AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisMiSenDolNCT05822856

Gut Microbiota: a Player in Chronic Pain in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Fibromyalgia, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Although rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments are very effective in reducing inflammation, chronic pain persists in 20 to 30% of patients. The intestinal microbiota can participate on the pain pathways and a decrease in Faecalibacterium has been associated with chronic pain and chronic fatigue. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Fibromyalgia
What is being tested?
Blood sampling and others interventions
How many people
125 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
6 Jul 2023to Nov 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Population with a painful pathology (RA and fibromyalgia) compared to a non-painful population (RA and healthy subjects)

Who may be able to join

  • For all :
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • For A1 Group (3 groups of RA patients of 25 patients each):
  • Subject with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) meeting the American College of Rheumatology / European League Against Rheumatism ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria, without disease-modifying treatment or with conventional treatment initiated for at least 3 months (at stable dosage for more than 6 weeks)
  • For A1-1 group : active RA
  • DAS28>3.2 with increased CRP (> laboratory standard),
Show all 24Show fewer
  • VAS (Visual Analogic Scale)>5/10 with no other explanation than inflammatory rheumatism
  • For A1-2 group : RA without inflammation with persistent chronic pain (>3 months) despite control of inflammation and no other identified cause:
  • no swollen joint,
  • CRP normal (< laboratory standard),
  • VAS>5/10
  • For A1-3 groupe : RA in remission without pain:
  • DAS28 ≤2.6,
  • no swollen joint,
  • CRP normal (< laboratory standard),
  • VAS≤2/10
  • For A2 Group (1 group of 25 Fibromyalgia patients):
  • Subjects with Fibromyalgia meeting 2016 diagnostic criteria
  • VAS>5/10
  • FIRST (FIbromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool) ≥5
  • For A3 Group (1 group of 25 healthy subjects ):
  • healthy and pain-free controls subjects with no progressive disease,
  • VAS≤2/10,
  • FIRST =0

Who cannot join

  • biological therapy for RA: within the previous year for rituximab, within < 4 intervals between anti-TNF, anti-IL6R, or CTLA4-Ig injections and within the previous 15 days for JAKi (JAK inhibitor)
  • Corticosteroids > 10 mg/d per os at inclusion
  • Corticosteroids > 20 mg/d per os or bolus within 15 days prior to inclusion
  • Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pain medication in the previous week
  • Current oral anti-diabetic or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy
  • Antibiotic therapy in the previous 3 months
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Infection, cancer in the last 5 years prior to inclusion
  • History of other systemic inflammatory/autoimmune diseases
  • Not affiliated to a social security
  • Patient unwilling or unable to give consent: patient under guardianship or conservatorship,
  • Mentally impaired, dementia, language barrier
  • Patient under court protection
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Refusal of written consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Claire I DAIEN, MD-PhD contact

467338710 ext. +33

c-daien@chu-montpellier.fr

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHU montpellier - department of rheumatology

    Montpellier, 34295

    claire DAIEN, MD - PhD, 0033467336733, c-daien@chu-montpellier.fr

    Claire DAIEN, MD - PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Gut Microbiota: a Player in the Patients Pain's Sensitization With Rheumatoid Arthritis?

Although rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatments are very effective in reducing inflammation, chronic pain persists in 20 to 30% of patients.

The intestinal microbiota can participate on the pain pathways and a decrease in Faecalibacterium has been associated with chronic pain and chronic fatigue. RA patients have an altered gut microbiota or dysbiosis. Among the bacteria that are most often differentially represented between RA and control, Faecalibacterium, was also found less abundant in RA patients.

The composition of the gut microbiota has never been evaluated in relation to the clinical phenotype of RA patients and in particular to the presence of a diffuse pain. In this study, investigators will test whether the gut microbiota of RA patients, and in particular the decrease of Faecalibacterium, would promote pain sensitization phenomena, and thus, chronic pain despite the control of joint inflammation.

Read the detailed description

There are currently many treatments available for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although these treatments are very effective on inflammation, chronic pain persists in 20 to 30% of patients, even though clinical and biological remission seems to have been achieved, greatly reducing their daily quality of life. They are characterized in particular by a global lowering of pain thresholds, with a clinical picture of secondary fibromyalgia. Indeed, it seems that RA patients present central and peripheral hypersensitization of nociceptors, abnormalities in central pain processing and a defect in top-down inhibitory pain control mechanisms. It is also possible that RA patients with these inflammation-dissociated polyalgic pictures have a different pathophysiology of their disease than those with inflammation-only pain. A growing body of work shows that the gut microbiota (GM) affects pain pathways at multiple levels through the gut-brain axis. This axis relies, among others, on the afferent pathways of the vagus nerve. The microbiota modulates the activity of the vagus nerve by releasing neurotransmitters (gamma-aminobutyric acid, dopamine), by modulating immune cells (cytokines), by modulating the secretions of enteroendocrine cells (serotonin, cholecystokinins, glucagon-like peptide-1, peptide XY) or by releasing metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids, including butyrate. The latter is known to bind to several functional receptors present on vagal afferents. A decrease in Faecalibacterium has been associated with chronic pain and chronic fatigue.

RA is associated with dysbiosis of the gut microbiota, i.e. a change in the composition of the gut flora . Among the bacteria that are most often differentially represented between RA and control, Fecal bacteria are also less abundant in RA patients. The research team has conducted several experiments that clearly confirm the hypothesis that the microbiota of RA patients acts differently on the gut-brain axis than that of healthy subjects. Indeed, it is known that these RA patients present a defect in the control of parasympathetic activity and a link between dysbiosis of the GM and alteration of the autonomous nervous system (ANS) has already been shown in several pathologies. Considering that the GM is altered in RA and that alterations in the GM can modulate the ANS, the research team therefore hypothesized that the GM of RA patients is capable of altering cardiovascular function and particularly autonomic function. To demonstrate the role of the GM in ANS alterations, a mouse model with humanized microbiota by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) of RA patients or healthy subjects (age- and sex-matched controls) was developed and the research team showed that transfer of gut microbiota from RA patients toof mice previously treated with antibiotics alters the autonomic control of cardiac rhythm. Indeed, a decrease in vagal activity, objectified by the analysis of heart rate variability was observed, unpublished data. This confirms our hypothesis that the microbiota of RA patients acts differently on the gut-brain axis than that of healthy subjects. There is therefore a strong rationale for thinking that the microbiota of these patients could influence the central sensitization and control of pain and that RA patients with a fibromyalgia profile have a different microbiota from others.

Bacterial extracellular vesicles (EVs) are important vectors of communication between the gut microbiota and its host. They are the subject of increasing attention and could participate in the gut-brain axis. Indeed, some pathogenic EVs participate in the alteration of the intestinal barrier, pass into the bloodstream and can therefore act remotely from the intestine. Moreover, it has been shown that some bacteria (e.g. A. muciniphila and Faecalibacterium Prausnitzii) modulate the intestinal serotonin system mainly via their EVs. However, our preliminary experiments with stool transfer from RA patients suggest that serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine 5 HT) is altered, as the research team showed that its expression is decreased in the intestine of mice transplanted with stool from RA patients (unpublished).

Hypothesis: RA patients have an altered gut microbiota or dysbiosis. Among the bacteria that are most often differentially found between RA and control, Faecalibacterium are less abundant in RA patients and a decrease in Faecalibacterium has also been associated with chronic pain patterns . The research team therefore hypothesizes that the intestinal microbiota of RA patients, and in particular the decrease in Faecalibacterium, would promote pain sensitization phenomena, the lack of top-down inhibitory control, and thus chronic pain despite the control of joint inflammation.

To test this hypothesis, the investigating team will compare the composition of the gut microbiota of patients with RA in inflammatory flare, RA in pain-free remission, RA without inflammation with chronic pain, healthy subjects without pain, and patients with fibromyalgia without inflammatory rheumatism. Microbial analysis by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing and quantification of major microbiota-derived fecal metabolites (including short-chain fatty acids and tryptophan derivatives and vesicles

Next, investigators will also functionally evaluate the impact of the gut microbiota on pain sensitization. For this purpose, the research team will use in vitro experimental models (intestinal barrier models (Caco2) and neurons of vagal afferents (primary cultures obtained from murine jugular and nuchal ganglia). In an in vivo study, some faeces samples will be used to humanize the mouse microbiota and then evaluate the impact on tactile sensitivity (Von-Frey).

Being tested
Blood sampling and others interventions
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, intestinal microbiota, Faecalibacterium, pain
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Fibromyalgia, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blood sampling and others interventionsOther

    Blood sampling, faeces collection, questionnaires, tactile sensitivity, sensorial tests

Study groups in NCT05822856
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with RA without inflammation with persistent chronic painBlood sampling, faeces collection, questionnaires, tactile sensitivity, sensorial tests
Receives: Other: Blood sampling and others interventions
Patients with an active RA (in inflammatory flare)Blood sampling, faeces collection, questionnaires, tactile sensitivity, sensorial tests
Receives: Other: Blood sampling and others interventions
Patients with RA in remission without painBlood sampling, faeces collection, questionnaires, tactile sensitivity, sensorial tests
Receives: Other: Blood sampling and others interventions
fibromyalgia patientsBlood sampling, faeces collection, questionnaires, tactile sensitivity, sensorial tests
Receives: Other: Blood sampling and others interventions
Control subjects: healthy volunteersBlood sampling, faeces collection, questionnaires, tactile sensitivity, sensorial tests
Receives: Other: Blood sampling and others interventions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of the frequency of intestinal Faecalibacterium between : - inflammation-free RA with persistent chronic pain patients and - RA remission pain-free patients

    Comparison of the frequency of intestinal Faecalibacterium assessed by 16S RNA sequencing from patient stool samples collected in OMNIGene-Gut collection tubes

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. comparison of the frequency of intestinal Faecalibacterium between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - active RA patients

    Frequency of different families, genera, species, alpha diversity evaluated by Shannon index and bacterial richness

    Measured: Baseline

  2. comparison of the frequency of intestinal Faecalibacterium between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - healthy subjects

    Frequency of different families, genera, species, alpha diversity evaluated by Shannon index and bacterial richness

    Measured: Baseline

  3. comparison of the frequency of intestinal Faecalibacterium between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - patients with fibromyalgia

    Frequency of different families, genera, species, alpha diversity evaluated by Shannon index and bacterial richness

    Measured: Baseline

  4. comparison of the metabolites from the microbiota between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - active RA patients

    Concentrations of short chain fatty acids and tryptophan metabolites evaluated by Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in the feces

    Measured: Baseline

  5. comparison of the metabolites from the microbiota between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - healthy subjects

    Concentrations of short chain fatty acids and tryptophan metabolites evaluated by Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in the feces

    Measured: Baseline

  6. comparison of the metabolites from the microbiota between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - patients with fibromyalgia

    Concentrations of short chain fatty acids and tryptophan metabolites evaluated by Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in the feces

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Comparison of markers of intestinal permeability between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - active RA patients

    Quantification of intestinal permeability markers (ZO-1, LBP, CD14-soluble, iFABP) in the serum of the participants by ELISA technique

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Comparison of markers of intestinal permeability between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - healthy subjects

    Quantification of intestinal permeability markers (ZO-1, LBP, CD14-soluble, iFABP) in the serum of the participants by ELISA technique

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Comparison of markers of intestinal permeability between: - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - patients with fibromyalgia

    Quantification of intestinal permeability markers (ZO-1, LBP, CD14-soluble, iFABP) in the serum of the participants by ELISA technique

    Measured: Baseline

  10. comparison of markers inflammation (CRP, pro-inflammatory cytokines) between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - active RA patients

    Quantification of inflammation marker (CRP, pro-inflammatory cytokines) in the serum.

    Measured: Baseline

  11. comparison of markers inflammation (CRP, pro-inflammatory cytokines) between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - healthy subjects

    Quantification of inflammation marker (CRP, pro-inflammatory cytokines) in the serum.

    Measured: Baseline

  12. comparison of markers inflammation (CRP, pro-inflammatory cytokines) between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - patients with fibromyalgia

    Quantification of inflammation marker (CRP, pro-inflammatory cytokines) in the serum.

    Measured: Baseline

  13. Comparison of the neurotrophic marker BDNF between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - active RA patients

    Quantification of the neurotrophic marker BDNF in the blood.

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Comparison of the neurotrophic marker BDNF between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - healthy subjects

    Quantification of the neurotrophic marker BDNF in the blood.

    Measured: Baseline

  15. Comparison of the neurotrophic marker BDNF between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - patients with fibromyalgia

    Quantification of the neurotrophic marker BDNF in the blood.

    Measured: Baseline

  16. comparison of fecal calprotectin between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - active RA patients

    Quantification of fecal calprotectin.

    Measured: Baseline

  17. comparison of fecal calprotectin between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - healthy subjects

    Quantification of fecal calprotectin.

    Measured: Baseline

  18. comparison of fecal calprotectin between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - patients with fibromyalgia

    Quantification of fecal calprotectin.

    Measured: Baseline

  19. comparison of the tactile sensitivity and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pains between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - healthy subjects

    Tactile sensitivity using the Von-frey filament technique in front of the affected joints in RA (metacarpophalangeal) and at a distance from the joints (forearms and calves)

    Measured: Baseline

  20. comparison of the tactile sensitivity and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pains between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - patients with fibromyalgia

    Tactile sensitivity using the Von-frey filament technique in front of the affected joints in RA (metacarpophalangeal) and at a distance from the joints (forearms and calves)

    Measured: Baseline

  21. comparison of the tactile sensitivity and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pains between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - active RA patients

    Tactile sensitivity using the Von-frey filament technique in front of the affected joints in RA (metacarpophalangeal) and at a distance from the joints (forearms and calves)

    Measured: Baseline

  22. To investigate the association between tactile sensitivity by the Von-Frey filament technique, bacteria, bacterial metabolites and biomarkers

    Tactile sensitivity using the Von-frey filament technique in front of the affected joints in RA (metacarpophalangeal) and at a distance from the joints (forearms and calves) study of the bacterial population by 16s RNA sequencing determination of bacterial metabolites by Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) determination of blood biomarkers (intestinal permeability, inflammation and BDNF)

    Measured: Baseline

  23. comparison of the central pain sensitivity (QST) data between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - active RA patients

    Tactile sensitivity using the Von-frey filament technique in front of the affected joints in RA (metacarpophalangeal) and at a distance from the joints (forearms and calves)

    Measured: Baseline

  24. comparison of the central pain sensitivity (QST) data between : - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - healthy subjects

    Tactile sensitivity using the Von-frey filament technique in front of the affected joints in RA (metacarpophalangeal) and at a distance from the joints (forearms and calves)

    Measured: Baseline

  25. comparison of the central pain sensitivity (QST) data between: - RA in remission without pain patients and RA without inflammation with persistant chronic pain patients - patients with fibromyalgia

    Tactile sensitivity using the Von-frey filament technique in front of the affected joints in RA (metacarpophalangeal) and at a distance from the joints (forearms and calves)

    Measured: Baseline

  26. comparison of the Extracellular Vesicles from microbiota (fecal and circulating).

    Isolation, Quantification and Characterization of extracellular vesicles resulting from the interaction host / microbiota interaction

    Measured: Baseline

  27. Functional evaluation in an experimental models of the effect of the intestinal microbiota on pain sensitization

    impact on in vitro study models of the intestinal barrier (Caco2) and on vagal afferents neurons (primary cultures))

    impact on in vitro intestinal barrier study models (Caco2) and on vagal afferent neurons (primary cultures obtained from murine jugular and nodes) exposed to supernatants from the stools of different patients and to metabolites identified in the comparison of patients' stools. We will also expose them to circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) in the circulation and in the stool

    Measured: Baseline

  28. In vivo (mice) verification of the effect of microbiota on pain.

    Transfer of stool samples from patients in a mouse model then a comparison of tactile sensitivity by the Von-frey filament technique

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2023
  2. Study start6 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completionNov 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
125 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05822856
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL22_0385
Acronym
MiSenDol
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
7 Apr 2023
Last updated
13 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Fibromyalgia, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 24 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Claire I DAIEN, MD-PhD (467338710 ext. +33, c-daien@chu-montpellier.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of the frequency of intestinal Faecalibacterium between : - inflammation-free RA with persistent chronic pain patients and - RA remission pain-free patients (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in