T-cell Lymphoblastic LymphomaPhase 3NCT05681260

Capizzi Escalating Methotrexate Versus High Dose Methotrexate in Children With Newly Diagnosed T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LBL)

A Phase 3 study testing Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin and Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Vindesine, Etoposide, Ifosfamide in people with T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, run by Children's Cancer Group, China at 2 sites in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Who is it for?: Ages 12 months to 18 years
Conditions the study is for: T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
What is being tested?: Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin and Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Vindesine, Etoposide, Ifosfamide
Type of treatment: Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?: No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people: 200 participants
Where: 2 sitesChina
Study dates: 6 Feb 2023to 31 Dec 2029
Phase: Phase 3
Are there results?: Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

Ages 12 months to 18 years
All sexes
No healthy volunteers
Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

Newly diagnosed T-lineage lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) Stage II-IV

Who cannot join

Patients with Down syndrome or primary immune comprised disease.
Ph+ T-LBL
Patients must not have received any prior cytotoxic chemotherapy
Any steroids pretreatment for > 5 days in the 7 days or for >14 days in the 28 days before the initiation of Induction chemotherapy. The dose of prednisone or methylprednisone pretreatment does not affect eligibility. Any steroids exposure that occurred > 28 days before the initiation of Induction chemotherapy is allowed. Inhalation and topical steroids are not considered pretreatment. A single dose of vincristine is allowed.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Yi-Jin Gao, M.D. contact

0086-21-38087513

gaoyijin@scmc.com.cn

Qing Quan, M.D contact

yuanqing@scmc.com.cn

China2 sites, 2 recruiting

West China Second University Hospital
Chengdu
Xia Guo, MD
Not yet recruiting
Shanghai Children's Medical Center
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200127
Yi-Jin Gao, MD, 0086-21-38087513, gaoyijin@scmc.com.cn
Qing Yuan, MD, 0086-21-38626161, yuanqing@scmc.com.cn
Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Trial Using a Modified COG ABFM Regimen Backbone to Investigate Capizzi Escalating Methotrexate Versus High Dose Methotrexate in Children With Newly Diagnosed T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LBL)

T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) is the second most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in children and adolescents. With current treatment, event-free survival (EFS) rates vary between 75%~85%. Two different MTX intensification strategies are used commonly: HD-MTX with leucovorin rescue, and Capizzi-style MTX without leucovorin rescue plus PEG-ASP (C-MTX). Although superior outcome of patients with T-ALL receiving C-MTX compared with HD-MTX on the AALL0434 trial, the 2 approaches had not been compared directly in patients with T-LBL. There remains controversy on PET/CT interpretation in children with NHL. Large prospective studies in pediatric patients with T-LBL regarding PET/CT value for this is scarce. Around 1% pediatric patients with T-LBL will not achieve remission at the end of Induction (induction failure). The optimal treatment for this small subgroup is largely unclear. The BFM HR Blocks usually are applied to these patients even though the efficacy is unknown. Novel targeted therapies are needed for use. Dasatinib is identified as a targeted therapy for T-cell ALL in preclinical drug screening.

Read the detailed description

T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) which involves 90% of LBL cases is the second most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in children and adolescents. With current treatment, event-free survival (EFS) rates vary between 75%~85%. Poor probabilities of survival (10~15%) for patients after relapse leave no room for treatment de-escalation in frontline protocols. Limitations in numbers of newly diagnosed patients impeded evaluation potential prognostic markers and validation or conducting clinical studies.
In the GER-GPOH-NHL-BFM-95 study, the prophylactic cranial radiation was omitted, and the intensity of induction therapy was decreased slightly. There were no significant increases in CNS relapses, suggesting cranial radiation may be reserved for patients with CNS disease at diagnosis. The 5-year EFS was worse in NHL-BFM-95 (82%) than in NHL-BFM-90 (90%). It was proposed that the major difference in EFS between NHL-BFM-90 and NHL-BFM-95 resulted from the increased number of subsequent neoplasms observed in NHL-BFM-95.
Two different MTX intensification strategies are used commonly: HD-MTX with leucovorin rescue, and Capizzi-style MTX without leucovorin rescue plus PEG-ASP (C-MTX). Although superior outcome of patients with T-ALL receiving C-MTX compared with HD-MTX on the AALL0434 trial, the 2 approaches had not been compared directly in patients with T-LBL.
POG 9404: the small cohort (n = 66) of lymphoma patients who did not receive HD-MTX, the 5-year EFS was 88%. Of note, all of these patients received prophylactic cranial radiation therapy, which has been demonstrated not to be required in T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) patients.
COG-A5971 evaluated 2 strategies for CNS prophylaxis without CNS irradiation [5]. Patients were randomly assigned to receive HD-MTX in interim maintenance (BFM-95) or intrathecal chemotherapy throughout maintenance (CCG-BFM). The overall incidence of CNS relapse was 1.2%, and there was no difference between the treatment arms for CNS relapse, DFS, or OS. Minimal disseminated disease (MDD) >1% by FLOW at diagnosis was shown to be associated with a worse outcome in this trial (a BFM backbone containing HD-MTX). Measurement of bone marrow MDD at diagnosis with sequential response monitoring through peripheral blood during remission induction to aid treatment stratification was also suggested in an early COG study. The prognostic significance of MDD at End-of-Induction (EOI) or End-of-Consolidation (EOC) for T-LBL patients with positive MDD at diagnosis is still unclear.
COG AALL0434: the COG ABFM regimen with C-MTX provided excellent DFS without cranial radiation for patients with standard risk T-LBL (85%, Arm A, n=82, completed 64) and high risk T-LBL (85%, Arm A, n=61, completed 51) although patients with CNS 3 were not included. It appears that C-MTX may have negated the prognostic impact of MDD.
Nelarabine is unavailable in mainland China at this time, which did not show benefit in COG AALL0434 study.
AALL07P1: 10 patients with T-LBL in first relapse treated with a 4-drug induction regimen adding bortezomib: 7 had a response (1 had a complete response, 2 had unconfirmed complete responses, and 4 had partial responses)
COG AALL1231 for T-LBL: the 4-year EFS and OS were better in bortezomib group than the control group (86.4% and 89.5% vs. 76.5% and 78.3%, p=0.041 and 0.009, respectively.). Incorporating bortezomib into standard therapy for de novo T-LBL appears beneficial.
A biopsy for pathological examination of a mediastinal residual mass is a clinical dilemma. Currently, conventional imaging is still considered as the "standard" modality for evaluating pediatric patients with NHL at diagnosis and subsequent response. There remains controversy on PET/CT interpretation in children with NHL. Large prospective studies in pediatric patients with T-LBL regarding PET/CT value for this is scarce.
Although an overlap in morphology and immune-phenotyping exists in T-LBL and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), different disease distribution suggests possible different genetic profiles and pathogenesis. Except for stage, none of other parameters is used in the current stratification system outside of clinical trials for T-LBL (several candidates, but none have been validated sufficiently). Little is known about biomarkers with prognostic relevance for T-LBL. To improve risk stratification strategy and better understand biologic rationale for incorporating novel therapies (chemicals, target agents and immunotherapy) into a conventional chemotherapy backbone, translational research to identify molecular markers with prognostic relevance in T-LBL is highly recommended.
With the current treatment, around 1% pediatric patients with T-LBL will not achieve remission at the end of Induction (induction failure). The optimal treatment for this small subgroup is largely unclear. The BFM HR Blocks usually are applied to these patients even though the efficacy is unknown. Novel targeted therapies are needed for use. Dasatinib is identified as a targeted therapy for T-cell ALL in preclinical drug screening.

Conditions: T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Being tested: Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Vindesine, Etoposide, Ifosfamide
Keywords: T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma, Pediatric, Capizzi-style Methotrexate, High dose Methotrexate, bortezomib, treatment, survival, PET scan

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, DoxorubicinDrug
Standard risk Arm A: Induction I followed by Consolidation, extracompartmental Capizzi MTX, delayed intensification and 96 weeks' maintenance therapy. Twenty-one or twenty-six triple intrathecal injections for CNS negative or positive patients, respectively.
Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, DoxorubicinDrug
Standard risk Arm B: Induction I followed by Consolidation, extracompartmental high dose MTX, delayed intensification and 96 weeks' maintenance therapy. Twenty-one or twenty-six triple intrathecal injections for CNS negative or positive patients, respectively.
Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Vindesine, Etoposide, IfosfamideDrug
High Risk T-LBL: Induction I followed by 2 cycles of BFM HR Blocks, delayed intensification and 96 weeks' maintenance therapy. Twenty-four or twenty-eight triple intrathecal injections for CNS negative or positive patients, respectively.

Study groups in NCT05681260
Study group	Role	What they receive
Standard risk Arm A	Experimental	Any pediatric patients with newly diagnosed T-LBL Stage II to IV who achieve at least a PR at the end of Induction (EOI). Induction I followed by consolidation, Capizzi escalating methotrexate (interim maintenance) , delayed intensification and maintenance therapy. Triple intrathecal injections. Receives: Drug: Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin
Standard risk Arm B	Experimental	Any pediatric patients with newly diagnosed T-LBL Stage II to IV who achieve at least a PR at the end of Induction (EOI). Induction I followed by consolidation, high dose methotrexate (interim maintenance) , delayed intensification and maintenance therapy. Triple intrathecal injections. Receives: Drug: Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin
High Risk T-LBL	Experimental	Any pediatric patients with newly diagnosed T-LBL Stage II to IV who fail to achieve at least a PR at the end of Induction (EOI). Induction I followed by 6 intensive polychemotherapy blocks (HR1'-HR2'-HR3'-HR1'-HR2'-HR3'), deIayed intensification, and maintenance therapy. Triple intrathecal injections. Receives: Drug: Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Vindesine, Etoposide, Ifosfamide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

Event free survival for standard risk patients
To determine the EFS in patients with newly diagnosed standard T-LBL, through randomization, the modified COG ABFM regimen with CMTX to the regimen with HD MTX
Measured: 4 years
Event free survival according to bone marrow MDD
After using the modified COG ABFM regimen, to validate whether bone marrow MDD by Flow at diagnosis is still a prognostic factor for pediatric patients newly diagnosed with T-LBL
Measured: 4 years
Event free survival for high risk patients
To determine the EFS in patients with induction failure who become complete or partial response after using 3 HR BFM Blocks and continue chemotherapy on 3 HR BFM Blocks followed by delayed intensification and maintenance therapy.
Measured: 4 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

6 Feb 202331 Dec 2029

First posted12 Jan 2023
Study start6 Feb 2023
Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
Other trials for T-cell Lymphoblastic LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design

Study type: Interventional
Phase: Phase 3
Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomised
Intervention model: Parallel groups
Masking: None (open label)
Enrolment: 200 participants (estimated)

IDs, dates and publications

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05681260
Sponsor's protocol ID: CCCG-T-LBL-2023
Status last verified: Mar 2026
First submitted: 27 Dec 2022
Last updated: 19 Mar 2026
Results posted: No
Data monitoring committee: Yes
FDA-regulated drug: No
FDA-regulated device: No

Publications

Burkhardt B, Reiter A, Landmann E, Lang P, Lassay L, Dickerhoff R, Lakomek M, Henze G, von Stackelberg A. Poor outcome for children and adolescents with progressive disease or relapse of lymphoblastic lymphoma: a report from the berlin-frankfurt-muenster group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 10;27(20):3363-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3367. Epub 2009 May 11.
PubMed 19433688
Burkhardt B, Woessmann W, Zimmermann M, Kontny U, Vormoor J, Doerffel W, Mann G, Henze G, Niggli F, Ludwig WD, Janssen D, Riehm H, Schrappe M, Reiter A. Impact of cranial radiotherapy on central nervous system prophylaxis in children and adolescents with central nervous system-negative stage III or IV lymphoblastic lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):491-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.2707.
PubMed 16421426
Winter SS, Dunsmore KP, Devidas M, Wood BL, Esiashvili N, Chen Z, Eisenberg N, Briegel N, Hayashi RJ, Gastier-Foster JM, Carroll AJ, Heerema NA, Asselin BL, Gaynon PS, Borowitz MJ, Loh ML, Rabin KR, Raetz EA, Zweidler-Mckay PA, Winick NJ, Carroll WL, Hunger SP. Improved Survival for Children and Young Adults With T-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results From the Children's Oncology Group AALL0434 Methotrexate Randomization. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 10;36(29):2926-2934. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7250. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
PubMed 30138085
Asselin BL, Devidas M, Wang C, Pullen J, Borowitz MJ, Hutchison R, Lipshultz SE, Camitta BM. Effectiveness of high-dose methotrexate in T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia and advanced-stage lymphoblastic lymphoma: a randomized study by the Children's Oncology Group (POG 9404). Blood. 2011 Jul 28;118(4):874-83. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-292615. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
PubMed 21474675
Termuhlen AM, Smith LM, Perkins SL, Lones M, Finlay JL, Weinstein H, Gross TG, Abromowitch M. Disseminated lymphoblastic lymphoma in children and adolescents: results of the COG A5971 trial: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Br J Haematol. 2013 Sep;162(6):792-801. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12460. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
PubMed 23889312
Coustan-Smith E, Sandlund JT, Perkins SL, Chen H, Chang M, Abromowitch M, Campana D. Minimal disseminated disease in childhood T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma: a report from the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 20;27(21):3533-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1318. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
PubMed 19546402
Hayashi RJ, Winter SS, Dunsmore KP, Devidas M, Chen Z, Wood BL, Hermiston ML, Teachey DT, Perkins SL, Miles RR, Raetz EA, Loh ML, Winick NJ, Carroll WL, Hunger SP, Lim MS, Gross TG, Bollard CM. Successful Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: Results From Children's Oncology Group AALL0434. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):3062-3070. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00531. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
PubMed 32552472
Horton TM, Whitlock JA, Lu X, O'Brien MM, Borowitz MJ, Devidas M, Raetz EA, Brown PA, Carroll WL, Hunger SP. Bortezomib reinduction chemotherapy in high-risk ALL in first relapse: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Br J Haematol. 2019 Jul;186(2):274-285. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15919. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
PubMed 30957229
Teachey DT, Devidas M, Wood BL, Chen Z, Hayashi RJ, Hermiston ML, Annett RD, Archer JH, Asselin BL, August KJ, Cho SY, Dunsmore KP, Fisher BT, Freedman JL, Galardy PJ, Harker-Murray P, Horton TM, Jaju AI, Lam A, Messinger YH, Miles RR, Okada M, Patel SI, Schafer ES, Schechter T, Singh N, Steele AC, Sulis ML, Vargas SL, Winter SS, Wood C, Zweidler-McKay P, Bollard CM, Loh ML, Hunger SP, Raetz EA. Children's Oncology Group Trial AALL1231: A Phase III Clinical Trial Testing Bortezomib in Newly Diagnosed T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;40(19):2106-2118. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02678. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
PubMed 35271306
Rosolen A, Perkins SL, Pinkerton CR, Guillerman RP, Sandlund JT, Patte C, Reiter A, Cairo MS. Revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Staging System. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 20;33(18):2112-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7203. Epub 2015 May 4.
PubMed 25940716
Sandlund JT, Guillerman RP, Perkins SL, Pinkerton CR, Rosolen A, Patte C, Reiter A, Cairo MS. International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Response Criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 20;33(18):2106-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.0745. Epub 2015 May 4.
PubMed 25940725
Bhojwani D, McCarville MB, Choi JK, Sawyer J, Metzger ML, Inaba H, Davidoff AM, Gold R, Shulkin BL, Sandlund JT. The role of FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of residual disease in paediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2015 Mar;168(6):845-53. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13219. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
PubMed 25382494
Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, Lister TA; Alliance, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium; Italian Lymphoma Foundation; European Organisation for Research; Treatment of Cancer/Dutch Hemato-Oncology Group; Grupo Espanol de Medula Osea; German High-Grade Lymphoma Study Group; German Hodgkin's Study Group; Japanese Lymphorra Study Group; Lymphoma Study Association; NCIC Clinical Trials Group; Nordic Lymphoma Study Group; Southwest Oncology Group; United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):3059-68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800.
PubMed 25113753
Teachey DT, O'Connor D. How I treat newly diagnosed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma in children. Blood. 2020 Jan 16;135(3):159-166. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001557.
PubMed 31738819
Khanam T, Sandmann S, Seggewiss J, Ruether C, Zimmermann M, Norvil AB, Bartenhagen C, Randau G, Mueller S, Herbrueggen H, Hoffmann P, Herms S, Wei L, Woeste M, Wuensch C, Gowher H, Oschlies I, Klapper W, Woessmann W, Dugas M, Burkhardt B. Integrative genomic analysis of pediatric T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma reveals candidates of clinical significance. Blood. 2021 Apr 29;137(17):2347-2359. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005381.
PubMed 33152759

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title: A Randomized Trial Using a Modified COG ABFM Regimen Backbone to Investigate Capizzi Escalating Methotrexate Versus High Dose Methotrexate in Children With Newly Diagnosed T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (T-LBL)
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05681260
Acronym / sponsor ID: CCCG-T-LBL-2023
Conditions: T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Keywords: T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma, Pediatric, Capizzi-style Methotrexate, High dose Methotrexate, bortezomib, treatment, survival, PET scan
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional
Recruitment status: Recruiting
Enrolment: 200 participants (estimated)
Lead sponsor: Children's Cancer Group, ChinaResearch network
Collaborators: Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Beijing Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital of Scow University, West China Second University Hospital, Nanjing Children's Hospital, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tongji Hospital, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Cancer hospital of Shandong Province, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Wuhan Children's Hospital, The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Ruijin Hospital, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Children's Hospital of Hebei Province, Cancer Hospital of Henan Province, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Qilu Children's Hospital
Study start: 6 Feb 2023 (actual)
Primary completion: 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Study completion: 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
First posted: 12 Jan 2023 (actual)
Results: Not posted in the source record

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Detailed description

T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) which involves 90% of LBL cases is the second most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in children and adolescents. With current treatment, event-free survival (EFS) rates vary between 75%~85%. Poor probabilities of survival (10~15%) for patients after relapse leave no room for treatment de-escalation in frontline protocols. Limitations in numbers of newly diagnosed patients impeded evaluation potential prognostic markers and validation or conducting clinical studies.
In the GER-GPOH-NHL-BFM-95 study, the prophylactic cranial radiation was omitted, and the intensity of induction therapy was decreased slightly. There were no significant increases in CNS relapses, suggesting cranial radiation may be reserved for patients with CNS disease at diagnosis. The 5-year EFS was worse in NHL-BFM-95 (82%) than in NHL-BFM-90 (90%). It was proposed that the major difference in EFS between NHL-BFM-90 and NHL-BFM-95 resulted from the increased number of subsequent neoplasms observed in NHL-BFM-95.
Two different MTX intensification strategies are used commonly: HD-MTX with leucovorin rescue, and Capizzi-style MTX without leucovorin rescue plus PEG-ASP (C-MTX). Although superior outcome of patients with T-ALL receiving C-MTX compared with HD-MTX on the AALL0434 trial, the 2 approaches had not been compared directly in patients with T-LBL.
POG 9404: the small cohort (n = 66) of lymphoma patients who did not receive HD-MTX, the 5-year EFS was 88%. Of note, all of these patients received prophylactic cranial radiation therapy, which has been demonstrated not to be required in T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) patients.
COG-A5971 evaluated 2 strategies for CNS prophylaxis without CNS irradiation [5]. Patients were randomly assigned to receive HD-MTX in interim maintenance (BFM-95) or intrathecal chemotherapy throughout maintenance (CCG-BFM). The overall incidence of CNS relapse was 1.2%, and there was no difference between the treatment arms for CNS relapse, DFS, or OS. Minimal disseminated disease (MDD) >1% by FLOW at diagnosis was shown to be associated with a worse outcome in this trial (a BFM backbone containing HD-MTX). Measurement of bone marrow MDD at diagnosis with sequential response monitoring through peripheral blood during remission induction to aid treatment stratification was also suggested in an early COG study. The prognostic significance of MDD at End-of-Induction (EOI) or End-of-Consolidation (EOC) for T-LBL patients with positive MDD at diagnosis is still unclear.
COG AALL0434: the COG ABFM regimen with C-MTX provided excellent DFS without cranial radiation for patients with standard risk T-LBL (85%, Arm A, n=82, completed 64) and high risk T-LBL (85%, Arm A, n=61, completed 51) although patients with CNS 3 were not included. It appears that C-MTX may have negated the prognostic impact of MDD.
Nelarabine is unavailable in mainland China at this time, which did not show benefit in COG AALL0434 study.
AALL07P1: 10 patients with T-LBL in first relapse treated with a 4-drug induction regimen adding bortezomib: 7 had a response (1 had a complete response, 2 had unconfirmed complete responses, and 4 had partial responses)
COG AALL1231 for T-LBL: the 4-year EFS and OS were better in bortezomib group than the control group (86.4% and 89.5% vs. 76.5% and 78.3%, p=0.041 and 0.009, respectively.). Incorporating bortezomib into standard therapy for de novo T-LBL appears beneficial.
A biopsy for pathological examination of a mediastinal residual mass is a clinical dilemma. Currently, conventional imaging is still considered as the "standard" modality for evaluating pediatric patients with NHL at diagnosis and subsequent response. There remains controversy on PET/CT interpretation in children with NHL. Large prospective studies in pediatric patients with T-LBL regarding PET/CT value for this is scarce.
Although an overlap in morphology and immune-phenotyping exists in T-LBL and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), different disease distribution suggests possible different genetic profiles and pathogenesis. Except for stage, none of other parameters is used in the current stratification system outside of clinical trials for T-LBL (several candidates, but none have been validated sufficiently). Little is known about biomarkers with prognostic relevance for T-LBL. To improve risk stratification strategy and better understand biologic rationale for incorporating novel therapies (chemicals, target agents and immunotherapy) into a conventional chemotherapy backbone, translational research to identify molecular markers with prognostic relevance in T-LBL is highly recommended.
With the current treatment, around 1% pediatric patients with T-LBL will not achieve remission at the end of Induction (induction failure). The optimal treatment for this small subgroup is largely unclear. The BFM HR Blocks usually are applied to these patients even though the efficacy is unknown. Novel targeted therapies are needed for use. Dasatinib is identified as a targeted therapy for T-cell ALL in preclinical drug screening.

Study design

Primary purpose: Treatment
Allocation: Randomised
Intervention model: Parallel groups
Masking: None (open label)
Number of arms: 3

Arm	Type	Receives
Standard risk Arm A	Experimental	Drug: Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, DoxorubicinAny pediatric patients with newly diagnosed T-LBL Stage II to IV who achieve at least a PR at the end of Induction (EOI). Induction I followed by consolidation, Capizzi escalating methotrexate (interim maintenance) , delayed intensification and maintenance therapy. Triple intrathecal injections.
Standard risk Arm B	Experimental	Drug: Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, DoxorubicinAny pediatric patients with newly diagnosed T-LBL Stage II to IV who achieve at least a PR at the end of Induction (EOI). Induction I followed by consolidation, high dose methotrexate (interim maintenance) , delayed intensification and maintenance therapy. Triple intrathecal injections.
High Risk T-LBL	Experimental	Drug: Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Vindesine, Etoposide, IfosfamideAny pediatric patients with newly diagnosed T-LBL Stage II to IV who fail to achieve at least a PR at the end of Induction (EOI). Induction I followed by 6 intensive polychemotherapy blocks (HR1'-HR2'-HR3'-HR1'-HR2'-HR3'), deIayed intensification, and maintenance therapy. Triple intrathecal injections.

Who may qualify

Ages: 12 months to 18 years
Sex: All
Healthy volunteers: Not accepted
Age groups: Child, Adult

Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)

Newly diagnosed T-lineage lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) Stage II-IV

Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)

Patients with Down syndrome or primary immune comprised disease.
Ph+ T-LBL
Patients must not have received any prior cytotoxic chemotherapy
Any steroids pretreatment for > 5 days in the 7 days or for >14 days in the 28 days before the initiation of Induction chemotherapy. The dose of prednisone or methylprednisone pretreatment does not affect eligibility. Any steroids exposure that occurred > 28 days before the initiation of Induction chemotherapy is allowed. Inhalation and topical steroids are not considered pretreatment. A single dose of vincristine is allowed.

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Intervention	Type	Arms
Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, DoxorubicinStandard risk Arm A: Induction I followed by Consolidation, extracompartmental Capizzi MTX, delayed intensification and 96 weeks' maintenance therapy. Twenty-one or twenty-six triple intrathecal injections for CNS negative or positive patients, respectively.	Drug	Standard risk Arm A
Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, DoxorubicinStandard risk Arm B: Induction I followed by Consolidation, extracompartmental high dose MTX, delayed intensification and 96 weeks' maintenance therapy. Twenty-one or twenty-six triple intrathecal injections for CNS negative or positive patients, respectively.	Drug	Standard risk Arm B
Prednisone,Vincristine, Pegylated-asparaginase, Bortezomib,Cytarabine, Cyclophosphamide, Daunorubicin, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, Dexamethasone, Doxorubicin, Vindesine, Etoposide, IfosfamideHigh Risk T-LBL: Induction I followed by 2 cycles of BFM HR Blocks, delayed intensification and 96 weeks' maintenance therapy. Twenty-four or twenty-eight triple intrathecal injections for CNS negative or positive patients, respectively.	Drug	High Risk T-LBL

Primary outcome

Event free survival for standard risk patients
Time frame: 4 years
To determine the EFS in patients with newly diagnosed standard T-LBL, through randomization, the modified COG ABFM regimen with CMTX to the regimen with HD MTX
Event free survival according to bone marrow MDD
Time frame: 4 years
After using the modified COG ABFM regimen, to validate whether bone marrow MDD by Flow at diagnosis is still a prognostic factor for pediatric patients newly diagnosed with T-LBL
Event free survival for high risk patients
Time frame: 4 years
To determine the EFS in patients with induction failure who become complete or partial response after using 3 HR BFM Blocks and continue chemotherapy on 3 HR BFM Blocks followed by delayed intensification and maintenance therapy.

Results and safety

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

Research links

Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2026.
Results publication: PubMed 19433688Burkhardt B, Reiter A, Landmann E, Lang P, Lassay L, Dickerhoff R, Lakomek M, Henze G, von Stackelberg A. Poor outcome for children and adolescents with progressive disease or relapse of lymphoblastic lymphoma: a report from the berlin-frankfurt-muenster group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 10;27(20):3363-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3367. Epub 2009 May 11.
Results publication: PubMed 16421426Burkhardt B, Woessmann W, Zimmermann M, Kontny U, Vormoor J, Doerffel W, Mann G, Henze G, Niggli F, Ludwig WD, Janssen D, Riehm H, Schrappe M, Reiter A. Impact of cranial radiotherapy on central nervous system prophylaxis in children and adolescents with central nervous system-negative stage III or IV lymphoblastic lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):491-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.2707.
Results publication: PubMed 30138085Winter SS, Dunsmore KP, Devidas M, Wood BL, Esiashvili N, Chen Z, Eisenberg N, Briegel N, Hayashi RJ, Gastier-Foster JM, Carroll AJ, Heerema NA, Asselin BL, Gaynon PS, Borowitz MJ, Loh ML, Rabin KR, Raetz EA, Zweidler-Mckay PA, Winick NJ, Carroll WL, Hunger SP. Improved Survival for Children and Young Adults With T-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results From the Children's Oncology Group AALL0434 Methotrexate Randomization. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 10;36(29):2926-2934. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.7250. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
Results publication: PubMed 21474675Asselin BL, Devidas M, Wang C, Pullen J, Borowitz MJ, Hutchison R, Lipshultz SE, Camitta BM. Effectiveness of high-dose methotrexate in T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia and advanced-stage lymphoblastic lymphoma: a randomized study by the Children's Oncology Group (POG 9404). Blood. 2011 Jul 28;118(4):874-83. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-292615. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
Results publication: PubMed 23889312Termuhlen AM, Smith LM, Perkins SL, Lones M, Finlay JL, Weinstein H, Gross TG, Abromowitch M. Disseminated lymphoblastic lymphoma in children and adolescents: results of the COG A5971 trial: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Br J Haematol. 2013 Sep;162(6):792-801. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12460. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
Results publication: PubMed 19546402Coustan-Smith E, Sandlund JT, Perkins SL, Chen H, Chang M, Abromowitch M, Campana D. Minimal disseminated disease in childhood T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma: a report from the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jul 20;27(21):3533-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.1318. Epub 2009 Jun 22.
Results publication: PubMed 32552472Hayashi RJ, Winter SS, Dunsmore KP, Devidas M, Chen Z, Wood BL, Hermiston ML, Teachey DT, Perkins SL, Miles RR, Raetz EA, Loh ML, Winick NJ, Carroll WL, Hunger SP, Lim MS, Gross TG, Bollard CM. Successful Outcomes of Newly Diagnosed T Lymphoblastic Lymphoma: Results From Children's Oncology Group AALL0434. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):3062-3070. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00531. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
Results publication: PubMed 30957229Horton TM, Whitlock JA, Lu X, O'Brien MM, Borowitz MJ, Devidas M, Raetz EA, Brown PA, Carroll WL, Hunger SP. Bortezomib reinduction chemotherapy in high-risk ALL in first relapse: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Br J Haematol. 2019 Jul;186(2):274-285. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15919. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
Results publication: PubMed 35271306Teachey DT, Devidas M, Wood BL, Chen Z, Hayashi RJ, Hermiston ML, Annett RD, Archer JH, Asselin BL, August KJ, Cho SY, Dunsmore KP, Fisher BT, Freedman JL, Galardy PJ, Harker-Murray P, Horton TM, Jaju AI, Lam A, Messinger YH, Miles RR, Okada M, Patel SI, Schafer ES, Schechter T, Singh N, Steele AC, Sulis ML, Vargas SL, Winter SS, Wood C, Zweidler-McKay P, Bollard CM, Loh ML, Hunger SP, Raetz EA. Children's Oncology Group Trial AALL1231: A Phase III Clinical Trial Testing Bortezomib in Newly Diagnosed T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;40(19):2106-2118. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02678. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Results publication: PubMed 25940716Rosolen A, Perkins SL, Pinkerton CR, Guillerman RP, Sandlund JT, Patte C, Reiter A, Cairo MS. Revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Staging System. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 20;33(18):2112-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7203. Epub 2015 May 4.
Results publication: PubMed 25940725Sandlund JT, Guillerman RP, Perkins SL, Pinkerton CR, Rosolen A, Patte C, Reiter A, Cairo MS. International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Response Criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 20;33(18):2106-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.0745. Epub 2015 May 4.
Results publication: PubMed 25382494Bhojwani D, McCarville MB, Choi JK, Sawyer J, Metzger ML, Inaba H, Davidoff AM, Gold R, Shulkin BL, Sandlund JT. The role of FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of residual disease in paediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2015 Mar;168(6):845-53. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13219. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

Related trials for T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

RecruitingPhase 1
Anti-CRLF2-R/TSLPR Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (TSLPR-CART) in Participants With Recurrent or Refractory CRLF2-R/TSLPR-Overexpressing B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL)
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
Autologous T Cells Transduced With Retroviral Vectors Expressing TCRs for Participant-specific Neoantigens in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies
Malignancy, Hematologic, Neoplasms, Hematologic
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Addition of an Anti-cancer Drug, Lenalidomide, to the Usual Combination Chemotherapy Treatment ("EPOCH") for Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma (ATLL)
Acute Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Pharmacokinetic Study of Venetoclax Tablets Crushed and Dissolved Into a Solution
Hematologic Malignancy, Leukemia

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.

Yi-Jin Gao, M.D. contact

0086-21-38087513

gaoyijin@scmc.com.cn

Qing Quan, M.D contact

yuanqing@scmc.com.cn

Yi-Jin Gao, MD principal investigator

Shanghai Children's Medical Center

2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yi-Jin Gao, M.D. (0086-21-38087513, gaoyijin@scmc.com.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Event free survival for standard risk patients (time frame: 4 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05681260, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2026.