PainNCT05717088
Effectiveness of Oral Sucrose During Lung Ultrasound
A study testing 24% Sucrose solution in people with Pain, run by Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Background: control of pain in neonates has an important role in preventing long- term effects on neurodevelopment and pain reactivity. Oral sucrose and non-nutritive suckling are considered a non-pharmacological treatment that has many advantages. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 days to 37 weeks
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- 24% Sucrose solution
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 18 Dec 2020to 1 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 days to 37 weeks
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Infants with neurological disorders, congenital anomalies that interfere with oral intake,
- On pain medications, or
- receiving nothing per oral because of medical condition e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis are excluded
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X5
Adel Mohamed, MD
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Oral Sucrose for Preterm Infants Undergoing Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: control of pain in neonates has an important role in preventing long- term effects on neurodevelopment and pain reactivity. Oral sucrose and non-nutritive suckling are considered a non-pharmacological treatment that has many advantages. Currently, there is controversy regarding the use of sucrose during point of care lung ultrasound (LUS) scan as many consider LUS is not a painful procedure.
Objective: Determine the efficacy of oral sucrose solution + soother versus soother alone in reducing infant's agitation during LUS scan Method: This is a blinded, prospective, parallel group randomized controlled trial comparing the Premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score in infants randomized to receive oral sucrose followed by soother soother vs. soother alone while having LUS scan Study outcomes: The primary outcome of this study is to compare the changes in PIPP scores at 4 time points between infants receiving oral sucrose solution + soother versus soother alone. The secondary outcomes are 1) total time to complete a standard LUS scan from start of scanning to the end, 2) Association of LUS with adverse events e.g., episodes of desaturation, tachycardia, bradycardia or apnea.
Read the detailed description
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that oral sucrose solution with soother is more effective than soother alone in reducing infant's agitation during LUS.
Method
Design: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PIPP score during LUS in infants who receive oral sucrose plus soother vs. soother alone.
Population: described below
Intervention The study is a 2-arm, randomized controlled trial. Infants will be allocated to one of the 2 groups as described below
Study Procedures:
Infants' face and physiological monitor will be video recorded for 30 seconds before administration of study intervention. Video recording will be paused during the administration of study intervention (24% sucrose + soother or soother alone) to be given while maintaining blinding of type of intervention and group assignment for enrolled infants. Video recording will be restarted after administration of the study intervention and will be continued for 1 minute after finishing the scan and returning the baby to pre-intervention state. In infants assigned to group A, the study solution (24% oral sucrose) will be given by a study investigator or bedside nurse to the anterior portion of the tongue without touching the infant's mouth followed by insertion of a soother that will be maintained in infant's mouth throughout the procedure. Infants assigned to group B will receive a soother that will be maintained in infant's mouth throughout the procedure. PIPP score will be assessed at 4-time points a) 30 seconds prior to administration of study intervention (baseline PIPP score), b) 30 seconds into LUS scan, c) midway of LUS scan, d) 30 seconds after the procedure is completed and soother removed.
Outcome measures: The primary and secondary outcomes as described below
Measures Measurement of procedural pain For all enrolled infants, The investigators will assess stress/pain using PIPP score, a validated tool approved by the American Academy of Pediatrics for pain assessment in both term and preterm neonates. The PIPP score is based on seven parameters: corrected gestational age, behavioral state, changes in maximum heart rate (HR), changes in minimum arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), brow bulging, eye squeezing, and nasolabial furrowing. These indices are individually scored from 0 to 3, and the total score is calculated by summing the scores for these 7 indices. The PIPP score ranges from 0-21 in preterm infants.
Measurement of physiological response Heart rate (HR) and Oxygen saturation (SpO2) data will be videotaped directly from the patient's bedside physiological monitor (Philips-The intellivue MX800). HR and SpO2 will be reviewed by videotape analyzer and will be incorporated into PIPP score. Average HR and SpO2, presence of apnea during the LUS will reviewed and documented to assess for adverse events associated with the study procedure.
Measurement of incidence of adverse events The following adverse events associated with the procedure (LUS scan); tachycardia> 180 bpm, bradycardia< 100 bpm, SpO2 < 80%, or apnea (cessation of breathing for > 20 second or < 20 second but associated with hypoxia or bradycardia) will be compared between the 2 study groups.
Randomization, allocation and blinding All enrolled infants will be randomized by computer-generated randomization sequence (block size from 4 to 6 with 1:1 allocation ratio) to 24% sucrose plus soother group or soother alone (control group). The random numbers will be placed in sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes and will be opened after obtaining informed consent and just before the procedure by one of the study investigators to ensure allocation concealment. These envelopes will be kept in a secure, locked drawer in the principle investigator office and only study investigators will have access to it. Attending physician will be blinded, however, the operator who will perform the LUS will not be possible due to nature of intervention. The PIPP score analyzer (the coder) will be blind to group allocation.
Sample size The sample size is calculated based on the results of a previous study that assessed pain/stress associated with echocardiography in neonates using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score. The investigators hypothesize a difference of 2 or more in the mean PIPP score between the control and the intervention group. Assuming standard deviation of 2.5 for both groups, with 5% significance level and 80% power, 26 subjects are required in each group. The investigators are planning to recruit 32 subjects in each group (total 64) to account for 20% loss due to errors in videotaping and missing data.
Consent Parents/legal guardians of infants who meet eligibility criteria will be approached for participation in the study. One of the study investigators (who is not involved in infant's care at the time of the consent) will provide a brief description of the research and state clearly that participation is voluntary and that refusal would not change the care that the infant will receive in the unit. Parents/legal guardians who agree to participate will sign a written consent form.
Statistical Analysis Infant characteristics as well as outcomes will be compared between two groups. Difference will be assessed by Pearson Chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables, and Student t-test (ANOVA F-test) or Wilcoxon rank test for continuous variables. Results will be reported as frequency (percentage), mean (standard deviation) or median (inter quartile range) as appropriate. GEE model will be used to assess the significance between two groups with repeat measures. All analyses will be conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) with two-sided significance level 0.05.
Data collection The following data will be collected; Infants' baseline characteristics; gestational age(GA), Birth weight, sex, current/corrected GA and weight, APGAR score at 5 minutes) will be collected. Data regarding current respiratory support at the time of the study will be collected. Total time needed to complete a scan will abstracted from ultrasound machine. Adverse events during the scan such as tachycardia (> 180 bpm), bradycardia (< 100 bpm), Oxygen saturation (< 80%), or apnea episode will be recorded. All patients' identifiers will be removed. A separate list of study ID and Hospital ID (MSID) will be kept on secure hospital drive with password-protected access available only to study investigators.
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- 24% Sucrose solution
- Keywords
- Preterm, Lung, PIPP score, infants, neonates
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
24% Sucrose solutionOther
Infants will either receive oral sucrose (24%) 2 minutes before the procedure "LUS scan". The dose will be 0.2 mL, 0.5 mL and 1 mL for infants with current weight < 1500g, 1500-2500g, and > 2500g respectively.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Oral sucrose + soother group (group A) | Experimental | Group A: Infants will receive oral sucrose (24%) followed by a soother 2 minutes before the procedure "LUS scan". The dose will be 0.2 mL, 0.5 mL and 1 mL for infants with current weight < 1500g, 1500-2500g, and > 2500g respectively. Receives: Other: 24% Sucrose solution |
| Soother alone group (group B) | No intervention | Group B (control group): infants will receive a soother 2 minutes before LUS scan. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Premature infant pain profile Score (PIPP) measured in (points 0-21) ranging 0-21 points
To compare the changes in the Pain Score "Premature infant pain profile Score (PIPP)" at 4 time points between infants receiving oral sucrose solution + Pacifier versus Pacifier alone. PIPP score ranges from 0-21 points, where 0 means no pain and 21 is severe pain.
Measured: 1 YEAR
Secondary outcomes (1)
Total time to complete the scan (minutes)
- total time to complete a standard LUS scan from start of scanning to the end, 2) Association of LUS with adverse events e.g., episodes of desaturation, tachycardia, bradycardia or apnea.
Measured: 1 YEAR
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2023
- Study start18 Dec 2020
- Primary completion1 Feb 2023
- Study completion1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Adel Mohamed, MD, Principal investigator, Sinai Health System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05717088
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-0220-E
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Oral Sucrose for Preterm Infants Undergoing Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05717088
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20-0220-E
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- Preterm, Lung, PIPP score, infants, neonates
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Mount Sinai Hospital, CanadaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: control of pain in neonates has an important role in preventing long- term effects on neurodevelopment and pain reactivity. Oral sucrose and non-nutritive suckling are considered a non-pharmacological treatment that has many advantages. Currently, there is controversy regarding the use of sucrose during point of care lung ultrasound (LUS) scan as many consider LUS is not a painful procedure.
Objective: Determine the efficacy of oral sucrose solution + soother versus soother alone in reducing infant's agitation during LUS scan Method: This is a blinded, prospective, parallel group randomized controlled trial comparing the Premature infant pain profile (PIPP) score in infants randomized to receive oral sucrose followed by soother soother vs. soother alone while having LUS scan Study outcomes: The primary outcome of this study is to compare the changes in PIPP scores at 4 time points between infants receiving oral sucrose solution + soother versus soother alone. The secondary outcomes are 1) total time to complete a standard LUS scan from start of scanning to the end, 2) Association of LUS with adverse events e.g., episodes of desaturation, tachycardia, bradycardia or apnea.
Detailed description
Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that oral sucrose solution with soother is more effective than soother alone in reducing infant's agitation during LUS.
Method
Design: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing PIPP score during LUS in infants who receive oral sucrose plus soother vs. soother alone.
Population: described below
Intervention The study is a 2-arm, randomized controlled trial. Infants will be allocated to one of the 2 groups as described below
Study Procedures:
Infants' face and physiological monitor will be video recorded for 30 seconds before administration of study intervention. Video recording will be paused during the administration of study intervention (24% sucrose + soother or soother alone) to be given while maintaining blinding of type of intervention and group assignment for enrolled infants. Video recording will be restarted after administration of the study intervention and will be continued for 1 minute after finishing the scan and returning the baby to pre-intervention state. In infants assigned to group A, the study solution (24% oral sucrose) will be given by a study investigator or bedside nurse to the anterior portion of the tongue without touching the infant's mouth followed by insertion of a soother that will be maintained in infant's mouth throughout the procedure. Infants assigned to group B will receive a soother that will be maintained in infant's mouth throughout the procedure. PIPP score will be assessed at 4-time points a) 30 seconds prior to administration of study intervention (baseline PIPP score), b) 30 seconds into LUS scan, c) midway of LUS scan, d) 30 seconds after the procedure is completed and soother removed.
Outcome measures: The primary and secondary outcomes as described below
Measures Measurement of procedural pain For all enrolled infants, The investigators will assess stress/pain using PIPP score, a validated tool approved by the American Academy of Pediatrics for pain assessment in both term and preterm neonates. The PIPP score is based on seven parameters: corrected gestational age, behavioral state, changes in maximum heart rate (HR), changes in minimum arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2), brow bulging, eye squeezing, and nasolabial furrowing. These indices are individually scored from 0 to 3, and the total score is calculated by summing the scores for these 7 indices. The PIPP score ranges from 0-21 in preterm infants.
Measurement of physiological response Heart rate (HR) and Oxygen saturation (SpO2) data will be videotaped directly from the patient's bedside physiological monitor (Philips-The intellivue MX800). HR and SpO2 will be reviewed by videotape analyzer and will be incorporated into PIPP score. Average HR and SpO2, presence of apnea during the LUS will reviewed and documented to assess for adverse events associated with the study procedure.
Measurement of incidence of adverse events The following adverse events associated with the procedure (LUS scan); tachycardia> 180 bpm, bradycardia< 100 bpm, SpO2 < 80%, or apnea (cessation of breathing for > 20 second or < 20 second but associated with hypoxia or bradycardia) will be compared between the 2 study groups.
Randomization, allocation and blinding All enrolled infants will be randomized by computer-generated randomization sequence (block size from 4 to 6 with 1:1 allocation ratio) to 24% sucrose plus soother group or soother alone (control group). The random numbers will be placed in sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes and will be opened after obtaining informed consent and just before the procedure by one of the study investigators to ensure allocation concealment. These envelopes will be kept in a secure, locked drawer in the principle investigator office and only study investigators will have access to it. Attending physician will be blinded, however, the operator who will perform the LUS will not be possible due to nature of intervention. The PIPP score analyzer (the coder) will be blind to group allocation.
Sample size The sample size is calculated based on the results of a previous study that assessed pain/stress associated with echocardiography in neonates using the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score. The investigators hypothesize a difference of 2 or more in the mean PIPP score between the control and the intervention group. Assuming standard deviation of 2.5 for both groups, with 5% significance level and 80% power, 26 subjects are required in each group. The investigators are planning to recruit 32 subjects in each group (total 64) to account for 20% loss due to errors in videotaping and missing data.
Consent Parents/legal guardians of infants who meet eligibility criteria will be approached for participation in the study. One of the study investigators (who is not involved in infant's care at the time of the consent) will provide a brief description of the research and state clearly that participation is voluntary and that refusal would not change the care that the infant will receive in the unit. Parents/legal guardians who agree to participate will sign a written consent form.
Statistical Analysis Infant characteristics as well as outcomes will be compared between two groups. Difference will be assessed by Pearson Chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables, and Student t-test (ANOVA F-test) or Wilcoxon rank test for continuous variables. Results will be reported as frequency (percentage), mean (standard deviation) or median (inter quartile range) as appropriate. GEE model will be used to assess the significance between two groups with repeat measures. All analyses will be conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) with two-sided significance level 0.05.
Data collection The following data will be collected; Infants' baseline characteristics; gestational age(GA), Birth weight, sex, current/corrected GA and weight, APGAR score at 5 minutes) will be collected. Data regarding current respiratory support at the time of the study will be collected. Total time needed to complete a scan will abstracted from ultrasound machine. Adverse events during the scan such as tachycardia (> 180 bpm), bradycardia (< 100 bpm), Oxygen saturation (< 80%), or apnea episode will be recorded. All patients' identifiers will be removed. A separate list of study ID and Hospital ID (MSID) will be kept on secure hospital drive with password-protected access available only to study investigators.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Oral sucrose + soother group (group A) | Experimental | Other: 24% Sucrose solutionGroup A: Infants will receive oral sucrose (24%) followed by a soother 2 minutes before the procedure "LUS scan". The dose will be 0.2 mL, 0.5 mL and 1 mL for infants with current weight < 1500g, 1500-2500g, and > 2500g respectively. |
| Soother alone group (group B) | No intervention | –Group B (control group): infants will receive a soother 2 minutes before LUS scan. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 days to 37 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Infants with neurological disorders, congenital anomalies that interfere with oral intake,
- On pain medications, or
- receiving nothing per oral because of medical condition e.g. necrotizing enterocolitis are excluded
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 24% Sucrose solutionInfants will either receive oral sucrose (24%) 2 minutes before the procedure "LUS scan". The dose will be 0.2 mL, 0.5 mL and 1 mL for infants with current weight < 1500g, 1500-2500g, and > 2500g respectively. | Other | Oral sucrose + soother group (group A) |
Primary outcome
Premature infant pain profile Score (PIPP) measured in (points 0-21) ranging 0-21 points
Time frame: 1 YEAR
To compare the changes in the Pain Score "Premature infant pain profile Score (PIPP)" at 4 time points between infants receiving oral sucrose solution + Pacifier versus Pacifier alone. PIPP score ranges from 0-21 points, where 0 means no pain and 21 is severe pain.
1 secondary outcome
Total time to complete the scan (minutes)
Time frame: 1 YEAR
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Mar 2023.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adel Mohamed, MD principal investigator
Sinai Health System
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 24% Sucrose solution in people with Pain, run by Mount Sinai Hospital, Canada at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Adel Mohamed, MD (4165864800 ext. 7396, adel.mohamed@sinaihealth.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Premature infant pain profile Score (PIPP) measured in (points 0-21) ranging 0-21 points (time frame: 1 YEAR). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2023.