AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisPhase 2NCT05630547

A Study to Evaluate the Effect of SAR443820 on Serum Neurofilament Levels in Male and Female Adult Participants With Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 2 study testing SAR443820 in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Sanofi at 35 sites in 10 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 parallel-arm study to assess the effect on serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), safety and tolerability of oral SAR443820 compared to placebo in male and female participants aged 18 to 60 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
SAR443820
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
174 participants
Where
35 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
19 Dec 2022to 21 Nov 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, 18 to 60 years (inclusive) of age, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Participants with diagnosis of RRMS, SPMS (relapsing or non-relapsing) or primary progressive subtype according to the 2017 revision of the McDonald diagnostic criteria (SPMS diagnostic criteria according to initial relapsing remitting disease course followed by progression with or without occasional relapses, minor remissions, and plateaus; progression denotes the continuous worsening of neurological impairment over at least 6 months).
  • Participants with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 2 to 6 inclusive at screening.
  • Participants who were either untreated or in the opinion of the Investigator were stable on an allowed disease-modifying therapy (DMT) (interferons, glatiramer acetate, fumarates, or teriflunomide) for at least the past 3 months, AND not anticipated to require a change in multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment for the duration of Part A and Part B (through Week 96); in Part B changes in dose of allowed DMTs or transition to other allowed DMTs was permitted).
  • Participants with body weight at least 45 kg and body mass index (BMI) at least 18.0 kg/m^2.
  • Contraceptive use by men and women was consistent with local regulations regarding the methods of contraception for those participating in clinical studies.

Who cannot join

  • Participants with immunodeficiency syndromes or other autoimmune diseases requiring immunosuppressive therapy
  • Participants with a history of seizures or epilepsy (history of febrile seizure during childhood was allowed).
  • Participants with known clinical relapse (acute or subacute episodes of new or increasing neurological dysfunction followed by full or partial recovery, in absence of fever or infection) within 8 weeks of screening.
  • Participants with neurological disease history other than MS, eg, head trauma within 3 months, cerebrovascular disease, and vascular dementia.
  • Participants with a history of recent serious infection (eg, pneumonia, septicemia) within 4 weeks of screening; an infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 4 weeks of screening; or chronic bacterial infections (such as tuberculosis) deemed unacceptable, as per Investigator's judgment.
  • Participants who had significant cognitive impairment, psychiatric disease, other neurodegenerative disorders (eg, Parkinson disease or Alzheimer disease), substance abuse, or any other conditions that made the participants unsuitable for participating in the study or interfered with assessment or completing the study in the opinion of the Investigator.
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Participants with a documented history of attempted suicide over the 24 weeks prior to the Screening Visit, presents with suicidal ideation of category 4 or 5 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS), or if in the Investigator's judgment, the participant was at risk for a suicide attempt.
  • Participants with a history of unstable or severe cardiac, pulmonary, oncological, hepatic, or renal disease or another medically significant illness other than MS precluding their safe participation in this study.
  • Participants who received a live vaccine within 14 days before the Screening Visit.
  • Participants with a known history of allergy to any ingredients of SAR443820 (mannitol, lactose monohydrate, sodium starch glycolate, colloidal silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate, hypromellose, titanium dioxide, polyethylene glycol, and microcrystalline cellulose).
  • Participants who used any medications that are moderate or strong inhibitors or strong inducers of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4).
  • Participants who used of any of the following medications/treatments: fampridine/dalfampridine, ofatumumab, fingolimod, cladribine, siponimod, ponesimod, ozanimod, alemtuzumab, mitoxantrone, ocrelizumab, natalizumab, or similar approved compounds but with different trade names and any unapproved treatments or therapies for MS; any DMTs newly approved after January 2023 that are marketed at any time during the course of the double-blind study period. These medications were not allowed within 5 half-lives before the Screening Visit and for the duration of Part A and Part B.
  • Participants who had prior/concurrent clinical study enrollment, ie, the participant had taken other investigational drugs within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever was longer, before the first Screening Visit; concurrent or recent participation in non-interventional studies may be permitted.
  • Participants with abnormal laboratory test(s) at the Screening Visit:
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) more than 3.0 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Bilirubin more than 1.5 x ULN; unless the participant has documented Gilbert syndrome (isolated bilirubin more than 1.5 x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin less than 35%)
  • Serum albumin less than 3.5 g/dL
  • Estimated Glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD])
  • Other abnormal laboratory values or electrocardiogram (ECG) changes that are deemed clinically significant as per Investigator's judgment
  • The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a potential participation in a clinical trial

Trial locations and contacts

35 sites in 10 countries.

35 sites in 10 countries

Spain6 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 7240001

    Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08035

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240003

    Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28040

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240006

    Madrid, 28034

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240004

    Madrid / Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28007

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240005

    Murcia, 30120

  • Investigational Site Number : 7240002

    Seville, Andalusia, 41009

Other trials in Spain

Poland5 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 6160002

    Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-571

  • Investigational Site Number : 6160005

    Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-686

  • Investigational Site Number : 6160001

    Krakow, 31-503

  • Investigational Site Number : 6160004

    Plewiska, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 62-064

  • Investigational Site Number : 6160006

    Zabrze, 41-800

Other trials in Poland

Canada4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 1240001

    Gatineau, Quebec, J8Y 1W2

  • Investigational Site Number : 1240003

    Lévis, Quebec, G6W0M5

  • Investigational Site Number : 1240002

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6

  • Investigational Site Number : 1240004

    Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8

Other trials in Canada

China4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 1560003

    Chengdu, 610041

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560002

    Shanghai, 200040

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560001

    Tianjin, 300052

  • Investigational Site Number : 1560004

    Xi'an, 710038

Other trials in China

France4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 2500004

    Caen, 14033

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500002

    Nice, 06001

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500001

    Paris, 75013

  • Investigational Site Number : 2500003

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

Italy4 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 3800005

    Cagliari, 09126

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800002

    Milan, 20132

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800003

    Milan, 20133

  • Investigational Site Number : 3800001

    Pozzilli, Isernia, 86077

Other trials in Italy

Belgium3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 0560001

    Brussels, BE-1200

  • Investigational Site Number : 0560002

    Ghent, 9000

  • Investigational Site Number : 0560003

    Overpelt, 3900

Other trials in Belgium

Bulgaria3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number : 1000001

    Sofia, 1407

  • Investigational Site Number : 1000002

    Sofia, 1431

  • Investigational Site Number : 1000003

    Sofia, 1680

Other trials in Bulgaria

Chile1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 1520001

    Santiago, Reg Metropolitana de Santiago, 8380456

Other trials in Chile

Germany1 site
  • Investigational Site Number : 2760002

    Würzburg, 97074

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2 Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Effect of SAR443820 on Serum Neurofilament Levels in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis, Followed by an Open-label Long-term Extension Period

This was a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 parallel-arm study to assess the effect on serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), safety and tolerability of oral SAR443820 compared to placebo in male and female participants aged 18 to 60 years with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) (relapsing or non-relapsing), or primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) followed by an open-label long-term extension period.

The total study duration was approximately 100 weeks and included the following:

Read more

4-week screening period 48-week double-blind treatment period (Part A) 48-week open-label long-term extension period (Part B)

The study was terminated prior to completion (of Week 96) as primary endpoint was not met. Therefore final duration was less than 96 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Approximately 100 weeks

Being tested
SAR443820, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SAR443820Drug

    Tablet by oral administration

  • PlaceboOther

    Tablet by oral administration

Study groups in NCT05630547
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SAR443820ExperimentalOral SAR443820
Receives: Drug: SAR443820
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorOral placebo
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) Levels

    Serum blood samples were collected at indicated time points to measure changes in NfL, a marker of neuronal damage. Baseline was defined as the average value of the assessments on screening and Day 1 visits prior to the first dose of the study treatment unless the number of Gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesion at Day 1 was greater than zero in which case baseline was the lower value of screening and Day 1 visits.

    Measured: Baseline (up to Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48

  2. Part B: Change From Baseline to Week 72 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels

    Serum blood samples were collected at indicated time points to measure changes in NfL, a marker of neuronal damage. Baseline was defined as the average value of the assessments on screening and Day 1 visits prior to the first dose of the study treatment unless the number of Gd-enhancing T1 lesion at Day 1 was greater than zero in which case baseline was the lower value of screening and Day 1 visits.

    Measured: Baseline (up to Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 72

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Part A: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

    The adjusted number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions per scan were derived using negative binomial model.

    Measured: Post-baseline (Baseline: Day 1, pre-dose) and up to Week 48

  2. Part B: Number of New Gadolinium-Enhancing T1 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI

    Cumulative number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions detected by MRI, defined as the sum of the individual number of new Gd-enhancing T1 hyperintense lesions at all scheduled visits calculated for each arm/group as a whole.

    Measured: From Week 48 to approximately up to Week 72

  3. Part A: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI

    The adjusted number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions per year were derived using negative binomial model.

    Measured: Post-baseline (Baseline: Day 1, pre-dose) and up to Week 48

  4. Part B: Number of New, Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions as Detected by MRI

    Cumulative number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions detected by MRI, defined as the sum of the individual number of new, enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions at all scheduled visits at all scheduled visits calculated for each arm/group as a whole.

    Measured: From Week 48 to approximately up to Week 72

  5. Part A: Time to Onset of 12 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score

    Time to onset of 12 weeks CDP was defined as time from randomization to onset of an increase in EDSS score (defined as an increase of >=1.0 point from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was <=5.5 or an increase of >=0.5 points from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was >5.5) confirmed after a 12 weeks interval. EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 functional systems (FS) in brain which was used to derive score. The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48

  6. Part B: Time to Onset of 24 Weeks Confirmed Disability Progression From Baseline as Assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale Score

    Time to onset of 24 weeks CDP was defined as time from randomization to onset of an increase in EDSS score (defined as an increase of >=1.0 point from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was <=5.5 or an increase of >=0.5 points from baseline EDSS score when baseline score was >5.5) confirmed after a 12 weeks interval. EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 FS in brain which was used to derive score. The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

  7. Part A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) Confirmed Over at Least 12 Weeks

    The 9-HPT was a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function (lower bound: 10 seconds; upper bound: 300 seconds). Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand were immediately followed by 2 consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The mean time to test completion served as an assessment of the participant's hand dexterity. A participant was asked to place pegs into holes and remove them with the dominant and non-dominant hand for several repetitions. A higher value of overall 9-HPT was indicative of higher disability. An increase of >=20% from the baseline score in the 9-HPT was considered meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48

  8. Part B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in 9-Hole Peg Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks

    The 9-HPT was a brief, standardized, quantitative test of upper extremity function (lower bound: 10 seconds; upper bound: 300 seconds). Two consecutive trials with the dominant hand were immediately followed by 2 consecutive trials with the non-dominant hand. The mean time to test completion served as an assessment of the participant's hand dexterity. A participant was asked to place pegs into holes and remove them with the dominant and non-dominant hand for several repetitions. A higher value of overall 9-HPT was indicative of higher disability. An increase of >20% from the baseline score in the 9-HPT was considered meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

  9. Part A: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25-FW) Confirmed Over at Least 12 Weeks

    The T25-FW test was used to assess a participant's walking ability, time in seconds to walk 25 feet (lower bound: 2.2 seconds; upper bound: 180 seconds). The participant was directed to 1 end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and was instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as safely possible with several repetitions. The mean walk time was used for assessment of the participant's walking ability. An increase of >20% from the baseline score in the T25-FW test was considered as meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48

  10. Part B: Time to Onset of Sustained 20% Increase in Timed 25-Foot Walk Test Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks

    The T25-FW test was used to assess a participant's walking ability, time in seconds to walk 25 feet (lower bound: 2.2 seconds; upper bound: 180 seconds). The participant was directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and was instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as safely possible with several repetitions. The mean walk time was used for assessment of the participant's walking ability. An increase of >20% from the baseline score in the T25-FW test was considered as meaningful worsening. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

  11. Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale Score

    EDSS was a scale for assessing neurologic impairment in participants with MS, based on 7 FS in the brain which was used to derive the EDSS (score). The standard EDSS assessments of 7 FS (visual, brain stem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder, and cerebral functions) scoring was performed by assessment of neurologic symptoms in each FS. Ambulation scoring was done to conclude the evaluation. Individual FS scores were then used in conjugation with ambulation score to obtain EDSS score which ranged from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS), with higher scores indicating greater disability. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48 (Part A) and approximately up to Week 72 (Part B)

  12. Part A: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) Population

    Relapse was defined as the occurrence of acute, new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination attributable to MS. Symptoms were as follows: attributed to MS, last for >=24 hours, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by >=30 days of clinical stability (no previous MS relapse). The adjusted ARR was derived using negative binomial model with the total number of relapses per participant occurring in the observation period.

    Measured: Up to Week 48

  13. Part B: Annualized Relapse Rate of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Population

    Relapse was defined as the occurrence of acute, new neurological symptoms or worsening of previous neurological symptoms with an objective change on neurological examination attributable to MS. Symptoms were as follows: attributed to MS, last for >=24 hours, present at normal body temperature, and preceded by >=30 days of clinical stability (no previous MS relapse). The unadjusted ARR was the total number of relapses that occurred during the observation period divided by the total participant years in the study.

    Measured: Approximately up to Week 72

  14. Parts A and B: Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume Loss (BVL) as Detected by Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate BVL. Imaging measure to detect degree of atrophy or decrease in whole brain, cortical and/or thalamic volume, which was diagnostic evidence of disease progression and played a key role in long-term disability. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48 (Part A) and approximately up to Week 72 (Part B)

  15. Part A: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions (SELs)

    The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate volume of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible central nervous system (CNS) injury.

    Measured: Week 48

  16. Part B: Volume of Slowly Expanding Lesions

    The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate volume of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.

    Measured: Approximately up to Week 72

  17. Part A: Number of Slowly Expanding Lesions

    The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.

    Measured: Week 48

  18. Part B: Number of Slowly Expanding Lesions

    The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of SELs. SELs represent chronic active lesions in MS where there is ongoing, smoldering inflammation primarily driven by activated microglia and macrophages at the lesion edges. This localized, radial expansion causes gradual enlargement of pre-existing T2 MRI lesions over time and leads to progressive neural tissue damage including demyelination, axonal loss, and irreversible CNS injury.

    Measured: Approximately up to Week 72

  19. Part A: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding Lesions

    The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate normalization of T1 intensity of SELs. It was used to quantify tissue damage within SELs of MS, reflecting neuro-axonal loss and demyelination and correlating with clinical progression.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose), Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

  20. Part B: Normalized T1 Intensity of Slowly Expanding Lesions

    The basic MRI scan was performed at all sites and used to evaluate normalized T1 intensity of SELs. It was used to quantify tissue damage within SELs of MS, reflecting neuro-axonal loss and demyelination and correlating with clinical progression.

    Measured: Week 48 and Week 72

  21. Part A: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions (PRL) Conducted at 3 Tesla (3T) Capable Sites

    The basic MRI scan sequences were performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of PRL. Phase rim lesions were a subtype of MS lesion identified by a paramagnetic edge indicative chronic smoldering inflammation linked to chronic active lesions. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and Weeks 12, 24, 36, and 48

  22. Part B: Change From Baseline in the Number of Phase Rim Lesions Conducted at 3 Tesla Capable Sites

    The basic MRI scan sequences were performed at all sites and used to evaluate number of PRL. Phase rim lesions were a subtype of MS lesion identified by a paramagnetic edge indicative chronic smoldering inflammation linked to chronic active lesions. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

  23. Parts B and A+B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) After SAR443820 Initiation

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. TEAEs were defined as the AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period (defined as time from first administration of study treatment (Day 1) to last administration of study treatment + 14 days). SAE: Any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. All TEAE occurring after SAR443820 initiation are provided for both randomized treatment arms in this endpoint.

    Measured: From first dose of SAR443820 (Day 1, post-dose) up to 14 days after last dose of SAR443820 administration in Part B, approximately 93 weeks for Parts A+B combined arm (SAR443820/SAR443820), approximately 45 weeks Part B Arm (Placebo/SAR443820)

  24. Part A: Plasma Concentration of SAR443820

    Plasma samples were collected at specified timepoints to determine plasma concentrations of SAR443820.

    Measured: Day 1: 0.25-1 hour and 1-3 hours post-dose; Week 2: pre-dose, 0.5-3 hours post-dose; Weeks 6, 12, and 36: pre-dose

  25. Part B: Time to Onset of Composite Confirmed Disability Progression Confirmed Over at Least 24 Weeks

    Time to onset of 24-week CCDP, was assessed by composite endpoint EDSS-Plus (EDSS score, or T25-FW test, or 9-HPT), was confirmed over at least 24 week. The EDSS-plus event was defined as disability progression on at least 1 of 3 components, EDSS score, or T25-FW test, or 9-HPT. Disability criteria for the individual components are defined as follows: Disability progression on the EDSS was defined as an increase of >=1.0 point from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was <=5.5 or an increase of >=0.5 points from the baseline EDSS score when the baseline score was >5.5. Disability progression on the T25-FW test was defined as an increase (worsening) of >=20% from the baseline score. Disability progression on the 9-HPT was defined as an increase (worsening) of >=20% from the baseline score. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

  26. Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 Version 2 (MSIS-29v2) Physical and Psychological Domains Scores

    The MSIS-29v2 evaluates the specific physical and psychological impact of MS from a participant's perspective. This participant reported outcome instrument has 2 subscales: a physical impact score (20 items) and a psychological impact score (9 items). The physical and psychological impact subscales of the MSIS-29v2 range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater physical or psychological impact. Each of the 2 scales are scored by summing the responses across items, then converting to score range 0-100 where 100 indicates greater impact of disease on daily function (worse health). Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

  27. Part B: Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale 12 Items (MSWS-12) Scores

    The MSWS-12 measured the impact of walking impairment in participants with MS. This participant reported outcome instrument has 12 items with a global score ranging from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates better quality of life. The MSWS-12 score was calculated by summing the 12 components and transforming into a scale with a range of 0 to 100, with higher score indicating better quality of life. Baseline was defined as Day 1 (pre-dose).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1, pre-dose) and approximately up to Week 72

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Nov 2022
  2. Study start19 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion21 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion21 Nov 2024

Why it stopped: The study was terminated as it did not meet its primary and key secondary endpoints

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
174 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05630547
Sponsor's protocol ID
ACT16753
Other IDs
U1111-1271-1257, ACT16753, 2023-509078-45-00, 2022-000049-34, 2023
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
7 Nov 2022
Last updated
15 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org

Publications

  • Hincelin-Mery A, Nicolas X, Cantalloube C, Pomponio R, Lewanczyk P, Benamor M, Ofengeim D, Krupka E, Hsiao-Nakamoto J, Eastenson A, Atassi N. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and target engagement of a brain penetrant RIPK1 inhibitor, SAR443820 (DNL788), in healthy adult participants. Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13690. doi: 10.1111/cts.13690. Epub 2023 Dec 11.

    PubMed 38010108

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing SAR443820 in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Sanofi at 35 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 35 sites in Spain, Poland, Canada, China, France and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Part A: Change From Baseline to Week 48 in Serum Neurofilament Light Chain (sNfL) Levels (time frame: Baseline (up to Day 1, pre-dose) and Week 48). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05630547, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in