AzTrials
AzTrials

Femoropopliteal DiseaseICARUSNCT05805280

IntravasCular Imaging-Guided Versus AngiogRaphy-GUided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Fermoropopliteal Artery Disease

A study testing intravascular ultrasound-guided group and angiography-guided group in people with Femoropopliteal Disease, run by Asan Medical Center at 8 sites in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Objectives: 1) To evaluate the feasibility of using intravascular ultrasound to assess lesion morphology, select an appropriate stent size and landing zone 2) To compare the primary patency rates after intra vascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided stent implantation for the treatment of fermoropopliteal… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Femoropopliteal Disease
What is being tested?
intravascular ultrasound-guided group and angiography-guided group
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
8 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
27 Nov 2020to 26 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men or women at least 20 years up to 85 years of age
  • Intermittent claudication or tissue loss suitable for elective endovascular intervention (Rutherford category 2,3,4, or 5)
  • Significant native superficial femoral or proximal popliteal artery lesions suitable for stent implantation. Restenotic lesions can be enrolled at least 12-month after the index procedure uding plain balloon or drug-coated balloon.
  • Total lesion length of 30 to 220 mm
  • Reference vessel diameter of 4 - 6 mm
  • The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site.

Who cannot join

  • Existence of a stent in the target vessel
  • Previous use of atherectomy device in the target vessel
  • Use of drug-coated balloon in the target vessel within 12-month
  • Untreatable significant stenosis or occlusion (diameter stenosis ≥70%) in all 3 infrapopliteal arteries (patient can be enrolled if at least 1 patent outflow artery to the ankle (diameter stenosis <50%) can be achieved by treatment during the index procedure)
  • A known intolerance or contraindication to antiplatelet drugs (aspirin or clopidogrel)
  • Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

South Korea8 sites
  • Inje University Busan Paik Hospital

    Busan

  • Veterans Hospital

    Daegu

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul

  • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital

    Seoul

  • Konkuk University Medical Center

    Seoul

  • Severance Cardiovascular Hospital

    Seoul

  • Veterans Health Service Medical Center

    Seoul

  • Ajou University Medical Center

    Suwon

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: IntravasCular Imaging-Guided Versus AngiogRaphy-GUided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Fermoropopliteal Artery Disease (ICARUS Trial); A Feasibility Study

Objectives: 1) To evaluate the feasibility of using intravascular ultrasound to assess lesion morphology, select an appropriate stent size and landing zone 2) To compare the primary patency rates after intra vascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided stent implantation for the treatment of fermoropopliteal artery segment lesions.

Hypothesis: One of the key determinants of the device failure is inappropriate landing zone, selection of smaller stent relative to the reference vessel diameter, and lack of high-pressure post-dilatation in a necessary post-stent segment. Therefore, intravascular ultrasound-guided selection of appropriate landing zone, stent size and balloon size for high pressure post-dilation may maximize the benefits of stent use and improve patency duration. the investigators hypothesize that intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation is superior to angiography-guided stent implantation with respect to 12 months primary patency in patients with significant femoropopliteal disease

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, open-label, randomized comparison feasibility trial involving patients with significant femoropopliteal disease who are undergoing drug-eluting stent (paclitaxel-eluting, durable-polymer-coated Eluvia stent) implantation. Patients with symptoms attributable to limb ischemia are eligible for enrollment if the culprit lesions are suitable for stent implantation based on angiographic findings. The detailed information for inclusion and exclusion criteria is described below in session 7. Patients meeting inclusion criteria without any exclusion criteria will be randomized to either intravascular ultrasound-guided or angiography-guided group immediately before the endovascular intervention. In the intravascular ultrasound-guided group, intravascular ultrasound will be either automatically (1 mm/sec) or manually (5-10 mm/sec) pulled back at a constant speed according to the lesion length. Stent size and length are selected by information acquired from on-line intravascular ultrasound examination, and adjunct high-pressure dilation is performed to achieve stent optimization based on the intravascular ultrasound finding. For the selection of the landing zone and stent length, intravascular ultrasound and fluoroscopy images should be recorded simultaneously to link intravascular ultrasound images with location preferably using a ruler. For the selection of stent size and assessment of stent optimization, external elastic membrane area (EEM) before ballooning and minimal stent area (MSA) (i.e, the smallest cross-sectional area within the stent) after post-dilation are assessed. intravascular ultrasound is used at any step of the procedure before, during, or after stenting. However, image examination is mandatory before and after stenting. In the angiography-guided group, stent size and length are chosen by visual estimation, and adjunctive high-pressure dilation is performed if an optimal result, defined as angiographic residual diameter stenosis of less than 30% by visual estimation and the absence of angiographically detected dissection, was not achieved. Stent size is chosen at the operator's discretion in both groups, with diameters 1 or 2 mm larger than the reference diameter assessed either by intravascular ultrasound or visual estimation.

Being tested
intravascular ultrasound-guided group, angiography-guided group

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intravascular ultrasound-guided groupDevice

    intravascular ultrasound use

  • angiography-guided groupDevice

    angiography-guided use

Study groups in NCT05805280
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
intravascular ultrasound-guided groupExperimentalIn the intravascular ultrasound-guided group, intravascular ultrasound will be either automatically (1 mm/sec) or manually (5-10 mm/sec) pulled back at a constant speed according to the lesion length. Stent size and length are selected by information acquired from on-line intravascular ultrasound examination, and adjunct high-pressure dilation is performed to achieve stent optimization based on the intravascular ultrasound finding
Receives: Device: intravascular ultrasound-guided group
angiography-guided groupActive comparatorIn the angiography-guided group, stent size and length are chosen by visual estimation, and adjunctive high-pressure dilation is performed if an optimal result, defined as angiographic residual diameter stenosis of less than 30% by visual estimation and the absence of angiographically detected dissection, , was not achieved
Receives: Device: angiography-guided group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. patency at 12 months after treatment

    peak systolic velocity ratio 2.4 or lower as assessed by the duplex ultrasound, in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization or bypass of the target lesion.

    Measured: 12 month after randomization

  2. Number of procedure related death

    procedure related death through 30 days post-procedure

    Measured: 30 Days post procedure

  3. Number of major amputation of the target limb or target-lesion revascularization

    major amputation of the target limb through 12 months, or target-lesion revascularization through 12 months

    Measured: 12 month after randomization

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. technical success

    deployment of the stent to the target lesion to achieve residual angiographic stenosis ≤30%

    Measured: within 24 hours

  2. procedural success

    technical success without major adverse events

    Measured: within 24 hours

  3. Rutherford category score

    1. Stage 0 - Asymptomatic
    2. Stage 1 - Mild claudication
    3. Stage 2 - Moderate claudication
    4. Stage 3 - Severe claudication
    5. Stage 4 - Rest pain
    6. Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot
    7. Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene

    Measured: 12 month after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2023
  2. Study start27 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion26 Feb 2026
  4. Study completion26 Feb 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Enrolled patients will be randomized at a ratio 1:1 to two treatment arms by a computer-generated randomization sequence with a permutated block size 4. a) intravascular ultrasound-guided group or b) Angiography-guided group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05805280
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-1514
Acronym
ICARUS
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
22 Mar 2023
Last updated
30 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing intravascular ultrasound-guided group and angiography-guided group in people with Femoropopliteal Disease, run by Asan Medical Center at 8 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

patency at 12 months after treatment (time frame: 12 month after randomization). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in