Knee OsteoarthritisNCT05767788
Mobilization With Movement (MWM) on Knee Osteoarthritis (OA)
A study testing Movement with Mobilization (MWM) in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
Movement with mobilization (MWM) is an effective manual therapy to improve pain and function of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, immediate, and prolonged effects after prolonged MWM period was under-investigated. In this double-blinded randomized control trial, 40 patients are needed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Movement with Mobilization (MWM)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- 10 Dec 2022to 10 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- History of knee OA for at least 1-year
- Pain intensity level ≥ 3 on a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
- Both unilateral or bilateral knee pain
- Having morning stiffness less than 30 minutes
- Having crepitus on active movement
- Having bony tenderness
- Having bony enlargement
Who cannot join
- Having active inflammatory or infectious knee conditions
- Having bone integrity conditions like osteoporosis
- Having knee joint instability
- Having skin integrity conditions like frail skin or lower limb peripheral vascular disease
- History of hip or knee fracture
- History of knee surgical history
- Use of knee corticosteroid or opioid injection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Hong Kong1 site
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of Mobilization With Movement (MWM) on Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis (OA): A Double-blinded Randomized Sham-controlled Trial
Movement with mobilization (MWM) is an effective manual therapy to improve pain and function of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
However, immediate, and prolonged effects after prolonged MWM period was under-investigated.
Read more
In this double-blinded randomized control trial, 40 patients are needed. The subjects and assessors will be blinded. Subjects in intervention group will receive MWM twice a week and corresponding home exercise for 6 weeks.
Participants in control group will only receive sham treatment with light touch.
The effects on knee pain in visual analogue scale (VAS); flexion and extension range of motion (ROM) by goniometer; strength by hand-held dynamometer; function by Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and 30-second Chair Stand Test; and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) just after, 1-month and 3-month after treatment will be compared with baseline. Six-month after treatment, KOOS and WOMAC will be conducted.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Movement with Mobilization (MWM), Sham Movement with Mobilization (Sham MWM)
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Movement with Mobilization (MWM)Other
Painful active functional knee movement is identified. The most comfortable passive medial, lateral, medial rotatory, lateral rotatory, postero-anterior, and antero-posterior glide, is applied to the knee of the patient.
Three sets of 10 repetitions are applied. Corresponding home MWM exercise is taught. The treatment is conducted for 12 sessions over 6 weeks.
Sham Movement with Mobilization (Sham MWM)Other
Painful active functional knee movement is identified. The most comfortable passive medial, lateral, medial rotatory, lateral rotatory, postero-anterior, and antero-posterior light-touch glide, is applied to the knee of the patient.
Three sets of 10 repetitions are applied. Corresponding home MWM exercise is taught. The treatment is conducted for 12 sessions over 6 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Movement with Mobilization (MWM) | Experimental | Active movement with passive mobilization gliding force Receives: Other: Movement with Mobilization (MWM) |
| Sham Movement with Mobilization (Sham MWM) | Sham comparator | Active movement with passive light touch gliding force Receives: Other: Sham Movement with Mobilization (Sham MWM) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of pain in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects will indicate the pain level on a 100-millimeter line with endpoints, marked "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain", at the time of assessment.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of pain in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects will indicate the pain level on a 100-millimeter line with endpoints, marked "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain", at the time of assessment.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of pain in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Subjects will indicate the pain level on a 100-millimeter line with endpoints, marked "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain", at the time of assessment.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Secondary outcomes (26)
Change of time used in the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Subjects will be instructed to get up from the chair and then walk to a target 3 meters away, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time used will be recorded. An average of two testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of time used in the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Subjects will be instructed to get up from the chair and then walk to a target 3 meters away, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time used will be recorded. An average of two testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of time used in the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Subjects will be instructed to get up from the chair and then walk to a target 3 meters away, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time used will be recorded. An average of two testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of number of repetitions in the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30CST)
Subjects will be instructed to stand up from the chair and then return to sit down on the chair repeatedly for 30 seconds or until the subject fails to continue at any time point during the trial. Only 1 testing trial will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of number of repetitions in the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30CST)
Subjects will be instructed to stand up from the chair and then return to sit down on the chair repeatedly for 30 seconds or until the subject fails to continue at any time point during the trial. Only 1 testing trial will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of number of repetitions in the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30CST)
Subjects will be instructed to stand up from the chair and then return to sit down on the chair repeatedly for 30 seconds or until the subject fails to continue at any time point during the trial. Only 1 testing trial will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of knee flexors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
A digital dynamometer will be used to measure the muscle strength (in kilograms) of the subject's hamstrings muscles. Subjects will be guided to sit with their arms crossed at the shoulders and hold against their chest, back straight, knees relax in 90 degrees flexion in a high sitting position. The isometric peak force for flexion will be recorded respectively.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of knee flexors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
A digital dynamometer will be used to measure the muscle strength (in kilograms) of the subject's hamstrings muscles. Subjects will be guided to sit with their arms crossed at the shoulders and hold against their chest, back straight, knees relax in 90 degrees flexion in a high sitting position. The isometric peak force for flexion will be recorded respectively.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of knee flexors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
A digital dynamometer will be used to measure the muscle strength (in kilograms) of the subject's hamstrings muscles. Subjects will be guided to sit with their arms crossed at the shoulders and hold against their chest, back straight, knees relax in 90 degrees flexion in a high sitting position. The isometric peak force for flexion will be recorded respectively.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of knee extensors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
A digital dynamometer will be used to measure the muscle strength (in kilograms) of the subject's quadriceps and muscles.
Subjects will be guided to sit with their arms crossed at the shoulders and hold against their chest, back straight, knees relax in 90 degrees flexion in a high sitting position.
The isometric peak force for flexion and extension will be recorded respectively.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of knee extensors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
A digital dynamometer will be used to measure the muscle strength (in kilograms) of the subject's quadriceps and muscles.
Subjects will be guided to sit with their arms crossed at the shoulders and hold against their chest, back straight, knees relax in 90 degrees flexion in a high sitting position.
The isometric peak force for flexion and extension will be recorded respectively.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of knee extensors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
A digital dynamometer will be used to measure the muscle strength (in kilograms) of the subject's quadriceps and muscles.
Subjects will be guided to sit with their arms crossed at the shoulders and hold against their chest, back straight, knees relax in 90 degrees flexion in a high sitting position.
The isometric peak force for flexion and extension will be recorded respectively.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
A health-related quality of life questionnaire. The score ranges from 0% (the worst) to 100% (the best).
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
A health-related quality of life questionnaire. The score ranges from 0% (the worst) to 100% (the best).
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
A health-related quality of life questionnaire. The score ranges from 0% (the worst) to 100% (the best).
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
A health-related quality of life questionnaire. The score ranges from 0% (the worst) to 100% (the best).
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 6-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
A health-related quality of life questionnaire. The score ranges from 0 (the worst) to 100 (the best).
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
A health-related quality of life questionnaire. The score ranges from 0 (the worst) to 100 (the best).
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
A health-related quality of life questionnaire. The score ranges from 0 (the worst) to 100 (the best).
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
A health-related quality of life questionnaire. The score ranges from 0 (the worst) to 100 (the best).
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 6-month after last treatment session
Change of active knee flexion range of motion by the standard goniometer
The active range of motion for knee flexion will be measured with a standard goniometer on the painful knee in supine.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of active knee flexion range of motion by the standard goniometer
The active range of motion for knee flexion will be measured with a standard goniometer on the painful knee in supine.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of active knee flexion range of motion by the standard goniometer
The active range of motion for knee flexion will be measured with a standard goniometer on the painful knee in supine.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of active knee extension range of motion by the standard goniometer
The active range of motion for knee flexion will be measured with a standard goniometer on the painful knee in supine.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of active knee extension range of motion by the standard goniometer
The active range of motion for knee flexion will be measured with a standard goniometer on the painful knee in supine.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of active knee extension range of motion by the standard goniometer
The active range of motion for knee flexion will be measured with a standard goniometer on the painful knee in supine.
An average of 3 testing trials will be used.
Measured: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2023
- Study start10 Dec 2022
- Primary completion10 May 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion10 May 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- KING HIM CHAN, BSc, Principal investigator, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityMING HON LEE, BSc, Principal investigator, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityYIK SING SHUM, BSc, Principal investigator, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityYEUK LAI CHAN, BSc, Principal investigator, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityFADI AL ZOUBI, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityMAN HA TSANG, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05767788
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MWMKOA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2023
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of Mobilization With Movement (MWM) on Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis (OA): A Double-blinded Randomized Sham-controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05767788
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MWMKOA
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 May 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 May 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Movement with mobilization (MWM) is an effective manual therapy to improve pain and function of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).
However, immediate, and prolonged effects after prolonged MWM period was under-investigated.
In this double-blinded randomized control trial, 40 patients are needed. The subjects and assessors will be blinded. Subjects in intervention group will receive MWM twice a week and corresponding home exercise for 6 weeks.
Participants in control group will only receive sham treatment with light touch.
The effects on knee pain in visual analogue scale (VAS); flexion and extension range of motion (ROM) by goniometer; strength by hand-held dynamometer; function by Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and 30-second Chair Stand Test; and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) just after, 1-month and 3-month after treatment will be compared with baseline. Six-month after treatment, KOOS and WOMAC will be conducted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Movement with Mobilization (MWM) | Experimental | Other: Movement with Mobilization (MWM)Active movement with passive mobilization gliding force |
| Sham Movement with Mobilization (Sham MWM) | Sham comparator | Other: Sham Movement with Mobilization (Sham MWM)Active movement with passive light touch gliding force |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History of knee OA for at least 1-year
- Pain intensity level ≥ 3 on a 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
- Both unilateral or bilateral knee pain
- Having morning stiffness less than 30 minutes
- Having crepitus on active movement
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Having active inflammatory or infectious knee conditions
- Having bone integrity conditions like osteoporosis
- Having knee joint instability
- Having skin integrity conditions like frail skin or lower limb peripheral vascular disease
- History of hip or knee fracture
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Movement with Mobilization (MWM)Painful active functional knee movement is identified. The most comfortable passive medial, lateral, medial rotatory, lateral rotatory, postero-anterior, and antero-posterior glide, is applied to the knee of the patient. Three sets of 10 repetitions are applied. Corresponding home MWM exercise is taught. The treatment is conducted for 12 sessions over 6 weeks. | Other | Movement with Mobilization (MWM) |
| Sham Movement with Mobilization (Sham MWM)Painful active functional knee movement is identified. The most comfortable passive medial, lateral, medial rotatory, lateral rotatory, postero-anterior, and antero-posterior light-touch glide, is applied to the knee of the patient. Three sets of 10 repetitions are applied. Corresponding home MWM exercise is taught. The treatment is conducted for 12 sessions over 6 weeks. | Other | Sham Movement with Mobilization (Sham MWM) |
Primary outcome
Change of pain in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Subjects will indicate the pain level on a 100-millimeter line with endpoints, marked "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain", at the time of assessment.
Change of pain in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Subjects will indicate the pain level on a 100-millimeter line with endpoints, marked "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain", at the time of assessment.
Change of pain in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Subjects will indicate the pain level on a 100-millimeter line with endpoints, marked "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain", at the time of assessment.
26 secondary outcomes
Change of time used in the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of time used in the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of time used in the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of number of repetitions in the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30CST)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of number of repetitions in the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30CST)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of number of repetitions in the 30-second Chair Stand Test (30CST)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of knee flexors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of knee flexors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of knee flexors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of knee extensors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of knee extensors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of knee extensors muscle strength by the hand-held dynamometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 6-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 6-month after last treatment session
Change of active knee flexion range of motion by the standard goniometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of active knee flexion range of motion by the standard goniometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of active knee flexion range of motion by the standard goniometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Change of active knee extension range of motion by the standard goniometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment
Change of active knee extension range of motion by the standard goniometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 1-month after last treatment session
Change of active knee extension range of motion by the standard goniometer
Time frame: The change before the start of treatment and 3-month after last treatment session
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
KING HIM CHAN, BSc principal investigator
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
MING HON LEE, BSc principal investigator
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
YIK SING SHUM, BSc principal investigator
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Movement with Mobilization (MWM) in people with Knee Osteoarthritis, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of pain in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (time frame: The change before the start of treatment and after 6-week treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2023.