AzTrials
AzTrials

Laparoscopic HysterectomyMgSO4NCT05826119

Intravenous Administration of Magnesium Sulfate in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Cases

A study testing magnesium sulfate group in people with Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Magnesium Sulfate, run by Ondokuz Mayıs University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In our study, it was aimed to show the contribution of intraoperative intravenous magnesium sulfate administration to peroperative opioid consumption and postoperative analgesia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 70 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
magnesium sulfate group
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
20 Jan 2024to 15 Jun 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 70 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient undergoing abdominal hysterectomy
  • Between the ages of 20-70,
  • ASA I- II

Who cannot join

  • Presence of hepatic and renal dysfunction,
  • Presence of cardiac arrhythmia or other cardiac comorbidity,
  • Neurological and psychiatric disorder,
  • Chronic use of calcium and beta blockers,
  • Drug or alcohol abuse,
  • Pregnancy and lactation status,
  • Patients with a history of allergy to any drug included in the study protocol

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine

    Samsun

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Use on Intraoperative Remifentanil Consumption and Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Cases

In our study, it was aimed to show the contribution of intraoperative intravenous magnesium sulfate administration to peroperative opioid consumption and postoperative analgesia.

Read the detailed description

Postsurgical pain is one of the most important issues that could impress on postoperative peace and comfort. Laparoscopic hysterectomy associated with intense inflammatory response, resulting in moderate to severe postoperative pain perception The major goal in postoperative pain management is to minimize the dose of medications and lessen side effects, while still providing adequate analgesia. Postoperative pain relief leads to earlier mobilization, shortened hospital staying, reduced hospital costs, and increased patient satisfaction Narcotics are the most common analgesics which are used after the surgeries. But anesthetists are always looking for replaceable methods with fewer side effects and cost . It seems adjuvant analgesics are those desirable replacements. Nowadays there have been many debates on the role of adjuvant analgesics on postoperative pain relief. One way to use adjuvant analgesics is preventive method Preventive analgesia is a method initiated before anesthetic procedure in order to reduce the physiological consequences of nociceptive stimulation and medical adverse effects and has been defined as an antinociceptive treatment that prevents establishment of altered central processing of afferent input from injuries. One of the intravenous adjuvant that has been shown potential in preventive analgesia is magnesium sulfate that could be administered with multiple routes or methods Mg has been used for many years in anesthesia and cardiology as an anticonvulsant or antiarrhythmic drug. The mechanism of the analgesic effect of Mg is not clear but interference with calcium channels and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor seem to play an important role. It seems that analgesic mechanism of NMDA-antagonists is made by preventing nociceptive central sensitization. Another suggesting mechanism is the role of it on reduction of catecholamine release with sympathetic stimulation, thereby decreasing peripheral nociception or the stress response to the surgery. Data illustrate that the NMDA receptor antagonists "like Mg sulfate" have an effect on pain threshold and could prevent pain perception even with low doses (preventive doses) In our study, investigators aimed to determine the contribution of magnesium sulfate to postoperative analgesia in abdominal hysterectomy by considering its mechanism of action.

The patients were divided into two groups as magnesium sulfate administered and non-administered The magnesium group received a bolus of 20 mg/kg of magnesium sulfate in 100 mL of saline for 15 minutes before induction, followed by a continuous infusion of 20 mg/kg/hr until the skin was closed. The same volume of isotonic saline for the control group was administered as indicated in the magnesium group.

Being tested
magnesium sulfate group, Placebo
Keywords
intravenous magnesium sulfate, lararoscopic hysterectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • magnesium sulfate groupDrug

    Also called magnesium sulfate

    Anesthesia induction was provided with propofol (2mg/kg), fentanyl (2mcg/kg). Intubation was performed after administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium with an appropriate endotracheal tube. Anesthesia was maintained using AIR/O2 (50%/50%), 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane, 0.1-0.25 mcg/kg/min remifentanil infusion. The target BIS value was kept between 40 and 50. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90mmHg or <20% of baseline was considered hypotension; remifentanil infusion was reduced. If no response was obtained, 5-10 mg of IV ephedrine was administered. HR < 45 beats/min was evaluated as bradycardia; IV atropine 0.5 mg was planned The magnesium group received a bolus of 20 mg/kg of magnesium sulfate in 100 mL of saline for 15 minutes prior to induction, followed by a continuous infusion of 20 mg/kg/hr until skin closure.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called saline

    Anesthesia induction was provided with propofol (2mg/kg), fentanyl (2mcg/kg). Intubation was performed after administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium with an appropriate endotracheal tube. Anesthesia was maintained using AIR/O2 (50%/50%), 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane, 0.1-0.25 mcg/kg/min remifentanil infusion. The target BIS value was kept between 40 and 50. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90mmHg or <20% of baseline was considered hypotension; remifentanil infusion was reduced. If no response was obtained, 5-10 mg of IV ephedrine was administered. HR < 45 beats/min was evaluated as bradycardia; IV atropine 0.5 mg was planned The same volume of isotonic saline for the control group was administered as indicated in the magnesium group.

Study groups in NCT05826119
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Magnesium sulfateActive comparatorBefore induction, a bolus of 20 mg/kg magnesium sulfate in 100 mL saline was administered for 15 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 20 mg/kg/hour until the skin was closed.
Receives: Drug: magnesium sulfate group
PlaceboActive comparatorThe control group received only 100 ml of saline 15 minutes before induction.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery

    Fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours was measured. Patients were able to request opioids via a PCA device when their VAS score is above 4 at rest and during activity (coughing and walking).

    Measured: Postoperative Day 1

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Post-operative acute pain

    Pain status at rest and while activity (coughing and walking) was assessed by VAS scores at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. The VAS is an 11-point numeric scale which ranges from 0 to 10 at rest and during activity.

    Measured: Postoperative Day 1

  2. The incidences of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

    The severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assessed using a Verbal Descriptive Scale(VDS) at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24, hours after surgery. If a score of 3 or more is recorded, ondansetron 0,1 mg/kg iv was administered.

    Measured: Postoperative Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Apr 2023
  2. Study start20 Jan 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2024
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to a 1:1 randomization ratio using opaque sealed envelopes before surgery. Study randomization was performed using computer generated randomization codes by SPSS v23.0 (IBM, New York, USA). Each patient was asked to choose an envelope and the patients were assigned to the study according to the group specified in the envelope. The drugs to be used were prepared 30 minutes before the surgery by the nurse who did not participate in the study in the drug preparation room. Everyone involved in this study, including patients, researchers, the anesthesiologist responsible for anesthesia management, and the surgeon, remained blind to group distribution during the study.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05826119
Sponsor's protocol ID
drilke
Acronym
MgSO4
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
11 Apr 2023
Last updated
19 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Albrecht E, Kirkham KR, Liu SS, Brull R. Peri-operative intravenous administration of magnesium sulphate and postoperative pain: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2013 Jan;68(1):79-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07335.x. Epub 2012 Nov 1.

    PubMed 23121612
  • Seyhan TO, Tugrul M, Sungur MO, Kayacan S, Telci L, Pembeci K, Akpir K. Effects of three different dose regimens of magnesium on propofol requirements, haemodynamic variables and postoperative pain relief in gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Feb;96(2):247-52. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei291. Epub 2005 Nov 25.

    PubMed 16311277
  • Benevides ML, Fialho DC, Linck D, Oliveira AL, Ramalho DHV, Benevides MM. Intravenous magnesium sulfate for postoperative analgesia after abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia: a randomized, double-blind trial. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 Sep-Oct;71(5):498-504. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Mar 21.

    PubMed 33762190
  • Sousa AM, Rosado GM, Neto Jde S, Guimaraes GM, Ashmawi HA. Magnesium sulfate improves postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:379-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jun 5.

    PubMed 27687417

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing magnesium sulfate group in people with Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Magnesium Sulfate, run by Ondokuz Mayıs University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery (time frame: Postoperative Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05826119, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in