AzTrials
AzTrials

Pregnancy RelatedC123TNCT05750394

Cesarean 123 Trial: Randomized Trial Comparing Single, Double and Triple Layer Uterine Closures During Cesarean Delivery

A study testing Uterine layers closed, Suture Type and Endometrium in people with Pregnancy Related, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare post-operative uterine scar thickness in people who have had the uterus closed during cesarean sections by one of three different methods. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pregnancy Related
What is being tested?
Uterine layers closed, Suture Type and Endometrium
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2023to Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years or older
  • Singleton gestation
  • Nonurgent primary or secondary cesarean delivery at greater than 35w6d
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) <35 kg/m^2

Who cannot join

  • More than 1 prior cesarean delivery
  • Multiple gestation
  • Known coagulation disorder or current use of anti-coagulants
  • Mullerian anomalies
  • Placenta previa

About this study

Official title: Cesarean 123 Trial: Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Single, Double and Triple Layer Uterine Closures During Cesarean Delivery

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare post-operative uterine scar thickness in people who have had the uterus closed during cesarean sections by one of three different methods. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Residual myometrial thickness at the scar site assessed by MRI performed 4 months after the procedure
  • Myometrial niche formation assessed by MRI performed 4 months after the procedure
  • Scar healing ratio (HR) difference as defined by HR= residual myometrial thickness/total myometrial thickness
  • Post-operative change in hemoglobin
  • Time required for hysterotomy closure
  • The number of extra sutures required to achieve surgeon-acceptable hemostasis
Read more

Participants undergoing scheduled cesarean sections will be randomized to one of three different uterine closure methods. The methods are:

  1. Single layer closure using the following technique: Closure of the myometrium and serosa with one barbed suture using a running unlocked technique. The endometrium should be excluded.
  2. Double layer closure using the following technique: Closure of the full thickness of the myometrium with one smooth suture using a running locked technique. The endometrium should be excluded. Followed by imbrication of the second layer with one smooth suture using a running unlocked technique.
  3. Triple layer closure of Endometrium, Myometrium and Serosa (EMS) using one of the the following two techniques: Closure of the endometrium and 2-4 mm of internal myometrium with one barbed suture using a running unlocked technique followed by closure of the remaining myometrium and serosa with one barbed suture using a running unlocked technique. Or, Closure of the endometrium and 2-4 mm of internal myometrium with one barbed suture on using a running unlocked technique followed by closure of the remaining myometrium with one barbed suture a running unlocked technique followed by closure of the serosa with one barbed suture using a running unlocked technique.

Four months after the surgery, participants will have a MRI of the pelvis to assess the scar on the uterus.

Being tested
Uterine layers closed, Suture Type, Endometrium
Keywords
Cesarean, Myometrium, scar thickness, niche

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Uterine layers closedProcedure or surgery

    Uterus closed with 1, 2 or 3 layers

  • Suture TypeDevice

    Barbed or smooth

  • EndometriumProcedure or surgery

    Included or excluded

Study groups in NCT05750394
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single Layer ClosureActive comparatorSingle layer closure using the following technique: a. Closure of the myometrium and serosa with one (1) 0 V-Loc 90 suture on a GS-24 needle using an unlocked technique. The endometrium should be excluded.
Receives: Procedure: Uterine layers closed; Device: Suture Type; Procedure: Endometrium
Double Layer ClosureActive comparatorDouble layer closure using the following technique: 1. Closure of the full thickness of the myometrium with one (1) Monocryl suture on a CT needle using a running locked technique. The endometrium should be excluded. 2. Imbrication of the first layer with one (1) Monocryl suture on a CT needle using a running un-locked technique
Receives: Procedure: Uterine layers closed; Device: Suture Type; Procedure: Endometrium
Triple Layer ClosureActive comparatorTriple layer closure of Endometrium, Myometrium and Serosa (EMS) using one of the the following two techniques: 1. Closure of the endometrium and 2-4 mm of internal myometrium with one (1) 2-0 V-Loc 90 suture on a GS-21 needle using an unlocked technique 2. Closure of the remaining myometrium and serosa with one (1) 0 V-Loc 90 suture on a GS-24 needle using an unlocked technique or 1. Closure of the endometrium and 2-4 mm of internal myometrium with one (1) 2-0 V-Loc 90 suture on a GS-21 needle using an unlocked technique 2. Closure of the remaining myometrium with one (1) 0 V-Loc 90 suture on a GS-24 needle using an unlocked technique 3. Closure of the serosa with one (1) 2-0 V-Loc 90 suture on a GS-21 needle using an unlocked technique
Receives: Procedure: Uterine layers closed; Device: Suture Type; Procedure: Endometrium

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Myometrial thickness

    Residual myometrial thickness at the scar site assessed by MRI performed

    Measured: 4 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Niche

    Myometrial niche formation assessed by MRI performed

    Measured: 4 months

  2. Scar ratio

    Scar healing ratio (HR) difference as defined by HR= residual myometrial thickness/total myometrial thickness by MRI

    Measured: 4 month

  3. Blood loss

    Post-operative change in hemoglobin

    Measured: 1 day

  4. Time for closure

    Time required for hysterotomy closure

    Measured: Immediate

  5. Extra sutures

    The number of extra sutures required to achieve surgeon-acceptable hemostasis

    Measured: Immediate

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Mar 2023
  2. Study startJul 2023 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJul 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2025 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Lack of funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05750394
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023P000041
Acronym
C123T
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
20 Feb 2023
Last updated
2 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, Vikhareva O, Markey S, Chaillet N, Moore L, Paris G, Bujold E. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):507.e1-507.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

    PubMed 26522861
  • Alessandri F, Evangelisti G, Centurioni MG, Gustavino C, Ferrero S, Barra F. Fishbone double-layer barbed suture in cesarean section: a help in preventing long-term obstetric sequelae? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Sep;304(3):573-576. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06121-8.

    PubMed 34146146

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Uterine layers closed, Suture Type and Endometrium in people with Pregnancy Related, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Myometrial thickness (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05750394, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in