PainPBMTNCT05738239
Photo-biomodulation Therapy for Pain Relief After Caesarean Section
A study testing Laser therapy in people with Pain, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
C-sections may result in a lot of pain that is distressing to the mother, and can impact bonding with the baby. Although there are medications used to treat strong pain, they are not good to use after C-sections because they can affect the baby. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Laser therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2023to 30 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women aged ≥18 years with planned C-Section under spinal anesthesia.
Who cannot join
- Not willing
- Language barrier or cannot communicate in English.
- History of chronic ongoing pain needing daily opioid medications
- High risk or twin/multiple pregnancy
- C-Section planned under a general anesthetic.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Application of Photo-biomodulation as Part of Multimodal Analgesia to Improve Pain Relief and Wound Healing for Patients Having Elective Caesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial
C-sections may result in a lot of pain that is distressing to the mother, and can impact bonding with the baby. Although there are medications used to treat strong pain, they are not good to use after C-sections because they can affect the baby. There is a need for a pain management option that can reduce the use of medications. The investigators are testing the effects of a combined light and laser device (photo-biomodulation therapy; PBMT), used on the wound twice daily, with respect to pain right after surgery, and pain that lasts longer than 6 weeks after surgery.
Read the detailed description
Background Caesarean section (CS) is the most common inpatient surgical procedure performed in Canada, with an average duration of stay of 2.7 days. Its rate continues to increase; from 28.2% in 2016-2017 to 31.0% in 2020-2021. CS is commonly performed under neuraxial anesthesia (spinal or epidural) with majority of elective CSs being carried out under spinal anesthesia. It is associated with moderate to severe pain in most women and is more severe within the first 2 days. In a large cohort study involving 1288 parturients including 391 women having caesarean delivery, the mean pain score (standard deviation) was 4.7 (2.0). In another prospective study of 195 women having elective CS under spinal anesthesia, the median (interquartile range) visual analogue score (0-100 scale) with movement was 53 (32-72). Avoidance of pain during and after CS was noted to be the topmost priority among women. Significant pain after CS not only causes maternal distress but interferes with neonatal bonding and furthermore predisposes a woman for persistent pain and postpartum depression.
Chronic or persistent pain after CS can be an important problem. As per the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is defined as pain that develops on increases after a surgical procedure as identified at three months or more after surgery; localized to the area of surgery or projected to the innervation territory; and pain that is not explained by an infection, malignancy, a pre-existing pain condition or any other alternative cause.
A prospective study of 527 women noted an incidence of 18.3 %, 11.3 % and 6.8 %, respectively at 3, 6 and 12 months, and observed that more severe pain during movement within 24 h of surgery and preoperative depression were predictive of pain persistence at 6 months. A more recent prospective study of 462 women (among 621) notes an incidence of 25.5% (95% CI: 21.8-29.7) at 90 days. Presurgical anxiety (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.03; 95%CI: 1.01-1.05), smoking (adjusted RR 2.22; 95%CI: 1.27-3.88) and severe pain in the early postoperative period (adjusted RR 2.79; 95%CI: 1.29-6.00) were predictive of CPSP. Overall, the incidence of CPSP after CS can vary between 4% to 41.8% and generally decreases over time. Although factors associated with its development are noted to be inconsistent in studies, presence of severe pain in the first 1-2 days after surgery can be noted as the most commonly identified factor. CPSP can lead to significant maternal distress, suffering, continued need and potential long-term exposure to opioids, and post-partum depression (PPD). PPD is one of the commonest maternal long-term complication after childbirth, with an incidence of around 13%, as noted in published studies and also in a large observational study. History of preoperative depression and post-surgical pain can influence the incidence of PPD. In a longitudinal study of 1288 women, there was a threefold increase in the odds of PPD (at 8 weeks) in women having severe acute postpartum pain. In studies, screening for PPD is commonly performed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale consisting of 10 questions, and a threshold of >12 is considered as positive for PPD.
Photo-biomodulation therapy (PBMT) and pain relief Biological effects of low-level LASER therapy have been studied for various clinical indications. Over the years the differential effects of light emitting diodes (LEDs) in causing stimulatory effects including wound healing, epithelialization and angiogenesis, and deeper inhibitory doses of radiation by LASER in modulating pain signals have been recognized (19). As per the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery the term photo-biomodulation should be used, and PBMT is defined as a "form of light therapy that utilizes non-ionizing forms of light sources including LASERS, LEDs, and broadband light, in the visible and near infrared spectrum". PBMT has been used in many musculoskeletal conditions and in some acute pain conditions. Its proposed mechanism of action on pain and wound healing includes increased production of anti-inflammatory cytokines and local neo-angiogenesis apart from other actions.
Considering the existing limitations in multimodal analgesia and a concerted need to avoid opioids in this context, there is a greater need for non-pharmacological strategies. Photo-biomodulation therapy (PBMT) can improve pain control and wound healing. By using PBMT after surgery, the investigators have the potential to achieve better pain control and postoperative outcomes. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PBMT as part of existing multimodal analgesia, so that it can be demonstrated as appropriate for clinical use. This will result in improved maternal satisfaction and wound healing; decrease the use of perioperative opioids; potentially influence a decrease in the incidence of postpartum depression and persistent pain; and overall lead to better postoperative outcomes thereby decreasing healthcare costs.
Objectives Primary objective: To evaluate the effect of PBMT as part of a multimodal analgesia on post-surgical pain burden using pain scores with movement, after elective caesarean deliveries. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the effect of PBMT on the following outcomes during the hospital stay (up to 48 hours) after surgery: 1) Pain scores at rest; 2) The percentage of patients with moderate and severe pain; 3) The dose of total opioid used in mg of oral morphine equivalents; 4) The incidence of opioid-related adverse including nausea-vomiting and sedation, and 5) Patient satisfaction at hospital discharge. To evaluate the effect of PBMT on the following outcomes at 6 weeks after surgery: 6) The incidence of surgical wound infection and delayed wound healing; 7) The incidence of persistent pain around the surgical site, 8) The incidence and severity of PPD, and lastly 9) Any adverse effects related to the use of PBMT at any time during the study. Tertiary objectives: In all patients, to evaluate the following outcomes at 3 months after surgery: 1) incidence of chronic post-surgical pain, and 2) incidence of delayed wound healing or wound infection at 3 months after surgery, 3) incidence of PPD, and lastly 4) Any adverse effects related to the use of home based PBMT.
Design Placebo-controlled two-arm parallel-design randomized controlled trial Screening and Baseline data collection At each site there are typically 2-3 women booked for elective CS each day, with approximately 8-10 surgeries per week. Patients will be approached on the morning of surgery and informed about the study. Patients willing to participate will be consented along with collection of baseline study variables.
Study interventions Study Group Patients will have 5 treatment sessions of PBMT provided by a trained research nurse; 4 hrs after the CS, then morning (8 am), and evening (7 pm) of postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2. Each session will involve LED therapy (7 minutes) using DUO 240 LED (red at 660 nm and near infrared at 840 nm) applied parallel to the abdominal incision scar, followed by simultaneous spot treatment using the BIOFLEX LDR-100 laser probe (660 nm red light) and the LD1-200 laser probe (825 nm near infrared light), applied at the incision wound edges, for a total treatment time of 10 minutes.
Placebo Group Patients will have 5 treatment sessions following the same schedule as above, with non-effective doses of LED array and LASER therapy.
Data Collection and Follow-Up All patients will be followed by a blinded research assistant for 7 time points during their hospital stay and relevant outcomes will be collected; evening of surgery (8-9 pm); on POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm). All patients will also be contacted at 6 weeks in person, to coincide with their expected follow-up visit with their physician and relevant outcomes will be collected.
At the 6-week follow-up, patients with either persisting pain or delayed wound healing will be provided with the option of using home-based PBMT as per the randomized groups (active or placebo), 3-5 times/day until 3 months after surgery.
Sample size considerations Sample size was estimated based on a mixed model of repeated measures with general correlation structure (30). A mean score of 4.7 and SD of 2 was considered for the control group (3) and a mean difference of 1 point or more in 0-10 NRS was considered as the treatment effect. Using an alpha of 0.05 and power of 90%, and an attrition of 5%, our sample size would be 90 per group.
Data analysis According to the intention-to-treat principle and reported as per the CONSORT guidelines. Primary outcome of pain intensity for repeated measures will be analyzed using a generalized estimating equations model (GEE), with pain scores modeled as a function of time, with the use of appropriate model and correlation structure. Secondary and tertiary outcomes will be analyzed with appropriate logistic and linear regression models after adjusting for baseline variables that are known to influence these outcomes. For all, statistical significance will be considered using a 2-sided test with p-value is <0.05. All analyses will be performed in R version 4.2.1. The investigators will perform a subgroup analysis for outcomes collected at 3 months based on the patients who used home based PBMT.
Ethical considerations This trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP), as defined by the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). This protocol will be reviewed and approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB) prior to commencement of the trial.
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- Laser therapy
- Keywords
- Postoperative wound pain, Caesarean section, Photo-biomodulation therapy, Low-level LASER, Chronic post-surgical pain
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laser therapyDevice
Biological effects of low-level LASER therapy have been studied for various clinical indications, including musculoskeletal conditions and some acute pain conditions. PBMT includes low level LASER (works on pain) and light-emitting diodes (LED) (works on wound healing).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Experimental | Application of photo-biomodulation Receives: Device: Laser therapy |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Inactive PBMT Receives: Device: Laser therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Measured: Evening of surgery (8-9 pm)
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Measured: Postoperative day 1, morning (9-10 am)
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Measured: Postoperative day 1, noon (12-1 pm)
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Measured: Postoperative day 1, evening (8-9 pm)
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Measured: Postoperative day 2, morning (9-10 am)
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Measured: Postoperative day 2, noon (12-1 pm)
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Measured: Postoperative day 2, evening (8-9 pm)
Secondary outcomes (10)
Pain scores at rest
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Measured: 7 time points: evening of surgery (8-9 pm); POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm).
The percentage of patients with moderate and severe pain
Patients with average resting pain score of >4/10 on the Numerical Rating Scale during their hospital stay
Measured: Average of pain scores from 7 time points: evening of surgery (8-9 pm); POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm).
Total opioid dose used in hospital
All opioids used will be converted into oral morphine milligram equivalents for comparison
Measured: 3 days: Day of surgery until discharge from hospital
Incidence of patients with clinically important postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV).
Clinically important postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV) measured using a validated PONV intensity scale,
Wengritzky R, Mettho T, Myles PS, Burke J, Kakos A. Development and validation of a postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity scale. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104(2):158-66
Measured: 3 days: Day of surgery until discharge from hospital at 7 time points: evening of surgery (8-9 pm); POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm).
Incidence of severe sedation
Patients with grade 3 and above in the Pasero Opioid-induced Sedation scale (grade 3= frequently drowsy, arousable but drifts off to sleep during conversation)
Nisbet AT, Mooney-Cotter F. Comparison of selected sedation scales for reporting opioid-induced sedation assessment. Pain Manag Nurs. 2009;10(3):154-64
Measured: 3 days: Day of surgery until discharge from hospital at 7 time points: evening of surgery (8-9 pm); POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm).
Patient satisfaction at hospital discharge
Measured using a 0-10 scale (0=least satisfied; 10=most satisfied), patient reported
Measured: Postoperative day 3
Wound healing
Number of patients with physician identified i) delayed healing and ii) surgical skin site infection (as per the CDC criteria)
Network NHS 2023;Pages. Accessed at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention at https://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf on January 19 2023.
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Incidence of persistent pain
Elicited as Yes/No and intensity recorded using 0-10 NRS. (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain)
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Incidence of postpartum depression
Considered as positive if the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score is ≥12 The 10-question Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) helps identify patients at risk for "perinatal" depression. Scores range from 0 (not at all at risk) to 30 (highest possible risk). Scores of 12 and over are considered as postpartum depression
Measured: 6 weeks postoperatively
Incidence of adverse effects due to PBMT
Incidence of any skin allergy or injury or reaction to PBMT treatment
Measured: Any time point in the study (POD0 to 3-month follow-up)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2023
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025
- Study completion30 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by McMaster UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Active PBMT
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Harsha Shanthanna, MD, Principal investigator, SJHH and McMaster University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05738239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PBMT-2023
- Acronym
- PBMT
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand'homme P, Landau R, Houle TT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
PubMed 18818022Cheng K, Martin LF, Slepian MJ, Patwardhan AM, Ibrahim MM. Mechanisms and Pathways of Pain Photobiomodulation: A Narrative Review. J Pain. 2021 Jul;22(7):763-777. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
PubMed 33636371
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Application of Photo-biomodulation as Part of Multimodal Analgesia to Improve Pain Relief and Wound Healing for Patients Having Elective Caesarean Section: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05738239
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PBMT / PBMT-2023
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- Postoperative wound pain, Caesarean section, Photo-biomodulation therapy, Low-level LASER, Chronic post-surgical pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- McMaster UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
C-sections may result in a lot of pain that is distressing to the mother, and can impact bonding with the baby. Although there are medications used to treat strong pain, they are not good to use after C-sections because they can affect the baby. There is a need for a pain management option that can reduce the use of medications. The investigators are testing the effects of a combined light and laser device (photo-biomodulation therapy; PBMT), used on the wound twice daily, with respect to pain right after surgery, and pain that lasts longer than 6 weeks after surgery.
Detailed description
Background Caesarean section (CS) is the most common inpatient surgical procedure performed in Canada, with an average duration of stay of 2.7 days. Its rate continues to increase; from 28.2% in 2016-2017 to 31.0% in 2020-2021. CS is commonly performed under neuraxial anesthesia (spinal or epidural) with majority of elective CSs being carried out under spinal anesthesia. It is associated with moderate to severe pain in most women and is more severe within the first 2 days. In a large cohort study involving 1288 parturients including 391 women having caesarean delivery, the mean pain score (standard deviation) was 4.7 (2.0). In another prospective study of 195 women having elective CS under spinal anesthesia, the median (interquartile range) visual analogue score (0-100 scale) with movement was 53 (32-72). Avoidance of pain during and after CS was noted to be the topmost priority among women. Significant pain after CS not only causes maternal distress but interferes with neonatal bonding and furthermore predisposes a woman for persistent pain and postpartum depression.
Chronic or persistent pain after CS can be an important problem. As per the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), chronic post-surgical pain (CPSP) is defined as pain that develops on increases after a surgical procedure as identified at three months or more after surgery; localized to the area of surgery or projected to the innervation territory; and pain that is not explained by an infection, malignancy, a pre-existing pain condition or any other alternative cause.
A prospective study of 527 women noted an incidence of 18.3 %, 11.3 % and 6.8 %, respectively at 3, 6 and 12 months, and observed that more severe pain during movement within 24 h of surgery and preoperative depression were predictive of pain persistence at 6 months. A more recent prospective study of 462 women (among 621) notes an incidence of 25.5% (95% CI: 21.8-29.7) at 90 days. Presurgical anxiety (adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.03; 95%CI: 1.01-1.05), smoking (adjusted RR 2.22; 95%CI: 1.27-3.88) and severe pain in the early postoperative period (adjusted RR 2.79; 95%CI: 1.29-6.00) were predictive of CPSP. Overall, the incidence of CPSP after CS can vary between 4% to 41.8% and generally decreases over time. Although factors associated with its development are noted to be inconsistent in studies, presence of severe pain in the first 1-2 days after surgery can be noted as the most commonly identified factor. CPSP can lead to significant maternal distress, suffering, continued need and potential long-term exposure to opioids, and post-partum depression (PPD). PPD is one of the commonest maternal long-term complication after childbirth, with an incidence of around 13%, as noted in published studies and also in a large observational study. History of preoperative depression and post-surgical pain can influence the incidence of PPD. In a longitudinal study of 1288 women, there was a threefold increase in the odds of PPD (at 8 weeks) in women having severe acute postpartum pain. In studies, screening for PPD is commonly performed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale consisting of 10 questions, and a threshold of >12 is considered as positive for PPD.
Photo-biomodulation therapy (PBMT) and pain relief Biological effects of low-level LASER therapy have been studied for various clinical indications. Over the years the differential effects of light emitting diodes (LEDs) in causing stimulatory effects including wound healing, epithelialization and angiogenesis, and deeper inhibitory doses of radiation by LASER in modulating pain signals have been recognized (19). As per the American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery the term photo-biomodulation should be used, and PBMT is defined as a "form of light therapy that utilizes non-ionizing forms of light sources including LASERS, LEDs, and broadband light, in the visible and near infrared spectrum". PBMT has been used in many musculoskeletal conditions and in some acute pain conditions. Its proposed mechanism of action on pain and wound healing includes increased production of anti-inflammatory cytokines and local neo-angiogenesis apart from other actions.
Considering the existing limitations in multimodal analgesia and a concerted need to avoid opioids in this context, there is a greater need for non-pharmacological strategies. Photo-biomodulation therapy (PBMT) can improve pain control and wound healing. By using PBMT after surgery, the investigators have the potential to achieve better pain control and postoperative outcomes. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of PBMT as part of existing multimodal analgesia, so that it can be demonstrated as appropriate for clinical use. This will result in improved maternal satisfaction and wound healing; decrease the use of perioperative opioids; potentially influence a decrease in the incidence of postpartum depression and persistent pain; and overall lead to better postoperative outcomes thereby decreasing healthcare costs.
Objectives Primary objective: To evaluate the effect of PBMT as part of a multimodal analgesia on post-surgical pain burden using pain scores with movement, after elective caesarean deliveries. Secondary objectives: To evaluate the effect of PBMT on the following outcomes during the hospital stay (up to 48 hours) after surgery: 1) Pain scores at rest; 2) The percentage of patients with moderate and severe pain; 3) The dose of total opioid used in mg of oral morphine equivalents; 4) The incidence of opioid-related adverse including nausea-vomiting and sedation, and 5) Patient satisfaction at hospital discharge. To evaluate the effect of PBMT on the following outcomes at 6 weeks after surgery: 6) The incidence of surgical wound infection and delayed wound healing; 7) The incidence of persistent pain around the surgical site, 8) The incidence and severity of PPD, and lastly 9) Any adverse effects related to the use of PBMT at any time during the study. Tertiary objectives: In all patients, to evaluate the following outcomes at 3 months after surgery: 1) incidence of chronic post-surgical pain, and 2) incidence of delayed wound healing or wound infection at 3 months after surgery, 3) incidence of PPD, and lastly 4) Any adverse effects related to the use of home based PBMT.
Design Placebo-controlled two-arm parallel-design randomized controlled trial Screening and Baseline data collection At each site there are typically 2-3 women booked for elective CS each day, with approximately 8-10 surgeries per week. Patients will be approached on the morning of surgery and informed about the study. Patients willing to participate will be consented along with collection of baseline study variables.
Study interventions Study Group Patients will have 5 treatment sessions of PBMT provided by a trained research nurse; 4 hrs after the CS, then morning (8 am), and evening (7 pm) of postoperative day (POD) 1 and 2. Each session will involve LED therapy (7 minutes) using DUO 240 LED (red at 660 nm and near infrared at 840 nm) applied parallel to the abdominal incision scar, followed by simultaneous spot treatment using the BIOFLEX LDR-100 laser probe (660 nm red light) and the LD1-200 laser probe (825 nm near infrared light), applied at the incision wound edges, for a total treatment time of 10 minutes.
Placebo Group Patients will have 5 treatment sessions following the same schedule as above, with non-effective doses of LED array and LASER therapy.
Data Collection and Follow-Up All patients will be followed by a blinded research assistant for 7 time points during their hospital stay and relevant outcomes will be collected; evening of surgery (8-9 pm); on POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm). All patients will also be contacted at 6 weeks in person, to coincide with their expected follow-up visit with their physician and relevant outcomes will be collected.
At the 6-week follow-up, patients with either persisting pain or delayed wound healing will be provided with the option of using home-based PBMT as per the randomized groups (active or placebo), 3-5 times/day until 3 months after surgery.
Sample size considerations Sample size was estimated based on a mixed model of repeated measures with general correlation structure (30). A mean score of 4.7 and SD of 2 was considered for the control group (3) and a mean difference of 1 point or more in 0-10 NRS was considered as the treatment effect. Using an alpha of 0.05 and power of 90%, and an attrition of 5%, our sample size would be 90 per group.
Data analysis According to the intention-to-treat principle and reported as per the CONSORT guidelines. Primary outcome of pain intensity for repeated measures will be analyzed using a generalized estimating equations model (GEE), with pain scores modeled as a function of time, with the use of appropriate model and correlation structure. Secondary and tertiary outcomes will be analyzed with appropriate logistic and linear regression models after adjusting for baseline variables that are known to influence these outcomes. For all, statistical significance will be considered using a 2-sided test with p-value is <0.05. All analyses will be performed in R version 4.2.1. The investigators will perform a subgroup analysis for outcomes collected at 3 months based on the patients who used home based PBMT.
Ethical considerations This trial will be conducted in compliance with the protocol, principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP), as defined by the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). This protocol will be reviewed and approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB) prior to commencement of the trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Active PBMT
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active | Experimental | Device: Laser therapyApplication of photo-biomodulation |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Device: Laser therapyInactive PBMT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women aged ≥18 years with planned C-Section under spinal anesthesia.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Not willing
- Language barrier or cannot communicate in English.
- History of chronic ongoing pain needing daily opioid medications
- High risk or twin/multiple pregnancy
- C-Section planned under a general anesthetic.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laser therapyBiological effects of low-level LASER therapy have been studied for various clinical indications, including musculoskeletal conditions and some acute pain conditions. PBMT includes low level LASER (works on pain) and light-emitting diodes (LED) (works on wound healing). | Device | Active, Placebo |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Evening of surgery (8-9 pm)
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Postoperative day 1, morning (9-10 am)
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Postoperative day 1, noon (12-1 pm)
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Postoperative day 1, evening (8-9 pm)
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Postoperative day 2, morning (9-10 am)
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Postoperative day 2, noon (12-1 pm)
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale
Time frame: Postoperative day 2, evening (8-9 pm)
The 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain, patient reported.
10 secondary outcomes
Pain scores at rest
Time frame: 7 time points: evening of surgery (8-9 pm); POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm).
The percentage of patients with moderate and severe pain
Time frame: Average of pain scores from 7 time points: evening of surgery (8-9 pm); POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm).
Total opioid dose used in hospital
Time frame: 3 days: Day of surgery until discharge from hospital
Incidence of patients with clinically important postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV).
Time frame: 3 days: Day of surgery until discharge from hospital at 7 time points: evening of surgery (8-9 pm); POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm).
Incidence of severe sedation
Time frame: 3 days: Day of surgery until discharge from hospital at 7 time points: evening of surgery (8-9 pm); POD 1 and 2 at morning (9-10 am), noon (12-1 pm), and evening (8-9 pm).
Patient satisfaction at hospital discharge
Time frame: Postoperative day 3
Wound healing
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Incidence of persistent pain
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Incidence of postpartum depression
Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
Incidence of adverse effects due to PBMT
Time frame: Any time point in the study (POD0 to 3-month follow-up)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 18818022Eisenach JC, Pan PH, Smiley R, Lavand'homme P, Landau R, Houle TT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain. 2008 Nov 15;140(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Sep 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 33636371Cheng K, Martin LF, Slepian MJ, Patwardhan AM, Ibrahim MM. Mechanisms and Pathways of Pain Photobiomodulation: A Narrative Review. J Pain. 2021 Jul;22(7):763-777. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.02.005. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Harsha Shanthanna, MD principal investigator
SJHH and McMaster University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Laser therapy in people with Pain, run by McMaster University at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity with movement (elicited by asking the patient to move from supine to sitting position) using 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (time frame: Evening of surgery (8-9 pm)). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05738239, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2026.