frequencies will be performed for the description of the study data. The comparative analysis of the quantitative data will be previously subjected to normality evaluation by the Shapiro-Wilk test and graphical analyses. According to the normality, data comparative analysis will be performed either with a two-way Student's test or U Mann-Whitney test. For the comparative analyses of the categorical data (e.g., manual abdominal compression, postural change, need for intervention by the attending endoscopist) will be used chi-square or Fisher' exact test. A p value of <0.05 will be accepted as statistical significance. Statistical inferential analysis will be performed using RStudio® (R Core Team v.1.2.5033; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) and SPSS® Statistics for Windows Version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RStudio® (R Core Team v.1.2.5033) will be also used for drawing graphics. The study biostatistician (SA) will be blinded to the randomization phase and recollection data process.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Once enrolled, patients will be randomized to either the abdominal binder (AB) group or the sham binder (SB) group in a 1:1 ratio.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal Binder Intervention Group | Experimental | Device: Abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt)Patients randomized to the Abdominal Binder Intervention Group will have the abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) secured firmly between the subcostal border and the anterior superior iliac spine area to the abdomen just prior the colonoscopy. |
| Sham Group | Sham comparator | Device: Loose abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt)Sham Group will have the abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) secured firmly between the subcostal border and the anterior superior iliac spine area to the abdomen just prior the colonoscopy but it will be loosened just prior the procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male and female adults between the ages of 20-80
- Participants with ASA I-III (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class)
- Undergoing a colonoscopy at any of the study locations for:
- CRC screening (first colonoscopy or 10 years follow up of negative exam). II. Surveillance (prior colonoscopy with polyps). III. Diagnostic colonoscopy performed to evaluate symptoms such as abdominal pain or rectal bleeding.
- Participants must have completed the full prescribed colonoscopy purgative preparation prior to their procedure and describe adequate cleansing.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Patients with known or suspected pregnancy.
- Patients undergoing multiple procedures (e.g., upper and lower endoscopy).
- Previous colon resection surgery.
- History of problems with sedation or anesthesia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt)Also: Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA), Revive 3-in-1 abdominal binderRevive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA). An abdominal binder is a kind of elastic abdominal compression device | Device | Abdominal Binder Intervention Group |
| Loose abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt)Also: Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA), Revive 3-in-1 abdominal binderRevive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt (KeaBabies® Co., CA, USA). An abdominal binder is a kind of elastic abdominal compression device. It will be loosened just prior the procedure. | Device | Sham Group |
Primary outcome
Mean Cecal Intubation Time
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Cecal intubation time will be defined as the time from insertion of the colonoscope into the rectum to identification of the base of the cecum
12 secondary outcomes
Frequency of Use of Abdominal Pressure
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Length of Cecal Intubation
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Frequency of Intervention by the Attending Endoscopist
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Colonoscopy Completion Rate
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Number of Participants With Mild, Moderate, and Severe Procedural Difficulty as Assessed by Trainees
Time frame: Immediately following completion of procedure when scope is removed from rectum, an average of 10 minutes after completion of the procedure.
Number of Participants According to Colonoscopy Findings
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Operator Perception of Patient Discomfort
Time frame: Immediately following completion of procedure when scope is removed from rectum, an average of 10 minutes after completion of the procedure.
Additional Analgesic Drug Required to Complete Procedure
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into de rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum, an average of 30 minutes.
Patient Pain at Discharge
Time frame: At single time point occurring after the colonoscopy, just prior to the patient being discharged from facility, an average of 90 minutes after completion of the procedure.
Patient Satisfaction at Discharge
Time frame: At single time point occurring after the colonoscopy, just prior to the patient being discharged from facility, an average of 90 minutes after completion of the procedure.
Frequency of Use of Position Change
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.
Additional Anesthetic Drug Required to Complete Procedure
Time frame: During colonoscopy, from time point of insertion of scope into de rectum to point in time when scope is removed from rectum, an average of 30 minutes.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 25480100Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, Lieb JG 2nd, Park WG, Rizk MK, Sawhney MS, Shaheen NJ, Wani S, Weinberg DS. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):31-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058. Epub 2014 Dec 2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32514451Toyoshima O, Nishizawa T, Sakitani K, Yamakawa T, Yoshida S, Fukagawa K, Hata K, Ishihara S, Suzuki H. Colonoscopy using back brace support belt: A randomized, prospective trial. JGH Open. 2019 Nov 7;4(3):441-445. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12276. eCollection 2020 Jun.
- Background: PubMed 26767313Crockett SD, Cirri HO, Kelapure R, Galanko JA, Martin CF, Dellon ES. Use of an Abdominal Compression Device in Colonoscopy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jun;14(6):850-857.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.12.039. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. all IPD that underlie results in a publication
Related trials for Performance of Colonoscopy
Recruiting
Performance and Safety of MiWEndo-assisted Colonoscopy (MiWEndo II)
Colorectal Cancer, Colorectal Polyp
Recruiting
Comparison of Adenoma Detection Rate in 3D vs. 2D Surveillance Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy, Adenoma Detection Rate
Recruiting
Comparison of the Performance Between Conventional Colonoscopy and 3D Colonoscopy in Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Group
Adenoma Detection Rate, Colonoscopy
Recruiting
Measurement of MMP-14 Protein, a Potential New Marker for Colorectal Cancer Detection, in Plasma Vesicles Named Exosomes
Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
Accuracy and Sustainability of SCALE-EYE Evaluation for Measuring Reliable Polyp Size
Colorectal Polyps
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Monica Arellano, M.D study chair
Ethical committee president of the Hospital Central Norte PEMEX
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) and Loose abdominal binder (Revive 3-in-1 Postpartum Recovery Support Belt) in people with Performance of Colonoscopy and Tolerance of Colonoscopy, run by Hospital Central Norte PEMEX at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 May 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Cecal Intubation Time (time frame: During colonoscopy, from insertion of scope into rectum to point in time when base of the cecum is identified, an average of 30 minutes.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05617521, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2024.