AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive Function 1, SocialNCT05806476

Caffeine, DNA and Cognition

A study testing caffeine in people with Cognitive Function 1, Social, run by St. Mary's University, Twickenham at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A study investigating the effects of acute caffeine intake on cognition based on genes associated with caffeine metabolism and physiological effect. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Function 1, Social
What is being tested?
caffeine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
42 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
22 Feb 2023to 30 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1) adult males and females 18-65 years; 2) who habitually consume caffeine; 3) free from any known disease; 4) free from medication, including contraceptive pills; 5) without uncorrected vision issues, e.g., having myopia but not wearing eyeglasses or daltonism (colour blindness); 6) non-smokers (to avoid contributory effects of nicotine or other tobacco substances to caffeine effects or tolerance) and 7) non-pregnant or breastfeeding.

Who cannot join

  • 1) individuals with a chronic medical condition, 2) pregnant or lactating women, 3) regularly taking medication, including contraceptive pills, 4) with uncorrected vision, 5) smokers, 6) individuals who habitually consume alcohol more than the publicly recommended upper safe limits (21 and 14 units per week for men and women, respectively) and 7) not providing written informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • St Mary's University Twickenham

    London, Lobdon, TW1 4SX

    Yiannis Mavrommatis, 020 8240 4000, yiannis.mavrommatis@stmarys.ac.uk

    Recruiting
  • St Mary's University

    London, TW14SX

    Leta Pilic, PhD, 0208 240 4000, leta.pilic@stmarys.ac.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Acute Caffeine Intake, Cognition and DNA Study

A study investigating the effects of acute caffeine intake on cognition based on genes associated with caffeine metabolism and physiological effect.

Read the detailed description

A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design that incorporates alternating periods of 'long-term' caffeine exposure and abstinence will be employed to investigate the inter-individual effects of caffeine on cognitive performance. The procedure that participants need to follow on each of the four weeks of the study is described in detail below.

  1. Baseline visit: baseline questionnaire, anthropometry, familiarisation with study procedures and tasks. Participants will be supplied with week 1 supplementation (n= 18 capsules) and saliva vials (n= 6) for saliva sample collection. Participants will also be provided with decaffeinated coffee, tea and cocoa, depending on their preferences.
  2. Days 1-6: placebo or caffeine capsules x 3 per day at 09.00, 11.00, and 15.00. Compliance with the caffeine and placebo supplementation will be assessed by a saliva sample at 17.00 every day for each of the days on long-term supplementation. Caffeine concentrations in blood and saliva correlate highly, and levels typically increase progressively during the day (due to intermittent consumption of caffeine beverages). The best single-sample bioassay of daily caffeine intake is provided by samples obtained in the late afternoon (James, 1994; James \& Rogers, 2005).
  3. Days 5 and 6: In preparation for the 'challenge' days and to control for environmental factors which have been shown to affect inducibility of CYP1A2 enzyme, participants will be asked to abstain from alcohol for 48 h and avoid strenuous exercise for 24 h before the trials and avoid consumption of cruciferous foods (broccoli and Brussels sprouts) (Gunes \& Dahl, 2008). Finally, participants will be provided with diet diaries to record all food and beverages consumed during the 24 h before all four experimental trials.
  4. Day 7 (Experimental day): Participants will be asked to present to the laboratory after an overnight fast and they will follow the procedure shown below:

09:00: Pre-supplementation saliva sample \& cognitive tasks

09:30: Supplementation with 3 mg / kg body mass caffeine or placebo

10:30: First post-supplementation saliva sample \& cognitive tasks

12:30: Second post-supplementation saliva sample \& cognitive tasks

13:00: A meal containing of fruit juice or soft drink and a cheese sandwich

15:30: Third post-supplementation saliva sample \& cognitive tasks

Saliva samples will be taken upon arrival and 1, 3 and 6 h post-supplementation. The first sample will be taken to verify adherence to the requirement not to take their morning supplementation, thus be in caffeine abstinence, regardless of the study arm. It has been shown that 1 mg/kg of caffeine results in caffeine plasma levels of about 1 μg/ml and salivary caffeine concentration may be expected to be about 70% of plasma levels (Walther et al., 1983). Mean saliva caffeine levels below 1 μg / ml have been previously reported for overnight caffeine abstinence (Evans \& Griffiths, 1999). Following caffeinated treatment, salivary caffeine levels will aid in determination of caffeine metabolism (Dodd et al., 2015).

The supplementation will be swallowed with water proportional to participant weight (3-ml/kg body mass). During the experimental days, participants will be asked to consume water ad libitum in their first trial and an equal volume in the subsequent trials. They will also be asked to avoid exercise between the trials.

The cognitive tasks will be performed on four time points: pre- and 1, 3 and 6 h post-supplementation. When using anhydrous caffeine in capsules, peak caffeine concentration usually occurs around 1 h post ingestion (Graham, 2001). Therefore, measuring caffeine metabolites for 1 h post-caffeine ingestion would mostly measure caffeine absorption and not metabolism, which is determined by CYP1A2 enzyme. Thus, studies investigating the effects of CYP1A2 genotypes on caffeine effects should focus on using protocols which last >1 h, since these effects may be more evident in events lasting longer than 1 h, where the metabolism of caffeine may have a more pronounced effect. It should also be noted that the half-life of caffeine is on average 4-6 h (Nehlig, 2018) in most adults and it is not yet known to what degree caffeine metabolism is altered between fast and slow metabolisers. Therefore, it is unknown at what time point there would be a large enough difference in the circulating levels of caffeine between fast and slow metabolisers to have a significant impact on the ergogenicity of caffeine (Southward et al., 2018). For this reason, we selected 3 different time points post-supplementation to complete the cognitive tasks: 1 h post-supplementation was selected to permit comparison with several previous caffeine studies, because it is the most frequently used time point to test cognitive performance post-supplementation in the literature (Carswell et al., 2020). We also added the 3 h and 6 h post-supplementation time points since they are within the average range of caffeine half-life and to investigate the differences in performance between 'fast' and 'slow' metabolisers. We hypothesise that those who metabolise caffeine faster would not maintain high saliva levels of caffeine throughout the 6 h event compared to those with a slower metabolism of caffeine.

At the end of each experimental day, participants will be supplied with the capsules for the following week, as well as the vials for saliva caffeine sampling.

Once provided, samples will be kept frozen at -20 °C until analysis. Salivary caffeine levels will be measured using the Enzyme Multiplied Immunoassay Technique (EMIT) by spectrophotometric method. The EMIT assay is a homogenous enzyme immunoassay intended for use in determining caffeine as a metabolite and will be preferred given that it is less invasive than using serum caffeine and has been shown reliable and reproducible (Tripathi et al., 2015). Serum caffeine levels greater than 30 μg / ml require dilution when analysed by EMIT assay.

Being tested
caffeine, placebo
Keywords
cognition, caffeine, attention, memory, executive function, emotion recognition, genetics

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • caffeineDietary supplement

    1.75mg / kg body mass of caffeine x 3 times a day during the run-in days and 3mg / body mass of caffeine once on the experimental days

  • placeboDietary supplement

    1.75mg / kg body mass of microcrystalline cellulose x 3 times a day during the run-in days and 3mg / body mass of microcrystalline cellulose once on the experimental days

Study groups in NCT05806476
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
C - CExperimentalcaffeine intake during the run-in days and caffeine intake on the experimental day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: caffeine
C - PExperimentalcaffeine intake during the run-in days and placebo intake on the experimental day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: caffeine; Dietary Supplement: placebo
P - PExperimentalplacebo intake during the run-in days and placebo intake on the experimental day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: placebo
P - CExperimentalplacebo intake during the run-in days and caffeine intake on the experimental day
Receives: Dietary Supplement: caffeine; Dietary Supplement: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Attention and psychomotor speed

    Attention and psychomotor speed is assessed using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). The reaction times to optical stimulus (red dot) on the screen, measured in milliseconds will be used as a measure.

    Measured: 8 min online task on 4 timepoints (n=4) on all experimental days (n=4)

  2. Memory

    Memory is assessed using the N-back letter task. The reaction times for correct answers (was the letter on the screen displayed one/two/three letters ago? Yes or No), measured in milliseconds will be used as a measure.

    Measured: 6 min online task on 4 timepoints (n=4) on all experimental days (n=4)

  3. Emotion recognition

    Emotion recognition is assessed using the Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces. The reaction times for correct answers (what emotion does the person on the picture show? Anger, Fear, Disgust, Happiness, Sadness, Surprise), measured in milliseconds will be used as a measure.

    Measured: 4 min online task on 4 timepoints (n=4) on all experimental days (n=4)

  4. Executive function

    Executive function is assessed using the Stroop colour and word task. The reaction times for correct answers (name the word and name the colour of the word), measured in milliseconds will be used as a measure.

    Measured: 5 min online task on 4 timepoints (n=4) on all experimental days (n=4)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Apr 2023
  2. Study start22 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 May 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
42 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05806476
Sponsor's protocol ID
SMU_ETHICS_2021-22-319
Status last verified
Mar 2023
First submitted
28 Mar 2023
Last updated
10 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: participants have signed a consent form which clearly states who the members of the research team are and that their data will not be shared with anyone outside the research group, as part of their personal data protection

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing caffeine in people with Cognitive Function 1, Social, run by St. Mary's University, Twickenham at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Attention and psychomotor speed (time frame: 8 min online task on 4 timepoints (n=4) on all experimental days (n=4)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2023.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in