Social IsolationLEAPTogetherNCT05831475
LEAPTogether: An Intergenerational Intervention to Address Loneliness and Social Isolation
A study testing Intergenerational Virtual Paired Exercise and Peer Virtual Paired Exercise in people with Social Isolation and Loneliness, run by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Older adult participants will engage in exercise videos twice a week for 8 weeks either while paired with a peer (same age group) or paired with a younger adult with the ability to simultaneously video chat while exercising. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Social Isolation, Loneliness, Intergenerational Relations
- What is being tested?
- Intergenerational Virtual Paired Exercise and Peer Virtual Paired Exercise
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Sep 2023to 25 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Verbal informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study
- Age 18-30 years for younger adults
- Age greater than or equal to 65 years for older adults
- Has access to a tablet, laptop, or desktop computer with video capabilities connected to the internet with a screen at least 13 inches across
- Able to read, write, and understand English
- Has a 5 x 6 foot space at home in which to exercise
Who cannot join
- Current diagnosis of dementia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
About this study
Official title: Leveraging Exercise to Age in Place (LEAP) Together: An Intergenerational Intervention to Address Loneliness and Social Isolation
Older adult participants will engage in exercise videos twice a week for 8 weeks either while paired with a peer (same age group) or paired with a younger adult with the ability to simultaneously video chat while exercising.
Read the detailed description
Participation in this study includes:
- Completing assessments at baseline (start of study), 8 weeks, and 16 weeks
- Initial meeting with an Exercise Physiologist to determine exercise interests and preferences
- Being matched with an exercise partner
- Virtually meeting with partner to engage in exercise videos via the FlexTogether platform (meet twice a week for a total of 8 weeks)
- Attend a live group class once a month
- Completing an exit interview
Primary Objective:
To assess feasibility by monitoring adherence to an 8-week virtual paired exercise program for older adults
Secondary Objectives:
- To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e., older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness, decrease loneliness, improve well-being, and increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the short-term (pre-post) through surveys and qualitative interviews
- To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e., older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness, decrease loneliness, improve well-being, and increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the long-term (8 weeks post-intervention / 18 weeks on study) through surveys and qualitative interviews
- Conditions
- Social Isolation, Loneliness, Intergenerational Relations
- Being tested
- Intergenerational Virtual Paired Exercise, Peer Virtual Paired Exercise
- Keywords
- physical activity, older adults, intergenerational, social isolation, loneliness, virtual exercise
- Medical subject headings
- Social Isolation, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intergenerational Virtual Paired ExerciseBehavioural
Participants will be paired with someone older/ younger and will engage in exercise videos with the ability to simultaneously video chat with their partner while exercising. Participants will log on with their partner twice a week for 8 weeks.
Peer Virtual Paired ExerciseBehavioural
Participants will be paired with someone of the same age group and will engage in exercise videos with the ability to simultaneously video chat with their partner while exercising. Participants will log on with their partner twice a week for 8 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Peer Pairings | Experimental | Two older adults paired Receives: Behavioral: Peer Virtual Paired Exercise |
| Intergenerational Pairings | Experimental | A younger adult and older adult paired Receives: Behavioral: Intergenerational Virtual Paired Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adherence to an 8-week virtual paired exercise program for older adults
Adherence defined as attending at least 12 out of 16 sessions (70% attendance)
Measured: Attendance over 8-weeks
Secondary outcomes (15)
social connectedness per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness in the short-term (pre-post) through Duke Social Support Index (min score- 11, max score- 33; higher score indicates higher social support and interaction).
Measured: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post loneliness per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to decrease loneliness in the short-term (pre-post) through UCLA Loneliness Survey (min score- 3, max score- 9; higher scores correspond to higher feelings of loneliness)
Measured: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post emotional, social, and psychological well-being per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the short-term (pre-post) through Mental Health Continuum Short-Form (min score- 14, max score- 84; higher scores indicate greater levels of positive well-being)
Measured: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post expectations regarding aging per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the short-term (pre-post) through Expectations Regarding Aging Survey (min score- 12, max score- 48; higher score indicates higher (positive) expectations of aging)
Measured: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post generativity per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the short-term (pre-post) through Baltimore Experience Corps Trial Generativity Scale (min score- 13, max score- 65; higher score indicates higher levels of generativity)
Measured: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post physical activity per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the short-term (pre-post) through Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (min score- 0, max score- 24+; total of 14 or less indicates insufficient activity/sedentary lifestyle, 24 units or more indicates active lifestyle)
Measured: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post physical activity per 30 second sit to stand
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the short-term (pre-post) through 30 second sit to stand (how many times can the participant sit and stand without using their hands in a 30 second period, higher number indicates higher level of endurance)
Measured: baseline and 10 weeks
long-term social connectedness per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Duke Social Support Index (min score- 11, max score- 33; higher score indicates higher social support and interaction).
Measured: 18 weeks
long-term loneliness per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to decrease loneliness in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through UCLA Loneliness Survey (min score- 3, max score- 9; higher scores correspond to higher feelings of loneliness)
Measured: 18 weeks
long-term expectations regarding aging per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Expectations Regarding Aging Survey (min score- 12, max score- 48; higher score indicates higher (positive) expectations of aging)
Measured: 18 weeks
long-term emotional, social, and psychological well-being per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Mental Health Continuum Short-Form (min score- 14, max score- 84; higher scores indicate greater levels of positive well-being)
Measured: 18 weeks
long-term generativity per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e. solo, older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to improve well-being in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Baltimore Experience Corps Trial Generativity Scale (min score- 13, max score- 65; higher score indicates higher levels of generativity)
Measured: 18 weeks
long-term physical activity per units in scale
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components within a virtual program necessary to increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (min score- 0, max score- 24+; total of 14 or less indicates insufficient activity/sedentary lifestyle, 24 units or more indicates active lifestyle)
Measured: 18 weeks
long-term physical activity per 30 second sit to stand
To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components within a virtual program necessary to increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the long-term (4.5 months/18 weeks) through 30 second sit to stand (how many times can the participant sit and stand without using their hands in a 30 second period, higher number indicates higher level of endurance)
Measured: 18 weeks
Key social pairing components in virtual programming
Qualitative interview to capture any other thoughts and observations from participants that are not easily captured in surveys
Measured: 10 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Apr 2023
- Study start7 Sep 2023
- Primary completion25 Mar 2026
- Study completion25 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Social IsolationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized by the coordinator to a study arm: Arm 1- older adult paired with older adult (40) Arm 2- older adult paired with younger adult (20 older, 20 younger)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- FlexTogether
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Allison Mays, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
- Investigators
- Celina H Shirazipour, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterAllison M Mays, MD, MAS, Principal investigator, Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterSonja Rosen, MD, FACP, AGSF, Principal investigator, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05831475
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00001980
- Acronym
- LEAPTogether
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Feb 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5797-801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219686110. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
PubMed 23530191Tiwari SC. Loneliness: A disease? Indian J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;55(4):320-2. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.120536. No abstract available.
PubMed 24459300Perissinotto CM, Stijacic Cenzer I, Covinsky KE. Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jul 23;172(14):1078-83. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1993.
PubMed 22710744Ronzi S, Orton L, Pope D, Valtorta NK, Bruce NG. What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 30;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0680-2.
PubMed 29382375Teater B. Intergenerational Programs to Promote Active Aging: The Experiences and Perspectives of Older Adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging. 2016/01/02 2016;40(1):1-19. doi:10.1080/01924788.2016.1127041
Peters R, Ee N, Ward SA, Kenning G, Radford K, Goldwater M, Dodge HH, Lewis E, Xu Y, Kudrna G, Hamilton M, Peters J, Anstey KJ, Lautenschlager NT, Fitzgerald A, Rockwood K. Intergenerational Programmes bringing together community dwelling non-familial older adults and children: A Systematic Review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 May-Jun;94:104356. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104356. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
PubMed 33567363Kim Y, Kim J, Lee JM, Seo DC, Jung HC. Intergenerational Taekwondo Program: A Narrative Review and Practical Intervention Proposal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095247.
PubMed 35564642Rizzo N. Fitness Industry Statistics 2021-2028 [Market Research]. 2021. https://runrepeat.com/fitness-industry
Russell D, Peplau LA, Ferguson ML. Developing a measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1978 Jun;42(3):290-4. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11.
PubMed 660402Koenig HG, Westlund RE, George LK, Hughes DC, Blazer DG, Hybels C. Abbreviating the Duke Social Support Index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals. Psychosomatics. 1993 Jan-Feb;34(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(93)71928-3.
PubMed 8426892Rikli RE, Jones CJ. Development and Validation of a Functional Fitness Test for Community-Residing Older Adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 01 Apr. 1999 1999;7(2):129-161. doi:10.1123/japa.7.2.129
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Leveraging Exercise to Age in Place (LEAP) Together: An Intergenerational Intervention to Address Loneliness and Social Isolation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05831475
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LEAPTogether / STUDY00001980
- Conditions
- Social Isolation, Loneliness, Intergenerational Relations
- Keywords
- physical activity, older adults, intergenerational, social isolation, loneliness, virtual exercise
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- FlexTogether
- Study start
- 7 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Older adult participants will engage in exercise videos twice a week for 8 weeks either while paired with a peer (same age group) or paired with a younger adult with the ability to simultaneously video chat while exercising.
Detailed description
Participation in this study includes:
- Completing assessments at baseline (start of study), 8 weeks, and 16 weeks
- Initial meeting with an Exercise Physiologist to determine exercise interests and preferences
- Being matched with an exercise partner
- Virtually meeting with partner to engage in exercise videos via the FlexTogether platform (meet twice a week for a total of 8 weeks)
- Attend a live group class once a month
- Completing an exit interview
Primary Objective:
To assess feasibility by monitoring adherence to an 8-week virtual paired exercise program for older adults
Secondary Objectives:
- To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e., older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness, decrease loneliness, improve well-being, and increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the short-term (pre-post) through surveys and qualitative interviews
- To mechanistically investigate the key social pairing components (i.e., older adults together, younger and older adult pairing) within a virtual program necessary to enhance social connectedness, decrease loneliness, improve well-being, and increase physical activity in older adults and younger adult participants in the long-term (8 weeks post-intervention / 18 weeks on study) through surveys and qualitative interviews
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomized by the coordinator to a study arm: Arm 1- older adult paired with older adult (40) Arm 2- older adult paired with younger adult (20 older, 20 younger)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Peer Pairings | Experimental | Behavioral: Peer Virtual Paired ExerciseTwo older adults paired |
| Intergenerational Pairings | Experimental | Behavioral: Intergenerational Virtual Paired ExerciseA younger adult and older adult paired |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Verbal informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study
- Age 18-30 years for younger adults
- Age greater than or equal to 65 years for older adults
- Has access to a tablet, laptop, or desktop computer with video capabilities connected to the internet with a screen at least 13 inches across
- Able to read, write, and understand English
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Current diagnosis of dementia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intergenerational Virtual Paired ExerciseParticipants will be paired with someone older/ younger and will engage in exercise videos with the ability to simultaneously video chat with their partner while exercising. Participants will log on with their partner twice a week for 8 weeks. | Behavioural | Intergenerational Pairings |
| Peer Virtual Paired ExerciseParticipants will be paired with someone of the same age group and will engage in exercise videos with the ability to simultaneously video chat with their partner while exercising. Participants will log on with their partner twice a week for 8 weeks. | Behavioural | Peer Pairings |
Primary outcome
Adherence to an 8-week virtual paired exercise program for older adults
Time frame: Attendance over 8-weeks
Adherence defined as attending at least 12 out of 16 sessions (70% attendance)
15 secondary outcomes
social connectedness per units in scale
Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post loneliness per units in scale
Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post emotional, social, and psychological well-being per units in scale
Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post expectations regarding aging per units in scale
Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post generativity per units in scale
Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post physical activity per units in scale
Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks
pre/post physical activity per 30 second sit to stand
Time frame: baseline and 10 weeks
long-term social connectedness per units in scale
Time frame: 18 weeks
long-term loneliness per units in scale
Time frame: 18 weeks
long-term expectations regarding aging per units in scale
Time frame: 18 weeks
long-term emotional, social, and psychological well-being per units in scale
Time frame: 18 weeks
long-term generativity per units in scale
Time frame: 18 weeks
long-term physical activity per units in scale
Time frame: 18 weeks
long-term physical activity per 30 second sit to stand
Time frame: 18 weeks
Key social pairing components in virtual programming
Time frame: 10 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 23530191Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakakos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5797-801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219686110. Epub 2013 Mar 25.
- Background: PubMed 24459300Tiwari SC. Loneliness: A disease? Indian J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;55(4):320-2. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.120536. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22710744Perissinotto CM, Stijacic Cenzer I, Covinsky KE. Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Jul 23;172(14):1078-83. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1993.
- Background: PubMed 29382375Ronzi S, Orton L, Pope D, Valtorta NK, Bruce NG. What is the impact on health and wellbeing of interventions that foster respect and social inclusion in community-residing older adults? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 30;7(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0680-2.
- BackgroundTeater B. Intergenerational Programs to Promote Active Aging: The Experiences and Perspectives of Older Adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging. 2016/01/02 2016;40(1):1-19. doi:10.1080/01924788.2016.1127041
- Background: PubMed 33567363Peters R, Ee N, Ward SA, Kenning G, Radford K, Goldwater M, Dodge HH, Lewis E, Xu Y, Kudrna G, Hamilton M, Peters J, Anstey KJ, Lautenschlager NT, Fitzgerald A, Rockwood K. Intergenerational Programmes bringing together community dwelling non-familial older adults and children: A Systematic Review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 May-Jun;94:104356. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104356. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
- Background: PubMed 35564642Kim Y, Kim J, Lee JM, Seo DC, Jung HC. Intergenerational Taekwondo Program: A Narrative Review and Practical Intervention Proposal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 26;19(9):5247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095247.
- BackgroundRizzo N. Fitness Industry Statistics 2021-2028 [Market Research]. 2021. https://runrepeat.com/fitness-industry
- Background: PubMed 660402Russell D, Peplau LA, Ferguson ML. Developing a measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1978 Jun;42(3):290-4. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_11.
- Background: PubMed 8426892Koenig HG, Westlund RE, George LK, Hughes DC, Blazer DG, Hybels C. Abbreviating the Duke Social Support Index for use in chronically ill elderly individuals. Psychosomatics. 1993 Jan-Feb;34(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(93)71928-3.
- BackgroundRikli RE, Jones CJ. Development and Validation of a Functional Fitness Test for Community-Residing Older Adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 01 Apr. 1999 1999;7(2):129-161. doi:10.1123/japa.7.2.129
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Social Isolation
Not yet recruiting
A Mobile Informatics Solution to Assist Caregivers in Care Coordination and Monitoring Social Engagement
Memory Disorders, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Does Attachment Anxiety Moderate the Influence of Social Rejection on Alcohol Use Among Young Adults?
Social Rejection, Attachement Style
Active, not recruiting
Multimodal Training With Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve the Cognitive Health and Emotional Well-being of Older Women Living Alone
Social Isolation in Older Adults, Poverty
Recruiting
Social Connection Collective for Older Adults in Subsidized Housing
Social Isolation in Older Adults, Social Isolation or Loneliness
Not yet recruiting
Improving Diet Quality of Community-Dwelling Seniors Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach
Diet Quality, Social Isolation in Older Adults
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Celina H Shirazipour, Ph.D. principal investigator
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Allison M Mays, MD, MAS principal investigator
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Sonja Rosen, MD, FACP, AGSF principal investigator
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intergenerational Virtual Paired Exercise and Peer Virtual Paired Exercise in people with Social Isolation and Loneliness, run by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adherence to an 8-week virtual paired exercise program for older adults (time frame: Attendance over 8-weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05831475, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.