Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNCT05801224
Vascular ARDS Recruitment After Inhaled Nitric Oxide
A study testing Nitric Oxide in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Ventilation Perfusion Mismatch, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is when a person's lungs become inflamed, which can be caused by infection, trauma, surgery, blood transfusion, or burn. ARDS often leads to a situation where the person cannot breathe independently and needs machines' help. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Ventilation Perfusion Mismatch
- What is being tested?
- Nitric Oxide
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2026to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult intubated and mechanically ventilated patients (≥ 18 years old) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)
- ARDS diagnosis with mild to moderate severity by Berlin criteria1 (100 mmHg < PaO2/FiO2 <= 300 mmHg)
- Presence of an arterial line for blood gas measurement and blood pressure monitoring and of a central line for hypertonic saline injection
Who cannot join
- Suspected pregnancy, pregnancy or less than six weeks postpartum
- Younger than 18 years or older than 80 years
- Patients with thorax perimeter not within the range of 37.5 - 134cm
- Baseline methemoglobin ≥ 5%
- Hemoglobin level less than 7 g/dl
- Subjects enrolled in another interventional research study
Show all 22Show fewer
- Presence of pneumothorax
- Usage of any devices with the electric current generation, such as a pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator
- Past medical history of severe lung disease
- Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency
- Cytochrome b5 reductase deficiency
- Sickle cell disease
- Patients that are receiving inhaled pulmonary vasodilators at the time of the enrollment
- Hemodynamic instability is defined as:
- Persistent systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and/or >180 mmHg despite the use of vasopressor or vasodilators, or
- Requiring an increment in inotropic vasopressors over the past two hours just before enrollment: more than 15 mcg/min for norepinephrine and dopamine, more than 10 mcg/min in epinephrine, and more than 50 mcg/ min for phenylephrine.
- Increase in FiO2 > 20%, increase in PEEP > 5cmH2O over the past two hours just before enrollment
- Hypernatremia (serum sodium > 150 mEq/L)
- Patients cannot be enrolled for DECT if they have:
- History of allergic reaction to intravenous contrast
- Renal dysfunction on the day of the study (serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL)
- Limited to sub-cohort 2: contraindications to prone positioning.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Maurizio Cereda, 6177263030, MCEREDA@mgh.harvard.edu
Roberta Ribeiro De Santis Santiago, 6176437733, rrsantiago@mgh.harvard.edu
About this study
Official title: Regional Vascular Recruitment With Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients With ARDS
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is when a person's lungs become inflamed, which can be caused by infection, trauma, surgery, blood transfusion, or burn. ARDS often leads to a situation where the person cannot breathe independently and needs machines' help. Once the lungs are inflamed, the small air sacs responsible for exchanging gases (i.e., ventilation) and the blood flow in the lungs (i.e., perfusion) can be affected. In the past, most research focused on studying ventilation physiology and how to help people breathe with machines. Less was done on perfusion because it requires imaging techniques such as computed tomography with intravenous contrast and radiation. One treatment option for low oxygen levels is inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a gas that can dilate the lung blood vessels and improve oxygenation; however, it is not always clear whether this treatment will work.
Prone position has been used for several years in the care of ARDS patients and has been demonstrated to improve survival in more severe patients. It is not known how iNO and prone positioning interact in determining the distribution of pulmonary perfusion and whether their combine use can benefit ARDS patients.
Read more
Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a bedside and accessible imaging technique that is radiation-free and non-invasive and can potentially detect changes in lung perfusion. EIT can perform multiple measurements; it is portable and accessible. This prospective interventional study aims to assess changes in regional blood perfusion in the lungs of patients with ARDS in response to iNO and to prone positioning utilizing EIT. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- If EIT can measure lung regional perfusion response to an iNO challenge of 20ppm for 15 minutes.
- If EIT can measure the lung regional perfusion responses to prone position, applied alone and in combination with iNO.
- If EIT is comparable to dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), the gold-standard method, in the detection of changes in regional lung perfusion due to iNO.
- If EIT can be an imaging marker to identify ARDS severity
Participants will be divided into three cohorts:
- Sub-Cohort 1 (n=60): Participants will be asked to be monitored by EIT before, during, and after the administration of iNO (20 ppm) for 15 minutes (OFF-ON-OFF) in the supine position
- Sub-Cohort 2 (N=10): Participants will be asked to be monitored by EIT before and during the administration of iNO (20 ppm) for 15 minutes (OFF-ON) in both the supine and in the prone position. The same subjects will be monitored also with DECT in the supine position and then after 30 minutes in the prone position (without NO administration).
- Sub-Cohort 3 (N=10): In this subset of Sub-Cohort 1, subjects will be asked to be monitored also with DECT (in addition to EIT) in the supine body position before iNO and after 15 minutes while receiving iNO.
Read the detailed description
The investigators will screen patients with ARDS diagnosis daily at MGH intensive care units and work in the consenting process with the ICU team and surrogates. The enrollment period will be limited to the time subjects will undergo the study procedures. Subjects will exit the study as soon as the study procedures are completed. No further procedures are planned; therefore, subjects will not be asked to return to the hospital exclusively for research-related purposes.
The enrolled subjects (n=70) will be divided into three sub-cohorts. Sub-Cohort 1 (n=60) will be monitored with EIT before, during, and after the administration of iNO (OFF-ON-OFF). Sub-Cohort 2 (n=10) will be monitored with EIT before and during the administration of iNO (OFF-ON) in the supine and in the prone position, and with DECT in the supine and in the prone position (without iNO). Sub-Cohort 3 (n=10) will be a subset of Cohort 1 and will be monitored with DECT before and during the administration of iNO, in addition to EIT monitoring before, during and after iNO administration (OFF-ON-OFF).
Methods to answer question 1 (To measure the topographic perfusion response to an iNO challenge with EIT):
- The EIT monitoring will be composed of ventilation and perfusion distributions. First, the ventilation is recorded; at this point, no additional maneuver is needed; the subjects need to wear the electrode belt connected to the device, and their ventilation will be recorded. Secondly, for the perfusion distribution, after a pause in the ventilation, EIT measures the distribution of blood perfusion in the lungs during the injection of a 10 mL bolus of 11.7% hypertonic saline solution through a central venous catheter. Cohort 1 (n=60) will receive 20ppm of iNO for 15 minutes. Cohort 1 will be monitored with EIT before, during, and after the iNO delivery in an OFF-ON-OFF fashion.
Methods to answer question 2 (To measure the topographic perfusion response to prone position, applied alone and in combination with iNO):
- Sub-Cohort 2 (n=10) will be monitored with EIT before and after 15 minutes receiving 20ppm iNO in an OFF-ON fashion, both in the supine and in the prone position. A second EIT measurement off iNO will not be obtained to minimize the total dose of hypertonic saline solution. The subjects will be transported to the computed tomography (CT) room, and DECT will be performed first in the supine position. A second DECT will be obtained after 30 minutes in the prone position. No iNO will be given during DECT.
Methods to answer question 3 (To compare changes of regional lung perfusion due to iNO detected by EIT against the changes detected by gold standard DECT):
- 10 subjects in Sub-Cohort 1 will receive DECT in addition to EIT monitoring in the supine position. DECT will be obtained before the iNO delivery. Then, the iNO delivery will start, and after 15 minutes, DECT will be repeated.
Methods to answer question 4 (to define correlations between EIT-derived perfusion changes during an iNO challenge and clinical characteristics and outcomes. ):
- The investigators will explore the vascular response measured by EIT from all 70 subjects and categorize subjects accordingly. The investigators plan to apply EIT patterns as an image marker and use them in conjunction with other markers (demographical, radiological, clinical, biochemical, and inflammatory) to identify ARDS severity.
Finally,
- Blood MetHb levels will be continuously monitored before, during, and after each iNO administration of the day. At the end of each iNO administration, MetHb will continue to be monitored until values return to the level recorded before the current treatment and
- The NO, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) will be continuously monitored by INOmax DSIR (Mallinckrodt) deliver system.
- Being tested
- Nitric Oxide
- Keywords
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Ventilation/perfusion mismatch, Electrical impedance tomography, Inhaled nitric oxide, Dual-energy computed tomography
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiratory Aspiration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nitric OxideDevice
Also called inhaled nitric oxide (iNO)
20ppm for 15 minutes delivered by INO max(Nitric Oxide) Company : INO therapeutics, Inc.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical Impedance Tomography | Experimental | A total of 60 subjects (Sub-Cohort 1) will receive an inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) challenge (20 ppm) for 15 min. The investigators will measure ventilation and perfusion distributions using EIT before iNO ("OFF1"), after 15 min on iNO ("ON"), and after 15 min washout ("OFF2") to confirm baseline stability. Receives: Device: Nitric Oxide |
| Electrical Impedance Tomography and Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in the Supine and Prone position | Experimental | In a subset of 10 subjects (Sub-Cohort 2), EIT will be performed without and with iNO (OFF-ON) both in the supine and in the prone position. The OFF-ON fashion for EIT imaging is to minimize the subject's exposure to hypertonic saline solution. Sub-cohort 2 patient will be imaged also with DECT in the supine and after 30 minutes in the prone position. iNO will not be administered during DECT. Receives: Device: Nitric Oxide |
| Electrical Impedance Tomography with and without Inhaled Nitric Oxide in the Supine Position | Experimental | 10 subjects (Sub-Cohort 3) from Sub-Cohort 1 will be monitored without iNO, with iNO, and without iNO (OFF-ON-OFF) in the supine position. Sub-Cohort 3 subjects will be imaged also with DECT. Imaging will be performed in the supine position without iNO and following iNO administration for 15 minutes (OFF-ON) . Receives: Device: Nitric Oxide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in regional lung perfusion after the delivery of inhaled nitric oxide
The primary outcome is to detect changes in regional perfusion distribution with the administration of inhaled nitric oxide with electrical impedance tomography by measuring changes in impedance.
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (1)
Compare methods to detect change in regional lung perfusion after the delivery of inhaled nitric oxide
The secondary outcome is to To compare electrical impedance tomography measurements against the gold standard dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Apr 2023
- Study start10 Jul 2026
- Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- In a prospective, single-center, physiological, crossover study, the investigators will recruit 70 adults meeting the ARDS criteria based on the Berlin definition who have not previously received inhaled vasodilators.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maurizio F. Cereda, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Maurizio Cereda, MD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05801224
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023p000138
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.
PubMed 22797452Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, Arabi YM, Beitler JR, Mercat A, Herridge M, Randolph AG, Calfee CS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Mar 14;5(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0.
PubMed 30872586Cressoni M, Caironi P, Polli F, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Cadringher P, Quintel M, Ranieri VM, Bugedo G, Gattinoni L. Anatomical and functional intrapulmonary shunt in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):669-75. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000300276.12074.E1.
PubMed 18091555Zapol WM, Kobayashi K, Snider MT, Greene R, Laver MB. Vascular obstruction causes pulmonary hypertension in severe acute respiratory failure. Chest. 1977 Feb;71(2 suppl):306-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.71.2_supplement.306. No abstract available.
PubMed 836381Greene R, Zapol WM, Snider MT, Reid L, Snow R, O'Connell RS, Novelline RA. Early bedside detection of pulmonary vascular occlusion during acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Nov;124(5):593-601. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.124.5.593. No abstract available.
PubMed 7305115Tomashefski JF Jr, Davies P, Boggis C, Greene R, Zapol WM, Reid LM. The pulmonary vascular lesions of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Pathol. 1983 Jul;112(1):112-26.
PubMed 6859225Rossaint R, Falke KJ, Lopez F, Slama K, Pison U, Zapol WM. Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1993 Feb 11;328(6):399-405. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199302113280605.
PubMed 8357359Johnson TR. Dual-energy CT: general principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5 Suppl):S3-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9116.
PubMed 23097165Borges JB, Suarez-Sipmann F, Bohm SH, Tusman G, Melo A, Maripuu E, Sandstrom M, Park M, Costa EL, Hedenstierna G, Amato M. Regional lung perfusion estimated by electrical impedance tomography in a piglet model of lung collapse. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Jan;112(1):225-36. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01090.2010. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
PubMed 21960654Safaee Fakhr B, Araujo Morais CC, De Santis Santiago RR, Di Fenza R, Gibson LE, Restrepo PA, Chang MG, Bittner EA, Pinciroli R, Fintelmann FJ, Kacmarek RM, Berra L. Bedside monitoring of lung perfusion by electrical impedance tomography in the time of COVID-19. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):e434-e436. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 32859359Morais CCA, Safaee Fakhr B, De Santis Santiago RR, Di Fenza R, Marutani E, Gianni S, Pinciroli R, Kacmarek RM, Berra L. Bedside Electrical Impedance Tomography Unveils Respiratory "Chimera" in COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;203(1):120-121. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1801IM. No abstract available.
PubMed 33196303De Santis Santiago R, Teggia Droghi M, Fumagalli J, Marrazzo F, Florio G, Grassi LG, Gomes S, Morais CCA, Ramos OPS, Bottiroli M, Pinciroli R, Imber DA, Bagchi A, Shelton K, Sonny A, Bittner EA, Amato MBP, Kacmarek RM, Berra L; Lung Rescue Team Investigators. High Pleural Pressure Prevents Alveolar Overdistension and Hemodynamic Collapse in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Class III Obesity. A Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;203(5):575-584. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1687OC.
PubMed 32876469
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Regional Vascular Recruitment With Inhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients With ARDS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05801224
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023p000138
- Keywords
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Ventilation/perfusion mismatch, Electrical impedance tomography, Inhaled nitric oxide, Dual-energy computed tomography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is when a person's lungs become inflamed, which can be caused by infection, trauma, surgery, blood transfusion, or burn. ARDS often leads to a situation where the person cannot breathe independently and needs machines' help. Once the lungs are inflamed, the small air sacs responsible for exchanging gases (i.e., ventilation) and the blood flow in the lungs (i.e., perfusion) can be affected. In the past, most research focused on studying ventilation physiology and how to help people breathe with machines. Less was done on perfusion because it requires imaging techniques such as computed tomography with intravenous contrast and radiation. One treatment option for low oxygen levels is inhaled nitric oxide (iNO), a gas that can dilate the lung blood vessels and improve oxygenation; however, it is not always clear whether this treatment will work.
Prone position has been used for several years in the care of ARDS patients and has been demonstrated to improve survival in more severe patients. It is not known how iNO and prone positioning interact in determining the distribution of pulmonary perfusion and whether their combine use can benefit ARDS patients.
Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a bedside and accessible imaging technique that is radiation-free and non-invasive and can potentially detect changes in lung perfusion. EIT can perform multiple measurements; it is portable and accessible. This prospective interventional study aims to assess changes in regional blood perfusion in the lungs of patients with ARDS in response to iNO and to prone positioning utilizing EIT. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- If EIT can measure lung regional perfusion response to an iNO challenge of 20ppm for 15 minutes.
- If EIT can measure the lung regional perfusion responses to prone position, applied alone and in combination with iNO.
- If EIT is comparable to dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), the gold-standard method, in the detection of changes in regional lung perfusion due to iNO.
- If EIT can be an imaging marker to identify ARDS severity
Participants will be divided into three cohorts:
- Sub-Cohort 1 (n=60): Participants will be asked to be monitored by EIT before, during, and after the administration of iNO (20 ppm) for 15 minutes (OFF-ON-OFF) in the supine position
- Sub-Cohort 2 (N=10): Participants will be asked to be monitored by EIT before and during the administration of iNO (20 ppm) for 15 minutes (OFF-ON) in both the supine and in the prone position. The same subjects will be monitored also with DECT in the supine position and then after 30 minutes in the prone position (without NO administration).
- Sub-Cohort 3 (N=10): In this subset of Sub-Cohort 1, subjects will be asked to be monitored also with DECT (in addition to EIT) in the supine body position before iNO and after 15 minutes while receiving iNO.
Detailed description
The investigators will screen patients with ARDS diagnosis daily at MGH intensive care units and work in the consenting process with the ICU team and surrogates. The enrollment period will be limited to the time subjects will undergo the study procedures. Subjects will exit the study as soon as the study procedures are completed. No further procedures are planned; therefore, subjects will not be asked to return to the hospital exclusively for research-related purposes.
The enrolled subjects (n=70) will be divided into three sub-cohorts. Sub-Cohort 1 (n=60) will be monitored with EIT before, during, and after the administration of iNO (OFF-ON-OFF). Sub-Cohort 2 (n=10) will be monitored with EIT before and during the administration of iNO (OFF-ON) in the supine and in the prone position, and with DECT in the supine and in the prone position (without iNO). Sub-Cohort 3 (n=10) will be a subset of Cohort 1 and will be monitored with DECT before and during the administration of iNO, in addition to EIT monitoring before, during and after iNO administration (OFF-ON-OFF).
Methods to answer question 1 (To measure the topographic perfusion response to an iNO challenge with EIT):
- The EIT monitoring will be composed of ventilation and perfusion distributions. First, the ventilation is recorded; at this point, no additional maneuver is needed; the subjects need to wear the electrode belt connected to the device, and their ventilation will be recorded. Secondly, for the perfusion distribution, after a pause in the ventilation, EIT measures the distribution of blood perfusion in the lungs during the injection of a 10 mL bolus of 11.7% hypertonic saline solution through a central venous catheter. Cohort 1 (n=60) will receive 20ppm of iNO for 15 minutes. Cohort 1 will be monitored with EIT before, during, and after the iNO delivery in an OFF-ON-OFF fashion.
Methods to answer question 2 (To measure the topographic perfusion response to prone position, applied alone and in combination with iNO):
- Sub-Cohort 2 (n=10) will be monitored with EIT before and after 15 minutes receiving 20ppm iNO in an OFF-ON fashion, both in the supine and in the prone position. A second EIT measurement off iNO will not be obtained to minimize the total dose of hypertonic saline solution. The subjects will be transported to the computed tomography (CT) room, and DECT will be performed first in the supine position. A second DECT will be obtained after 30 minutes in the prone position. No iNO will be given during DECT.
Methods to answer question 3 (To compare changes of regional lung perfusion due to iNO detected by EIT against the changes detected by gold standard DECT):
- 10 subjects in Sub-Cohort 1 will receive DECT in addition to EIT monitoring in the supine position. DECT will be obtained before the iNO delivery. Then, the iNO delivery will start, and after 15 minutes, DECT will be repeated.
Methods to answer question 4 (to define correlations between EIT-derived perfusion changes during an iNO challenge and clinical characteristics and outcomes. ):
- The investigators will explore the vascular response measured by EIT from all 70 subjects and categorize subjects accordingly. The investigators plan to apply EIT patterns as an image marker and use them in conjunction with other markers (demographical, radiological, clinical, biochemical, and inflammatory) to identify ARDS severity.
Finally,
- Blood MetHb levels will be continuously monitored before, during, and after each iNO administration of the day. At the end of each iNO administration, MetHb will continue to be monitored until values return to the level recorded before the current treatment and
- The NO, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) will be continuously monitored by INOmax DSIR (Mallinckrodt) deliver system.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- In a prospective, single-center, physiological, crossover study, the investigators will recruit 70 adults meeting the ARDS criteria based on the Berlin definition who have not previously received inhaled vasodilators.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical Impedance Tomography | Experimental | Device: Nitric OxideA total of 60 subjects (Sub-Cohort 1) will receive an inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) challenge (20 ppm) for 15 min. The investigators will measure ventilation and perfusion distributions using EIT before iNO ("OFF1"), after 15 min on iNO ("ON"), and after 15 min washout ("OFF2") to confirm baseline stability. |
| Electrical Impedance Tomography and Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in the Supine and Prone position | Experimental | Device: Nitric OxideIn a subset of 10 subjects (Sub-Cohort 2), EIT will be performed without and with iNO (OFF-ON) both in the supine and in the prone position. The OFF-ON fashion for EIT imaging is to minimize the subject's exposure to hypertonic saline solution. Sub-cohort 2 patient will be imaged also with DECT in the supine and after 30 minutes in the prone position. iNO will not be administered during DECT. |
| Electrical Impedance Tomography with and without Inhaled Nitric Oxide in the Supine Position | Experimental | Device: Nitric Oxide10 subjects (Sub-Cohort 3) from Sub-Cohort 1 will be monitored without iNO, with iNO, and without iNO (OFF-ON-OFF) in the supine position. Sub-Cohort 3 subjects will be imaged also with DECT. Imaging will be performed in the supine position without iNO and following iNO administration for 15 minutes (OFF-ON) . |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult intubated and mechanically ventilated patients (≥ 18 years old) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU)
- ARDS diagnosis with mild to moderate severity by Berlin criteria1 (100 mmHg < PaO2/FiO2 <= 300 mmHg)
- Presence of an arterial line for blood gas measurement and blood pressure monitoring and of a central line for hypertonic saline injection
Key exclusion criteria (22 listed)
- Suspected pregnancy, pregnancy or less than six weeks postpartum
- Younger than 18 years or older than 80 years
- Patients with thorax perimeter not within the range of 37.5 - 134cm
- Baseline methemoglobin ≥ 5%
- Hemoglobin level less than 7 g/dl
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nitric OxideAlso: inhaled nitric oxide (iNO)20ppm for 15 minutes delivered by INO max(Nitric Oxide) Company : INO therapeutics, Inc. | Device | Electrical Impedance Tomography, Electrical Impedance Tomography and Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in the Supine and Prone position, Electrical Impedance Tomography with and without Inhaled Nitric Oxide in the Supine Position |
Primary outcome
Change in regional lung perfusion after the delivery of inhaled nitric oxide
Time frame: Day 1
The primary outcome is to detect changes in regional perfusion distribution with the administration of inhaled nitric oxide with electrical impedance tomography by measuring changes in impedance.
1 secondary outcome
Compare methods to detect change in regional lung perfusion after the delivery of inhaled nitric oxide
Time frame: Day 1
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 22797452ARDS Definition Task Force; Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5669.
- Background: PubMed 30872586Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, Arabi YM, Beitler JR, Mercat A, Herridge M, Randolph AG, Calfee CS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Mar 14;5(1):18. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0069-0.
- Background: PubMed 18091555Cressoni M, Caironi P, Polli F, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Cadringher P, Quintel M, Ranieri VM, Bugedo G, Gattinoni L. Anatomical and functional intrapulmonary shunt in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):669-75. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000300276.12074.E1.
- Background: PubMed 836381Zapol WM, Kobayashi K, Snider MT, Greene R, Laver MB. Vascular obstruction causes pulmonary hypertension in severe acute respiratory failure. Chest. 1977 Feb;71(2 suppl):306-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.71.2_supplement.306. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 7305115Greene R, Zapol WM, Snider MT, Reid L, Snow R, O'Connell RS, Novelline RA. Early bedside detection of pulmonary vascular occlusion during acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981 Nov;124(5):593-601. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1981.124.5.593. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 6859225Tomashefski JF Jr, Davies P, Boggis C, Greene R, Zapol WM, Reid LM. The pulmonary vascular lesions of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Pathol. 1983 Jul;112(1):112-26.
- Background: PubMed 8357359Rossaint R, Falke KJ, Lopez F, Slama K, Pison U, Zapol WM. Inhaled nitric oxide for the adult respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1993 Feb 11;328(6):399-405. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199302113280605.
- Background: PubMed 23097165Johnson TR. Dual-energy CT: general principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5 Suppl):S3-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9116.
- Background: PubMed 21960654Borges JB, Suarez-Sipmann F, Bohm SH, Tusman G, Melo A, Maripuu E, Sandstrom M, Park M, Costa EL, Hedenstierna G, Amato M. Regional lung perfusion estimated by electrical impedance tomography in a piglet model of lung collapse. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Jan;112(1):225-36. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01090.2010. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 32859359Safaee Fakhr B, Araujo Morais CC, De Santis Santiago RR, Di Fenza R, Gibson LE, Restrepo PA, Chang MG, Bittner EA, Pinciroli R, Fintelmann FJ, Kacmarek RM, Berra L. Bedside monitoring of lung perfusion by electrical impedance tomography in the time of COVID-19. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):e434-e436. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 7. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 33196303Morais CCA, Safaee Fakhr B, De Santis Santiago RR, Di Fenza R, Marutani E, Gianni S, Pinciroli R, Kacmarek RM, Berra L. Bedside Electrical Impedance Tomography Unveils Respiratory "Chimera" in COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 1;203(1):120-121. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202005-1801IM. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 32876469De Santis Santiago R, Teggia Droghi M, Fumagalli J, Marrazzo F, Florio G, Grassi LG, Gomes S, Morais CCA, Ramos OPS, Bottiroli M, Pinciroli R, Imber DA, Bagchi A, Shelton K, Sonny A, Bittner EA, Amato MBP, Kacmarek RM, Berra L; Lung Rescue Team Investigators. High Pleural Pressure Prevents Alveolar Overdistension and Hemodynamic Collapse in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Class III Obesity. A Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;203(5):575-584. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201909-1687OC.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Active, not recruiting
CT for Personalized Mechanical Ventilation
Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, Sepsis Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Multicenter Validation of an Explainable System for Neonatal ARDS-Compatible Phenotyping
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Blood Viscosity in ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome)
ARDS
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Maurizio Cereda, MD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nitric Oxide in people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Ventilation Perfusion Mismatch, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Maurizio F Cereda, MD (6177263030, mcereda@mgh.harvard.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in regional lung perfusion after the delivery of inhaled nitric oxide (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05801224, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2026.