AzTrials
AzTrials

Bleeding DisorderNCT05790109

Operator and Patient Acceptance of Radiofrequency Cautery of the Biopsy Track During Percutaneous Liver, Kidney or Spleen Biopsy Procedures.

A study testing RF track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy in people with Bleeding Disorder and Spleen Lesion, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to assess the physician and patient experience of radio frequency (RF) track cautery in patients undergoing needle biopsy of the liver, kidney, or spleen who have one or more risk factors for biopsy-related bleeding. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Bleeding Disorder, Spleen Lesion, Liver Diseases
What is being tested?
RF track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 May 2023to 30 Jun 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients referred to interventional radiology for clinically indicated liver, kidney, or spleen biopsy for diffuse or focal disease, who also have one or more of the following risk factors for bleeding:
  • Coagulopathy (INR ≥ 1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50) before correction
  • Renal disease with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 ml/min
  • Liver cirrhosis
  • Anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications where periprocedural withholding poses
  • Competing medical risk, or the urgency of the procedure precludes holding the anticoagulant medications for the standard interval (departmental guidelines).
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Any splenic biopsy
  • Hypervascular masses in the liver or kidney
  • Renal and liver parenchymal biopsies, which are known to carry a higher risk of bleeding.

Who cannot join

  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR remaining ≥ 2.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets remaining < 25)
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients who are not competent to provide their own consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to assess the physician and patient experience of radio frequency (RF) track cautery in patients undergoing needle biopsy of the liver, kidney, or spleen who have one or more risk factors for biopsy-related bleeding. RF track cautery involves inserting a bipolar electrode through the same introducer needle used for the biopsy, and heating the tissues along the path of the biopsy needle to prevent bleeding. This study primarily aims to assess the operator and patient experience during the use of track cautery. Secondary aims are to assess the technical success rate and procedure adverse events. Participants who enroll in the study will undergo track cautery as part of their clinically indicated liver, kidney, or spleen biopsy. After the procedure, they will fill out a brief survey asking about their experience during the procedure. Physician operators who perform track cautery as part of the study will also fill out a survey after each procedure asking about their experience using this technique.

Read the detailed description

Percutaneous biopsies of abdominal organs (liver, kidney, spleen) are commonly performed procedures and, while generally considered safe, have a small risk of post-biopsy hemorrhage. Bleeding risks of percutaneous biopsy are known to be higher for solid abdominal organs including liver, kidney and spleen, than for abdominal biopsies not involving these organs (for example, peritoneal masses or lymph nodes) Some patients also exhibit an increase in bleeding risk due to alterations in coagulation parameters or platelet number and function, which are known to increase rates of post-biopsy hemorrhage. Existing corrective measures for bleeding diathesis such as blood product transfusions are costly and confer additional risks, and do not address the mechanical tissue and vessel injury that sometimes underlies post-biopsy bleeding. Injection of gelatin sponge or other materials into the biopsy track via the introducer needle, while commonly used, can be cumbersome and imprecise, and has not yet clearly demonstrated a benefit in reducing post-biopsy bleeding in human studies.

High-frequency RF cautery, a technique ubiquitous in modern surgical practice, is routinely used for intraoperative hemostasis. This technique is also routinely used during image-guided percutaneous thermal ablation procedures, where the needle track created by the ablation probe is cauterized during probe retraction. An FDA-cleared bipolar RF cautery device that fits through a 17G biopsy introducer needle is now in clinical use, for the purpose of minimizing bleeding during percutaneous image-guided procedures. This study aims to prospectively study the physician and patient experience of using RF track cautery in patients undergoing percutaneous liver, kidney, or spleen biopsy procedures.

Primary aims of the study are:

  • Determine how the use of radiofrequency (RF) track cautery during percutaneous solid organ biopsy affects operator experience.
  • Determine how the use of radiofrequency (RF) track cautery during percutaneous solid organ biopsy affects patient experience.

Secondary aims of the study are:

  • Determine the technical success rate of RF track cautery during percutaneous solid organ biopsy, defined by successful deployment of the cautery electrode through the biopsy introducer needle and application of radiofrequency current to the biopsy track.
  • Monitor adverse events, such as bleeding, during and after biopsy procedures in which RF track cautery is used.
Being tested
RF track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy
Keywords
Biopsy, Cautery, Bleeding, Liver, Kidney, Spleen, Hemostasis
Medical subject headings
Hemostatic Disorders, Liver Diseases, Kidney Diseases, Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RF track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsyDevice

    After biopsy samples are obtained, the physician operator will place a radiofrequency bipolar cautery electrode through the biopsy introducer needle into the biopsy track and cauterize the track using a standardized protocol.

Study groups in NCT05790109
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RF biopsy track cauteryExperimentalThis study is designed as an open-label, single arm study, wherein all study participants will undergo RF track cautery during percutaneous liver, kidney, or spleen biopsy.
Receives: Device: RF track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient experience during use of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy

    Patient experience will be assessed via a questionnaire completed while in the recovery area following their procedure. The patient questionnaire will include questions regarding patient recollection of discomfort related to RF cautery, and whether or not they would be willing to have RF cautery performed again during a future biopsy session, if indicated.

    Measured: Within 6 hours after procedure

  2. Operator experience during use of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy

    Operator experience will be assessed via a post-procedure questionnaire (included below) administered to all study operators immediately after they perform each biopsy procedure with RF cautery. The operator questionnaire will consist of a series of questions related to the use of RF cautery, focusing on factors such as ease of use, added procedure time, perceived benefits/detriments, and the operator's perception of associated patient discomfort.

    Measured: Within 7 days after procedure

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Technical success rate of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy

    Technical success will be defined by successful deployment of the cautery electrode through the introducer needle into the region sampled by the biopsy needle and application of radiofrequency current for the requisite duration. This will be assessed based on a combination of self-reported technical success by the operator as well as retrospective review of the intraprocedural images by the study investigators.

    Measured: Within 7 days after procedure

  2. Adverse events of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy

    Adverse events will be assessed by recording any major and minor adverse events (including bleeding) that occur during or after biopsy procedures where RF cautery was used.

    Measured: Within 30 days after procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Mar 2023
  2. Study start23 May 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2023

Why it stopped: changed study design to retrospective study, since the study intervention is already in routine clinical practice

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05790109
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022P001476
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
14 Mar 2023
Last updated
3 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Minami Y, Hayaishi S, Kudo M. Radiofrequency ablation for hepatic malignancies: is needle tract cauterization necessary for preventing iatrogenic bleeding? Dig Dis. 2013;31(5-6):480-4. doi: 10.1159/000355254. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

    PubMed 24281024
  • Laeseke PF, Winter TC 3rd, Davis CL, Stevens KR, Johnson CD, Fronczak FJ, Webster JG, Lee FT Jr. Postbiopsy bleeding in a porcine model: reduction with radio-frequency ablation--preliminary results. Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):493-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020173. Epub 2003 Apr 3.

    PubMed 12676970
  • Pritchard WF, Wray-Cahen D, Karanian JW, Hilbert S, Wood BJ. Radiofrequency cauterization with biopsy introducer needle. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 Feb;15(2 Pt 1):183-7. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.000019398.74740.69.

    PubMed 14963187
  • Lim S, Rhim H, Lee MW, Song KD, Kang TW, Kim YS, Lim HK. New Radiofrequency Device to Reduce Bleeding after Core Needle Biopsy: Experimental Study in a Porcine Liver Model. Korean J Radiol. 2017 Jan-Feb;18(1):173-179. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.1.173. Epub 2017 Jan 5.

    PubMed 28096727
  • Choi SH, Lee JM, Lee KH, Kim SH, Lee JY, Han JK, Choi BI. Postbiopsy splenic bleeding in a dog model: comparison of cauterization, embolization, and plugging of the needle tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):878-84. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1395.

    PubMed 16177404
  • Song KD, Rhim H, Lee MW, Kang TW, Lim S. A radiofrequency device for tract ablation after liver biopsy: a single-institution human feasibility study. Br J Radiol. 2018 May;91(1085):20170585. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170585. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

    PubMed 29356562

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing RF track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy in people with Bleeding Disorder and Spleen Lesion, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient experience during use of radiofrequency track cautery during percutaneous organ biopsy (time frame: Within 6 hours after procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05790109, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in