DrivePhase 3NCT05696353
Teen Driving Translation Study (NIH)
A Phase 3 study testing Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Training and Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Training in people with Drive and Recidivism, run by Ginger Yang at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To translate our evidence-based, parent-engagement safe teen driving intervention to a high-risk, rural and urban teen drivers with a traffic violation, and to test the implementation, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the proposed intervention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 18 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Drive, Recidivism, Communication
- What is being tested?
- Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Training and Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 588 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Nov 2022to 30 Jun 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 18 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Teen must be 16 or 17 years old at the time of the moving-related violation
- Teen must be found guilty of committing the violation
- Teen must possess a valid Ohio provisional driver's license and proof of car insurance
- Teen must have access to a vehicle with an On-board Diagnostics II system port (i.e., cars made after 1996) in which they are the primary driver
- Teen must have a smart phone with Bluetooth capabilities
Who cannot join
- Teen is unable to drive due to injury, has a suspended driver's license, and/or car damage
- Teen has previously received a traffic citation
- Vehicle already has an in-vehicle driving feedback system installed
- Teen has non-English speaking parents
- Teen is currently enrolled in another driving-related study
- Teen is a ward of the State
Show all 9Show fewer
- Adults unable to consent
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43205
About this study
Official title: Adoption and Implementation of an Evidence-based Safe Driving Program for High-Risk Teen Drivers
To translate our evidence-based, parent-engagement safe teen driving intervention to a high-risk, rural and urban teen drivers with a traffic violation, and to test the implementation, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the proposed intervention.
Read the detailed description
For this study, 290 teen and parent/guardian dyads will be randomized into one of three study groups for 12 months with 6 months of active data collection. Teens will be aged 16-17 who committed a moving-related traffic violation and their parent/legal guardian who is most involved with their driving. Dyads will be recruited from both urban and rural counties in Ohio following the teen's moving violation conviction. The study will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention on teens' risky driving events, unsafe driving behaviors, traffic violation recidivism, and motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), as well as frequency and quality of parent-teen communications about safe driving practices. Additionally, the study will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the peer-delivered intervention vs. expert-delivered intervention on the outcomes of the interest. Finally, the study will assess the barriers/facilitators to the adoption and implementation of the intervention in rural and urban families.
- Conditions
- Drive, Recidivism, Communication, Feedback, Psychological
- Being tested
- In-vehicle Device, Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Training, Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Training
- Medical subject headings
- Recidivism, Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
In-vehicle DeviceCombination product
Also called Azuga Device, In-vehicle Driving Feedback Technology
The Azūga™ in-vehicle driving feedback technology, which consists of a pager-sized device plugged into the vehicle's on-board diagnostic port (installed in the teen's car) and a smart phone app (downloaded on the teen's smart phone), will be installed/downloaded. Three types of feedback will be provided to intervention teens: 1) Direct audio feedback from the installed device; 2) Detailed cumulative driving data via the smart phone app and study website; 3) A customized biweekly driving summary report via study website; and 4) Push notification on the phone screen when a trip ends.
Expert-Delivered Parent Communication TrainingBehavioural
Also called Expert-Delivered Parent Training, Steering Teens Safe (Expert), Expert-Delivered Motivational Interviewing Training
An individualized virtual training in communication strategies about teen driving safety along with a booster session will be delivered by a traffic safety communication specialist to parents in the Feedback and Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group. Intervention parents in this group will also be provided with access to an online parent-teen safe driving communication guide.
Peer-Delivered Parent Communication TrainingBehavioural
Also called Peer-Delivered Parent Training, Steering Teens Safe (Peer), Peer-Delivered Motivational Interviewing Training
An individualized virtual training in communication strategies about teen driving safety along with a booster session will be delivered by a peer trainer who is a parent of teen with traffic citation and has participated in the Feedback and Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group. Intervention parents in this group will also be provided with access to an online parent-teen safe driving communication guide.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | The Control Group will have an in-vehicle device installed in the teen's car, but all feedback features will be disabled. Parents assigned into this group will receive no communication training on how to motivate their teen to adopt safe driving habits. |
| Feedback and Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group | Experimental | Teens will have an in-vehicle device installed in their car and the smart phone app downloaded on their smart phone. Teens will receive real-time and cumulative driving feedback generated by the in-vehicle device and app; parents will have access to their teen's cumulative driving data at any time via study web portal. Parents will also receive communication training on how to motivate their teen to adopt safe driving habits via online modules and a video call with a teen driving safety communication expert. A second booster session will occur two months after the initial training. Both teens and parents will also receive a biweekly summary report of the teen's driving events prepared by the research team. Receives: Combination Product: In-vehicle Device; Behavioral: Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Training |
| Feedback and Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group | Experimental | Teens will have an in-vehicle device installed in their car and the smart phone app download on their smart phone. Teens will receive real-time and cumulative driving feedback generated by the in-vehicle device and app; parents will have access to their teen's cumulative driving data at any time via study web portal. Parents will also receive communication training on how to motivate their teen to adopt safe driving habits via online modules and a video call with a peer trainer who is a parent of teen with a traffic violation and who has received the Expert-delivered Intervention and met the defined peer trainer criteria. A second booster session delivered by the peer trainer will also occur two months after the initial training. Both teens and parents will also receive a biweekly summary report of the teen's driving events prepared by the research team. Receives: Combination Product: In-vehicle Device; Behavioral: Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Risky Driving Events
Risky driving events are continuously monitored for teens across all three groups using an in-vehicle device and smartphone app. The system automatically detects and records driving events, including hard braking (≤ -0.45 g-force) sudden acceleration (> 0.35 g-force), speeding (>10 miles over the posted speed limit), and speed >75 mph. Event rates are calculated as the number of risky driving events per 1,000 miles driven.
Measured: Six months/study period
Unsafe Driving Behaviors
Unsafe driving behaviors among teens are continuously monitored across all three study groups using an in-vehicle device and a smartphone app. The system automatically records behaviors such as speeding, and seatbelt nonuse (for selected vehicle makes and model years only), as well as the distance traveled while these behaviors occur. Unsafe behavior rates are calculated as the number of miles involving an unsafe behavior per 1,000 miles driven. Survey data supplement these measures by capturing self-reported distracted driving and seatbelt use for vehicles that are not fully compatible with the in-vehicle device.
Measured: Six months/study period
Secondary outcomes (2)
Traffic Violation Recidivism
Recidivism is assessed by linking traffic citation and court disposition records to participants' driver's license numbers. Data collected include violation dates, types, and intervals between the index and subsequent violations.
Measured: Up to one-year post-study period
Parent-Teen Communication
Parent-teen communication is assessed using REDCap surveys. Teens and parents rate the frequency (0-3) and success (1-10) of discussions about 26 driving skills and safety principles from the past month. Frequency scores range from 0-78, with higher scores indicating more frequent communication, and quality scores are weighted averages expressed as percentages (1-100%), with higher scores indicating higher quality communication. Additionally, one voice-recorded conversation per survey is also coded by trained raters for active listening, OARS (i.e.,open questions, affirmations, reflective listening, and summary reflections) use solicitation of the teen's perspective, focus on behaviors, and emotional expression, with each behavior scored 0-3 to generate a summary quality score, with higher scores indicating higher quality communication.
Measured: At Baseline, Three months, and Six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2023
- Study start17 Nov 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DriveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Hybrid Type II
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 588 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ginger Yang
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Iowa, Ohio State University, University of Nebraska, Dayton Children's Hospital, Wright State University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Ginger Yang, Nationwide Children's Hospital
- Investigators
- Jingzhen (Ginger) Yang, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, Nationwide Children's Hospital - Center for Injury Research and Policy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05696353
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00001081
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Mar 2022
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified data used and/or analyzed during this study, along with detailed study protocol, are available from the PI, Dr. Jingzhen Yang, on reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.
Publications
Masten SV, Foss RD, Marshall SW. Graduated driver licensing and fatal crashes involving 16- to 19-year-old drivers. JAMA. 2011 Sep 14;306(10):1098-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1277.
PubMed 21917580Mayhew DR, Simpson HM, Pak A. Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Sep;35(5):683-91. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00047-7.
PubMed 12850069McCartt AT, Shabanova VI, Leaf WA. Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 May;35(3):311-20. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00006-4.
PubMed 12643948Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Fatality Facts: Teenagers 2015. Arlington (VA): The Institute; 2017
Rajalin S. The connection between risky driving and involvement in fatal accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 1994 Oct;26(5):555-62. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90017-5.
PubMed 7999200Summala H, Rajalin S, Radun I. Risky driving and recorded driving offences: a 24-year follow-up study. Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
PubMed 25171522Alver Y, Demirel MC, Mutlu MM. Interaction between socio-demographic characteristics: traffic rule violations and traffic crash history for young drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
PubMed 25019690Ayuso M, Guillen M, Alcaniz M. The impact of traffic violations on the estimated cost of traffic accidents with victims. Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):709-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.10.020. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
PubMed 20159098Factor R. The effect of traffic tickets on road traffic crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Mar;64:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
PubMed 24342150Gebers MA, Peck RC. Using traffic conviction correlates to identify high accident-risk drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Nov;35(6):903-12. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00098-2.
PubMed 12971925Goldenbeld C, Reurings M, Van Norden Y, Stipdonk H. Crash involvement of motor vehicles in relationship to the number and severity of traffic offenses. An exploratory analysis of Dutch traffic offenses and crash data. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):584-91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.743125.
PubMed 23859422Curry AE, Peek-Asa C, Hamann CJ, Mirman JH. Effectiveness of Parent-Focused Interventions to Increase Teen Driver Safety: A Critical Review. J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jul;57(1 Suppl):S6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.003.
PubMed 26112737Beck KH, Shattuck T, Raleigh R. Parental predictors of teen driving risk. Am J Health Behav. 2001 Jan-Feb;25(1):10-20. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.25.1.2.
PubMed 11289724Hartos J, Eitel P, Simons-Morton B. Parenting practices and adolescent risky driving: a three-month prospective study. Health Educ Behav. 2002 Apr;29(2):194-206. doi: 10.1177/109019810202900205.
PubMed 11942714Simons-Morton B. Parent involvement in novice teen driving: rationale, evidence of effects, and potential for enhancing graduated driver licensing effectiveness. J Safety Res. 2007;38(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.007. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
PubMed 17478190
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Adoption and Implementation of an Evidence-based Safe Driving Program for High-Risk Teen Drivers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05696353
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00001081
- Conditions
- Drive, Recidivism, Communication, Feedback, Psychological
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 588 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ginger YangUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Iowa, Ohio State University, University of Nebraska, Dayton Children's Hospital, Wright State University
- Study start
- 17 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To translate our evidence-based, parent-engagement safe teen driving intervention to a high-risk, rural and urban teen drivers with a traffic violation, and to test the implementation, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the proposed intervention.
Detailed description
For this study, 290 teen and parent/guardian dyads will be randomized into one of three study groups for 12 months with 6 months of active data collection. Teens will be aged 16-17 who committed a moving-related traffic violation and their parent/legal guardian who is most involved with their driving. Dyads will be recruited from both urban and rural counties in Ohio following the teen's moving violation conviction. The study will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention on teens' risky driving events, unsafe driving behaviors, traffic violation recidivism, and motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), as well as frequency and quality of parent-teen communications about safe driving practices. Additionally, the study will determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the peer-delivered intervention vs. expert-delivered intervention on the outcomes of the interest. Finally, the study will assess the barriers/facilitators to the adoption and implementation of the intervention in rural and urban families.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Hybrid Type II
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | –The Control Group will have an in-vehicle device installed in the teen's car, but all feedback features will be disabled. Parents assigned into this group will receive no communication training on how to motivate their teen to adopt safe driving habits. |
| Feedback and Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group | Experimental | Combination Product: In-vehicle Device, Behavioral: Expert-Delivered Parent Communication TrainingTeens will have an in-vehicle device installed in their car and the smart phone app downloaded on their smart phone. Teens will receive real-time and cumulative driving feedback generated by the in-vehicle device and app; parents will have access to their teen's cumulative driving data at any time via study web portal. Parents will also receive communication training on how to motivate their teen to adopt safe driving habits via online modules and a video call with a teen driving safety communication expert. A second booster session will occur two months after the initial training. Both teens and parents will also receive a biweekly summary report of the teen's driving events prepared by the research team. |
| Feedback and Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group | Experimental | Combination Product: In-vehicle Device, Behavioral: Peer-Delivered Parent Communication TrainingTeens will have an in-vehicle device installed in their car and the smart phone app download on their smart phone. Teens will receive real-time and cumulative driving feedback generated by the in-vehicle device and app; parents will have access to their teen's cumulative driving data at any time via study web portal. Parents will also receive communication training on how to motivate their teen to adopt safe driving habits via online modules and a video call with a peer trainer who is a parent of teen with a traffic violation and who has received the Expert-delivered Intervention and met the defined peer trainer criteria. A second booster session delivered by the peer trainer will also occur two months after the initial training. Both teens and parents will also receive a biweekly summary report of the teen's driving events prepared by the research team. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Teen must be 16 or 17 years old at the time of the moving-related violation
- Teen must be found guilty of committing the violation
- Teen must possess a valid Ohio provisional driver's license and proof of car insurance
- Teen must have access to a vehicle with an On-board Diagnostics II system port (i.e., cars made after 1996) in which they are the primary driver
- Teen must have a smart phone with Bluetooth capabilities
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Teen is unable to drive due to injury, has a suspended driver's license, and/or car damage
- Teen has previously received a traffic citation
- Vehicle already has an in-vehicle driving feedback system installed
- Teen has non-English speaking parents
- Teen is currently enrolled in another driving-related study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| In-vehicle DeviceAlso: Azuga Device, In-vehicle Driving Feedback TechnologyThe Azūga™ in-vehicle driving feedback technology, which consists of a pager-sized device plugged into the vehicle's on-board diagnostic port (installed in the teen's car) and a smart phone app (downloaded on the teen's smart phone), will be installed/downloaded. Three types of feedback will be provided to intervention teens: 1) Direct audio feedback from the installed device; 2) Detailed cumulative driving data via the smart phone app and study website; 3) A customized biweekly driving summary report via study website; and 4) Push notification on the phone screen when a trip ends. | Combination product | Feedback and Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group, Feedback and Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group |
| Expert-Delivered Parent Communication TrainingAlso: Expert-Delivered Parent Training, Steering Teens Safe (Expert), Expert-Delivered Motivational Interviewing TrainingAn individualized virtual training in communication strategies about teen driving safety along with a booster session will be delivered by a traffic safety communication specialist to parents in the Feedback and Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group. Intervention parents in this group will also be provided with access to an online parent-teen safe driving communication guide. | Behavioural | Feedback and Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group |
| Peer-Delivered Parent Communication TrainingAlso: Peer-Delivered Parent Training, Steering Teens Safe (Peer), Peer-Delivered Motivational Interviewing TrainingAn individualized virtual training in communication strategies about teen driving safety along with a booster session will be delivered by a peer trainer who is a parent of teen with traffic citation and has participated in the Feedback and Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group. Intervention parents in this group will also be provided with access to an online parent-teen safe driving communication guide. | Behavioural | Feedback and Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Risky Driving Events
Time frame: Six months/study period
Risky driving events are continuously monitored for teens across all three groups using an in-vehicle device and smartphone app. The system automatically detects and records driving events, including hard braking (≤ -0.45 g-force) sudden acceleration (> 0.35 g-force), speeding (>10 miles over the posted speed limit), and speed >75 mph. Event rates are calculated as the number of risky driving events per 1,000 miles driven.
Unsafe Driving Behaviors
Time frame: Six months/study period
Unsafe driving behaviors among teens are continuously monitored across all three study groups using an in-vehicle device and a smartphone app. The system automatically records behaviors such as speeding, and seatbelt nonuse (for selected vehicle makes and model years only), as well as the distance traveled while these behaviors occur. Unsafe behavior rates are calculated as the number of miles involving an unsafe behavior per 1,000 miles driven. Survey data supplement these measures by capturing self-reported distracted driving and seatbelt use for vehicles that are not fully compatible with the in-vehicle device.
2 secondary outcomes
Traffic Violation Recidivism
Time frame: Up to one-year post-study period
Parent-Teen Communication
Time frame: At Baseline, Three months, and Six months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 21917580Masten SV, Foss RD, Marshall SW. Graduated driver licensing and fatal crashes involving 16- to 19-year-old drivers. JAMA. 2011 Sep 14;306(10):1098-103. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1277.
- Background: PubMed 12850069Mayhew DR, Simpson HM, Pak A. Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Sep;35(5):683-91. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00047-7.
- Background: PubMed 12643948McCartt AT, Shabanova VI, Leaf WA. Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 May;35(3):311-20. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00006-4.
- BackgroundInsurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Fatality Facts: Teenagers 2015. Arlington (VA): The Institute; 2017
- Background: PubMed 7999200Rajalin S. The connection between risky driving and involvement in fatal accidents. Accid Anal Prev. 1994 Oct;26(5):555-62. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(94)90017-5.
- Background: PubMed 25171522Summala H, Rajalin S, Radun I. Risky driving and recorded driving offences: a 24-year follow-up study. Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
- Background: PubMed 25019690Alver Y, Demirel MC, Mutlu MM. Interaction between socio-demographic characteristics: traffic rule violations and traffic crash history for young drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
- Background: PubMed 20159098Ayuso M, Guillen M, Alcaniz M. The impact of traffic violations on the estimated cost of traffic accidents with victims. Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Mar;42(2):709-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.10.020. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
- Background: PubMed 24342150Factor R. The effect of traffic tickets on road traffic crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Mar;64:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.11.010. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
- Background: PubMed 12971925Gebers MA, Peck RC. Using traffic conviction correlates to identify high accident-risk drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 2003 Nov;35(6):903-12. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00098-2.
- Background: PubMed 23859422Goldenbeld C, Reurings M, Van Norden Y, Stipdonk H. Crash involvement of motor vehicles in relationship to the number and severity of traffic offenses. An exploratory analysis of Dutch traffic offenses and crash data. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):584-91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.743125.
- Background: PubMed 26112737Curry AE, Peek-Asa C, Hamann CJ, Mirman JH. Effectiveness of Parent-Focused Interventions to Increase Teen Driver Safety: A Critical Review. J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jul;57(1 Suppl):S6-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.003.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified data used and/or analyzed during this study, along with detailed study protocol, are available from the PI, Dr. Jingzhen Yang, on reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.
Related trials for Drive
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Apalutamide in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer Before Radical Prostatectomy
Prostate Adenocarcinoma, Stage IIB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingObservational study
AVEIR DR Coverage With Evidence Development (CED) Study
Cardiac Pacemaker, Arrythmia
Not yet recruiting
Dynamic, Real-world Learning, Innovative Mobility, and Versatile Exploration (DRIVE): Evaluating a Dose-matched Developmental Powered Mobility Intervention for Young Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Durvalumab in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy of Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
Small-cell Lung Cancer, Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Optimized Recruitment to Drive Equitable Research in Stroke, Empowering Decision-making (ORDERed)
Stroke, Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jingzhen (Ginger) Yang, PhD, MPH principal investigator
Nationwide Children's Hospital - Center for Injury Research and Policy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Expert-Delivered Parent Communication Training and Peer-Delivered Parent Communication Training in people with Drive and Recidivism, run by Ginger Yang at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Risky Driving Events (time frame: Six months/study period). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05696353, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026.