AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoarthritis, KneeINSPIRENCT05670314

lIfestyle iNterventionS for PaIn ReliEf (INSPIRE)

A study testing Inulin Fibre supplement and Exercise in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by University of Nottingham at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a 2x2 factorial design randomised controlled trial in which participants with knee pain will be grouped into the diet intervention, exercise intervention, diet and exercise intervention or placebo arm. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis, Knee
What is being tested?
Inulin Fibre supplement and Exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
117 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 May 2022to 25 Feb 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with any pain in or around a knee on most days for more than 3 months
  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Participant eligibility includes those aged >18 years who have a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 39.9 kg/m2

Who cannot join

  • The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply:
  • Have psychosocial or gastrointestinal (e.g. malabsorptive conditions such as IBS/IBD, coeliac)
  • Are taking the following medications: immunosuppressants, anticoagulants, amiodarone and/or perhexiline
  • Are currently following or anticipated to commence a specialised commercially available weight loss diet and/or program
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • History or current psychiatric illness
Show all 11Show fewer
  • History or current neurological condition (e.g. epilepsy)
  • Those undergoing revision, having severe hip OA, inflammatory arthropathies
  • Diagnosed non-OA cause of knee pain (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Neuropathy or diabetes mellitus
  • Having taken part in a research study in the last 3 months involving invasive procedures or an inconvenience allowance (this must remain for ALL UoN FMHS UREC approved studies)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • University of Nottingham

    Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Molecular Signatures of Endocannabinoid Induced Pain Relief in Humans: Lifestyle Interventions, Systemic and Localised Changes

This is a 2x2 factorial design randomised controlled trial in which participants with knee pain will be grouped into the diet intervention, exercise intervention, diet and exercise intervention or placebo arm. The study involves intake of dietary supplements and performing routine exercises which are commonly used and are not pharmacological agents. N= 117. 2x2 intervention with individuals per block: placebo (n=27), diet only (n=26), exercise only (n=40), diet + exercise (n=24)

Being tested
Inulin Fibre supplement, Maltodextrin (Placebo), Exercise
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Inulin Fibre supplementDietary supplement

    20g/ day. Inulin is easily dissolvable in liquid and can be incorporated into the usual diet - by adding to water, juice, smoothies, cereal, yogurt etc.

  • Maltodextrin (Placebo)Dietary supplement

    10g/ day which can be consumed by adding to breakfast cereal/ smoothie/ yogurt or drink of choice

  • ExerciseBehavioural

    Joint Academy An app-based exercises platform (Joint Academy®) will be used as an intervention given to the treatment arm. The programme consists of a mixture of open and close chain exercises, a combination of concentric, eccentric and focusing on the global strength of legs including the muscles around the hips and knee joints as well as balance enhancement exercises.

Study groups in NCT05670314
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo armPlacebo comparatorThe participants in the placebo/control arm will be required to take 10g of maltodextrin for the same period of 6 weeks.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Maltodextrin (Placebo)
Diet only ArmExperimentalThe participants in the dietary intervention arm will be required to take 20g of inulin for a period of 6 weeks.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Inulin Fibre supplement
Exercise only armExperimentalJoint Academy An app-based exercises platform (Joint Academy®) will be used as an intervention given to the treatment arm. The programme consists of a mixture of open and close chain exercises, a combination of concentric, eccentric and focusing on the global strength of legs including the muscles around the hips and knee joints as well as balance enhancement exercises. The intervention also includes educational sessions integrated into the programme covering the basics of OA, its treatment, self-managing symptoms of OA and the benefits of maintaining a healthy lifestyle. The exercise intervention focuses on core stability and performance, neuromuscular leg strengthening and balance enhancement.
Receives: Behavioral: Exercise
Diet + exercise intervention armExperimentalThe participants in this arm will be required to take 20g of inulin for a period of 6 weeks and doing exercise at the same time.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Inulin Fibre supplement; Behavioral: Exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain

    The Numerical Rate Score (NRS) will be used to assess the changes in the level of pain in response to the intervention between baseline and follow-up.

    Participants reported their pain on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 the worst pain imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Change in Functional Outcome 30-seconds Sit-to-stand (30CST)

    Measures how many times a participant can rise from a chair to a full standing position in 30 seconds.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  2. Change in Functional Outcome Timed-up and go (TUG)

    Time in seconds to stand up, walk 3m, return, and sit. Average of 3 trials at baseline and follow-up (at the end of 6 weeks).

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  3. Change in Functional Outcome Grip Strength

    Measured with dynamometer; average of 3 trials on dominant hand in seated position with participant applying as much grip pressure as possible on the dynamometer. The maximum reading (kg) in taken for each repetition.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  4. Change in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Temporal Summation (TS)

    Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality temporal summation (TS). TS assesses sensitivity to sharpness by applying a brief "pinprick" stimulus (256 mN Pinprick; MRC-Systems, Heidelberg, Germany) to the skin with higher ratings potentially suggesting increased spinal cord pain sensitivity. A single stimulus was applied to the rectus femoris (5cm above the mid-point of the patella of the most painful knee), followed by 10 repetitive stimuli at 1/s. Participants rated pain/sharpness intensity on a 0-10 Visual Analogue Scale after both the single and the average of the repeated stimuli. Each test was performed twice, with a 2-minute break between repetitions and the average was taken.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  5. Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superolateral Patella Site

    Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superolateral edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  6. Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Superomedial Patella Site

    Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: quadricep (2cm above superomedial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  7. Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Medial Joint Line Site

    Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from abeline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at the anatomical position: medial joint line (3cm medially from medial edge of patella). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  8. Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Tibialis Anterior Muscle Site

    Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from at baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: tibialis anterior (5 cm distal and 1 cm lateral to the tibial tuberosity). PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the most painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  9. Changes in Pain Sensitisation Outcome Pressure Pain Detection Threshold (PPT) at the Brachioradialis Muscle Site

    Pain sensitisation will be measured using quantitative sensory testing (QST) to assess any changes in pain sensitisation indices from baseline to follow-up. QST is a non-invasive method to assess pain sensitivity using standardised stimuli like mechanical pressure or sharpness. We used the QST modality pressure pain detection threshold (PPT) at anatomical position: brachioradialis (5 cm medial and distal to the lateral epicondyle) on the arm opposite the painful knee. PPT measures the lowest pressure a participant perceives as painful while pressure is applied using a handheld probe (Medoc-AlgoMed, Israel) at a rate of 50 kPa/s on the arm opposite the painful knee, with lower PPT threshold suggestive of increased pain sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  10. Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Butyric Acid

    Change in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) butyric acid in response to the interventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  11. Change in Short Chain Fatty Acid Acetic Acid

    Change in serum levels of short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) acetic acid in response to theinterventions. SCFA levels in serum will be measured using mass spectrometry.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  12. Change in Inflammatory Protein Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels

    Change in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  13. Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inflammatory Protein Levels

    Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  14. Change in Inflammatory Protein Interferon Gamma (IFN-γ) Levels

    Change in Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) inflammatory protein levels measured with the Olink for a subset of individuals. For Olink cytokine assay panels data is reported in either Normalized Protein eXpression units (NPX) units or absolute concentration units (pg/mL), with the lower limit of detection typically below 1 pg/mL for most assays.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  15. Changes in Gut Microbiome (Shannon Diversity Index)

    The gut microbiome will be measured with shotgun metagenomic sequencing of stool samples and the Shannon Diversity Index will be calculated. The Shannon Diversity Index assesses both the richness (number of different species) and evenness (distribution of individuals among species) within the gut microbiome. A higher Shannon index indicates a more diverse microbiome, while a lower index suggests less diversity.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  16. Change in Serum Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) Levels

    Serum levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of Endocannabinoid Anandamide (AEA) in response to the intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  17. Change in Serum 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid Levels

    Serum levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid will be measured using mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). This will help us ascertain the change in levels of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) Endocannabinoid in response to the intervention.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  18. Changes in Calcium Voltage-gated Channel Subunit alpha1 B Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals

    Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  19. Changes in Solute Carrier Family 12 Member 5 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals

    Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected at baseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood, and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

  20. Changes in Sodium Voltage-gated Channel Alpha Subunit 11 Gene Expression Levels Using Transcriptomics on a Subset of Individuals

    Transcriptomics will be measured using RNA sequencing of blood samples collected atbaseline and at follow-up (at the end of six weeks). RNA was extracted from whole blood,and sequencing libraries were prepared and analysed using standard RNA-seq pipelines.

    Measured: Baseline and 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2023
  2. Study start1 May 2022
  3. Primary completion25 Feb 2025
  4. Study completion25 Feb 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
2x2 intervention with individuals per block: placebo (n=27), diet only (n=26), exercise only (n=40), diet + exercise (n=24)
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
117 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05670314
Sponsor's protocol ID
22025
Acronym
INSPIRE
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
18 Nov 2022
Last updated
16 Sep 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: To comply with the data protection act, personal data will be deleted as soon as possible after it is no longer needed for the study.

Publications

  • Cui A, Li H, Wang D, Zhong J, Chen Y, Lu H. Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 26;29-30:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587. eCollection 2020 Dec.

    PubMed 34505846
  • Yu D, Peat G, Bedson J, Jordan KP. Annual consultation incidence of osteoarthritis estimated from population-based health care data in England. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Nov;54(11):2051-60. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev231. Epub 2015 Jul 9.

    PubMed 26163287
  • Moseng T, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Battista S, Beckwee D, Boyadzhieva V, Conaghan PG, Costa D, Doherty M, Finney AG, Georgiev T, Gobbo M, Kennedy N, Kjeken I, Kroon FPB, Lohmander LS, Lund H, Mallen CD, Pavelka K, Pitsillidou IA, Rayman MP, Tveter AT, Vriezekolk JE, Wiek D, Zanoli G, Osteras N. EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: 2023 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024 May 15;83(6):730-740. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-225041.

    PubMed 38212040
  • Jonsson T, Eek F, Dell'Isola A, Dahlberg LE, Ekvall Hansson E. The Better Management of Patients with Osteoarthritis Program: Outcomes after evidence-based education and exercise delivered nationwide in Sweden. PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222657. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31536554
  • Gohir SA, Eek F, Kelly A, Abhishek A, Valdes AM. Effectiveness of Internet-Based Exercises Aimed at Treating Knee Osteoarthritis: The iBEAT-OA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e210012. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0012.

    PubMed 33620447
  • Zhang S, Wang D, Zhao J, Zhao H, Xie P, Zheng L, Sheng P, Yuan J, Xia B, Wei F, Zhang Z. Metabolic syndrome increases osteoarthritis risk: findings from the UK Biobank prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 19;24(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17682-z.

    PubMed 38243159
  • Brain K, Burrows TL, Rollo ME, Chai LK, Clarke ED, Hayes C, Hodson FJ, Collins CE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition interventions for chronic noncancer pain. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Apr;32(2):198-225. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12601. Epub 2018 Oct 7.

    PubMed 30294938
  • Fortuna R, Wang W, Mayengbam S, Tuplin EWN, Sampsell K, Sharkey KA, Hart DA, Reimer RA. Effect of prebiotic fiber on physical function and gut microbiota in adults, mostly women, with knee osteoarthritis and obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Nutr. 2024 Sep;63(6):2149-2161. doi: 10.1007/s00394-024-03415-w. Epub 2024 May 7.

    PubMed 38713231
  • Woodhams SG, Sagar DR, Burston JJ, Chapman V. The role of the endocannabinoid system in pain. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2015;227:119-43. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-46450-2_7.

    PubMed 25846617
  • Ding W, You Z, Chen Q, Yang L, Doheny J, Zhou X, Li N, Wang S, Hu K, Chen L, Xia S, Wu X, Wang C, Zhang C, Chen L, Ritchie C, Huang P, Mao J, Shen S. Gut Microbiota Influences Neuropathic Pain Through Modulating Proinflammatory and Anti-inflammatory T Cells. Anesth Analg. 2021 Apr 1;132(4):1146-1155. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005155.

    PubMed 32889847
  • Millar B, McWilliams DF, Abhishek A, Akin-Akinyosoye K, Auer DP, Chapman V, Doherty M, Ferguson E, Gladman JRF, Greenhaff P, Stocks J, Valdes AM, Walsh DA. Investigating musculoskeletal health and wellbeing; a cohort study protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Mar 21;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03195-4.

    PubMed 32199451
  • Karandikar N, Vargas OO. Kinetic chains: a review of the concept and its clinical applications. PM R. 2011 Aug;3(8):739-45. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.02.021.

    PubMed 21871418
  • Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.

    PubMed 21621130
  • Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA. A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing. 2011 Jul;40(4):423-9. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr051. Epub 2011 May 30.

    PubMed 21624928
  • Barry E, Galvin R, Keogh C, Horgan F, Fahey T. Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2014 Feb 1;14:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-14.

    PubMed 24484314

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Inulin Fibre supplement and Exercise in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by University of Nottingham at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Sep 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Numerical Rate Score (NRS) for Pain (time frame: Baseline and 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05670314, which also lists 20 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in