AzTrials
AzTrials

Ear InfectionNCT05641285

Diagnostic Utility of Otosight Middle Ear Scope

An observational study of Ear Infection and Middle Ear Infection, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluate clinic workflow impact of OtoSight use for patients seen in the pediatric otolaryngology clinic. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 months to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Ear Infection, Middle Ear Infection, Otitis Media
What is being tested?
The OtoSight Middle Ear Scope
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
165 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
21 Feb 2023to 30 Jun 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 months to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Patients aged 6 months to 12 years old who are seen in the outpatient Otolaryngology clinic at Texas Children's Hospital main and west campuses who have no history of ear tube placement.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 6 months to 12 years old who are seen in the outpatient Otolaryngology clinic at Texas Children's Hospital main and west campuses.

Who cannot join

  • Patients who have a history of ear tube placement

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Texas Children's Hospital

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Diagnostic Utility of the Otosight Middle Ear Scope in Acute Otitis Media

Evaluate clinic workflow impact of OtoSight use for patients seen in the pediatric otolaryngology clinic.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the successful exam completion rate, the detection of middle ear fluid (versus no fluid), and the categorization of middle ear fluid (purulent vs. serous vs mucoid,) of routine otoscopy examination versus otosight examination versus tympanogram.

Being tested
The OtoSight Middle Ear Scope
Keywords
Otoscope, Tympanogram
Medical subject headings
Otitis, Otitis Media

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The OtoSight Middle Ear ScopeDevice

    The OtoSight Middle Ear Scope is intended for use as an imaging tool for real-time visualization of the human tympanic membrane and fluid or air within the middle ear space. In the presence of middle ear fluid, the OtoSight Middle Ear Scope is used to visualize the fluid density. The OtoSight Middle Ear Scope is also used to provide surface images of the ear canal and tympanic membrane. It is indicated for use in children and adults.

Study groups in NCT05641285
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Otosight, Otoscope, and TympanogramProspective study using a convenience sample. There will be no group assignment or randomization. There is no intervention planned and therefore, no placebo group or use of controls.
Receives: Device: The OtoSight Middle Ear Scope

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Exam Completion Rate

    Compare the successful exam completion rate of these three diagnostic tools.

    For the Otosight device: presence or absence of visible tympanic membrane, and presence or absence of graph indicating fluid/no fluid in the middle ear.

    For tympanogram: presence or absence of interpretable tracing indicating normal tympanic membrane movement, retracted tympanic membrane, or no movement of tympanic membrane.

    For the Otoscope: success is visualization of the tympanic membrane versus unable to see tympanic membrane.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Detection of middle ear fluid

    Compare the detection of middle ear fluid (versus no fluid) of these diagnostic tools.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Categorization of middle ear fluid

    Compare the categorization of middle ear fluid (purulent vs. serous vs mucoid) of these diagnostic tools.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Timed Evaluation of Clinic Flow

    Evaluate clinic workflow impact of OtoSight use for patients seen in the pediatric otolaryngology clinic by timing how long it takes for the MA and/or MD to complete the Otosight exam.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Dec 2022
  2. Study start21 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion29 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
165 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05641285
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-52641
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
17 Nov 2022
Last updated
31 Oct 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: No one besides the PI, the study staff, the IRB and the sponsor will have access to identifiable research data.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ear Infection and Middle Ear Infection, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Exam Completion Rate (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in