Knee OsteoarthritisNCT05714267
Effect of Noise Control During Total Knee Arthroplasty
A study testing Active noise cancelling, Passive noice cancelling and Active noise cancelling with music therapy in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Bezmialem Vakif University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Music has emerged as a well-received medical intervention. Patients may be uncomfortable during total joint replacement, which can result in high sedation requirements. These requirements put patients at risk of surgical stress. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Active noise cancelling, Passive noice cancelling and Active noise cancelling with music therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2021to 4 Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being between the ages of 18-80
- To participate in the research voluntarily,
- To be able to read and write Turkish,
- American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II,
- To have total knee arthroplasty surgery due to joint degeneration (gonarthrosis),
- Not using any medication that will affect anxiety,
- To be problem-free in terms of sensory perceptions and communication,
- The patient is conscious, oriented and cooperative.
Who cannot join
- Having a total knee replacement surgery due to an acquired physical trauma to the knee joint,
- Presence of diagnosed cancer in the patient.
- Being diagnosed with any psychiatric illness,
- Having previously undergone arthroplasty surgery (Revision arthroplasty).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Noise Control and Music Therapy on Anxiety, Vital Signs and Post-Operative Pain in Total Knee Prosthesis Surgery
Music has emerged as a well-received medical intervention. Patients may be uncomfortable during total joint replacement, which can result in high sedation requirements. These requirements put patients at risk of surgical stress. This study compares the effect of passive noise-cancellation versus active noise cancellation with music on pain, vital signs and anxiety during elective total knee replacement.
Read the detailed description
Unwanted sound that mixes with the sounds being listened to is defined as noise, and the sound community formed by the combination of many noise sources is defined as noise pollution. Environmental noise has many negative effects on human health, such as increasing stress and anxiety, causing the development of cerebral and cardiovascular diseases, and creating a risk of hearing loss.
Today, it is reported that noise pollution in hospitals has increased exponentially compared to previous years . It is reported that the noise is especially at high levels in the operating room units of hospitals and frequently exceeds both the 30 dBA (Decibel A) threshold determined by the World Health Organization and the American Occupational Safety and Health Administration standard. When we look at the studies in which the environmental noise in the operating room environment is examined, it is seen that the noise level varies between 80 and 119 dBA. These noise ranges are determined for both patient and employee health. is beyond the limits.
The noise that patients are exposed to in operating rooms can be caused by both healthcare workers and operating room equipment. Perioperative Nurses Association (AORN) created the "AORN Guide on Managing Distraction and Noise During Perioperative Patient Care" in 2014 to draw attention to the problem of loud noise in the operating room. According to this guideline, updated in 2020, noise is a risky situation that interrupts intraoperative care. For this reason, it is reported that noise should be prevented with an inter-team approach in order for effective care and treatment to continue. In the AORN report, it is reported that among the sources of noise are monitors, ventilators, air conditioning systems, telephones, pagers, surgical equipment, anesthesia devices, conversations within the team, and loud music. The methods used in surgeries and the choice of surgical instruments also affect noise levels. For this reason, it can be said that noise levels may change in surgeries performed with different instruments in different parts of the body. Especially in knee and hip replacement surgeries, when tools such as oscillator saws, hammers and surgical drills, which are used to shape the joint and replace the joint prosthesis, are used during the operation, it creates a higher noise compared to other surgeries. Simpson reported in their study that the noise level of the instruments used during knee and hip replacement surgery increased up to 105 decibels. While this noise level is equivalent to the noise heard while waiting next to a working helicopter, it is well above the thresholds recommended by NIOSH, OSHA and WHO.
It is reported that the negative effects of environmental noise during surgery on patients are controlled with sedative agents given to the patient during surgery. In addition, it is known that patients are made to listen to music to reduce the effect of environmental noise and to relax the patient. When the studies are examined, it is seen that there are limitations in both methods used. Listening to louder music so that the high-frequency sounds that occur during prosthetic surgeries are not heard by the patients can be another source of anxiety for the patients. Sedative opioid agents given to calm patients pose various risks, such as respiratory depression, death or permanent brain damage, and this is defined as a patient safety problem in the literature. Since the degeneration (arthrosis) of the knee joint will occur over the years, the patient population in need of prosthesis is generally geriatric. This situation causes the adverse risks of sedation on elderly patients to be much higher. The operating room nurse should take the necessary measures to reduce the stress, fear and anxiety of the patient who will undergo surgery. It is one of the independent roles of the nurse to ensure that non-pharmacological methods are used instead of pharmacological sedative agents applied to the patient.
Active noise control is one of the methods in which the noise is controlled with headphones that produce a sound in phase opposite to the environmental noise, and passive noise control is one of the methods in which the noise is controlled by the isolation method. Music therapy, on the other hand, lowers the blood pressure and pulse of the patients, regulates the respiratory rate and increases the oxygen saturation.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Active noise cancelling, Passive noice cancelling, Active noise cancelling with music therapy
- Keywords
- Music therapy, Active noise control, Pasive noise control, Knee replacement
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active noise cancellingDevice
During the operation, active noise canceling device (Sony wh100xm3) will be applied to the patients in Group-1 after spinal anesthesia is applied and will not be removed until the operation is completed. At the end of the surgery, the trait anxiety scale will be administered to the patients and the VAS pain scale will be administered at the 1st Hour, 8th Hour and 24th Hour. The obtained data will be recorded.
Passive noice cancellingDevice
During the operation, passive noise canceling device (3M Peltor X5a) will be applied to the patients in Group-2 after spinal anesthesia is applied and will not be removed until the operation is completed. At the end of the surgery, the trait anxiety scale will be administered to the patients and the VAS pain scale will be administered at the 1st Hour, 8th Hour and 24th Hour. The obtained data will be recorded.
Active noise cancelling with music therapyDevice
The patients in Group-3 will be given music therapy with an active noise canceling tool (Sony wh100xm3) during the surgery. The music that the patient will listen to will be left to the patient's preference. Music therapy with an active noise canceling device will be applied after spinal anesthesia is applied and will not be removed until the surgery is completed. At the end of the surgery, the trait anxiety scale will be administered to the patients and the VAS pain scale will be administered at the 1st Hour, 8th Hour and 24th Hour. The obtained data will be recorded.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancelling | Experimental | Patients corresponding to the number 1 blocks in the randomization table according to the order of surgery were included in the active noise control group. Preoperative care of the patients was performed by clinical nurses. After transferring to the operating room and performing spinal anesthesia, the active noise control headset (Sony WH1000xm4) was placed on the patient's head. The active noise control feature of the headset was turned on and it was not removed until the dressing of the patient was closed at the end of the operation. In this group, the vital signs of the patients were followed up during the surgery. At the end of each surgery, the researcher disinfected the earplugs with an antiseptic solution containing 2% chlorhexidine. In addition, the battery level of the headset was checked and charged by the researcher when necessary. This ensures that the headset is ready for the next patient. Receives: Device: Active noise cancelling |
| Passive noise cancelling | Experimental | The patients corresponding to the number 2 blocks in the randomization table according to the order of operation were included in the passive noise control group. Preoperative care of the patients was performed by clinical nurses. After transferring to the operating room and performing spinal anesthesia, passive noise control headset (3M Peltor Optime II) was placed on the patient's head. The earphone was not removed until the dressing of the patient was closed at the end of the surgery. In this group, the vital signs of the patients were followed up during the surgery. At the end of each operation, the earplugs were disinfected by the researcher with an antiseptic solution containing 2% chlorhexidine and prepared for the next patient. Receives: Device: Passive noice cancelling |
| Active noise cancelling with music therapy | Experimental | Patients corresponding to blocks numbered 3 in the randomization table according to the order of surgery were included in the music therapy group. Preoperative care of the patients was performed by clinical nurses. After transferring to the operating room and performing spinal anesthesia, the headset (Sony WH1000xm4) was positioned on the patient's head as shown in Figure 3.7-5 (A). iPod Touch 7th Generation music player with Spotify mobile application was used for music application. The connection between the headset and the music player was provided via Bluetooth. Music chosen by the patient; Active noise control was turned on and the patient was listened to until the dressing was removed at the end of the operation. The vital signs of the patient during the operation were followed up. In addition, the battery level of the headset was checked and charged by the researcher when necessary. This ensures that the headset is ready for the next patient. Receives: Device: Active noise cancelling with music therapy |
| Control group | No intervention | Patients corresponding to blocks numbered 0 in the randomization table according to the order of surgery were included in the control group. The patients, whose preoperative care was performed by clinical nurses, were transferred to the operating room and spinal anesthesia was administered. No intervention was made in this group during the surgery. The vital signs of the patients were followed up during the operation. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
State and trait anxiety scale
The application period of the scale, which can be applied to all individuals over the age of 14, is ten minutes on average. With the State Anxiety Scale, the individual can evaluate his feelings in a certain place and time according to 20 statements. By using the trait anxiety scale, the feelings of the individual can be evaluated according to these 20 expressions, regardless of the circumstances. The total weighted score for the reverse statements is subtracted from the total weight score for direct statements, and a constant value is added to this number. This value is 50 for the state anxiety scale and 35 for the trait anxiety scale. Both scales are scored between 20-80. A high score indicates high anxiety.
Measured: Before the surgery
Visual Analog Scale
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the assumed pain differences between groups. In order to measure the severity of pain with VAS, a 10 cm long ruler was used, in the range of 0-10 points, with "No pain" on one end and "Unbearable pain" on the other end. The patient was told that he was free to mark any part of the ruler, including 0-10. Then, the patient was asked to mark a point showing the severity of the pain on the created ruler. Numerical data were obtained by measuring in centimeters between the zero point of the ruler and the point marked by the patient. The numerical value corresponding to the point marked by the patient on the VAS was recorded in the data collection form. patient's pain;
- Before surgery,
- Immediately after the operation,
- 8 hours after surgery
- It was evaluated 4 times, 24 hours after the surgery.
Measured: Change from baseline to 1 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2023
- Study start1 Nov 2021
- Primary completion1 Aug 2023
- Study completion4 Aug 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Bezmialem Vakif UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bezmialem Vakif University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Deniz Öztekin, Professor, Study director, Doğuş University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05714267
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Bvu_Nursing-1
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Jul 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, Stansfeld S. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1325-1332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
PubMed 24183105Tran BW, Nowrouz MY, Dhillon SK, Xie KK, Breslin KM, Golladay GJ. The Impact of Music and Noise-Cancellation on Sedation Requirements During Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Mar 4;11:2151459320910844. doi: 10.1177/2151459320910844. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32181048Liu M, Yi C, Yin F, Dai Y. Noise in the outpatient operating room. Gland Surg. 2020 Apr;9(2):380-384. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.04.09.
PubMed 32420262Yeganeh S, Torabizadeh C, Bahmani T, Molazem Z, Doust HY, Dehnavi SD. Examining the views of operating room nurses and physicians on the relationship between professional values and professional communication. BMC Nurs. 2022 Jan 14;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00778-x.
PubMed 35031042Wang X, Zeng L, Li G, Xu M, Wei B, Li Y, Li N, Tao L, Zhang H, Guo X, Zhao Y. A cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in China: noise or silence in the operating room. BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 18;7(9):e016316. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016316.
PubMed 28928180Sampieri G, Namavarian A, Levin M, Philteos J, Lee JW, Koskinen A, Lin V, Lee J. Noise in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery operating rooms: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Feb 11;50(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00487-6.
PubMed 33573705Martinez-Millana A, Lizondo A, Gatta R, Vera S, Salcedo VT, Fernandez-Llatas C. Process Mining Dashboard in Operating Rooms: Analysis of Staff Expectations with Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 11;16(2):199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020199.
PubMed 30642000Grozdanovic D, Janackovic GL, Grozdanovic M, Mitkovic MB, Mitkovic MM. The Selection of Main Surgical Work Factors in Operating Rooms. Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211067497. doi: 10.1177/00469580211067497.
PubMed 34908506Song JJ, Vanneste S, De Ridder D. Dysfunctional noise cancelling of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in tinnitus patients. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123538. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25875099Zangari S, Mirowsky JE. A simple, cost-effective, and novel method for determining the efficiency of industrial and commercial noise-canceling earmuffs. Noise Health. 2019 May-Jun;21(100):108-115. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_52_19.
PubMed 32655064Ghaleb FA, Kamat MB, Salleh M, Rohani MF, Abd Razak S. Two-stage motion artefact reduction algorithm for electrocardiogram using weighted adaptive noise cancelling and recursive Hampel filter. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 20;13(11):e0207176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207176. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 30457996
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Noise Control and Music Therapy on Anxiety, Vital Signs and Post-Operative Pain in Total Knee Prosthesis Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05714267
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Bvu_Nursing-1
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- Music therapy, Active noise control, Pasive noise control, Knee replacement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bezmialem Vakif UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Aug 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Music has emerged as a well-received medical intervention. Patients may be uncomfortable during total joint replacement, which can result in high sedation requirements. These requirements put patients at risk of surgical stress. This study compares the effect of passive noise-cancellation versus active noise cancellation with music on pain, vital signs and anxiety during elective total knee replacement.
Detailed description
Unwanted sound that mixes with the sounds being listened to is defined as noise, and the sound community formed by the combination of many noise sources is defined as noise pollution. Environmental noise has many negative effects on human health, such as increasing stress and anxiety, causing the development of cerebral and cardiovascular diseases, and creating a risk of hearing loss.
Today, it is reported that noise pollution in hospitals has increased exponentially compared to previous years . It is reported that the noise is especially at high levels in the operating room units of hospitals and frequently exceeds both the 30 dBA (Decibel A) threshold determined by the World Health Organization and the American Occupational Safety and Health Administration standard. When we look at the studies in which the environmental noise in the operating room environment is examined, it is seen that the noise level varies between 80 and 119 dBA. These noise ranges are determined for both patient and employee health. is beyond the limits.
The noise that patients are exposed to in operating rooms can be caused by both healthcare workers and operating room equipment. Perioperative Nurses Association (AORN) created the "AORN Guide on Managing Distraction and Noise During Perioperative Patient Care" in 2014 to draw attention to the problem of loud noise in the operating room. According to this guideline, updated in 2020, noise is a risky situation that interrupts intraoperative care. For this reason, it is reported that noise should be prevented with an inter-team approach in order for effective care and treatment to continue. In the AORN report, it is reported that among the sources of noise are monitors, ventilators, air conditioning systems, telephones, pagers, surgical equipment, anesthesia devices, conversations within the team, and loud music. The methods used in surgeries and the choice of surgical instruments also affect noise levels. For this reason, it can be said that noise levels may change in surgeries performed with different instruments in different parts of the body. Especially in knee and hip replacement surgeries, when tools such as oscillator saws, hammers and surgical drills, which are used to shape the joint and replace the joint prosthesis, are used during the operation, it creates a higher noise compared to other surgeries. Simpson reported in their study that the noise level of the instruments used during knee and hip replacement surgery increased up to 105 decibels. While this noise level is equivalent to the noise heard while waiting next to a working helicopter, it is well above the thresholds recommended by NIOSH, OSHA and WHO.
It is reported that the negative effects of environmental noise during surgery on patients are controlled with sedative agents given to the patient during surgery. In addition, it is known that patients are made to listen to music to reduce the effect of environmental noise and to relax the patient. When the studies are examined, it is seen that there are limitations in both methods used. Listening to louder music so that the high-frequency sounds that occur during prosthetic surgeries are not heard by the patients can be another source of anxiety for the patients. Sedative opioid agents given to calm patients pose various risks, such as respiratory depression, death or permanent brain damage, and this is defined as a patient safety problem in the literature. Since the degeneration (arthrosis) of the knee joint will occur over the years, the patient population in need of prosthesis is generally geriatric. This situation causes the adverse risks of sedation on elderly patients to be much higher. The operating room nurse should take the necessary measures to reduce the stress, fear and anxiety of the patient who will undergo surgery. It is one of the independent roles of the nurse to ensure that non-pharmacological methods are used instead of pharmacological sedative agents applied to the patient.
Active noise control is one of the methods in which the noise is controlled with headphones that produce a sound in phase opposite to the environmental noise, and passive noise control is one of the methods in which the noise is controlled by the isolation method. Music therapy, on the other hand, lowers the blood pressure and pulse of the patients, regulates the respiratory rate and increases the oxygen saturation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancelling | Experimental | Device: Active noise cancellingPatients corresponding to the number 1 blocks in the randomization table according to the order of surgery were included in the active noise control group. Preoperative care of the patients was performed by clinical nurses. After transferring to the operating room and performing spinal anesthesia, the active noise control headset (Sony WH1000xm4) was placed on the patient's head. The active noise control feature of the headset was turned on and it was not removed until the dressing of the patient was closed at the end of the operation. In this group, the vital signs of the patients were followed up during the surgery. At the end of each surgery, the researcher disinfected the earplugs with an antiseptic solution containing 2% chlorhexidine. In addition, the battery level of the headset was checked and charged by the researcher when necessary. This ensures that the headset is ready for the next patient. |
| Passive noise cancelling | Experimental | Device: Passive noice cancellingThe patients corresponding to the number 2 blocks in the randomization table according to the order of operation were included in the passive noise control group. Preoperative care of the patients was performed by clinical nurses. After transferring to the operating room and performing spinal anesthesia, passive noise control headset (3M Peltor Optime II) was placed on the patient's head. The earphone was not removed until the dressing of the patient was closed at the end of the surgery. In this group, the vital signs of the patients were followed up during the surgery. At the end of each operation, the earplugs were disinfected by the researcher with an antiseptic solution containing 2% chlorhexidine and prepared for the next patient. |
| Active noise cancelling with music therapy | Experimental | Device: Active noise cancelling with music therapyPatients corresponding to blocks numbered 3 in the randomization table according to the order of surgery were included in the music therapy group. Preoperative care of the patients was performed by clinical nurses. After transferring to the operating room and performing spinal anesthesia, the headset (Sony WH1000xm4) was positioned on the patient's head as shown in Figure 3.7-5 (A). iPod Touch 7th Generation music player with Spotify mobile application was used for music application. The connection between the headset and the music player was provided via Bluetooth. Music chosen by the patient; Active noise control was turned on and the patient was listened to until the dressing was removed at the end of the operation. The vital signs of the patient during the operation were followed up. In addition, the battery level of the headset was checked and charged by the researcher when necessary. This ensures that the headset is ready for the next patient. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Patients corresponding to blocks numbered 0 in the randomization table according to the order of surgery were included in the control group. The patients, whose preoperative care was performed by clinical nurses, were transferred to the operating room and spinal anesthesia was administered. No intervention was made in this group during the surgery. The vital signs of the patients were followed up during the operation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Being between the ages of 18-80
- To participate in the research voluntarily,
- To be able to read and write Turkish,
- American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II,
- To have total knee arthroplasty surgery due to joint degeneration (gonarthrosis),
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Having a total knee replacement surgery due to an acquired physical trauma to the knee joint,
- Presence of diagnosed cancer in the patient.
- Being diagnosed with any psychiatric illness,
- Having previously undergone arthroplasty surgery (Revision arthroplasty).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active noise cancellingDuring the operation, active noise canceling device (Sony wh100xm3) will be applied to the patients in Group-1 after spinal anesthesia is applied and will not be removed until the operation is completed. At the end of the surgery, the trait anxiety scale will be administered to the patients and the VAS pain scale will be administered at the 1st Hour, 8th Hour and 24th Hour. The obtained data will be recorded. | Device | Active noise cancelling |
| Passive noice cancellingDuring the operation, passive noise canceling device (3M Peltor X5a) will be applied to the patients in Group-2 after spinal anesthesia is applied and will not be removed until the operation is completed. At the end of the surgery, the trait anxiety scale will be administered to the patients and the VAS pain scale will be administered at the 1st Hour, 8th Hour and 24th Hour. The obtained data will be recorded. | Device | Passive noise cancelling |
| Active noise cancelling with music therapyThe patients in Group-3 will be given music therapy with an active noise canceling tool (Sony wh100xm3) during the surgery. The music that the patient will listen to will be left to the patient's preference. Music therapy with an active noise canceling device will be applied after spinal anesthesia is applied and will not be removed until the surgery is completed. At the end of the surgery, the trait anxiety scale will be administered to the patients and the VAS pain scale will be administered at the 1st Hour, 8th Hour and 24th Hour. The obtained data will be recorded. | Device | Active noise cancelling with music therapy |
Primary outcome
State and trait anxiety scale
Time frame: Before the surgery
The application period of the scale, which can be applied to all individuals over the age of 14, is ten minutes on average. With the State Anxiety Scale, the individual can evaluate his feelings in a certain place and time according to 20 statements. By using the trait anxiety scale, the feelings of the individual can be evaluated according to these 20 expressions, regardless of the circumstances. The total weighted score for the reverse statements is subtracted from the total weight score for direct statements, and a constant value is added to this number. This value is 50 for the state anxiety scale and 35 for the trait anxiety scale. Both scales are scored between 20-80. A high score indicates high anxiety.
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: Change from baseline to 1 months
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the assumed pain differences between groups. In order to measure the severity of pain with VAS, a 10 cm long ruler was used, in the range of 0-10 points, with "No pain" on one end and "Unbearable pain" on the other end. The patient was told that he was free to mark any part of the ruler, including 0-10. Then, the patient was asked to mark a point showing the severity of the pain on the created ruler. Numerical data were obtained by measuring in centimeters between the zero point of the ruler and the point marked by the patient. The numerical value corresponding to the point marked by the patient on the VAS was recorded in the data collection form. patient's pain; 1. Before surgery, 2. Immediately after the operation, 3. 8 hours after surgery 4. It was evaluated 4 times, 24 hours after the surgery.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 24183105Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, Stansfeld S. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1325-1332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 32181048Tran BW, Nowrouz MY, Dhillon SK, Xie KK, Breslin KM, Golladay GJ. The Impact of Music and Noise-Cancellation on Sedation Requirements During Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Mar 4;11:2151459320910844. doi: 10.1177/2151459320910844. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 32420262Liu M, Yi C, Yin F, Dai Y. Noise in the outpatient operating room. Gland Surg. 2020 Apr;9(2):380-384. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.04.09.
- Background: PubMed 35031042Yeganeh S, Torabizadeh C, Bahmani T, Molazem Z, Doust HY, Dehnavi SD. Examining the views of operating room nurses and physicians on the relationship between professional values and professional communication. BMC Nurs. 2022 Jan 14;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00778-x.
- Background: PubMed 28928180Wang X, Zeng L, Li G, Xu M, Wei B, Li Y, Li N, Tao L, Zhang H, Guo X, Zhao Y. A cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital in China: noise or silence in the operating room. BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 18;7(9):e016316. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016316.
- Background: PubMed 33573705Sampieri G, Namavarian A, Levin M, Philteos J, Lee JW, Koskinen A, Lin V, Lee J. Noise in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery operating rooms: a systematic review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Feb 11;50(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40463-020-00487-6.
- Background: PubMed 30642000Martinez-Millana A, Lizondo A, Gatta R, Vera S, Salcedo VT, Fernandez-Llatas C. Process Mining Dashboard in Operating Rooms: Analysis of Staff Expectations with Analytic Hierarchy Process. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 11;16(2):199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020199.
- Background: PubMed 34908506Grozdanovic D, Janackovic GL, Grozdanovic M, Mitkovic MB, Mitkovic MM. The Selection of Main Surgical Work Factors in Operating Rooms. Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211067497. doi: 10.1177/00469580211067497.
- Background: PubMed 25875099Song JJ, Vanneste S, De Ridder D. Dysfunctional noise cancelling of the rostral anterior cingulate cortex in tinnitus patients. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 13;10(4):e0123538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123538. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 32655064Zangari S, Mirowsky JE. A simple, cost-effective, and novel method for determining the efficiency of industrial and commercial noise-canceling earmuffs. Noise Health. 2019 May-Jun;21(100):108-115. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_52_19.
- Background: PubMed 30457996Ghaleb FA, Kamat MB, Salleh M, Rohani MF, Abd Razak S. Two-stage motion artefact reduction algorithm for electrocardiogram using weighted adaptive noise cancelling and recursive Hampel filter. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 20;13(11):e0207176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207176. eCollection 2018.
- Asco Battery Operated Cannulated Drill Machine, For IndustrialLink provided by the sponsor.
- Orthopedic MalletLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Deniz Öztekin, Professor study director
Doğuş University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active noise cancelling, Passive noice cancelling and Active noise cancelling with music therapy in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by Bezmialem Vakif University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
State and trait anxiety scale (time frame: Before the surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05714267, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2024.