AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureIC-SPECNCT05782075

Biological Monitoring by a Nurse for Heart Failure Patients.

An observational study of Heart Failure, run by Hôpital NOVO at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of delegating remote biological monitoring in post-hospitalization for cardiac decompensation by a heart failure nurse. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure
What is being tested?
Remote biological monitoring by a heart failure nurse
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
23 Feb 2023to Apr 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients discharged from the cardiology department of NOVO Hospital with a heart failure episode

Who may be able to join

  • Patient ≥18 years old,
  • Patient hospitalised for heart failure and discharged,
  • Glomerular filtration rate at discharge > 20ml/min/1.73m²,
  • Patient informed and agree to participate,
  • Patient able to carry out the follow-up proposed by the cardiology department.

Who cannot join

  • Cognitive disorders with Codex test category C and D,
  • Barrier of the language,
  • Psychiatric disorder that may interfere with treatment,
  • Major surgery scheduled within 3 months,
  • Excessive alcohol or drug use with no desire to withdraw
  • Cardiac amyloidosis,
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Terminal heart failure,
  • Patient discharged to specialised Care and Rehabilitation department,
  • Any disease other than cardiac with a life expectancy of less than 1 year according to the investigator,
  • Patient under guardianship,

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Cardiology department - Hospital NOVO - Pontoise site

    Pontoise, 95300

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Biological Monitoring by a Nurse of Post-hospital Heart Failure Patients.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of delegating remote biological monitoring in post-hospitalization for cardiac decompensation by a heart failure nurse.

Read the detailed description

Chronic heart failure is a major public health issue in France. It is the leading cause of hospitalisation in people over 65 years of age and results in many costly and potentially avoidable hospital stays. One third of patients are readmitted to hospital within 3 months of discharge.

A remote monitoring programme and natriuretic peptide monitoring during this vulnerable period can help improve patient management, reducing rehospitalisation rates, emergency room visits and mortality.

Given the increasing pressure on already limited healthcare resources, it is important to examine the delegation of care to specialist nurses, as well as their safety.

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of delegating remote biological monitoring in post-hospitalization for cardiac decompensation by a heart failure nurse.

Conditions
Heart Failure
Being tested
Remote biological monitoring by a heart failure nurse
Keywords
Heart failure, Biological monitoring, Heart failure nurse, Post-hospitalization
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Remote biological monitoring by a heart failure nurseOther

    Review of biological results by a nurse (IDE) trained in heart failure monitoring, alongside the cardiologist, at S1, S2, M1, M2 and M3.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of the concordance, appropriateness and safety of nursing decisions in post-hospitalization heart failure

    The relevance and safety of IDE decisions will be determined by the concordance rate between the decisions made by the cardiologist and the IDE following the biological results at each check-up and after blind review by a second cardiologist

    Measured: At the end of the patient's follow-up, an average of 3 month

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Assessment of the risk of rehospitalisation in the study population between discharge and M3

    The risk of rehospitalization and death will be assessed, to see if a significant difference is observed between IDE decisions and cardiologist decisions, with items listed below :

    • Number of interventions initiated,
    • Number of rehospitalisation for all causes and for heart failure.
    • Number of emergency room visits for heart failure and all causes.

    Measured: At the end of the patient's follow-up, an average of 3 month

  2. Assessment of the risk of death in the study population between discharge and M3

    The risk of death will be assessed by the rate of death for all-cause and cardiac to see if a significant difference is observed between IDE decisions and cardiologist decisions.

    Measured: At the end of the patient's follow-up, an average of 3 month

  3. Impact of the organisation on patient outcomes at M3 (Brain natriuretic peptide)

    The impact of the organisation, favourable or unfavourable, on patient outcomes will be assessed by the evolution of the following item :

    • Brain natriuretic peptide levels between discharge and three months,

    Measured: At the end of the patient's follow-up, an average of 3 month

  4. Impact of the organisation on patient outcomes at M3 (New York Heart Association (NYHA))

    The impact of the organisation, favourable or unfavourable, on patient outcomes will be assessed by the evolution of the following item :

    • New York Heart Association (NYHA) score from discharge to three months.

    Measured: At the end of the patient's follow-up, an average of 3 month

  5. Assessment of the feasibility of the patient monitoring system

    The feasibility of the patient monitoring system will be assessed in relation to the number of biological tests not performed.

    If the number of biological tests not performed is too high, the patient monitoring system will not be validated.

    Measured: At the end of the patient's follow-up, an average of 3 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Mar 2023
  2. Study start23 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completionApr 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05782075
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHRD0323
Acronym
IC-SPEC
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
22 Feb 2023
Last updated
31 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Logeart D, Isnard R, Resche-Rigon M, Seronde MF, de Groote P, Jondeau G, Galinier M, Mulak G, Donal E, Delahaye F, Juilliere Y, Damy T, Jourdain P, Bauer F, Eicher JC, Neuder Y, Trochu JN; Heart Failure of the French Society of Cardiology. Current aspects of the spectrum of acute heart failure syndromes in a real-life setting: the OFICA study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2013 Apr;15(4):465-76. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs189. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

    PubMed 23186936
  • Khan MS, Sreenivasan J, Lateef N, Abougergi MS, Greene SJ, Ahmad T, Anker SD, Fonarow GC, Butler J. Trends in 30- and 90-Day Readmission Rates for Heart Failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;14(4):e008335. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008335. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

    PubMed 33866827
  • Health Quality Ontario. Effect of Early Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge on Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 May 25;17(8):1-37. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28638496
  • Koehler F, Winkler S, Schieber M, Sechtem U, Stangl K, Bohm M, Boll H, Kim SS, Koehler K, Lucke S, Honold M, Heinze P, Schweizer T, Braecklein M, Kirwan BA, Gelbrich G, Anker SD; TIM-HF Investigators. Telemedical Interventional Monitoring in Heart Failure (TIM-HF), a randomized, controlled intervention trial investigating the impact of telemedicine on mortality in ambulatory patients with heart failure: study design. Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Dec;12(12):1354-62. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfq199.

    PubMed 21098580
  • Jourdain P, Jondeau G, Funck F, Gueffet P, Le Helloco A, Donal E, Aupetit JF, Aumont MC, Galinier M, Eicher JC, Cohen-Solal A, Juilliere Y. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide-guided therapy to improve outcome in heart failure: the STARS-BNP Multicenter Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Apr 24;49(16):1733-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.081. Epub 2007 Apr 2.

    PubMed 17448376

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heart Failure, run by Hôpital NOVO at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of the concordance, appropriateness and safety of nursing decisions in post-hospitalization heart failure (time frame: At the end of the patient's follow-up, an average of 3 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05782075, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in