AzTrials
AzTrials

Invasive Fungal InfectionsNCT05656157

Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System for Fungal Infections

An observational study of Invasive Fungal Infections, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Invasive fungal infections are serious and frequent diseases in our hospitals, especially in intensive care units. In accordance with the institutional recommendations, it is necessary to have a clinical decision support system to support the clinicians in a rapid and optimal prescription of antifungals for invasive… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Invasive Fungal Infections
What is being tested?
Medical device
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
278 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Dec 2022to 30 Nov 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients receiving antifungal therapy for the treatment of invasive fungal disease

Who may be able to join

  • Patients receiving antifungal therapy for the treatment of invasive fungal disease

Who cannot join

  • Patients not receiving antifungal therapy for the treatment of invasive fungal disease

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon

    Lyon

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System for the Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections

Invasive fungal infections are serious and frequent diseases in our hospitals, especially in intensive care units. In accordance with the institutional recommendations, it is necessary to have a clinical decision support system to support the clinicians in a rapid and optimal prescription of antifungals for invasive fungal diseases. This clinical decision support system will benefit patients but also clinicians who will gain in medical efficiency. It will also have an ethical dimension since it will guarantee optimal antifungal treatments for all patients. The purpose of the research is to define the percentage of concordance between the medical prescription and the recommendation of the clinical decision support system.

Being tested
Medical device
Keywords
invasive fungal infections, antifungal treatment, clinical decision support system
Medical subject headings
Invasive Fungal Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Medical deviceDevice

    Clinical decision support system

Study groups in NCT05656157
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Antifungal treatment prescribed by the clinician for an invasive fungal diseaseNot described
Antifungal treatment recommended by the clinical decision support systemNot described
Receives: Device: Medical device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of concordance between the medical prescription and the recommendation of the clinical decision support system

    Measured: January to september 2023

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2022
  2. Study start1 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
278 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05656157
Sponsor's protocol ID
CRC_GHN_2022_001
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
9 Dec 2022
Last updated
15 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bienvenu AL, Pradat P, Guerin C, Aubrun F, Fellahi JL, Friggeri A, Guichon C, Hernu R, Menotti J, Monard C, Paulus S, Rimmele T, Piriou V, Chidiac C, Argaud L, Leboucher G. Evaluation of first-line therapies for the treatment of candidemia in ICU patients: A propensity score analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;93:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.037. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

    PubMed 31982622
  • Bienvenu AL, Pavese P, Leboucher G, Berger P, Roux S, Charmillon A, Foroni L, Menotti J, Lebeaux D, Mayan R, Mondain V, Robin C, Lesprit P, Alfandari S, Kerneis S. Practical checklist for implementation of antifungal stewardship programmes. J Med Microbiol. 2022 Jun;71(6). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001560.

    PubMed 35771615
  • Bienvenu AL, Cour M, Pavese P, Guichon C, Leray V, Chapuis C, Dureault A, Mohkam K, Gallet S, Bourget S, Kahale E, Chaabane W, Subtil F, Maucort-Boulch D, Talbot F, Dode X, Richard JC, Leboucher G. Correlation between antifungal clinical practices and a new clinical decision support system ANTIFON-CLIC(R) for the treatment of invasive candidiasis: a retrospective multicentre study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Jun 3;79(6):1407-1412. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkae118.

    PubMed 38656566

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Invasive Fungal Infections, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of concordance between the medical prescription and the recommendation of the clinical decision support system (time frame: January to september 2023). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05656157, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in