AzTrials
AzTrials

VO2maxNCT05742542

The Effects of High vs. Low Time Spent Near VO2max During Two Work-matched High Intensity Interval Training.

A study testing Exercise training in people with VO2max, run by University of the State of Santa Catarina at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is used to define cardiorespiratory fitness, which is important to health and sport performance in humans. Although different types of training can improve VO2max, the high intensity interval training is recognized as one of the best ways to do it. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
VO2max
What is being tested?
Exercise training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Jul 2021to 15 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male ≥ 18 years;
  • No known musculoskeletal disorders;
  • Apparently healthy
  • Physically active according to American College of Sports Medicine standards and recommendations (Garber et al., 2011; RIEBE et al., 2015).

Who cannot join

  • Taking any medication that could affect aerobic parameters;
  • Smokers;
  • Involved in an aerobic training program at the start of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • University of the State of Santa Catarina

    Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, 88080-350

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) is used to define cardiorespiratory fitness, which is important to health and sport performance in humans. Although different types of training can improve VO2max, the high intensity interval training is recognized as one of the best ways to do it. Furthermore, it has long been speculated that high intensity interval training that elicits a high time spent near VO2max could be the best way to improve VO2max. However, this theory has not been verified. Thus, the investigators performed a randomized controlled trial with crossover in healthy individuals who underwent two high intensity interval training protocols of two weeks, being a workout with longer and other with shorter time spent near VO2max.

Read the detailed description

Fifteen participants were enrolled in a randomized trial with crossover to perform two weeks of high intensity interval training with high (i.e., five times 2 minutes of work and 1 minute of recovery; T-2min:1min) or low (i.e., ten times 1 minutes of work and 30 seconds of recovery; T-1min:30seg) time spent near VO2max. The work intensity was adjusted at 85% and 87% of power output achieved at the end of incremental test for the first and second week, respectively. Before and after the T-2min:1min and T-1min:30seg, the participants performed tests to determine VO2max, lactate threshold, muscle oxidative capacity, pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics, power output achieved at the end of incremental test, and power output related to Wingate anaerobic test. The training programs had a washout period of at least one month.

Conditions
VO2max
Being tested
Exercise training
Keywords
VO2max, Exercise, Aerobic, Performance, Training
Medical subject headings
Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Exercise trainingOther

    Two weeks of high intensity interval training with high or low time spent near VO2max.

Study groups in NCT05742542
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High intensity interval training with high time spent near VO2maxExperimentalParticipants performed high intensity interval training with high time spent near VO2max three times a week for two weeks. All training sessions consisted of five times 2 minutes of work and 1 minute of passive recovery. The work intensity was adjusted at 85% and 87% of power output achieved at the end of incremental test for the first and second week, respectively. The training sessions were performed using cycle ergometer. Findings were compared to high intensity interval training with low time spent near VO2max, which followed the same exercise frequency, intensity and total duration.
Receives: Other: Exercise training
High intensity interval training with low time spent near VO2maxExperimentalParticipants performed high intensity interval training with low time spent near VO2max three times a week for two weeks. All training sessions consisted of ten times 1 minutes of work and 30 seconds of passive recovery. The work intensity was adjusted at 85% and 87% of power output achieved at the end of incremental test for the first and second week, respectively. The training sessions were performed using cycle ergometer. Findings were compared to high intensity interval training with high time spent near VO2max, which followed the same exercise frequency, intensity and total duration.
Receives: Other: Exercise training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximal oxygen uptake

    The highest 15 seconds VO2 average determined from rolling averages of 5 seconds samples measured during incremental test or confirmation test of VO2max.

    Measured: Change at Maximal oxygen uptake after two weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Lactate threshold

    The work intensity at which blood lactate concentration increased 1 mmol.L-1 above baseline.

    Measured: Change at Lactate threshold after two weeks

  2. Muscle oxidative capacity

    Rate recovery of muscle oxygen consumption (k-mV̇O2) of the vastus lateralis, with the k-mV̇O2 indicating muscle oxidative capacity.

    Measured: Change at Muscle oxidative capacity after two weeks

  3. Pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics

    The on-transient response for V̇O2 was fitted using a mono-exponential model, which the rate constant (k-pV̇O2) for the kinetics of V̇O2 was calculated as 1/tau (expressed in min-1).

    Measured: Change at Pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics after two weeks

  4. Power output achieved at the end of incremental test

    Power output achieved at the end of ramp incremental test (20 W.min-1).

    Measured: Change at Power output achieved at the end of incremental test after two weeks

  5. Wingate anaerobic test

    Peak power, mean power, and minimum power were defined as the highest mechanical power output, the average power sustained throughout the 30-s period, and the power output attained before the end of the test, respectively.

    Measured: Change at Wingate anaerobic test after two weeks

  6. Time spent near VO2max

    Time spent at or above 90% or 95% of VO2max.

    Measured: First to the last day of test or training, an average of 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2023
  2. Study start1 Jul 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
The order of training protocols was randomized and the training programs had a washout period of at least one month.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05742542
Sponsor's protocol ID
VO2maxtrainingUDESantaCatarina
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
3 Feb 2023
Last updated
24 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: The data will be presented as a group (training protocol), but data from representative subjects may be presented if they add relevant information.

Publications

  • Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle: Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med. 2013 May;43(5):313-38. doi: 10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x.

    PubMed 23539308
  • Laursen PB, Jenkins DG. The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training: optimising training programmes and maximising performance in highly trained endurance athletes. Sports Med. 2002;32(1):53-73. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232010-00003.

    PubMed 11772161
  • Lisboa FD, Raimundo JAG, Salvador AF, Pereira KL, Turnes T, Diefenthaeler F, Oliveira MFM, Caputo F. Acute Cardiopulmonary, Metabolic, and Neuromuscular Responses to Severe-Intensity Intermittent Exercises. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Feb;33(2):408-416. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002130.

    PubMed 28704307
  • Lisboa FD, Salvador AF, Raimundo JA, Pereira KL, de Aguiar RA, Caputo F. Decreasing Power Output Increases Aerobic Contribution During Low-Volume Severe-Intensity Intermittent Exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Sep;29(9):2434-40. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000914.

    PubMed 26308828
  • Midgley AW, Mc Naughton LR. Time at or near VO2max during continuous and intermittent running. A review with special reference to considerations for the optimisation of training protocols to elicit the longest time at or near VO2max. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006 Mar;46(1):1-14.

    PubMed 16596093
  • Midgley AW, Mc Naughton LR, Wilkinson M. Criteria and other methodological considerations in the evaluation of time at V.O2max. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2006 Jun;46(2):183-8.

    PubMed 16823345
  • Raimundo JAG, Turnes T, de Aguiar RA, Lisboa FD, Loch T, Ribeiro G, Caputo F. The Severe Exercise Domain Amplitude: A Comparison Between Endurance Runners and Cyclists. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019 Mar;90(1):3-13. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1549356. Epub 2019 Jan 17.

    PubMed 30653425
  • Turnes T, de Aguiar RA, Cruz RS, Caputo F. Interval training in the boundaries of severe domain: effects on aerobic parameters. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jan;116(1):161-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-015-3263-0. Epub 2015 Sep 15.

    PubMed 26373721

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exercise training in people with VO2max, run by University of the State of Santa Catarina at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximal oxygen uptake (time frame: Change at Maximal oxygen uptake after two weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05742542, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in