AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral AngiographyNCT05778214

A Clinical Trial for the Interventional Robotic System

A study testing Interventional Robotic System in people with Cerebral Angiography, run by Changhai Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this multi-center clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the interventional robotic system for cerebral angiography, researchers will compare the ordinary angiography to assess the clinical success rate, operation time, radiation absorption, etc. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Angiography
What is being tested?
Interventional Robotic System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
142 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
28 Feb 2023to Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 and ≤ 85 years;
  • Plan to undergo cerebral angiography;
  • Voluntarily participated in this trial and signed the informed consent form.

Who cannot join

  • Preoperative mRS score >2;
  • Allergy or intolerance to iodine contrast media;
  • Allergy to interventional devices;
  • Severe cardiac, hepatic and renal insufficiency;
  • Active systemic infection;
  • Severe stenosis, occlusion or skin infection at the puncture site;
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Subjects who are to undergo surgery at the same time as cerebral angiography;
  • Subjects with severe coagulation disorders, bleeding tendencies, or contraindications to anticoagulant drugs (e.g., heparin);
  • Subjects who are enrolled in clinical studies with other devices or drugs 3 months prior to screening;
  • Female subjects of childbearing age who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • Other subjects who, in the judgment of the investigator, are not suitable for participation in this trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Changhai Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai City

    Jianming liu, 008613901780638, chzhanghj@smmu.edu.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Non-Inferiority, Prospective and Parallel-Group Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Interventional Robotic System for Cerebral Angiography

The goal of this multi-center clinical trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the interventional robotic system for cerebral angiography, researchers will compare the ordinary angiography to assess the clinical success rate, operation time, radiation absorption, etc.

Being tested
Interventional Robotic System
Keywords
Cerebral Angiography, Interventional Surgical Robot

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interventional Robotic SystemDevice

    Cerebral angiography was performed by using the interventional robotic system

Study groups in NCT05778214
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Interventional Robotic System Assisted SurgeryExperimentalExperimental group underwent cerebral angiography using the vascular interventional surgical control system
Receives: Device: Interventional Robotic System
Traditional Manual SurgeryNo interventionThe control group process the traditional manual operation for cerebral angiography

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical Success Rate

    Assessment of the clinical success rate of the surgical physician in completing cerebral angiography examination through the operation of experimental instruments or artificial means.

    Measured: at the end of surgery

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Super-selective Technique Success Rate

    Assessing the technical success rate of the surgical physician in performing super-selective catheterization of cerebral vessels through the operation of experimental instruments or artificial means.

    Measured: at the end of surgery

  2. Super-selective Catheterization Time for Target Vessels

    Calculate and compare the average time taken to perform super-selective catheterization for each target vessel during each surgical procedure.

    Measured: at the end of surgery

  3. DSA Fluoroscopy Time

    Record and compare the duration of fluoroscopy during DSA for each surgical procedure.

    Measured: at the end of surgery

  4. Surgical Time

    Record and compare the duration of each surgical procedure.

    Measured: at the end of surgery

  5. Primary Operator Radiation Absorbed Dose

    Record and compare the absorbed dose of ionizing radiation received by the primary operator during each surgical procedure.

    Measured: at the end of surgery

  6. Instrument Performance Evaluation

    The surgical physician fills out a form after the surgery to subjectively evaluate the performance of the experimental instruments during the angiographic examination procedure.

    Measured: at the end of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2023
  2. Study start28 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
142 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05778214
Sponsor's protocol ID
P01-QR-003
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
23 Feb 2023
Last updated
21 Mar 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Zhang Y, Xu H, Sun J, Chen WH, Zhang Y, Chen M, Yi T, Wu YM, Cheng G, Guo J, Yang P, Guo S, Liu J. Safety and efficacy of cerebral robot assisted angiography: randomized comparison of robotic versus manual procedures. J Neurointerv Surg. 2026 Apr 16;18(5):1330-1336. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2025-023412.

    PubMed 40633938

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Interventional Robotic System in people with Cerebral Angiography, run by Changhai Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical Success Rate (time frame: at the end of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05778214, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in