Acute Kidney InjuryPhase 1/2TheoPHyLNNeNCT05853601
Theophylline Prophylaxis During Hypothermia to Limit Neonatal Nephron Damage
A Phase 1/2 study testing Single Dose Theophylline and Repeat Dose Theophylline in people with Acute Kidney Injury and HIE, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Acute kidney injury is a significant complication for infants who experience hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, being associated with increased rates of death and prolonged hospitalization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 hour to 18 hours
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Kidney Injury, HIE
- What is being tested?
- Single Dose Theophylline and Repeat Dose Theophylline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2023to May 2027
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 hour to 18 hours
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- gestational age at birth >= 35 weeks by best obstetrical dating
- birth weight > 1800 grams
- clinical determination of HIE and treatment with hypothermia being initiated within six hours of birth according to institutional guidelines
- no known congenital abnormalities involving the brain, kidneys, heart or lungs
- ability to administer theophylline via intravenous route within 18 hours of birth
Who cannot join
- infants with suspected or diagnosed significant renal, urinary tract, brain, heart, or lung abnormalities
- infant with known chromosomal anomaly
- evidence of head trauma or skull fracture causing major intracranial hemorrhage
- inability to initiate hypothermia within six hours of birth
- attending physician unwilling to have infant participate in the study
- inability to obtain informed consent within 18 hours of birth
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
About this study
Acute kidney injury is a significant complication for infants who experience hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, being associated with increased rates of death and prolonged hospitalization. This pilot study of theophylline administration soon after birth for the prevention of kidney injury will lay the foundation for the conduct of a larger clinical trial that seeks to identify a theophylline as a novel therapy to prevent kidney injury in thousands of at-risk infants.
Read the detailed description
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly seen in infants diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and is associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no approved therapies that target the prevention of AKI. Several small trials in infants with HIE suggest that a single dose of theophylline given soon after birth attenuates the development of AKI. However, these studies were not performed in infants being treated with therapeutic hypothermia (the current standard of care for moderate to severe HIE), and only reported short-term outcomes. Therefore, few clinicians use theophylline in the management of these patients. The long-term goal is to undertake an appropriately powered multicenter clinical trial to test the hypothesis that for infants > 35 weeks gestation treated with therapeutic hypothermia for HIE, intravenous theophylline (or aminophylline) within the first 18 hours after birth will result in a decreased incidence and/or severity of AKI or death (composite primary outcome) and improved long-term (2 year) renal outcomes. Before the conduct of a large trial, the feasibility of implementing the intervention and ability to measure relevant clinical outcomes need to be demonstrated. Therefore, the investigators propose a small pilot and feasibility clinical trial to i) evaluate recruitment, protocol adherence, and data collection procedures in a therapeutic trial of theophylline to decrease the incidence of AKI or death compared to standard treatment in infants with HIE being treated with therapeutic hypothermia; ii) evaluate the utility and applicability of established measures (serum creatinine, urine output, fluid balance) and novel, exploratory approaches to identify AKI in infants; and iii) determine theophylline pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety and preliminary effectiveness profiles of two different theophylline dosing regimens in a therapeutic trial of theophylline to decrease the incidence of AKI or death compared to standard treatment. Using a mixed methods data analysis strategy to assess the research and intervention process and examine outcomes of the intervention, the investigators will generate the requisite data to inform development and implementation of an appropriately powered study to determine whether theophylline attenuates the risk and severity of AKI in infants with HIE treated with therapeutic hypothermia.
- Conditions
- Acute Kidney Injury, HIE
- Being tested
- Single Dose Theophylline, Repeat Dose Theophylline
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Kidney Injury
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Single Dose TheophyllineDrug
Subjects are given a single loading dose of theophylline, 5mg/kg IV, within 18 hours after birth. A bioequivalent dose of aminophylline, a more soluble, ethylenediamine salt of theophylline, may be substituted for theophylline. The bioequivalent dose of aminophylline is 120% of the theophylline dose.
Repeat Dose TheophyllineDrug
Subjects are given a loading dose of theophylline, 5mg/kg IV, within 18 hours of birth, and then two subsequent doses (1.2mg/kg iv) at 12 hours and 24 hours after loading dose. A bioequivalent dose of aminophylline, a more soluble, ethylenediamine salt of theophylline, may be substituted for theophylline. The bioequivalent dose of aminophylline is 120% of the theophylline dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single Dose Theophylline | Experimental | Single dose of theophylline or aminophylline (5mg/kg IV) given within 18 hours after birth Receives: Drug: Single Dose Theophylline |
| Repeat Dose Theophylline | Experimental | Loading dose of theophylline or aminophylline (5mg/kg IV) given within 18 hours of birth, with two subsequent doses (1.2 mg/kg IV) given at 12 and 24 hours after the loading dose Receives: Drug: Repeat Dose Theophylline |
| Standard treatment | No intervention | Infants cared for according to standard practice. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recruitment of patients
Examine the ability to recruit and enroll patients in trial. We will assess the number of eligible patients and compare that number to those actually enrolled. This ratio will inform regarding the ability to recruit patients in a larger, randomized, appropriately powered trial.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (10)
Pharmacokinetic Profile of Theophylline#1
Evaluate plasma concentrations (mg/dl) of theophylline at time points ranging from 30 minutes to 48 hours after dosing
Measured: 2 years
Safety profile of theophylline#1
Incidence of tachycardia (heart rate > 200 beats per minute for 15 minutes) after theophylline dosing defined by pediatric neurologist
Measured: 2 years
Safety profile of theophylline#2
Incidence of hyperglycemia, defined as two sequential serum glucose values over 200 mg/dl) over one hour apart after theophylline dosing
Measured: 2 years
Safety profile of theophylline#3
Incidence of clinical seizures as diagnosed by a trained pediatric neurologist
Measured: 2 years
Demonstration of successful adherence to study protocol
Evaluate the incidence of protocol deviations both per subject and study-wide. Incidence will be expressed as number of study violations per enrolled subject
Measured: 2 years
Successful data collection procedures
Percent of incomplete data entry points per subject will be evaluated by reviewing data in REDCap
Measured: 2 years
Successful biospecimen collection procedures
Rate of successful collection and analysis of biospecimens per study logs. Data will be determined as percentage of successful completions (successful completions divided by opportunities per protocol).
Measured: 2 years
Pharmacokinetic Profile of Theophylline#2
Determine area under the curve profile of serum theophylline concentration (mg/dl) over time (hours) up to 48 hours after dosing of theophylline
Measured: 2 years
Acute kidney injury#1
Incidence of acute kidney injury as defined by modified neonatal KDIGO criteria using serum creatinine values
Measured: 2 years
Acute kidney injury#2
Incidence of acute kidney injury as defined by modified neonatal KDIGO criteria using urine output values (ml/kg/hour)
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2023
- Study start17 Oct 2023
- Primary completionMay 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Kidney InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical College of WisconsinThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Oklahoma
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jeffrey Segar, Medical College of Wisconsin
- Investigators
- Jeffrey Segar, MD, Principal investigator, Medical College of Wisconsin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05853601
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRO46949
- Acronym
- TheoPHyLNNe
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
DeFronzo R, Fleming GA, Chen K, Bicsak TA. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: Current perspectives on causes and risk. Metabolism. 2016 Feb;65(2):20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
PubMed 26773926Le Tourneau C, Lee JJ, Siu LL. Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12.
PubMed 19436029See KC. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: A mini review of pathophysiology, diagnosis and management in critically ill patients. World J Diabetes. 2024 Jun 15;15(6):1178-1186. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i6.1178.
PubMed 38983827Liao S, Li D, Hui Z, McLachlan CS, Zhang Y. Metformin added to bosentan therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart defects: a pilot study. ERJ Open Res. 2018 Aug 22;4(3):00060-2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00060-2018. eCollection 2018 Jul.
PubMed 30151369Brittain EL, Niswender K, Agrawal V, Chen X, Fan R, Pugh ME, Rice TW, Robbins IM, Song H, Thompson C, Ye F, Yu C, Zhu H, West J, Newman JH, Hemnes AR. Mechanistic Phase II Clinical Trial of Metformin in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 17;9(22):e018349. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018349. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
PubMed 33167773Biag HMB, Potter LA, Wilkins V, Afzal S, Rosvall A, Salcedo-Arellano MJ, Rajaratnam A, Manzano-Nunez R, Schneider A, Tassone F, Rivera SM, Hagerman RJ. Metformin treatment in young children with fragile X syndrome. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Nov;7(11):e956. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.956. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
PubMed 31520524Ayoub R, Ruddy RM, Cox E, Oyefiade A, Derkach D, Laughlin S, Ades-Aron B, Shirzadi Z, Fieremans E, MacIntosh BJ, de Medeiros CB, Skocic J, Bouffet E, Miller FD, Morshead CM, Mabbott DJ. Assessment of cognitive and neural recovery in survivors of pediatric brain tumors in a pilot clinical trial using metformin. Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1285-1294. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0985-2. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
PubMed 32719487Hutchinson AM, Pais R, Endginton AN, Pilon B, MacDonald JM, MacDonald ME, Lewis T, Offringa M, Kalish BT. Safety and feasibility trial protocol of metformin in infants after perinatal brain injury. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Aug 24;9(1):e002784. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002784.
PubMed 40850908Kirkpatrick EC, Mitchell ME, Thilly WG, Cava J, Tomita-Mitchell A, Gostjeva EV. Use of Metformin in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after TAPVR Repair. Glob Pediatr Health. 2020 Sep 25;7:2333794X20958924. doi: 10.1177/2333794X20958924. eCollection 2020. No abstract available.
PubMed 33029553Alemon-Medina R, Altamirano-Bustamante N, Lugo-Goytia G, Garcia-Alvarez R, Rivera-Espinosa L, Torres-Espindola LM, Chavez-Pacheco JL, Juarez-Olguin H, Gomez-Garduno J, Flores-Perez C, Fernandez-Perez PG. Comparative Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics Between the Solid Form of Metformin vs a Novel Liquid Extemporaneous Formulation in Children. Dose Response. 2021 Sep 27;19(3):15593258211033140. doi: 10.1177/15593258211033140. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
PubMed 34602916Park SI, Lee H, Oh J, Lim KS, Jang IJ, Kim JA, Jung JH, Yu KS. A fixed-dose combination tablet of gemigliptin and metformin sustained release has comparable pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and tolerability profiles to separate tablets in healthy subjects. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Feb 4;9:729-36. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S75980. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 25678778Kuhlmann I, Noddebo Nyrup A, Bjerregaard Stage T, Hougaard Christensen MM, Korshoj Bergmann T, Damkier P, Nielsen F, Hojlund K, Brosen K. Oral and intravenous pharmacokinetics of metformin with and without oral codeine intake in healthy subjects: A cross-over study. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Nov;14(6):2408-2419. doi: 10.1111/cts.13107. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
PubMed 34268884Rana U, Joshi C, Whitney E, Afolayan A, Dowell J, Teng RJ, Konduri GG. Decreased Liver Kinase B1 Expression and Impaired Angiogenesis in a Murine Model of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2024 Oct;71(4):481-494. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2024-0037OC.
PubMed 38869353Yadav A, Rana U, Michalkiewicz T, Teng RJ, Konduri GG. Decreased AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) function and protective effect of metformin in neonatal rat pups exposed to hyperoxia lung injury. Physiol Rep. 2020 Sep;8(18):e14587. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14587.
PubMed 32959498Hardie DG, Ross FA, Hawley SA. AMPK: a nutrient and energy sensor that maintains energy homeostasis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012 Mar 22;13(4):251-62. doi: 10.1038/nrm3311.
PubMed 22436748
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Theophylline Prophylaxis During Hypothermia to Limit Neonatal Nephron Damage
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05853601
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TheoPHyLNNe / PRO46949
- Conditions
- Acute Kidney Injury, HIE
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical College of WisconsinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Oklahoma
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute kidney injury is a significant complication for infants who experience hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, being associated with increased rates of death and prolonged hospitalization. This pilot study of theophylline administration soon after birth for the prevention of kidney injury will lay the foundation for the conduct of a larger clinical trial that seeks to identify a theophylline as a novel therapy to prevent kidney injury in thousands of at-risk infants.
Detailed description
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is commonly seen in infants diagnosed with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and is associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no approved therapies that target the prevention of AKI. Several small trials in infants with HIE suggest that a single dose of theophylline given soon after birth attenuates the development of AKI. However, these studies were not performed in infants being treated with therapeutic hypothermia (the current standard of care for moderate to severe HIE), and only reported short-term outcomes. Therefore, few clinicians use theophylline in the management of these patients. The long-term goal is to undertake an appropriately powered multicenter clinical trial to test the hypothesis that for infants > 35 weeks gestation treated with therapeutic hypothermia for HIE, intravenous theophylline (or aminophylline) within the first 18 hours after birth will result in a decreased incidence and/or severity of AKI or death (composite primary outcome) and improved long-term (2 year) renal outcomes. Before the conduct of a large trial, the feasibility of implementing the intervention and ability to measure relevant clinical outcomes need to be demonstrated. Therefore, the investigators propose a small pilot and feasibility clinical trial to i) evaluate recruitment, protocol adherence, and data collection procedures in a therapeutic trial of theophylline to decrease the incidence of AKI or death compared to standard treatment in infants with HIE being treated with therapeutic hypothermia; ii) evaluate the utility and applicability of established measures (serum creatinine, urine output, fluid balance) and novel, exploratory approaches to identify AKI in infants; and iii) determine theophylline pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, safety and preliminary effectiveness profiles of two different theophylline dosing regimens in a therapeutic trial of theophylline to decrease the incidence of AKI or death compared to standard treatment. Using a mixed methods data analysis strategy to assess the research and intervention process and examine outcomes of the intervention, the investigators will generate the requisite data to inform development and implementation of an appropriately powered study to determine whether theophylline attenuates the risk and severity of AKI in infants with HIE treated with therapeutic hypothermia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single Dose Theophylline | Experimental | Drug: Single Dose TheophyllineSingle dose of theophylline or aminophylline (5mg/kg IV) given within 18 hours after birth |
| Repeat Dose Theophylline | Experimental | Drug: Repeat Dose TheophyllineLoading dose of theophylline or aminophylline (5mg/kg IV) given within 18 hours of birth, with two subsequent doses (1.2 mg/kg IV) given at 12 and 24 hours after the loading dose |
| Standard treatment | No intervention | –Infants cared for according to standard practice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 hour to 18 hours
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- gestational age at birth >= 35 weeks by best obstetrical dating
- birth weight > 1800 grams
- clinical determination of HIE and treatment with hypothermia being initiated within six hours of birth according to institutional guidelines
- no known congenital abnormalities involving the brain, kidneys, heart or lungs
- ability to administer theophylline via intravenous route within 18 hours of birth
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- infants with suspected or diagnosed significant renal, urinary tract, brain, heart, or lung abnormalities
- infant with known chromosomal anomaly
- evidence of head trauma or skull fracture causing major intracranial hemorrhage
- inability to initiate hypothermia within six hours of birth
- attending physician unwilling to have infant participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Single Dose TheophyllineSubjects are given a single loading dose of theophylline, 5mg/kg IV, within 18 hours after birth. A bioequivalent dose of aminophylline, a more soluble, ethylenediamine salt of theophylline, may be substituted for theophylline. The bioequivalent dose of aminophylline is 120% of the theophylline dose. | Drug | Single Dose Theophylline |
| Repeat Dose TheophyllineSubjects are given a loading dose of theophylline, 5mg/kg IV, within 18 hours of birth, and then two subsequent doses (1.2mg/kg iv) at 12 hours and 24 hours after loading dose. A bioequivalent dose of aminophylline, a more soluble, ethylenediamine salt of theophylline, may be substituted for theophylline. The bioequivalent dose of aminophylline is 120% of the theophylline dose. | Drug | Repeat Dose Theophylline |
Primary outcome
Recruitment of patients
Time frame: 2 years
Examine the ability to recruit and enroll patients in trial. We will assess the number of eligible patients and compare that number to those actually enrolled. This ratio will inform regarding the ability to recruit patients in a larger, randomized, appropriately powered trial.
10 secondary outcomes
Pharmacokinetic Profile of Theophylline#1
Time frame: 2 years
Safety profile of theophylline#1
Time frame: 2 years
Safety profile of theophylline#2
Time frame: 2 years
Safety profile of theophylline#3
Time frame: 2 years
Demonstration of successful adherence to study protocol
Time frame: 2 years
Successful data collection procedures
Time frame: 2 years
Successful biospecimen collection procedures
Time frame: 2 years
Pharmacokinetic Profile of Theophylline#2
Time frame: 2 years
Acute kidney injury#1
Time frame: 2 years
Acute kidney injury#2
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 26773926DeFronzo R, Fleming GA, Chen K, Bicsak TA. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: Current perspectives on causes and risk. Metabolism. 2016 Feb;65(2):20-9. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.10.014. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
- Background: PubMed 19436029Le Tourneau C, Lee JJ, Siu LL. Dose escalation methods in phase I cancer clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):708-20. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp079. Epub 2009 May 12.
- Background: PubMed 38983827See KC. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis: A mini review of pathophysiology, diagnosis and management in critically ill patients. World J Diabetes. 2024 Jun 15;15(6):1178-1186. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v15.i6.1178.
- Background: PubMed 30151369Liao S, Li D, Hui Z, McLachlan CS, Zhang Y. Metformin added to bosentan therapy in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart defects: a pilot study. ERJ Open Res. 2018 Aug 22;4(3):00060-2018. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00060-2018. eCollection 2018 Jul.
- Background: PubMed 33167773Brittain EL, Niswender K, Agrawal V, Chen X, Fan R, Pugh ME, Rice TW, Robbins IM, Song H, Thompson C, Ye F, Yu C, Zhu H, West J, Newman JH, Hemnes AR. Mechanistic Phase II Clinical Trial of Metformin in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Nov 17;9(22):e018349. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018349. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 31520524Biag HMB, Potter LA, Wilkins V, Afzal S, Rosvall A, Salcedo-Arellano MJ, Rajaratnam A, Manzano-Nunez R, Schneider A, Tassone F, Rivera SM, Hagerman RJ. Metformin treatment in young children with fragile X syndrome. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2019 Nov;7(11):e956. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.956. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
- Background: PubMed 32719487Ayoub R, Ruddy RM, Cox E, Oyefiade A, Derkach D, Laughlin S, Ades-Aron B, Shirzadi Z, Fieremans E, MacIntosh BJ, de Medeiros CB, Skocic J, Bouffet E, Miller FD, Morshead CM, Mabbott DJ. Assessment of cognitive and neural recovery in survivors of pediatric brain tumors in a pilot clinical trial using metformin. Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1285-1294. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0985-2. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
- Background: PubMed 40850908Hutchinson AM, Pais R, Endginton AN, Pilon B, MacDonald JM, MacDonald ME, Lewis T, Offringa M, Kalish BT. Safety and feasibility trial protocol of metformin in infants after perinatal brain injury. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2025 Aug 24;9(1):e002784. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002784.
- Background: PubMed 33029553Kirkpatrick EC, Mitchell ME, Thilly WG, Cava J, Tomita-Mitchell A, Gostjeva EV. Use of Metformin in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis after TAPVR Repair. Glob Pediatr Health. 2020 Sep 25;7:2333794X20958924. doi: 10.1177/2333794X20958924. eCollection 2020. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 34602916Alemon-Medina R, Altamirano-Bustamante N, Lugo-Goytia G, Garcia-Alvarez R, Rivera-Espinosa L, Torres-Espindola LM, Chavez-Pacheco JL, Juarez-Olguin H, Gomez-Garduno J, Flores-Perez C, Fernandez-Perez PG. Comparative Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics Between the Solid Form of Metformin vs a Novel Liquid Extemporaneous Formulation in Children. Dose Response. 2021 Sep 27;19(3):15593258211033140. doi: 10.1177/15593258211033140. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
- Background: PubMed 25678778Park SI, Lee H, Oh J, Lim KS, Jang IJ, Kim JA, Jung JH, Yu KS. A fixed-dose combination tablet of gemigliptin and metformin sustained release has comparable pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and tolerability profiles to separate tablets in healthy subjects. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015 Feb 4;9:729-36. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S75980. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 34268884Kuhlmann I, Noddebo Nyrup A, Bjerregaard Stage T, Hougaard Christensen MM, Korshoj Bergmann T, Damkier P, Nielsen F, Hojlund K, Brosen K. Oral and intravenous pharmacokinetics of metformin with and without oral codeine intake in healthy subjects: A cross-over study. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Nov;14(6):2408-2419. doi: 10.1111/cts.13107. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Kidney Injury
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Not yet recruiting
Early Biomarker Kidney Injury Assessment After Acumen Directed Fluid Management in Cardiac Surgery
Renal Injury, Acute Kidney Injury
Recruiting
Acute Kidney Injury and Ultra-endurance Running
AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) Due to Trauma
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diastolic Shock Index for Predicting Hemodynamic Instability During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury, Hypotension (MeSH: D007022)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey Segar, MD principal investigator
Medical College of Wisconsin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Single Dose Theophylline and Repeat Dose Theophylline in people with Acute Kidney Injury and HIE, run by Medical College of Wisconsin at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recruitment of patients (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05853601, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2026.