AzTrials
AzTrials

Traumatic Brain InjuryNCT05622461

Setting Families on a Positive Path to Recovery After Pediatric TBI: Road-to-Recovery

A study testing Road-to-recovery in people with Traumatic Brain Injury and Head Injury, run by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study has two main goals: 1) to refine and enhance the R2R-TBI intervention; and 2) to examine the efficacy of the R2R-TBI intervention in a randomized control trial. To achieve the second goal, we will employ a between-groups randomized treatment design with repeated measures at baseline, one-month… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Road-to-recovery
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Feb 2023to 31 Aug 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Caregivers will be eligible if they are over 18 years of age, and if their child meets all of the following criteria:
  • Ages 3 months to 18 years at time of discharge from hospital
  • Sustained a complicated mild to severe TBI as defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 13-15 with imagining abnormalities or GCS 3-12 with or without imaging abnormalities
  • Admitted overnight to the hospital
  • 0-3 months post-discharge

Who cannot join

  • The caregiver will be excluded from participation if any of the following occur:
  • Child did not survive the injury
  • Child sustained a non-blunt head trauma (e.g. gunshot wound)
  • Child does not reside with parent/caregiver for study duration
  • English is not primary language spoken in the home

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Shari Wade, PhD contact

5134610952

Shari.Wade@cchmc.org

Stacey Raj contact

rajs@xavier.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229-3036

    Shari Wade, 5134610952, Shari.Wade@cchmc.org

    Stacey Raj, rajs@xavier.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Setting Families on a Positive Path to Recovery After Pediatric TBI: Road-to-Recovery, A Randomized Control Trial

This study has two main goals: 1) to refine and enhance the R2R-TBI intervention; and 2) to examine the efficacy of the R2R-TBI intervention in a randomized control trial. To achieve the second goal, we will employ a between-groups randomized treatment design with repeated measures at baseline, one-month post-randomization, and at a six-month follow-up. The two conditions will be: a) usual medical care plus access to internet resources regarding pediatric brain injury (Internet Resources Comparison group, IRC), and b) usual medical care plus the R2R-TBI intervention (Road-to-Recovery group, R2R-TBI).

Read the detailed description

The early recovery period constitutes a critical window to set families on a positive road-to-recovery by supporting parental self-care, positive parent-child interactions, and awareness of potential longer-term concerns. The latter would facilitate parental recognition of behavioral and psychosocial needs that might otherwise go unmet.

Recognizing that (1) caregivers of children who have sustained TBI are at risk of worsening psychological health and that (2) caregiver functioning and parenting behaviors have a direct impact on child recovery and outcomes; intervening and supporting caregivers in the acute phase following injury may set children and families on a positive path to recovery. Intervening at the acute phase may reduce the cascading effects of parental burden/distress and concomitant negative parent-child interactions on child recovery and functioning over time.

Because families of children with TBI and other chronic health conditions may have difficulty accessing services due to transportation and cost issues, particularly lower income families, the R2R-TBI program is designed to be accessed via any web-enabled device (e.g., smartphone, computer, tablet) with any form of internet connection. We will also offer the intervention (via tablet) to parents while they wait for their child to complete outpatient therapies (e.g., speech, physical, and occupational therapy). Delivery of web-based behavioral health interventions may reduce barriers to help-seeking and promote evidence-based interventions that are both accessible and efficient.

Being tested
Road-to-recovery
Medical subject headings
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Craniocerebral Trauma, Head Injuries, Closed, Brain Hemorrhage, Traumatic, Brain Edema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Road-to-recoveryBehavioural

    R2R-TBI is a self-guided web-based intervention that targets caregiver psychological functioning, parenting behaviors, and family functioning in the first three months following pediatric traumatic brain injury.

Study groups in NCT05622461
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Road-to-recovery group (R2R)ExperimentalUsual medical care plus the R2R-TBI intervention (self-guided web-program)
Receives: Behavioral: Road-to-recovery
Internet resources comparison group (IRC)Active comparatorUsual medical care plus internet resources
Receives: Behavioral: Road-to-recovery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Parent anxiety

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Measure 4a; scores range from 4-20 with higher score indicating greater symptoms of anxiety

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  2. Parent anxiety

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Measure 4a; scores range from 4-20 with higher score indicating greater symptoms of anxiety

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

  3. Parent depression

    Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; 10-items); scores range from 0 -30 with higher scores indicating of higher levels of depressive symptomatology

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  4. Parent depression

    Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; 10-items); scores range from 0 -30 with higher scores indicating of higher levels of depressive symptomatology

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

  5. Parenting self-efficacy

    Caregiver self-efficacy scale (CSES); scores range from 25-100, higher scores indicate greater parenting self efficacy

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  6. Parenting self-efficacy

    Caregiver self-efficacy scale (CSES); scores range from 25-100, higher scores indicate greater parenting self efficacy

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

  7. Parent post-traumatic symptoms

    Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5); scores rage from 0-5 with higher scores indicating greater experience of post-traumatic stress symptoms

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  8. Parent post-traumatic symptoms

    Primary Care PTSD Screen for DSM-5 (PC-PTSD-5); scores rage from 0-5 with higher scores indicating greater experience of post-traumatic stress symptoms

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Family Functioning

    Family Assessment Device - Global Functioning Scale. Scores range from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating poorer family functioning

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  2. Family Functioning

    Family Assessment Device - Global Functioning Scale. Scores range from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating poorer family functioning

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

  3. Family Burden of Injury

    Family Burden of Injury Interview (FBII). Average scores range from 0-4; higher scores indicate greater injury-related burden

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  4. Family Burden of Injury

    Family Burden of Injury Interview (FBII). Average scores range from 0-4; higher scores indicate greater injury-related burden

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

  5. Child Socioemotional Functioning

    Pediatric Quality of Life Scale (PEDS-QL) - Psychosocial Health Summary Score (score range varies based on child age; higher scores indicate greater health related quality of life)

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  6. Child Socioemotional Functioning

    Pediatric Quality of Life Scale (PEDS-QL) - Psychosocial Health Summary Score (score range varies based on child age; higher scores indicate greater health related quality of life)

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

  7. Parent mindful self-care

    Mindful self-care scale (MSCS); scores range from 6 - 30, higher scores denote greater frequency in engaging in self-care behaviors

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  8. Parent mindful self-care

    Mindful self-care scale (MSCS); scores range from 6 - 30, higher scores denote greater frequency in engaging in self-care behaviors

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

  9. Parent resilience

    Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRI); scores range from 0-40 with higher scored indicating greater resilience

    Measured: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention

  10. Parent resilience

    Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CDRI); scores range from 0-40 with higher scored indicating greater resilience

    Measured: Change from baseline at 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Nov 2022
  2. Study start13 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05622461
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022-0221
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
24 Oct 2022
Last updated
25 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Plan is to share deidentified data as consistent with requirement of funding source (i.e., The National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research).

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Road-to-recovery in people with Traumatic Brain Injury and Head Injury, run by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Shari Wade, PhD (5134610952, Shari.Wade@cchmc.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Parent anxiety (time frame: Change from baseline at 4-6 weeks post-intervention). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in