AzTrials
AzTrials

Eating DisordersCaGBBBNCT05724394

Feasibility Trial of Getting Better Bite by Bite for Eating Disorders

A study testing Culturally Adapted Getting Better Bite By Bite (Ca-GBBB) intervention in people with Eating Disorders and Bulimia Nervosa, run by Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning at 1 site in Pakistan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a mixed method feasibility randomized controlled trial to explore the feasibility and acceptability of therapist delivered, culturally adapted, manualized Ca-GBBB intervention for Eating Disorders (EDs) - Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Bing Eating Disorder (BED) in Pakistan. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Culturally Adapted Getting Better Bite By Bite (Ca-GBBB) intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
28 Apr 2023to 30 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age18 years
  • Screen positive on the Binge Eating Screening Questionnaire and/or Bulimic Investigatory test, Edinburgh
  • Residents of the study catchment area
  • Able to provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Aged under 18
  • Presence of any severe mental or physical illness that would prevent individual from participating in the intervention and or assessments.
  • Temporary resident unlikely to be available for follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Lahore site

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 203393

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial of Culturally Adapted Getting Better Bite-by-Bite (Ca-GBBB)Intervention for Individuals With Eating Disorders in Pakistan

This is a mixed method feasibility randomized controlled trial to explore the feasibility and acceptability of therapist delivered, culturally adapted, manualized Ca-GBBB intervention for Eating Disorders (EDs) - Bulimia Nervosa (BN) and Bing Eating Disorder (BED) in Pakistan.

Read the detailed description

Evidence on psychological management of eating disorders in low and middle income countries ( LMICs) is limited, and non-existent in Pakistan. A Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) based guided self-help manual "Getting Better Bite by Bite: A Survival Kit for Sufferers of Bulimia Nervosa and Binge Eating Disorders" (GBBB), has found to be feasible and acceptable for patients with BN.

Quantitative phase of this research aims to determine if the culturally adapted GBBB (Ca-GBBB) programme is feasible and acceptable for individuals with Eating disorders- BN and BED compared to treatment as usual.

The qualitative part of the study will include focus groups and in-depth digitally recorded one-to-one interviews with participants by trained qualitative researchers at two time points both before and after the intervention. These focus groups and in-depth interviews will continue till the data saturation is achieved. Moreover, in-depth digitally-recorded interviews with stakeholders (nutritionists, dietitian, educationist, therapists, health professionals, etc) will also be conducted by trained researchers.

Being tested
Culturally Adapted Getting Better Bite By Bite (Ca-GBBB) intervention
Keywords
Getting better bite by bite (GBBB), Culturally Adapted Intervention, Low resource settings, Pakistan, Eating Disorders, Feasibility Study
Medical subject headings
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Bulimia Nervosa, Binge-Eating Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Culturally Adapted Getting Better Bite By Bite (Ca-GBBB) interventionOther

    The Ca-GBBB strongly focuses on enhancing participant's motivation and belief in their ability to change. The intervention will be comprised of 16-week training program delivered over four months.

Study groups in NCT05724394
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ca-GBBB armExperimentalThe Ca-GBBB strongly focuses on enhancing participant's motivation and belief in their ability to change. The intervention will be comprised of 16-week training program delivered over four months. Sessions will be delivered weekly and each session will last about 45-50 minutes. All sessions will be delivered by master level psychologist. The manual will be translated to Urdu giving special consideration to cultural adaptation of phrases and concepts to reflect Pakistani culture. Additionally, culturally appropriate case scenarios will be incorporated and a consensual view to addressing cultural factors such as gender role, financial difficulties will be taken into consideration. The time and venue of session will be decided prior according to participant convenience.
Receives: Other: Culturally Adapted Getting Better Bite By Bite (Ca-GBBB) intervention
Treatment As UsualNo interventionTreatment as Usual (TAU) group will receive routine care and their follow up will be done at 4-month post-randomization.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recruitment and attrition Logs

    The parameters feasibility of undertaking the trial of intervention will include the recruitment rate (the number of patients referred/approached, proportion of those who consented out of all the eligible patients with BED and/or BN disorder referred from and approached at the recruitment sites) (The success criterion of feasibility will be to recruit > 50% of eligible participants) and the attrition rate (the number of patients withdrawn out of those who consented to participate).

    Measured: One year's time

  2. Intervention Log

    Feasibility of the intervention delivery: Duration of each session and completed feedback forms. This will be assessed by keeping record of whether the Ca-GBBB is delivered, received and enacted as intended.

    Measured: During 4-month intervention period.

  3. Attendance logs

    Therapy logs will include each participant's attendance in a session. This will give information about acceptability of intervention. mean attendance rate of >70% i.e. at least 11 sessions, will indicate that the intervention is acceptable for the participants

    Measured: From baseline to 4-month follow up

  4. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Tolerability of the intervention is defined as the ability to endure the intervention. Items on Client Satisfaction Questionnaire are scored on a four-point Likert scale from 1 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction), with different descriptors for each response point. Totals range from 8 to 32; with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Measured: From baseline to 4-month follow up

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. The Bulimic Investigatory Test, Edinburgh

    The BITE is a 33-item self-rating scale (Henderson and Freeman 1987). It consists of two subscales: The Symptom Scale (30 items), which measures the degree of symptoms and the Severity Scale (3 items), which provides an index of the severity as defined by the frequency of binge-eating and purging behavior. The total score for all the questions gives a "symptom score" - a score of 15 or above indicate that the individuals has a lot of thoughts and attitudes consistent with eating disorders. The toral score of question 6, 7 and 27 will give a severity index - a score of 5 or above signifies an eating disorder

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up.

  2. Binge-Eating Disorder Screener

    The 7-item Binge-Eating Disorder Screener (BEDS-7), a brief screener for BED, can assist physicians in identifying patients who may have BED. Those with a score of 2-3 are considered mildly at risk of BED, a score of 4-5 is determined to be moderately at risk for BED, and a score of 6 indicates severely at risk for BED

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up

  3. The Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food

    5 item questionnaire that covers the main three domains which are anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or other eating disorders. Each yes answer means 1 point and if the interviewee gets 2 points it reveals that he/she has anorexia nervosa or bulimia.

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up

  4. Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire

    a 28-item self-reported questionnaire adapted from the semi-structured interview Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and designed to assess the range and severity of features associated with a diagnosis of eating disorder using 4 subscales (Restraint, Eating Concern, Shape Concern and Weight Concern) and a global score. Higher scores on the global scale and subscales denote more problematic eating behaviours and attitudes. A cut-off of 4 on the global score is generally used as clinically significant

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up

  5. Kessler Psychological Distress Scale

    It is used to measure psychological distress. It's a 10 item scale measuring emotional states with a 5 level response scale. Scores will range from 10 to 50. Low scores indicate low levels of psychological distress and high scores indicate high levels of psychological distress. score 10 - 19 Likely to be well, 20 - 24 Likely to have a mild disorder, 25 - 29 Likely to have a moderate disorder and 30 - 50 Likely to have a severe disorder

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up

  6. Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation

    The BSS is a 21-item measure that will be used to assess the frequency and intensity of suicidal thoughts. Each item is scored based on an ordinal scale from 0 to 2 and the total score is 0 to 38. Individuals answer to the first 5 items which is excerpted. If individual's answer to the fifth item is positive (scores 1 and 2), he/she answers the rest of the items and otherwise the questionnaire is completed. No cut- point is used to categorize the scores

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up

  7. Beck Depression Inventory

    The BDI is a 29 item questionnaire that will be used to measure severity of depression. Score 1-10 are considered normal, 11-16 Mild mood disturbance, 17-20 Borderline clinical depression, 21-30 Moderate depression, 31-40 Severe depression over 40 Extreme depression

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up

  8. Oslo- 3 Social Support Scale

    O3SSS will be used to assess the relationship with friends, family and neighbors. The sum score ranges from 3 to 14, with high values representing strong levels and low values representing poor levels of social support. The OSSS-3 sum score can be operationalized into three broad categories of social support: a) 3-8 poor social support, b) 9-11 moderate social support, c) 12-14 strong social support

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up

  9. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire

    Participant satisfaction with services will be assessed using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Scores are summed across items once. Items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction

    Measured: Change in score from baseline to 4-month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2023
  2. Study start28 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial with participants randomized into two trial arms
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05724394
Sponsor's protocol ID
PILL-GBBB-ED
Acronym
CaGBBB
Status last verified
May 2024
First submitted
9 Dec 2022
Last updated
17 May 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The anonymised data will be shared on request

Publications

  • Atwood ME, Friedman A. A systematic review of enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT-E) for eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Mar;53(3):311-330. doi: 10.1002/eat.23206. Epub 2019 Dec 16.

    PubMed 31840285
  • Khaliq A, Muazzam A, Rafique R, Kiran T, Ahmed A, Suleheria I, Chaudhry N, Husain N. A feasibility randomized controlled trial of culturally adapted Getting Better Bite-by-Bite (Ca-GBBB) intervention for individuals with eating disorders in Pakistan. J Eat Disord. 2024 Jul 17;12(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s40337-024-01038-4.

    PubMed 39020405

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Culturally Adapted Getting Better Bite By Bite (Ca-GBBB) intervention in people with Eating Disorders and Bulimia Nervosa, run by Pakistan Institute of Living and Learning at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recruitment and attrition Logs (time frame: One year's time). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05724394, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 May 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in