Cardiopulmonary ArrestNCT05712915
Extension of Rapid Response Team Operation Time and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Incidence
An observational study of Cardiopulmonary Arrest, run by Dong-A University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Although early rapid response team was reported as a full-time operating system, similar efficacy of part-time rapid response team has been recently reported. We sought to investigate the association between the duration of rapid response team operation time and the incidence of general ward cardiopulmonary… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiopulmonary Arrest
- What is being tested?
- RRT operation
- How many people
- 142,088 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 31 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients admitted to study hospital from April 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020
Who may be able to join
- Patients admitted to study hospital from April 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020
Who cannot join
- Patients who developed CPR in elsewhere not GW (ICU, emergency department, operation room, outpatient clinics, cardiac catheterization laboratory)
- younger than 18 years
- Patients admitted via the emergency department
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Extension of Rapid Response Team Operation Time and Incidence of General Ward Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Incidence; A Retrospective Observational Study
Although early rapid response team was reported as a full-time operating system, similar efficacy of part-time rapid response team has been recently reported. We sought to investigate the association between the duration of rapid response team operation time and the incidence of general ward cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Read the detailed description
Rapid response team (RRT) was introduced to reduce the preventable cardiac arrest in general wards and it has been spread worldwide. RRTs usually consist of dedicated intensivists in RRT and nurse specialists in critical care.
Although RRT implementation could useful, it is not suitable for all hospital circumstances because it is required high cost and plenty of experience in critical care settings. For this reason, to minimize the RRT operating cost, the part-time RRT operation was reported. Recently similar efficacy in part-time operation RRT was reported. However, it is difficult to compare full-time and part-time RRT and no study has been reported the efficacy according to the intensity of RRT operation time.
Authors invested the incidence of general ward cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to the RRT operation time; from the initial implementation to the full-time RRT operation after stepwise extension.
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary Arrest
- Being tested
- RRT operation
- Keywords
- cardiopulmonary arrest, rapid response team, operation time
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Arrest
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RRT operationOther
A retrospective observational study was conducted at a 990-bed tertiary care referral teaching hospital from April 2014 to December 2020. The RRT implemented in April 2017 as a part-time RRT operating 8 hours on weekdays. In March 2018, operation time was extended to 15 hours on weekdays and finally, extended to 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in February 2019.
Impact of RRT operation on CPR incidence was retrospective analyzed without any prospective intervention.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
General ward CPR incidence during period without RRT (rapid response team)
Measured: at the end of period of no RRT operation. (31th March, 2017)
General ward CPR incidence during period of part time RRT
Measured: at the end of part time RRT period (28th February, 2018)
General ward CPR incidence during period of extended part time RRT
Measured: at the end of extended part time RRT period (31st January, 2019)
General ward CPR incidence during period of full time RRT
Measured: at the end of full time RRT period (31th December, 2020)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2023
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiopulmonary ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 142,088 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dong-A University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dong Hyun Lee, Dong-A University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05712915
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RRT_CPR
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Extension of Rapid Response Team Operation Time and Incidence of General Ward Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Incidence; A Retrospective Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05712915
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RRT_CPR
- Conditions
- Cardiopulmonary Arrest
- Keywords
- cardiopulmonary arrest, rapid response team, operation time
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 142,088 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dong-A University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Although early rapid response team was reported as a full-time operating system, similar efficacy of part-time rapid response team has been recently reported. We sought to investigate the association between the duration of rapid response team operation time and the incidence of general ward cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Detailed description
Rapid response team (RRT) was introduced to reduce the preventable cardiac arrest in general wards and it has been spread worldwide. RRTs usually consist of dedicated intensivists in RRT and nurse specialists in critical care.
Although RRT implementation could useful, it is not suitable for all hospital circumstances because it is required high cost and plenty of experience in critical care settings. For this reason, to minimize the RRT operating cost, the part-time RRT operation was reported. Recently similar efficacy in part-time operation RRT was reported. However, it is difficult to compare full-time and part-time RRT and no study has been reported the efficacy according to the intensity of RRT operation time.
Authors invested the incidence of general ward cardiopulmonary resuscitation according to the RRT operation time; from the initial implementation to the full-time RRT operation after stepwise extension.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients admitted to study hospital from April 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients admitted to study hospital from April 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who developed CPR in elsewhere not GW (ICU, emergency department, operation room, outpatient clinics, cardiac catheterization laboratory)
- younger than 18 years
- Patients admitted via the emergency department
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RRT operationA retrospective observational study was conducted at a 990-bed tertiary care referral teaching hospital from April 2014 to December 2020. The RRT implemented in April 2017 as a part-time RRT operating 8 hours on weekdays. In March 2018, operation time was extended to 15 hours on weekdays and finally, extended to 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in February 2019. Impact of RRT operation on CPR incidence was retrospective analyzed without any prospective intervention. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
General ward CPR incidence during period without RRT (rapid response team)
Time frame: at the end of period of no RRT operation. (31th March, 2017)
General ward CPR incidence during period of part time RRT
Time frame: at the end of part time RRT period (28th February, 2018)
General ward CPR incidence during period of extended part time RRT
Time frame: at the end of extended part time RRT period (31st January, 2019)
General ward CPR incidence during period of full time RRT
Time frame: at the end of full time RRT period (31th December, 2020)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cardiopulmonary Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Execution of Prehospital Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)
Active, not recruiting
The REVIVE-PEEP Trial: Positive End-expiratory Pressure Versus Sham Valve/Zero End-expiratory Pressure in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Manual Ventilation to Improve Neurological Outcomes at Discharge in Adult Patients Suffering an Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital
Active, not recruiting
RACE-CARS - RAndomized Cluster Evaluation of Cardiac ARrest Systems
Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiac Arrest - Ultrasound Detection of Occult Perfusion
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital, Hypotension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cardiopulmonary Arrest, run by Dong-A University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
General ward CPR incidence during period without RRT (rapid response team) (time frame: at the end of period of no RRT operation. (31th March, 2017)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2023.