White Spot LesionNCT05710874
A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Study on the Effects of CPP-ACP-paste, Fluoride and a Combination on the Evolution of White Spot Lesions in Orthodontic Patients After Debonding.
A study testing CPP-ACP paste, CPP-ACPF paste and 1.25% fluoride gel in people with White Spot Lesion and Orthodontic Appliance Complication, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the influence of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), CPP-ACP in combination with fluoride (CPP-ACPF), high fluoride concentration, and conventional fluoride toothpaste on the color and size of white spot lesions (WSLs) in orthodontic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- White Spot Lesion, Orthodontic Appliance Complication
- What is being tested?
- CPP-ACP paste, CPP-ACPF paste and 1.25% fluoride gel
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 107 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 23 Sep 2016to 29 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances at the Ghent University Hospital who developed at least three WSLs at debonding were included. Informed consent had to be obtained from the patient, both verbally and written.
Who cannot join
- Patients were excluded from the study if enamel demineralization was already present before orthodontic treatment.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Study on the Effects of Casein Phosphopeptide Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Paste, Fluoride and a Combination on the Evolution of White Spot Lesions in Orthodontic Patients After Debonding.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the influence of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), CPP-ACP in combination with fluoride (CPP-ACPF), high fluoride concentration, and conventional fluoride toothpaste on the color and size of white spot lesions (WSLs) in orthodontic patients following bracket removal.
- Being tested
- CPP-ACP paste, CPP-ACPF paste, 1.25% fluoride gel, Conventional
- Keywords
- orthodontics, orthodontic brackets, dental caries, decalcification, caseins, fluorides
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Caries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CPP-ACP pasteOther
Daily application of CPP-ACP (Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate) paste (Tooth Mousse®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste.
CPP-ACPF pasteOther
Daily application of CPP-ACPF (Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate in combination with fluoridepaste) (MI Paste Plus®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste.
1.25% fluoride gelOther
Weekly application of 1.25% fluoride gel (Elmex Medical Gel®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste.
ConventionalOther
Twice daily use of conventional toothpaste.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CPP-ACP paste | Experimental | Daily application of CPP-ACP (Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate) paste (Tooth Mousse®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste. Receives: Other: CPP-ACP paste |
| CPP-ACPF paste | Experimental | Daily application of CPP-ACPF (Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate in combination with fluoride) paste (MI Paste Plus®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste.. Receives: Other: CPP-ACPF paste |
| 1.25% fluoride gel | Experimental | Weekly application of 1.25% fluoride gel (Elmex Medical Gel®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste. Receives: Other: 1.25% fluoride gel |
| Conventional | Placebo comparator | Twice daily use of conventional toothpaste. Receives: Other: Conventional |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evolution of the relative area of the white spot lesions
ImageJ® (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the relative area. In order to measure the relative area of the white spot lesions, the affected tooth was trimmed out of the original photo and the entire buccal surface was measured in absolute pixels. After this, the white spot lesion was outlined and measured in pixels.
Measured: The change in relative area between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) is measured.
Evolution of the relative area of the white spot lesions
ImageJ® (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the relative area. In order to measure the relative area of the white spot lesions, the affected tooth was trimmed out of the original photo and the entire buccal surface was measured in absolute pixels. After this, the white spot lesion was outlined and measured in pixels.
Measured: The change in relative area between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2) is measured. Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
Evolution of the Andersson Index of the white spot lesions
The Andersson Index (AI) was determined on the basis of the clinical pictures.
Measured: The change in Andersson Index between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) is measured.
Evolution of the Andersson Index of the white spot lesions
The Andersson Index (AI) was determined on the basis of the clinical pictures.
Measured: The change in Andersson Index between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2) is measured. Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Gingival Index
The Gingival Index is determined by the maximum score measured on the included teeth. Score 0 means no gingival inflammation and score 1 means gingival inflammation.
Measured: The Gingival Indexis measured at the end of orthodontic treatment (T0), at 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) and at 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2). Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
Plaque Index
The Gingival Index is determined by the maximum score measured on the included teeth. Score 0 means no plaque and score 1 means plaque.
Measured: The Plaque Index is measured at the end of orthodontic treatment (T0), at 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) and at 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2). Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
Patient's use of the tooth paste
According to the patient's use of toothpaste, a score 0 (hardly ever use toothpaste) or 1 (usually or always use toothpaste) is given.
Measured: The patient's use of the tooth paste is determined at 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) and at 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2). Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Feb 2023
- Study start23 Sep 2016
- Primary completion29 Mar 2023
- Study completion29 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for White Spot LesionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Ghent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Levine Gavel, Principal investigator, Postgraduate OrthodonticsValentina Elena Arevalo Cabrera, Principal investigator, Master Student Oral Health SciencesDeseyne Thomas, Principal investigator, Alumnus OrthodonticsGuy AM De Pauw, Study chair, Professor dr. in OrthodonticsNoëmi MC De Roo, Study chair, Doctorate in OrthodonticsLiesbeth Temmerman, Study chair, dr. in Orthodontics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05710874
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BC-01938
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 24 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Study on the Effects of Casein Phosphopeptide Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Paste, Fluoride and a Combination on the Evolution of White Spot Lesions in Orthodontic Patients After Debonding.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05710874
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BC-01938
- Keywords
- orthodontics, orthodontic brackets, dental caries, decalcification, caseins, fluorides
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GhentUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Sep 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the influence of casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), CPP-ACP in combination with fluoride (CPP-ACPF), high fluoride concentration, and conventional fluoride toothpaste on the color and size of white spot lesions (WSLs) in orthodontic patients following bracket removal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CPP-ACP paste | Experimental | Other: CPP-ACP pasteDaily application of CPP-ACP (Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate) paste (Tooth Mousse®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste. |
| CPP-ACPF paste | Experimental | Other: CPP-ACPF pasteDaily application of CPP-ACPF (Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate in combination with fluoride) paste (MI Paste Plus®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste.. |
| 1.25% fluoride gel | Experimental | Other: 1.25% fluoride gelWeekly application of 1.25% fluoride gel (Elmex Medical Gel®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste. |
| Conventional | Placebo comparator | Other: ConventionalTwice daily use of conventional toothpaste. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances at the Ghent University Hospital who developed at least three WSLs at debonding were included. Informed consent had to be obtained from the patient, both verbally and written.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients were excluded from the study if enamel demineralization was already present before orthodontic treatment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CPP-ACP pasteDaily application of CPP-ACP (Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate) paste (Tooth Mousse®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste. | Other | CPP-ACP paste |
| CPP-ACPF pasteDaily application of CPP-ACPF (Casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate in combination with fluoridepaste) (MI Paste Plus®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste. | Other | CPP-ACPF paste |
| 1.25% fluoride gelWeekly application of 1.25% fluoride gel (Elmex Medical Gel®) in addition to twice daily use of conventional toothpaste. | Other | 1.25% fluoride gel |
| ConventionalTwice daily use of conventional toothpaste. | Other | Conventional |
Primary outcome
Evolution of the relative area of the white spot lesions
Time frame: The change in relative area between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) is measured.
ImageJ® (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the relative area. In order to measure the relative area of the white spot lesions, the affected tooth was trimmed out of the original photo and the entire buccal surface was measured in absolute pixels. After this, the white spot lesion was outlined and measured in pixels.
Evolution of the relative area of the white spot lesions
Time frame: The change in relative area between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2) is measured. Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
ImageJ® (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to measure the relative area. In order to measure the relative area of the white spot lesions, the affected tooth was trimmed out of the original photo and the entire buccal surface was measured in absolute pixels. After this, the white spot lesion was outlined and measured in pixels.
Evolution of the Andersson Index of the white spot lesions
Time frame: The change in Andersson Index between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) is measured.
The Andersson Index (AI) was determined on the basis of the clinical pictures.
Evolution of the Andersson Index of the white spot lesions
Time frame: The change in Andersson Index between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2) is measured. Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
The Andersson Index (AI) was determined on the basis of the clinical pictures.
3 secondary outcomes
Gingival Index
Time frame: The Gingival Indexis measured at the end of orthodontic treatment (T0), at 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) and at 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2). Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
Plaque Index
Time frame: The Plaque Index is measured at the end of orthodontic treatment (T0), at 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) and at 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2). Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
Patient's use of the tooth paste
Time frame: The patient's use of the tooth paste is determined at 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) and at 4 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T2). Patients participate in the study for 4 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Aug 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for White Spot Lesion
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinical Examination in White Spot Lesions Detection, Identification, And Scoring
White Spot Lesion of Tooth
Recruiting
EFFICACY OF BIOMIN FLUORIDE VERSUS SODIUM FLUORIDE VARNISHES, WITH AND WITHOUT DIODE LASER ON WHITE SPOT LESIONS REMINERALIZATION IN PRIMARY TEETH.
White Spot Lesions [Initial Caries] on Smooth Surface of Tooth
Not yet recruiting
S-PRG Filler for Preventing White Spot Lesions During Orthodontic Treatment
White Spot Lesion of Tooth, Orthodontic Treatment
Recruiting
Clinical Investigation of the Performance of Epinamel for Dental White Spot Lesions
White Spot Lesions [Initial Caries] on Smooth Surface of Tooth
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Outcomes, Cost-Effectiveness and Patient Satisfaction of Two Resin Infiltration Systems for The Management of White Spot Lesions
White Spot Lesion of Tooth
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Levine Gavel principal investigator
Postgraduate Orthodontics
Valentina Elena Arevalo Cabrera principal investigator
Master Student Oral Health Sciences
Deseyne Thomas principal investigator
Alumnus Orthodontics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CPP-ACP paste, CPP-ACPF paste and 1.25% fluoride gel in people with White Spot Lesion and Orthodontic Appliance Complication, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evolution of the relative area of the white spot lesions (time frame: The change in relative area between the end of orthodontic treatment (T0) and 2 months after the end of orthodontic treatment (T1) is measured.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2023.