AzTrials
AzTrials

WoundwoundsNCT05853237

Class iv Versus Class Iiib Laser Therapy on Median Sternotomy Healing After Coronary Artery Bybass Graft

A study testing laser therapy for wound management in people with Wound and Wound Heal, run by Heidy F. Ahmed at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

LASER therapy is potent physiotherapy modalities, providing better sternotomy healing for patients who have undergone CABG surgery, compared with traditional wound care management alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 65 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Wound, Wound Heal, Wound Infection
What is being tested?
laser therapy for wound management
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Nov 2021to 19 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 65 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • aged between 45 and 65 years
  • male gender; haemodynamic stability
  • body mass index (BMI) from 18.5 to 29.9 kg/m2
  • Non-infected sternotomy site
  • Normal ejection fraction to ensure normal vascularity.

Who cannot join

  • included previous thoracic surgery
  • emergency or urgent coronary artery bypass surgery
  • respiratory insufficiency after surgery, manifesting hypoxemia with partial oxygen pressure in arterial blood < 60 mmHg; Ejection fraction < 50%
  • Paramedian sternotomy which may cut wire causing sternal mobilization which is the start of deep wound infection
  • Bilateral mammary harvesting which decrease blood flow to sternum; low cardiac output syndrome with ST segment elevation in multiple electrocardiogram leads, cardiac arrhythmias or hypotension, according to the American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association
  • other medical conditions, such as diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension and obesity.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Kasr Al Aini University Hospital

    Giza, 12556

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Class iv Versus Class Iiib Laser Therapy on Median Sternotomy Healing After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft: a Randomize Control Trail

LASER therapy is potent physiotherapy modalities, providing better sternotomy healing for patients who have undergone CABG surgery, compared with traditional wound care management alone. HLLT and LLLT were found to be the most effective methods for sternotomy healing post-CABG surgery, with HLLT offering superior performance in the case of the high deep penetration and significance less time needed to deliver the same joules/ cm compared to LLLT used for the wound site.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of class IV high-level laser therapy (HLLT) versus class IIIb low level laser therapy (LLLT) on sternotomy healing following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Forty- five patients male patients who had CABG surgery in the age range of 45-65 years were divided randomly into three equal groups (n = 15). The group HLLT laser received HLLT plus traditional wound management, while the group LLLT laser received LLLT plus traditional wound management. The control group only received a traditional wound management in form of saline irrigation, dressing, and topical bivatracin spray according to hospital protocol. All groups were offered 10 sessions over 4 weeks. HLLT and LLLT were found to be the most effective methods for sternotomy healing post-CABG surgery, with HLLT offering superior performance in the case of the high deep penetration and significance less time needed to deliver the same joules/ cm compared to LLLT used for the wound site.

Being tested
laser therapy for wound management
Keywords
Coronary arteries bypass grafting, high level laser therapy, Low-level laser therapy, Median sternotomy healing
Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries, Wound Infection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • laser therapy for wound managementDevice

    comparison between laser effect on post median sternotomy incision compared to traditional wound care

Study groups in NCT05853237
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
class IV groupExperimentalstart from day one surgery for 4 successive weeks, the goal in the phase I (1st 10 days after surgery) is decontamination, improve circulation, pain reduction \&wound healing acceleration The goal of phase II (next10 days till complete healing) is improve osteo-integration, pain reduction \& enhance superficial collagen production to decrease scarring. The parameters are: Power > 500 mW; fluence 20 joule/ cm2 with (980, 915, 810 nm) and 5 joules/ cm2 by 650 nm; mode (continuous); hand piece radius = 2.5 cm; spot size (Area) = 5 cm; application by scanning not spotting to avoid thermal effect and time of session is 5- 10 minutes
Receives: Device: laser therapy for wound management
class IIIbExperimentalUse the same protocol as in HLLT with the same wave lengths but with low power Power = 200- 300 mW; fluence 20 joule/ cm2 with (980, 915, 810 nm) and 5 joules/ cm2 by 650 nm; mode (continuous); hand piece radius = 2.5 cm; spot size (Area) = 5 cm; application by spotting and time of session was 25- 30 minutes.
Receives: Device: laser therapy for wound management
traditional wound careActive comparatorAccording to the hospital protocol Irrigation of the wound by normal saline, betadine application, bivatracin spray and Change dressing daily to protect the wound from infection
Receives: Device: laser therapy for wound management

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PUSH pressure ulcer scaling healing score for wound healing

    measure wound surface area in cm 2

    Measured: two consecutive months

  2. PUSH pressure ulcer scaling healing score for wound healing

    measure wound exudate in percent

    Measured: two consecutive months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. VAS visual analogue scale

    visual analogue scale of the pain in numbers from 1-10(10 max pain and 1 min pain)

    Measured: two consecutive months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2023
  2. Study start1 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completion24 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion19 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
group A receive laser therapy class IV+traditional wound care and group (B): Laser therapy class IIIb + traditional wound care and group C receive only traditional wound care
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05853237
Sponsor's protocol ID
P.T.REC/012/003308
Acronym
wounds
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
6 Apr 2023
Last updated
10 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All collected individual participant data (IPD), all IPD that underlie results in a publication

Publications

  • Sanchis-Gomar F, Perez-Quilis C, Leischik R, Lucia A. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016 Jul;4(13):256. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.06.33.

    PubMed 27500157
  • Olbrecht VA, Barreiro CJ, Bonde PN, Williams JA, Baumgartner WA, Gott VL, Conte JV. Clinical outcomes of noninfectious sternal dehiscence after median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Sep;82(3):902-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.04.058.

    PubMed 16928505
  • Cove ME, Spelman DW, MacLaren G. Infectious complications of cardiac surgery: a clinical review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012 Dec;26(6):1094-100. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2012.04.021. Epub 2012 Jul 4. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22765993
  • Mazzeffi M, Khelemsky Y. Poststernotomy pain: a clinical review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):1163-78. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 29. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21955825
  • Brocki BC, Thorup CB, Andreasen JJ. Precautions related to midline sternotomy in cardiac surgery: a review of mechanical stress factors leading to sternal complications. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010 Jun;9(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2009.11.009. Epub 2010 Jan 3.

    PubMed 20051323
  • Chang VT, Sorger B, Rosenfeld KE, Lorenz KA, Bailey AF, Bui T, Weinberger L, Montagnini M. Pain and palliative medicine. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(2):279-94. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2006.06.0067.

    PubMed 17551879
  • Amaroli A, Ravera S, Baldini F, Benedicenti S, Panfoli I, Vergani L. Photobiomodulation with 808-nm diode laser light promotes wound healing of human endothelial cells through increased reactive oxygen species production stimulating mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Apr;34(3):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2623-5. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

    PubMed 30145725
  • 9. Pryor BA. Advances in Laser Therapy for the treatment of work related injuries. Current Perspectives in Clinical Treatment and Management onWorkers' Compensation Cases, 1st edn. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. 2011 Apr 23:191-201.

  • Liao X, Xie GH, Liu HW, Cheng B, Li SH, Xie S, Xiao LL, Fu XB. Helium-neon laser irradiation promotes the proliferation and migration of human epidermal stem cells in vitro: proposed mechanism for enhanced wound re-epithelialization. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014 Apr;32(4):219-25. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3667. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

    PubMed 24661127
  • Veith AP, Henderson K, Spencer A, Sligar AD, Baker AB. Therapeutic strategies for enhancing angiogenesis in wound healing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019 Jun;146:97-125. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 26.

    PubMed 30267742
  • 12. Johnson JF. Laser therapy and pain management. Laser Therapy in Veterinary Medicine: Photobiomodulation. 2017 May 11:75-87.

  • Tucker LD, Lu Y, Dong Y, Yang L, Li Y, Zhao N, Zhang Q. Photobiomodulation Therapy Attenuates Hypoxic-Ischemic Injury in a Neonatal Rat Model. J Mol Neurosci. 2018 Aug;65(4):514-526. doi: 10.1007/s12031-018-1121-3. Epub 2018 Jul 22.

    PubMed 30032397
  • 14. Pryor BA. Advances in Laser Therapy for the treatment of work related injuries. Current Perspectives in Clinical Treatment and Management onWorkers' Compensation Cases, 1st edn. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. 2011 Apr 23:191-201.

  • Alayat MS, El-Sodany AM, Ebid AA, Shousha TM, Abdelgalil AA, Alhasan H, Alshehri MA. Efficacy of high intensity laser therapy in the management of foot ulcers: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Oct;30(10):1341-1345. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.1341. Epub 2018 Oct 12.

    PubMed 30349176
  • 16. Mikołajczyk, Z., Nowak, I., Kawiński, A., & Mik, M. (2021). Phototherapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot-A Preliminary Study. Autex Research Journal, 21(4), 482-490.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing laser therapy for wound management in people with Wound and Wound Heal, run by Heidy F. Ahmed at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PUSH pressure ulcer scaling healing score for wound healing (time frame: two consecutive months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05853237, which also lists 28 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in