Moderate Asthma ExacerbationEOLENCT05691218
Early High-flow Oxygen Therapy With nebuLized Beta-2-agonist Using a Vibrating Mesh for the Management of Moderate to Severe Asthma Exacerbation in the Emergency Department
A study testing Standard Nebulization, A - Vibrating mesh nebulization and B - Vibrating mesh nebulisation and high-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen in people with Moderate Asthma Exacerbation and Severe Asthma Exacerbation, run by Poitiers University Hospital at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Acute exacerbation of asthma represents an acute or sub-acute worsening in symptoms and lung function in patients with asthma. It is characterized by a progressive increase in symptoms of shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, or chest tightness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Moderate Asthma Exacerbation, Severe Asthma Exacerbation
- What is being tested?
- Standard Nebulization, A - Vibrating mesh nebulization and B - Vibrating mesh nebulisation and high-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 19 Feb 2024to 19 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age equal or over 18 years
- admitted in an Emergency Department with a clinical suspicion of acute exacerbation of asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria.
- with at least one of the following criteria 60mn after a first treatment by beta-2 agonist adrenergic nebulization with 3 x 5 mg of terbutaline:
- Respiratory rate over 22 breaths/min
- Peak flow < 50% of predictive normal value
- SpO2 < 95% in room air
Show all 11Show fewer
- Signs of severe asthma exacerbation (at least one criteria):
- Talks in word, Agitation, Sits hunched forwards, Accessory muscles in use
- Free subject, without guardianship or curatorship or subordination
- Patients benefiting from a Social Security scheme or benefiting from it through a third party
- Informed consent signed by the patient after clear and honest information about the study
Who cannot join
- Acute exacerbation of asthma during the last 30 days
- Clinical suspicion of acute exacerbation of asthma due to anaphylaxis, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumonia or atelectasis.
- At least ONE of the following serious signs: drowsiness, confusion, auscultatory silence
- Clinical suspicion of another pathology that could explain the respiratory failure such as heart failure, laryngeal obstruction, pulmonary embolism, etc
- Patients with neurological (Glasgow < 13) or hemodynamical failure (Mean Arterial Pressure < 65 mmHg)
- contraindication to treatment with a beta-2-adrenergic agonist
Show all 10Show fewer
- History of hypersensitivity (allergy) to terbutaline or any of the constituents
- Contraindication to OHD
- Persons benefiting from enhanced protection, namely minors, persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, people assessed GIR1 or GIR 2 (AGGIR grid), adults under legal protection
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women, Women at age to procreate and not using effective contraception
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital of Poitiers
Poitiers, France, 86021
Nicolas MARJANOVIC, MD PHD, 0549441873 ext. +33, nicolas.marjanovic@chu-poitiers.fr
Sabrina SEGUIN, CRA, 0549443229 ext. +33, sabrina.seguin@chu-poitiers.fr
About this study
Acute exacerbation of asthma represents an acute or sub-acute worsening in symptoms and lung function in patients with asthma. It is characterized by a progressive increase in symptoms of shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, or chest tightness. It is a common diagnosis in patients admitted in an Emergency Department for dyspnoea. Near 10 to 15% of respiratory symptoms in an ED are related to acute exacerbation of asthma.
Treatment of acute exacerbation of asthma associates nebulized beta-2 agonist adrenergic with or without ipratropium bromide, oral corticosteroids and controlled oxygen therapy to maintain SpO2 between 93 and 95%. Treatment in the ED did not vary during last years, including for patients with a lack of efficacy after first line treatment, and exacerbation are always associated with a hospitalisation in 40% of adult patients and with mortality in 1% of hospitalized patients.
Read more
Vibrating mesh nebulizers are devices using vibration to push drug through the mesh, resulting in the drug nebulization. Vibrating mesh nebulizers have been associated with better pulmonary drug delivery than jet-nebulizers, provide faster improvement in peak expiratory flow and have been associated in retrospective studies with patient prognosis, particularly in terms of throughput time and need for hospitalisation. However, no studies have prospectively compared nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device with standard nebulisation in patients with asthma exacerbation on clinically relevant criteria. Nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device may potentiate the clinical efficacy of short-acting bronchodilators, result in faster and more effective clinical improvement, and be associated with improved short- and medium-term patient outcomes.
High-flow nasal cannula heated, and humidified oxygen (HNFO) is a ventilatory support which is commonly used for the management of acute respiratory failure for acute respiratory failure in intensive care units and in emergency departments. HFNO delivers high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), generates a low level of positive pressure and provides washout of dead space in the upper airways, thereby improving mechanical pulmonary properties and unloading inspiratory muscles during ARF. Consequently, HFNO is associated with a decrease in the work of breathing. During asthma exacerbation, HFNO was associated with an improvement in the dyspnea level and in the respiratory rate compared with conventional oxygen therapy. However, HFNO has never been assessed in association with nebulized beta-2 adrenergic agonist.
To resume, beta-2 adrenergic agonist nebulization with a vibrating mesh nebulizer seems effective, especially compared to standard jet nebulization. In addition, HFNO is a technique that appears to be suitable for the pathophysiological conditions of chronic reversible respiratory failure, and can be used during exacerbations of asthmatic disease. The high flow rate of gas makes it possible to control the FiO2 in order to avoid hyperoxia, to generate a PEEP effect, to reduce the patient's work of breathing and the respiratory resistance, and to avoid the re-inhalation of CO2 by a dead space wash-out.
In the EOLE study, the investigators propose to compare three therapeutic management strategies. One standard strategy (nebulisation with a jet-nebulizer), and two experimental strategies (nebulisation with a vibrating mesh device, and nebulisation with a vibrating mesh device in association with HFNO).
The investigators hypothesise that bronchodilator nebulization with a vibrating mesh nebulizer is more effective than jet-nebulizers for the management of patients admitted for asthma exacerbation and non-responders or with lack to efficacy to initial treatment. Furthermore, the investigators also hypothesise that the addition of the physiological effects of HFNO may enhance the efficacy of the treatment.
The therapeutic effects of nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device alone or with the addition of the physiological effects of HFNO could constitute a new approach to the management of asthma patients, particularly in patients who are insufficiently responsive or non-respondent to initial treatment.
- Being tested
- Standard Nebulization, A - Vibrating mesh nebulization, B - Vibrating mesh nebulisation and high-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Standard NebulizationDevice
Beta-2 adrenergic agonist administred by standrad nebulization
A - Vibrating mesh nebulizationDevice
Beta-2 adrenergic agonist nebulisation using a vibrating mesh nebuliser device (Aerogen, Galway, Ireland). Nebulisation will take place under medical air at 6L/min or medical O2 at 6L/min depending on the patient's needs and for a SpO2 target between 94-96%
B - Vibrating mesh nebulisation and high-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygenDevice
High-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen (HFNO) and nebulisation of beta-adrenergic agonist using a vibrating mesh device.
HFNO will be administered using an Airvo2 device and beta-2 adrenergic agonist nebulisation enabled by the use of a dedicated heated humidifier and an adaptable vibrating mesh nebuliser device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control - Standard Nebulization | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Standard Nebulization |
| A-Vibrating mesh Nebulization | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: A - Vibrating mesh nebulization |
| B-Vibrating mesh Nebulization and High-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: B - Vibrating mesh nebulisation and high-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of responding patients one hour after inclusion
A responding patient is defined by a patient responding to all the following criteria :
- Respiratory rate ≤ 22 ventilations /minutes
- Peak flow > 60% of theorics
- SpO2 ≥ 95% in room air
- Absence of clinical signs related with severe exacerbation of asthma
Measured: 1 hour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jan 2023
- Study start19 Feb 2024
- Primary completion19 Feb 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion19 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Moderate Asthma ExacerbationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Poitiers University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nicolas MARJANOVIC, MD PHD, Principal investigator, CHU Poitiers
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05691218
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EOLE
- Acronym
- EOLE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early High-flow Oxygen Therapy With nebuLized Beta-2-agonist Using a Vibrating Mesh for the Management of Moderate to Severe Asthma Exacerbation in the Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05691218
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EOLE / EOLE
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Poitiers University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Feb 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 19 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute exacerbation of asthma represents an acute or sub-acute worsening in symptoms and lung function in patients with asthma. It is characterized by a progressive increase in symptoms of shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, or chest tightness. It is a common diagnosis in patients admitted in an Emergency Department for dyspnoea. Near 10 to 15% of respiratory symptoms in an ED are related to acute exacerbation of asthma.
Treatment of acute exacerbation of asthma associates nebulized beta-2 agonist adrenergic with or without ipratropium bromide, oral corticosteroids and controlled oxygen therapy to maintain SpO2 between 93 and 95%. Treatment in the ED did not vary during last years, including for patients with a lack of efficacy after first line treatment, and exacerbation are always associated with a hospitalisation in 40% of adult patients and with mortality in 1% of hospitalized patients.
Vibrating mesh nebulizers are devices using vibration to push drug through the mesh, resulting in the drug nebulization. Vibrating mesh nebulizers have been associated with better pulmonary drug delivery than jet-nebulizers, provide faster improvement in peak expiratory flow and have been associated in retrospective studies with patient prognosis, particularly in terms of throughput time and need for hospitalisation. However, no studies have prospectively compared nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device with standard nebulisation in patients with asthma exacerbation on clinically relevant criteria. Nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device may potentiate the clinical efficacy of short-acting bronchodilators, result in faster and more effective clinical improvement, and be associated with improved short- and medium-term patient outcomes.
High-flow nasal cannula heated, and humidified oxygen (HNFO) is a ventilatory support which is commonly used for the management of acute respiratory failure for acute respiratory failure in intensive care units and in emergency departments. HFNO delivers high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), generates a low level of positive pressure and provides washout of dead space in the upper airways, thereby improving mechanical pulmonary properties and unloading inspiratory muscles during ARF. Consequently, HFNO is associated with a decrease in the work of breathing. During asthma exacerbation, HFNO was associated with an improvement in the dyspnea level and in the respiratory rate compared with conventional oxygen therapy. However, HFNO has never been assessed in association with nebulized beta-2 adrenergic agonist.
To resume, beta-2 adrenergic agonist nebulization with a vibrating mesh nebulizer seems effective, especially compared to standard jet nebulization. In addition, HFNO is a technique that appears to be suitable for the pathophysiological conditions of chronic reversible respiratory failure, and can be used during exacerbations of asthmatic disease. The high flow rate of gas makes it possible to control the FiO2 in order to avoid hyperoxia, to generate a PEEP effect, to reduce the patient's work of breathing and the respiratory resistance, and to avoid the re-inhalation of CO2 by a dead space wash-out.
In the EOLE study, the investigators propose to compare three therapeutic management strategies. One standard strategy (nebulisation with a jet-nebulizer), and two experimental strategies (nebulisation with a vibrating mesh device, and nebulisation with a vibrating mesh device in association with HFNO).
The investigators hypothesise that bronchodilator nebulization with a vibrating mesh nebulizer is more effective than jet-nebulizers for the management of patients admitted for asthma exacerbation and non-responders or with lack to efficacy to initial treatment. Furthermore, the investigators also hypothesise that the addition of the physiological effects of HFNO may enhance the efficacy of the treatment.
The therapeutic effects of nebulisation with a vibrating membrane device alone or with the addition of the physiological effects of HFNO could constitute a new approach to the management of asthma patients, particularly in patients who are insufficiently responsive or non-respondent to initial treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control - Standard Nebulization | Active comparator | Device: Standard Nebulization |
| A-Vibrating mesh Nebulization | Experimental | Device: A - Vibrating mesh nebulization |
| B-Vibrating mesh Nebulization and High-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen | Experimental | Device: B - Vibrating mesh nebulisation and high-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Age equal or over 18 years
- admitted in an Emergency Department with a clinical suspicion of acute exacerbation of asthma according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria.
- with at least one of the following criteria 60mn after a first treatment by beta-2 agonist adrenergic nebulization with 3 x 5 mg of terbutaline:
- Talks in word, Agitation, Sits hunched forwards, Accessory muscles in use
- Free subject, without guardianship or curatorship or subordination
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Acute exacerbation of asthma during the last 30 days
- Clinical suspicion of acute exacerbation of asthma due to anaphylaxis, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, pneumonia or atelectasis.
- At least ONE of the following serious signs: drowsiness, confusion, auscultatory silence
- Clinical suspicion of another pathology that could explain the respiratory failure such as heart failure, laryngeal obstruction, pulmonary embolism, etc
- Patients with neurological (Glasgow < 13) or hemodynamical failure (Mean Arterial Pressure < 65 mmHg)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Standard NebulizationBeta-2 adrenergic agonist administred by standrad nebulization | Device | Control - Standard Nebulization |
| A - Vibrating mesh nebulizationBeta-2 adrenergic agonist nebulisation using a vibrating mesh nebuliser device (Aerogen, Galway, Ireland). Nebulisation will take place under medical air at 6L/min or medical O2 at 6L/min depending on the patient's needs and for a SpO2 target between 94-96% | Device | A-Vibrating mesh Nebulization |
| B - Vibrating mesh nebulisation and high-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygenHigh-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen (HFNO) and nebulisation of beta-adrenergic agonist using a vibrating mesh device. HFNO will be administered using an Airvo2 device and beta-2 adrenergic agonist nebulisation enabled by the use of a dedicated heated humidifier and an adaptable vibrating mesh nebuliser device | Device | B-Vibrating mesh Nebulization and High-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen |
Primary outcome
Number of responding patients one hour after inclusion
Time frame: 1 hour
A responding patient is defined by a patient responding to all the following criteria : * Respiratory rate ≤ 22 ventilations /minutes * Peak flow > 60% of theorics * SpO2 ≥ 95% in room air * Absence of clinical signs related with severe exacerbation of asthma
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2026.
Related trials for Moderate Asthma Exacerbation
RecruitingPhase 2
Nebulized Ketamine Plus Standard Care vs. Standard Care Alone in Moderate to Severe Asthma Exacerbations
Asthma Acute, Asthma Attack
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Anakinra Rescue Treatment for Moderate Asthma Attacks (ARTMA)
Asthma (Diagnosis), Persistent Asthma
Recruiting
Blood Eosinophil Guided Versus Usual Care In The Management Of Mild To Moderate Asthma at Primary Care (BEAM)
Asthma Exacerbations, Biomarkers / Blood
Not yet recruiting
Improving the Quality of Care for Asthma Patients at Risk of Exacerbations
Asthma, Asthma Chronic
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Timely Administration of IV Magnesium Sulfate in Patients With a Moderate Asthma Exacerbation
Asthma in Children, Asthma Attack
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nicolas MARJANOVIC, MD PHD principal investigator
CHU Poitiers
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Standard Nebulization, A - Vibrating mesh nebulization and B - Vibrating mesh nebulisation and high-flow nasal cannula heated and humidified oxygen in people with Moderate Asthma Exacerbation and Severe Asthma Exacerbation, run by Poitiers University Hospital at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nicolas MARJANOVIC, MD PHD (0549441873 ext. +33, nicolas.marjanovic@chu-poitiers.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of responding patients one hour after inclusion (time frame: 1 hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.