Heart FailureNCT05696990
3/7 Resistance Training Method in Cardiac Rehabilitation
A study testing 3/7 Resistance Training Method and 3X9 Resistance Training Method in people with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease, run by Université Libre de Bruxelles at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Aim of the clinical monocentric study is to assess the resistance training exercise intervention in patients with Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) and coronary artery disease that will best improve peak oxygen uptake (Peak Vo2) and leg strength (assessed Isokinetic). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- 3/7 Resistance Training Method and 3X9 Resistance Training Method
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 112 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 30 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Clinical Coronary artery diseases
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Who cannot join
- angina
- acutely decompensated heart failure
- electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia
- significant valvular disease
- orthopedic/neurologic disorders that limited exercise
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: 3/7 Resistance Training Method in Cardiac Rehabilitation of Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Aim of the clinical monocentric study is to assess the resistance training exercise intervention in patients with Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) and coronary artery disease that will best improve peak oxygen uptake (Peak Vo2) and leg strength (assessed Isokinetic). The investigators hypothesize that resistance training exercise with induced a high stress metabolic is more important exercise with induced than a lower stress metabolic.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- 3/7 Resistance Training Method, 3X9 Resistance Training Method
- Keywords
- cardiac rehabilitation, resistance training, strength training, exercise for older adults
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3/7 Resistance Training MethodOther
3/7 Resistance Training Method
3X9 Resistance Training MethodOther
3X9 Resistance Training Method
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 3/7 RT method | Experimental | perform interval- type endurance exercise at high intensity and resistance training with the 3/7 method Receives: Other: 3/7 Resistance Training Method |
| 3X9 RT method | Active comparator | perform interval- type endurance exercise at high intensity and resistance training with the 3X9 method Receives: Other: 3X9 Resistance Training Method |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Peak VO2 after 3 months
Change in Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) after three 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in strength knee extensor after 3 months
Change in strength knee extensor (60°/sec) after three months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Secondary outcomes (20)
Change in VE/VCO2 slope after 3 months
Change in ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2) slope at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in submaximal exercise capacity after 3 months
Submaximal exercise capacity will be measured using watts at the first ventilatory threshold (VT1)
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in workload maximal after 3 months
Change in workload max at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Body fat after 3 months
Change in Body fat at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in lean mass after 3 months
Change in lean mass at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in leg lean mass after 3 months
Change in leg lean mass at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in bone mass after 3 months
Change in bone mass at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Visceral adipose tissue after 3 months
Change in Visceral adipose tissue measure by Dual-energy X- ray absorptiometry (DEXA) at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in hand grip force after 3 months
Change in hand grip force on non dominant hand at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in ventilation metaboreflex function after 3 months
Change in ventilation during metaboreflex test at baseline and 3 months intervention (Briefly, the subject is asked to exercise with the non-dominant arm by performing two 5 min handgrip manoeu- vres reaching approximately 50% of pre-determined maximal con- traction, in random order, separated by a 30 min interval: one bout with circulatory occlusion during the last 10 s of exercise and the all 3 min recovery phase ('clamp session'). During the clamp session, forearm cuff inflation to 30 mmHg above systolic blood pressure from the last 10 s of exercise till the end of the 3 min recovery phase; after cuff inflation, the subject is instructed to relax. Ergore- ceptor sensitivity is quantified as the percentage of the ventilatory and haemodynamic response to exercise maintained by circulatory occlusion during the third minute compared with the third minute of basal recovery.)
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in diastolic blood pressure metaboreflex function after 3 months
Change in diastolic blood pressure during metaboreflex test at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in heart rate at rest after 3 months
Change in heart rate at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in resting heart rate variability at rest after 3 months
Change in resting heart rate variability at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change 30 s sit-to-stand after 3 months
Change 30 s sit-to-stand at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in isometric strength knee extensor after 3 months
Change in strength knee extensor (isometric) at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in 120°/sec strength knee extensor after 3 months
Change in strength knee extensor (120°/sec) at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in 180°/sec strength knee extensor after 3 months
Change in strength knee extensor (180°/sec) at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change strength knee extensor in leg extension after 3 months
Change in one repetition maximal in leg extensor machine at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in sub maximal strength knee extensor in leg extension after 3 months
Change in 10 repetitions maximal in leg extensor machine at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Change in heart rate recovery after 3 months
Change in heart rate recovery at baseline and 3 months intervention
Measured: Baseline and 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jan 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion1 Mar 2023
- Study completion30 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Université Libre de Bruxelles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexis Gillet, Université Libre de Bruxelles
- Investigators
- Alexis Gillet, Principal investigator, Université Libre de Bruxelles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05696990
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P2020/489
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 15 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Efficacy of a new strength training design: the 3/7 method. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 May;119(5):1093-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04099-5. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
PubMed 30756168Duchateau J, Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A. Strength Training: In Search of Optimal Strategies to Maximize Neuromuscular Performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2021 Jan;49(1):2-14. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000234.
PubMed 33044332
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- 3/7 Resistance Training Method in Cardiac Rehabilitation of Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05696990
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- P2020/489
- Conditions
- Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- cardiac rehabilitation, resistance training, strength training, exercise for older adults
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Université Libre de BruxellesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of the clinical monocentric study is to assess the resistance training exercise intervention in patients with Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) and coronary artery disease that will best improve peak oxygen uptake (Peak Vo2) and leg strength (assessed Isokinetic). The investigators hypothesize that resistance training exercise with induced a high stress metabolic is more important exercise with induced than a lower stress metabolic.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 3/7 RT method | Experimental | Other: 3/7 Resistance Training Methodperform interval- type endurance exercise at high intensity and resistance training with the 3/7 method |
| 3X9 RT method | Active comparator | Other: 3X9 Resistance Training Methodperform interval- type endurance exercise at high intensity and resistance training with the 3X9 method |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Clinical Coronary artery diseases
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- angina
- acutely decompensated heart failure
- electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia
- significant valvular disease
- orthopedic/neurologic disorders that limited exercise
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3/7 Resistance Training Method3/7 Resistance Training Method | Other | 3/7 RT method |
| 3X9 Resistance Training Method3X9 Resistance Training Method | Other | 3X9 RT method |
Primary outcome
Change in Peak VO2 after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Peak oxygen consumption (VO2) after three 3 months intervention
Change in strength knee extensor after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in strength knee extensor (60°/sec) after three months intervention
20 secondary outcomes
Change in VE/VCO2 slope after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in submaximal exercise capacity after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in workload maximal after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Body fat after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in lean mass after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in leg lean mass after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in bone mass after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in Visceral adipose tissue after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in hand grip force after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in ventilation metaboreflex function after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in diastolic blood pressure metaboreflex function after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in heart rate at rest after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in resting heart rate variability at rest after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change 30 s sit-to-stand after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in isometric strength knee extensor after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in 120°/sec strength knee extensor after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in 180°/sec strength knee extensor after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change strength knee extensor in leg extension after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in sub maximal strength knee extensor in leg extension after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Change in heart rate recovery after 3 months
Time frame: Baseline and 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 30756168Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A, Duchateau J. Efficacy of a new strength training design: the 3/7 method. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019 May;119(5):1093-1104. doi: 10.1007/s00421-019-04099-5. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 33044332Duchateau J, Stragier S, Baudry S, Carpentier A. Strength Training: In Search of Optimal Strategies to Maximize Neuromuscular Performance. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2021 Jan;49(1):2-14. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000234.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexis Gillet principal investigator
Université Libre de Bruxelles
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3/7 Resistance Training Method and 3X9 Resistance Training Method in people with Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease, run by Université Libre de Bruxelles at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Peak VO2 after 3 months (time frame: Baseline and 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05696990, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2024.