Septate UterusNCT05802784
Hysteroscopic Septoplasty by Different Modalities
A study testing Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors and Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope in people with Septate Uterus and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, run by Mansoura University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in participant population ( women with uterine septum meeting the inclusion criteria) hysteroscopic septoplasty by resectoscope compared to hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Septate Uterus, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Subfertility
- What is being tested?
- Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors and Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2020to 21 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women of reproductive age
- Seeking conception
- Diagnosis of a septate or subseptate uterus
- A history of one of the following:
- Recurrent pregnancy loss
- Subfertility
- Preterm Birth
Who cannot join
- Not seeking conception
- Diagnosis of septate or subseptate uterus with no history of any of the following:
- Recurrent pregnancy loss
- Subfertility
- Preterm Birth
- Contraindications for surgery
- Those who refused to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Faculty of medicine, Mansoura university
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35511
About this study
Official title: Hysteroscopic Septoplasty by Different Modalities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in participant population ( women with uterine septum meeting the inclusion criteria) hysteroscopic septoplasty by resectoscope compared to hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors.
The main questions to answer are:
Is there a difference in operative time ? Is there a difference in fluid used and fluid deficit? Is there a difference in complications? Is there a difference in reproductive outcome? Researchers will compare the 2 different techniques to see if there is any difference in operative outcome ( operative time, fluid used and deficit, need for second intervention, and operative and postoperative complications) and reproductive outcome.
Read the detailed description
Study design:
Prospective randomized clinical trial
Study duration and location:
For at least 24 months, Patients admitted to Obstetrics and Gynecology department at Mansoura University Hospital.
Study method
At baseline, the following will be done:
- History taking: personal history, menstrual history, obstetrical and gynecological history, present and past history.
- Patient presentation (subfertility or pregnancy loss)
- Physical examination: General, abdominal and local examination.
- Diagnosis of uterine septum either by hysterosalpingogram (HSG), Three dimensional transvaginal ultrasound or office hysteroscopy.
Thereafter:
Patients will be prospectively recruited and randomized by computer program to 2 groups
Group A:
Patients in this group will undergo resection of the septum with hysteroscope and scissors. Saline will be used as a distending medium in the scissors group. Septal incision will be carried out using a thinning technique by which incisions will be made along each side of the septum alternately from one cornual end to the other
Group B:
Patients in this group will undergo resection of the septum with monopolar resectoscope , dilation of cervical os with Hegar's dilators , incision of the septum using a resectoscope with the Collins knife, monopolar energy (cut 50-70 Watt) and glycine 1.5% as the distension medium Sample size calculation Sample size was calculated using Power Analysis and Sample Size software program (PASS) version 15.0.5 for windows (2017) using the results published before with the operative duration of hysteroscopic incision in septate uterus by scissors compared to resectoscope as the primary outcome. The study reported the median operative duration as 10 minutes for resectoscope while that for scissors was 30 minutes. The null hypothesis was considered as the absence of difference between both groups regarding the operative duration. A sample size of 16 patients in each group is needed to achieve 95% power (1-β or the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false) in the proposed study using a two-sided Fisher exact test with a significance level (α or the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true) of 5% and hypothesized common standard deviation 15 in both groups. 4 patients drop-out is expected, so a total of 20 patients will be enrolled to each group
Statistical analysis Data will be analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) program for Windows (Standard version 24). The normality of data will be first tested with one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Qualitative data will be described using number and percent. Continuous variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data and median (IQR) for non-normal data. The following tests will be used; Chi square test: Compare qualitative variables. Fisher exact test and monte carlo test: Compare qualitative variables when expected count less than 5.
Independent t- test: Compare two quantitative variables (parametric). Mann Whitney test: Compare two quantitative variables (Non parametric). For all above mentioned statistical tests , the threshold of significance is fixed at 5% level.The results was considered significant when p ≤ 0.05. The smaller the p-value obtained, the more significant are the results.
Ethical consideration:
- Study protocol was submitted for approval by Institutional Review Board
- Approval of the managers of the health care facilities in which the study was conducted.
- Informed written consent will be obtained from each participant sharing in the study.
- Confidentiality and personal privacy will be respected in all levels of the study.
- Collected data will not be used for any other purpose.
- Conditions
- Septate Uterus, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Subfertility
- Being tested
- Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors, Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope
- Medical subject headings
- Septate Uterus, Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissorsProcedure or surgery
In hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors arm, incision of the septum was done by continuous flow hysteroscopy and scissors using saline as distension media.
Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscopeProcedure or surgery
In hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope arm, incision of the septum was done by 26 Fr monopolar resectoscope with collin's knife using glycine1.5% as distension media.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Scissors arm | Active comparator | Patients in this group had undergone resection of the septum with hysteroscope and scissors, The scissors used was pointed, single action and semi rigid . Saline was used as the distending medium in the scissors group. Septal incision was carried out using shortening technique by incising the septum at the leading edge and continue dividing by moving from side to side (in narrow septum), or by thinning technique by which incisions will be made along each side of the septum alternately from one cornual end to the other (in broad septum). The operation was stopped if the fluid deficit exceeded 2500 ml of saline. Receives: Procedure: Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors |
| Resectoscope arm | Active comparator | Patients in this group had undergone resection of the septum with Monopolar 26 French resectoscope Dilation of cervical os with Hegar's dilator (up to hegar 8 or 9) , incision of the septum using a resectoscope with the Collins knife, monopolar energy (cut 40-70 Watt) and glycine 1.5% as the distension medium, using shortening or thinning incision. The operation was stopped if the fluid deficit exceeded 1000 ml of glycine. The delivery of distension media was conducted by automated pressure delivery system. All patients were prescribed cyclic estrogen and progesterone for two months. Receives: Procedure: Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Operative time
Measured: During surgery
Fluid deficit
Measured: During surgery
Operative and post operative complications
Measured: 3 months follow up after intervention
Need for second intervention
Measured: 3 months follow up after intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Pregnancy rate
Measured: At least 6 months follow up after intervention
Live birth rate
Measured: Follow up until the end of first clinical pregnancy or 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2023
- Study start16 Jun 2020
- Primary completion1 Mar 2023
- Study completion21 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Septate UterusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Moustafa Alsayed Alamely, Mansoura University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05802784
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MD.20.05.324
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hysteroscopic Septoplasty by Different Modalities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05802784
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MD.20.05.324
- Conditions
- Septate Uterus, Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, Subfertility
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in participant population ( women with uterine septum meeting the inclusion criteria) hysteroscopic septoplasty by resectoscope compared to hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors.
The main questions to answer are:
Is there a difference in operative time ? Is there a difference in fluid used and fluid deficit? Is there a difference in complications? Is there a difference in reproductive outcome? Researchers will compare the 2 different techniques to see if there is any difference in operative outcome ( operative time, fluid used and deficit, need for second intervention, and operative and postoperative complications) and reproductive outcome.
Detailed description
Study design:
Prospective randomized clinical trial
Study duration and location:
For at least 24 months, Patients admitted to Obstetrics and Gynecology department at Mansoura University Hospital.
Study method
At baseline, the following will be done:
- History taking: personal history, menstrual history, obstetrical and gynecological history, present and past history.
- Patient presentation (subfertility or pregnancy loss)
- Physical examination: General, abdominal and local examination.
- Diagnosis of uterine septum either by hysterosalpingogram (HSG), Three dimensional transvaginal ultrasound or office hysteroscopy.
Thereafter:
Patients will be prospectively recruited and randomized by computer program to 2 groups
Group A:
Patients in this group will undergo resection of the septum with hysteroscope and scissors. Saline will be used as a distending medium in the scissors group. Septal incision will be carried out using a thinning technique by which incisions will be made along each side of the septum alternately from one cornual end to the other
Group B:
Patients in this group will undergo resection of the septum with monopolar resectoscope , dilation of cervical os with Hegar's dilators , incision of the septum using a resectoscope with the Collins knife, monopolar energy (cut 50-70 Watt) and glycine 1.5% as the distension medium Sample size calculation Sample size was calculated using Power Analysis and Sample Size software program (PASS) version 15.0.5 for windows (2017) using the results published before with the operative duration of hysteroscopic incision in septate uterus by scissors compared to resectoscope as the primary outcome. The study reported the median operative duration as 10 minutes for resectoscope while that for scissors was 30 minutes. The null hypothesis was considered as the absence of difference between both groups regarding the operative duration. A sample size of 16 patients in each group is needed to achieve 95% power (1-β or the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false) in the proposed study using a two-sided Fisher exact test with a significance level (α or the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true) of 5% and hypothesized common standard deviation 15 in both groups. 4 patients drop-out is expected, so a total of 20 patients will be enrolled to each group
Statistical analysis Data will be analyzed using the Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) program for Windows (Standard version 24). The normality of data will be first tested with one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Qualitative data will be described using number and percent. Continuous variables will be presented as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data and median (IQR) for non-normal data. The following tests will be used; Chi square test: Compare qualitative variables. Fisher exact test and monte carlo test: Compare qualitative variables when expected count less than 5.
Independent t- test: Compare two quantitative variables (parametric). Mann Whitney test: Compare two quantitative variables (Non parametric). For all above mentioned statistical tests , the threshold of significance is fixed at 5% level.The results was considered significant when p ≤ 0.05. The smaller the p-value obtained, the more significant are the results.
Ethical consideration:
- Study protocol was submitted for approval by Institutional Review Board
- Approval of the managers of the health care facilities in which the study was conducted.
- Informed written consent will be obtained from each participant sharing in the study.
- Confidentiality and personal privacy will be respected in all levels of the study.
- Collected data will not be used for any other purpose.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Scissors arm | Active comparator | Procedure: Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissorsPatients in this group had undergone resection of the septum with hysteroscope and scissors, The scissors used was pointed, single action and semi rigid . Saline was used as the distending medium in the scissors group. Septal incision was carried out using shortening technique by incising the septum at the leading edge and continue dividing by moving from side to side (in narrow septum), or by thinning technique by which incisions will be made along each side of the septum alternately from one cornual end to the other (in broad septum). The operation was stopped if the fluid deficit exceeded 2500 ml of saline. |
| Resectoscope arm | Active comparator | Procedure: Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscopePatients in this group had undergone resection of the septum with Monopolar 26 French resectoscope Dilation of cervical os with Hegar's dilator (up to hegar 8 or 9) , incision of the septum using a resectoscope with the Collins knife, monopolar energy (cut 40-70 Watt) and glycine 1.5% as the distension medium, using shortening or thinning incision. The operation was stopped if the fluid deficit exceeded 1000 ml of glycine. The delivery of distension media was conducted by automated pressure delivery system. All patients were prescribed cyclic estrogen and progesterone for two months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Women of reproductive age
- Seeking conception
- Diagnosis of a septate or subseptate uterus
- A history of one of the following:
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Not seeking conception
- Diagnosis of septate or subseptate uterus with no history of any of the following:
- Contraindications for surgery
- Those who refused to participate.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissorsIn hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors arm, incision of the septum was done by continuous flow hysteroscopy and scissors using saline as distension media. | Procedure or surgery | Scissors arm |
| Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscopeIn hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope arm, incision of the septum was done by 26 Fr monopolar resectoscope with collin's knife using glycine1.5% as distension media. | Procedure or surgery | Resectoscope arm |
Primary outcome
Operative time
Time frame: During surgery
Fluid deficit
Time frame: During surgery
Operative and post operative complications
Time frame: 3 months follow up after intervention
Need for second intervention
Time frame: 3 months follow up after intervention
2 secondary outcomes
Pregnancy rate
Time frame: At least 6 months follow up after intervention
Live birth rate
Time frame: Follow up until the end of first clinical pregnancy or 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Septate Uterus
Recruiting
Intrauterine Stent Placement Following Hysteroscopic Septum Resection
Intrauterine Adhesion
Recruiting
Surgical Approach to Uterine Septum
Uterine Septum, Surgical Complication
Recruiting
Added Value of Three-dimensional Transvaginal Ultrasound (3D TVUS) and Gel Infusion Sonography (3D GIS) Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in the Diagnosis of Patients With Suspicion of a Uterine Septum.
Uterine Septum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hysteroscopic septoplasty with scissors and Hysteroscopic septoplasty with resectoscope in people with Septate Uterus and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss, run by Mansoura University Hospital at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Operative time (time frame: During surgery). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2023.