AzTrials
AzTrials

Severe WastingProtein+NCT05737472

High-protein Quantity and Quality RUTF in Improving Linear Growth Among Children With Severe Wasting

A study testing High-protein RUTF and Standard RUTF in people with Severe Wasting and Severe Acute Malnutrition, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Malawi.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a proof-of-concept trial that aims to compare the efficacy of an 8-week treatment with higher-protein-Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTF) with standard RUTF in improving levels of markers of growths, height, nutritional recovery, and lean mass deposition among children with severe wasting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 23 months
Conditions the study is for
Severe Wasting, Severe Acute Malnutrition
What is being tested?
High-protein RUTF and Standard RUTF
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
128 participants
Where
1 siteMalawi
Study dates
14 Nov 2022to 23 Aug 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 23 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Infants 6-23 months of age with severe wasting at OTP admission according to the WHO criteria: WHZ below -3 or MUAC below 115mm.
  • Parent or guardian is able and available to consent
  • Children who are able to feed orally in the usual state of health
  • The primary caregiver plans to stay in the study area during the duration of the study.

Who cannot join

  • Children with medical complications as per the CMAM guidelines (lack of appetite, severe oedematous malnutrition, acute infections)
  • mild and moderate nutritional oedema
  • Children with a known terminal illness (e.g. cancer), cerebral palsy (CP), tuberculosis (TB,) HIV infected or exposed
  • Children who had SAM in the last 8 weeks, i.e., SAM relapses in the last 8 weeks
  • Children admitted to any NRU due to complicated SAM in the previous 4 weeks will also be excluded
  • Children whose caregivers refuse to give consent or whose primary givers are not available to give consent
  • Children who were previously enrolled in this trial or currently enrolled in this trial whose sibling has also been enrolled in the study
  • Children with known intolerance or allergy to high protein diets will be excluded as well as known intolerance or allergy to milk/lactose

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malawi1 site
  • Ndirande, Mbayani, Bangwe, Limbe and Bangwe health centres

    Blantyre, 000

Other trials in Malawi

About this study

Official title: A Proof-of-concept Randomized Control Trial on the Role of Higher Protein Quantity and Quality-ready-to-use Therapeutic Food in Improving Linear Growth Among 6-23-month-old Children With Severe Wasting

This is a proof-of-concept trial that aims to compare the efficacy of an 8-week treatment with higher-protein-Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods (RUTF) with standard RUTF in improving levels of markers of growths, height, nutritional recovery, and lean mass deposition among children with severe wasting. The study will also assess the safety and acceptability of the high-protein RUTF in comparison to the standard RUTF. The study will be conducted at four outpatient therapeutic programs in the Blantyre district of Malawi.

Read the detailed description

RUTF has successfully promoted recovery from severe wasting and widened treatment coverage. However, RUTF does not sufficiently promote linear growth, leaving many survivors of severe wasting at risk of persistent stunting. Stunting is associated with long-term effects like poor child development and an increased risk of non-communicable diseases in adults. High protein quantity and quality are known to stimulate linear growth; however, an RUTF with a higher protein quantity and quality than the standard RUTF has yet to be tested. The investigators hypothesize that the suboptimal linear growth in children surviving severe malnutrition can be improved by increasing the protein quantity and quality in the standard RUTF formulation. The investigators have designed a high protein quantity and quality RUTF that will be tested in a proof-of-concept quadruple-blind randomised controlled trial study design. The trial aims to compare the efficacy of higher-protein-RUTF and standard RUTF in improving markers of linear growth among 6-23 months old children with severe wasting.

Children aged 6-23 months newly enrolled in outpatient treatment programs for severe wasting and without medical complications are eligible. They will be assigned to either increased protein RUTF or standard RUTF for eight weeks.

The primary outcome is a change in insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF- 1) after four weeks of treatment. IGF-1 is a hormone that is mechanistically linked with growth. Secondary outcomes include ponderal and linear growth changes from baseline measured at eight weeks and plasma amino acid profile at four weeks. Other secondary outcomes are the acceptability and safety of high protein RUTF compared to standard RUTF. These findings will help to determine the optimal protein composition of RUTF to promote linear growth when treating severe wasting in children.

Being tested
High-protein RUTF, Standard RUTF
Keywords
Child health, Ready-to-use therapeutic food, Severe acute malnutrition, RUTF, SAM, Wasting, Outpatient Therapeutic Programme, OTP
Medical subject headings
Cachexia, Severe Acute Malnutrition

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • High-protein RUTFDietary supplement

    The high-protein RUTF is isocaloric to the standard RUTF. To have a higher protein quantity and quality, the recipe has greater proportions of milk powder plus whey protein and vegetable oil. A total of 15% of energy is from protein. The protein quality score, digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS )of the high protein, RUTF is 1.18 which is equivalent to a Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) of 1.19

  • Standard RUTFDietary supplement

    The standard RUTF was manufactured according to WHO recommendations, with at least 50% of protein-sourced dairy, mainly skim milk. A total of 10% of energy is from protein. The protein quality score, digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) of the standard RUTF is 0.76, which is equivalent to a Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS) of 0.86.

Study groups in NCT05737472
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard RUTFActive comparatorThe standard RUTF dose is according to weight as per the WHO 2013 guideline, thus 150-220Kcal/kg/day. A child will receive a weekly ration for 8 consecutive weeks from enrolment.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Standard RUTF
High-protein RUTFExperimentalThe high-protein RUTF dose is according to weight as per the WHO 2013 guideline, thus 150-220Kcal/kg/day. A child will receive a weekly ration for 8 consecutive weeks from enrolment.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: High-protein RUTF

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in plasma IGF-1

    To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in increasing circulating IGF- 1 in 6-23-month-old children with severe wasting.

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Changes in height for age z score

    To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in improving change in height-for-age z score.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Changes in weight for age z score

    To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in improving change in weight for age z score

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. Changes in weight for height z score

    To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in improving change in weight for height z score

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. Changes in knee heel length

    To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in improving change in knee heel length

    Measured: 8 weeks

  5. Changes in plasma essential amino acid profile leucine, threonine and tryptophan

    To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in improving plasma essential amino acids: leucine, threonine and tryptophan

    Measured: 4 weeks

  6. Changes in IGFBP3

    To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in increasing IGFFBP3

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. Changes in fat free mass accretion

    • To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in improving fat free mass accretions (kg/m2) using bioelectrical impedance and skinfold thickness

    Measured: 8 weeks

  8. Changes in fat mass accretion

    • To assess the efficacy of high-protein-RUTF with higher protein quality and quantity compared to standard RUTF in improving fat mass accretion (kg/m2) using bio-electrical impedance assessment and skinfold thickness

    Measured: 8 weeks

  9. Acceptability of high-protein RUTF

    • To assess acceptability of the high protein RUTF formulation compared to standard RUTF among children with severe wasting using an adaptation of action against hunger RUTF apettite test

    Measured: 4

  10. Acceptability of high-protein RUTF

    • To assess acceptability of the high protein RUTF formulation compared to standard RUTF among children with severe wasting by observing RUTF intake at participant homes for 5 hours at a single time point

    Measured: 4

  11. Compliance of high-protein RUTF

    • To assess compliance of the high protein RUTF formulation compared to standard RUTF among children with severe wasting by conducting in-depth interviews with the caregivers

    Measured: 4

  12. Safety of the high protein RUTF formulation:adverse events

    To assess the safety of high-protein-RUTF compared to standard RUTF by recording adverse events (defined as any untoward event including morbidity reported by the participant or detected by the investigator)

    Measured: 8 weeks

  13. Safety of the high protein RUTF formulation: severe adverse events

    To assess the safety of high-protein-RUTF compared to standard RUTF by recording adverse events (defined as any life threatening event reported by the participant or detected by the investigator)

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2023
  2. Study start14 Nov 2022
  3. Primary completion26 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion23 Aug 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
128 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05737472
Sponsor's protocol ID
1000079230
Acronym
Protein+
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
21 Dec 2022
Last updated
30 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: De-identified data may be made available after publication of the results in line with the study's sponsor's procedures for release.

Publications

  • Potani I, Spiegel-Feld C, Brixi G, Bendabenda J, Siegfried N, Bandsma RHJ, Briend A, Daniel AI. Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food (RUTF) Containing Low or No Dairy Compared to Standard RUTF for Children with Severe Acute Malnutrition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr. 2021 Oct 1;12(5):1930-1943. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmab027.

    PubMed 33838044
  • Shivakumar N, Jackson AA, Courtney-Martin G, Elango R, Ghosh S, Hodgkinson S, Xipsiti M, Lee WTK, Kurpad AV, Tome D. Protein Quality Assessment of Follow-up Formula for Young Children and Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Foods: Recommendations by the FAO Expert Working Group in 2017. J Nutr. 2020 Feb 1;150(2):195-201. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxz250.

    PubMed 31724705
  • Potani I, Daniel AI, Briend A, Courtney-Martin G, Berkley JA, Voskuijl W, Vresk L, Bourdon C, Kathumba S, Mbale E, Bandsma RHJ. A protocol for a proof-of-concept randomized control trial testing increased protein quantity and quality in ready-to-use therapeutic food in improving linear growth among 6-23-month-old children with severe wasting in Malawi. PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0287680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287680. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 37619218

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing High-protein RUTF and Standard RUTF in people with Severe Wasting and Severe Acute Malnutrition, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Malawi.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malawi. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in plasma IGF-1 (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05737472, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in