Acne VulgarisNCT05839223
Clinical Pharmacist Role in Adherence to Recommendations Among Isotretinoin Users
A study testing Education in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Jordan University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Jordan.
Trial summary
The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of clinical pharmacists in improving adherence to medication and the recommendations related to isotretinoin, awareness about proper use, dealing with the side effects, and anxiety and depressive symptoms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acne Vulgaris
- What is being tested?
- Education
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 207 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJordan
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 20 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients aged 18 years or older who were using isotretinoin.
- Patients with a current diagnosis of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.
- Patients who were on or going to receive standard isotretinoin doses (0.5-1mg/kg/day).
- Patients who were willing to participate in the study and to do a follow-up.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women and women who intend to become pregnant.
- Breastfeeding women.
- Presence of any renal or hepatic compromise or any pre-existing hyperlipidemia.
- Patients who were not willing to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Pharmacist Role in Increasing the Adherence to Recommendations Among Patients Using Isotretinoin: A Randomized, Controlled Study
The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of clinical pharmacists in improving adherence to medication and the recommendations related to isotretinoin, awareness about proper use, dealing with the side effects, and anxiety and depressive symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (received the educational process (recommendations) about isotretinoin by a clinical pharmacist in addition to the routine education about isotretinoin provided by the physician) and a control group (received only the routine education about isotretinoin provided by the physician) and then followed for three months. Patient's adherence to the recommendations, patient's knowledge about isotretinoin, and side effects management for both groups were measured through a set of questions adapted from a validated questionnaire at baseline and after three months. Adherence scale was used to evaluate adherence to the medication after three months. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used to assess depressive and anxiety symptoms at baseline and at follow-up in each group.
Read the detailed description
Patients and Settings
Patients who attended dermatological clinics (at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Princess Basma Hospital (PBH), and Prince Rashid Hospital (PRH). The study was conducted over the period from September/2020 to February/2021) to receive isotretinoin medication, with any brand names known in Jordan like (ISOSUPRA®, ROACCUTANE®, CURANCE®, RUATINE®,) and met the inclusion criteria were approached and asked to participate in the study. The following are the inclusion criteria:
- Male or female patients aged 18 years or older who were using isotretinoin.
- Patients with a current diagnosis of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.
- Patients who were on or going to receive standard isotretinoin doses (0.5-1mg/kg/day).
- Patients who were willing to participate in the study and to do a follow-up.
Patients with any contraindication to isotretinoin who cannot take the medication and patients who were not willing to participate in the study were excluded as explained in the following:
- Pregnant women and women who intend to become pregnant.
- Breastfeeding women.
- Presence of any renal or hepatic compromise or any pre-existing hyperlipidemia.
The patients were informed about the study objectives, and their voluntary participation, and that withdrawal from the study was possible at any time.
Ethical approval in accordance with regulations was obtained. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the IRB at Jordan University of Science and Technology on 27/08/2020. The IRB reference number is (16/134/2020). Patients were asked to sign an informed consent before participating. Participants' privacy was maintained and participants' answers were kept strictly confidential and were never linked to any personal details.
Study Sample and Randomization
The sample size was calculated by OpenEpi, Version 3, open-source calculator-SSCohort/ RCT. The following assumptions were employed: 30% effect size (difference in adherence to recommendation between control (50%) and intervention group (80%)), alpha= 0.05, beta=0.8, and enrollment ratio=1. Accordingly, the minimum sample size of patients needed was 45 patients in each group. In order to adjust for any dropout and to increase the statistical power, the sample size was increased to 200 participants (100 in each group). Enrolled patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 using a simple envelope method by flipping a coin.
Data collection
After the informed consent was taken from each patient agreed to participate, the clinical pharmacist measured the level of knowledge about the drug for both groups and measured anxiety and depression score (HADS) at baseline. Then, the participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Education (recommendations) on isotretinoin was provided by clinical pharmacists to participants in the intervention group only. Both groups received usual routine care (education on isotretinoin provided by a physician). Both patients and the treating physicians were unaware of the assignment to intervention and control groups. Then after three months, a phone call was made to each patient in both groups to measure the extent of knowledge of the drug, the patients' adherence to the drug and the recommendations for appropriate management of side effects, anxiety, and depression score.
Clinical Pharmacist's Role in Study
The first task of the clinical pharmacist was to interview the patients at baseline for both groups to get their responses on the questionnaires of knowledge, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Second, to educate patients in the intervention group. The education included: the degree of the importance of adherence to the drug and the recommendations, the correct method of taking it, the importance of doing periodic laboratory tests, common side effects, how to properly avoid and deal with side effects, precaution warnings they should pay attention to, and what are the cases in which the drug should be stopped.
Third, the clinical pharmacist distributed brochures in Arabic that contain the most important points about the medication. Finally, after three months, she called all the patients in both groups to get their responses on knowledge about isotretinoin, HADS, and adherence to the medication and recommendations.
Study Questionnaires
The baseline questionnaire was administered in the waiting room of the dermatological clinic, there was no one else present during the interview. The interviewer made sure that the patients understood the questions before answering them. If the patient did not understand a question, the interviewer explained it to him/her. A single interview lasted for approximately 20 - 25 min.
The follow-up questionnaire was administered via phone call. The interviewer confirmed that the patient understood all the questions before answering them. If the patient did not understand a question, the interviewer explained it to him/her. A single interview lasted for approximately 15- 20 min.
Data analysis
After data was collected, the data was entered into Excel worksheets. The responses were coded and entered into SPSS (version 23). Per protocol analysis was used. Descriptive statistics of categorical and continuous variables were calculated. For the categorical variables, the frequency and percentage were calculated, while the arithmetic mean and standard deviation were calculated for continuous variables.
The differences in participants' responses were examined using the Chi-square test (between intervention and control groups) and McNamara's test (between baseline and follow up encounters) for categorical dependent variables as appropriate. For continuous dependent variables, One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, independent samples t-test, and Wilcoxon test were performed when applicable. Both Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to test for normality of continuous variables. The statistical significance level was considered at a p-value ≤ 0.05.
The degree of knowledge and awareness of correct practice was calculated as a total score. McNamara's test was performed to test if there was a significant difference in knowledge before the intervention and after the intervention in the intervention group, and at if there was a significant difference in knowledge between baseline and follow-up in the control group. In addition, independent t-test was used to compare the knowledge score differences (knowledge score at follow up - knowledge score at baseline) between the intervention group and the control group. Linear regression was conducted to evaluate the effect of the educational intervention on the difference in knowledge score adjusting to variables that were unbalanced at baseline.
Patients Adherence to the Recommendations was calculated as a total score for each participant. Average score was evaluated across the intervention and control groups (using t test).
Chi square test was used to compare HADS items at baseline between intervention and control group. Besides, it was used to compare HADS items at follow-up between intervention and control group. Independent t-test was used to compare the HADS score differences (between baseline and at follow up) between the intervention group and the control group.
HADS scores were categorized into three categories based on the abnormality classification; normal (less than eight), borderline abnormal (between eight and eleven) and abnormal (above eleven). Chi square test was used to evaluate the association between HADS score categories and intervention control status at baseline and at follow up.
The percentages (%) of patients' adherence to medication and non-pharmacological adherence were calculated. The reasons behind the patient's non-adherence were themed into three distinct groups (forgetfulness, run out, and unavailability of isotretinoin). The frequency (%) of each group was calculated. Chi-square test was conducted to evaluate the association between adherence status and patient intervention control status.
- Conditions
- Acne Vulgaris
- Being tested
- Education
- Keywords
- Isotretinoin, Clinical Pharmacist, Counseling, Adherence
- Medical subject headings
- Acne Vulgaris
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EducationOther
educational process (recommendations) about isotretinoin by a clinical pharmacist.
The information included: the degree of the importance of adherence to the drug and the recommendations, the correct method of taking it, the importance of doing periodic laboratory tests (lipid profile, liver enzyme test, and pregnancy test), common side effects, how to properly avoid and deal with side effects, precaution warnings they should pay attention to, and what are the cases in which the drug should be stopped.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | received the educational process (recommendations) about isotretinoin by a clinical pharmacist in addition to the routine education about isotretinoin provided by the physician Receives: Other: Education |
| Control | No intervention | received only the routine education about isotretinoin provided by the physician |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Knowledge
The patient knowledge section consisted of ten different questions/items, and each item had two answers (yes/no). Items were coded according to the answer; the correct (adequate) answer was coded as one (1), while the wrong (not adequate) answer was coded as zero (0). So, the knowledge score could take the values of 0 (no knowledge) to 10 (perfect knowledge).
Measured: 3 months
Adherence to the Recommendations
10 items for all patients, and each item had answers (yes/no). Items were coded according to the answer; the correct (adherent) answer was coded as one (1), while the wrong (not adherent) answer was coded as zero (0). The adherence score of patients 'compliance with the recommendations ranged between 0 (least adherent) to 10 (most adherent).
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
HADS
consists of fourteen items; seven items each for the depression and anxiety subscale. The score for each item ranges from 0 to 3, and the HADS score ranged from 0 to 21 for depression and the same applied for anxiety
Measured: 3 MONTHS
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion15 Feb 2021
- Study completion20 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acne VulgarisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 207 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jordan University of Science and Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bushra Mahmoud Ahmad Hijazi, Jordan University of Science and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05839223
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IsoJordanUST
- Status last verified
- Apr 2023
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 3 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Pharmacist Role in Increasing the Adherence to Recommendations Among Patients Using Isotretinoin: A Randomized, Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05839223
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IsoJordanUST
- Conditions
- Acne Vulgaris
- Keywords
- Isotretinoin, Clinical Pharmacist, Counseling, Adherence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 207 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Jordan University of Science and TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the study was to evaluate the role of clinical pharmacists in improving adherence to medication and the recommendations related to isotretinoin, awareness about proper use, dealing with the side effects, and anxiety and depressive symptoms. Patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group (received the educational process (recommendations) about isotretinoin by a clinical pharmacist in addition to the routine education about isotretinoin provided by the physician) and a control group (received only the routine education about isotretinoin provided by the physician) and then followed for three months. Patient's adherence to the recommendations, patient's knowledge about isotretinoin, and side effects management for both groups were measured through a set of questions adapted from a validated questionnaire at baseline and after three months. Adherence scale was used to evaluate adherence to the medication after three months. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were used to assess depressive and anxiety symptoms at baseline and at follow-up in each group.
Detailed description
Patients and Settings
Patients who attended dermatological clinics (at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH), Princess Basma Hospital (PBH), and Prince Rashid Hospital (PRH). The study was conducted over the period from September/2020 to February/2021) to receive isotretinoin medication, with any brand names known in Jordan like (ISOSUPRA®, ROACCUTANE®, CURANCE®, RUATINE®,) and met the inclusion criteria were approached and asked to participate in the study. The following are the inclusion criteria:
- Male or female patients aged 18 years or older who were using isotretinoin.
- Patients with a current diagnosis of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.
- Patients who were on or going to receive standard isotretinoin doses (0.5-1mg/kg/day).
- Patients who were willing to participate in the study and to do a follow-up.
Patients with any contraindication to isotretinoin who cannot take the medication and patients who were not willing to participate in the study were excluded as explained in the following:
- Pregnant women and women who intend to become pregnant.
- Breastfeeding women.
- Presence of any renal or hepatic compromise or any pre-existing hyperlipidemia.
The patients were informed about the study objectives, and their voluntary participation, and that withdrawal from the study was possible at any time.
Ethical approval in accordance with regulations was obtained. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the IRB at Jordan University of Science and Technology on 27/08/2020. The IRB reference number is (16/134/2020). Patients were asked to sign an informed consent before participating. Participants' privacy was maintained and participants' answers were kept strictly confidential and were never linked to any personal details.
Study Sample and Randomization
The sample size was calculated by OpenEpi, Version 3, open-source calculator-SSCohort/ RCT. The following assumptions were employed: 30% effect size (difference in adherence to recommendation between control (50%) and intervention group (80%)), alpha= 0.05, beta=0.8, and enrollment ratio=1. Accordingly, the minimum sample size of patients needed was 45 patients in each group. In order to adjust for any dropout and to increase the statistical power, the sample size was increased to 200 participants (100 in each group). Enrolled patients were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 using a simple envelope method by flipping a coin.
Data collection
After the informed consent was taken from each patient agreed to participate, the clinical pharmacist measured the level of knowledge about the drug for both groups and measured anxiety and depression score (HADS) at baseline. Then, the participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Education (recommendations) on isotretinoin was provided by clinical pharmacists to participants in the intervention group only. Both groups received usual routine care (education on isotretinoin provided by a physician). Both patients and the treating physicians were unaware of the assignment to intervention and control groups. Then after three months, a phone call was made to each patient in both groups to measure the extent of knowledge of the drug, the patients' adherence to the drug and the recommendations for appropriate management of side effects, anxiety, and depression score.
Clinical Pharmacist's Role in Study
The first task of the clinical pharmacist was to interview the patients at baseline for both groups to get their responses on the questionnaires of knowledge, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Second, to educate patients in the intervention group. The education included: the degree of the importance of adherence to the drug and the recommendations, the correct method of taking it, the importance of doing periodic laboratory tests, common side effects, how to properly avoid and deal with side effects, precaution warnings they should pay attention to, and what are the cases in which the drug should be stopped.
Third, the clinical pharmacist distributed brochures in Arabic that contain the most important points about the medication. Finally, after three months, she called all the patients in both groups to get their responses on knowledge about isotretinoin, HADS, and adherence to the medication and recommendations.
Study Questionnaires
The baseline questionnaire was administered in the waiting room of the dermatological clinic, there was no one else present during the interview. The interviewer made sure that the patients understood the questions before answering them. If the patient did not understand a question, the interviewer explained it to him/her. A single interview lasted for approximately 20 - 25 min.
The follow-up questionnaire was administered via phone call. The interviewer confirmed that the patient understood all the questions before answering them. If the patient did not understand a question, the interviewer explained it to him/her. A single interview lasted for approximately 15- 20 min.
Data analysis
After data was collected, the data was entered into Excel worksheets. The responses were coded and entered into SPSS (version 23). Per protocol analysis was used. Descriptive statistics of categorical and continuous variables were calculated. For the categorical variables, the frequency and percentage were calculated, while the arithmetic mean and standard deviation were calculated for continuous variables.
The differences in participants' responses were examined using the Chi-square test (between intervention and control groups) and McNamara's test (between baseline and follow up encounters) for categorical dependent variables as appropriate. For continuous dependent variables, One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test, independent samples t-test, and Wilcoxon test were performed when applicable. Both Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used to test for normality of continuous variables. The statistical significance level was considered at a p-value ≤ 0.05.
The degree of knowledge and awareness of correct practice was calculated as a total score. McNamara's test was performed to test if there was a significant difference in knowledge before the intervention and after the intervention in the intervention group, and at if there was a significant difference in knowledge between baseline and follow-up in the control group. In addition, independent t-test was used to compare the knowledge score differences (knowledge score at follow up - knowledge score at baseline) between the intervention group and the control group. Linear regression was conducted to evaluate the effect of the educational intervention on the difference in knowledge score adjusting to variables that were unbalanced at baseline.
Patients Adherence to the Recommendations was calculated as a total score for each participant. Average score was evaluated across the intervention and control groups (using t test).
Chi square test was used to compare HADS items at baseline between intervention and control group. Besides, it was used to compare HADS items at follow-up between intervention and control group. Independent t-test was used to compare the HADS score differences (between baseline and at follow up) between the intervention group and the control group.
HADS scores were categorized into three categories based on the abnormality classification; normal (less than eight), borderline abnormal (between eight and eleven) and abnormal (above eleven). Chi square test was used to evaluate the association between HADS score categories and intervention control status at baseline and at follow up.
The percentages (%) of patients' adherence to medication and non-pharmacological adherence were calculated. The reasons behind the patient's non-adherence were themed into three distinct groups (forgetfulness, run out, and unavailability of isotretinoin). The frequency (%) of each group was calculated. Chi-square test was conducted to evaluate the association between adherence status and patient intervention control status.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Other: Educationreceived the educational process (recommendations) about isotretinoin by a clinical pharmacist in addition to the routine education about isotretinoin provided by the physician |
| Control | No intervention | –received only the routine education about isotretinoin provided by the physician |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female patients aged 18 years or older who were using isotretinoin.
- Patients with a current diagnosis of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.
- Patients who were on or going to receive standard isotretinoin doses (0.5-1mg/kg/day).
- Patients who were willing to participate in the study and to do a follow-up.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnant women and women who intend to become pregnant.
- Breastfeeding women.
- Presence of any renal or hepatic compromise or any pre-existing hyperlipidemia.
- Patients who were not willing to participate in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educationeducational process (recommendations) about isotretinoin by a clinical pharmacist. The information included: the degree of the importance of adherence to the drug and the recommendations, the correct method of taking it, the importance of doing periodic laboratory tests (lipid profile, liver enzyme test, and pregnancy test), common side effects, how to properly avoid and deal with side effects, precaution warnings they should pay attention to, and what are the cases in which the drug should be stopped. | Other | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Knowledge
Time frame: 3 months
The patient knowledge section consisted of ten different questions/items, and each item had two answers (yes/no). Items were coded according to the answer; the correct (adequate) answer was coded as one (1), while the wrong (not adequate) answer was coded as zero (0). So, the knowledge score could take the values of 0 (no knowledge) to 10 (perfect knowledge).
Adherence to the Recommendations
Time frame: 3 months
10 items for all patients, and each item had answers (yes/no). Items were coded according to the answer; the correct (adherent) answer was coded as one (1), while the wrong (not adherent) answer was coded as zero (0). The adherence score of patients 'compliance with the recommendations ranged between 0 (least adherent) to 10 (most adherent).
1 secondary outcome
HADS
Time frame: 3 MONTHS
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acne Vulgaris
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Fractional CO₂ Laser With and Without Intradermal Botulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Inflammatory Facial Acne Vulgaris.
Acne, Acne Papulopustulosa
RecruitingPhase 4
Safety, Tolerability, and Clinical Effectiveness of Adapalene/Clindamycin Phosphate Gel (Klenzit®-C) in Vietnamese Patients With Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris
Acne
RecruitingPhase 3
Phase 3 Study of Denifanstat in Participants With Moderate to Severe Acne (AURORA)
Acne Vulgaris
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparing Nadifloxacin Plus Tretinoin Versus Clindamycin Plus Tretinoin Creams for Mild-to-Moderate Acne
Acne Vulgaris
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Candela Technology
Hair Reduction, Tattoo Removal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Education in people with Acne Vulgaris, run by Jordan University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Jordan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Jordan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Knowledge (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2023.