PainNCT05873101
Comparison Of Effectiveness of Mobilization With Movement (MWM) and Kelternborn Treatment Technique to Increase ROM, Reducing Pain in Patient of ACL Reconstruction
A study testing Mobilization With Movement (MWM) and Kelternborn Treatment Technique in people with Pain, run by Superior University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
To determine the Comparison Of Effectiveness of Mobilization With Movement (MWM) and Kelternborn Treatment Technique to Increase ROM, Reducing Pain in Patient of ACL Reconstruction Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Mobilization With Movement (MWM) and Kelternborn Treatment Technique
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2023to Aug 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- • Subjects with age group between 20 to 60 years with sedentary lifestyle were included.
- Both males and females were included.
- Patients with diagnosed Tight hamstrings having knee extension less than 160º with the hip at 90º flexion.
- Patients with decreased ROM at the knee joint.
- Patients with reduced straight leg raise.
- Patients with pain in posterior compartment of thigh.
- Asymptomatic patients will be included.
Who cannot join
- • Patients with prolapsed disc were excluded.
- Patients with lower extremity injuries (strain, sprain, ligament injuries, etc.) in last 6 months were excluded.
- Patients with severe hamstring injury either acute or chronic were excluded.
- Patients with visual acute swelling in the region of hamstring muscle
- Patients with fracture of any type and area.
- Patients with dislocations or subluxations present were excluded.
- Patient recommended for TKR of knee joint.
- Patients with any neurological disease like lumbar/cervical herniation, polyneuropathy, scoliosis etc.)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Superior University
Lahore, Punjab Province
About this study
To determine the Comparison Of Effectiveness of Mobilization With Movement (MWM) and Kelternborn Treatment Technique to Increase ROM, Reducing Pain in Patient of ACL Reconstruction
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- Mobilization With Movement (MWM), Kelternborn Treatment Technique
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mobilization With Movement (MWM)Diagnostic test
Mobilization With Movement
Kelternborn Treatment TechniqueDiagnostic test
Kelternborn Treatment Technique
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mobilization With Movement (MWM) | Other | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Mobilization With Movement (MWM) |
| Kelternborn Treatment Technique | Experimental | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: Kelternborn Treatment Technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Goniometer (Range of Motion)
Measured: 6 Months
Visual Analog Scale ( VAS)
Measured: 6 Months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 May 2023
- Study start1 Apr 2023
- Primary completion1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Superior UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Superior University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05873101
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DPT/Batch-Fall18/539
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2023
- Last updated
- 24 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Of Effectiveness of Mobilization With Movement (MWM) and Kelternborn Treatment Technique to Increase ROM, Reducing Pain in Patient of ACL Reconstruction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05873101
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DPT/Batch-Fall18/539
- Conditions
- Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Superior UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 May 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To determine the Comparison Of Effectiveness of Mobilization With Movement (MWM) and Kelternborn Treatment Technique to Increase ROM, Reducing Pain in Patient of ACL Reconstruction
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mobilization With Movement (MWM) | Other | Diagnostic Test: Mobilization With Movement (MWM) |
| Kelternborn Treatment Technique | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Kelternborn Treatment Technique |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- • Subjects with age group between 20 to 60 years with sedentary lifestyle were included.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- • Patients with prolapsed disc were excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mobilization With Movement (MWM)Mobilization With Movement | Diagnostic test | Mobilization With Movement (MWM) |
| Kelternborn Treatment TechniqueKelternborn Treatment Technique | Diagnostic test | Kelternborn Treatment Technique |
Primary outcome
Goniometer (Range of Motion)
Time frame: 6 Months
Visual Analog Scale ( VAS)
Time frame: 6 Months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobilization With Movement (MWM) and Kelternborn Treatment Technique in people with Pain, run by Superior University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Shahzaib Sajjad, DPT (+923009425452, dptm-f17-063@superior.edu.pk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Goniometer (Range of Motion) (time frame: 6 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2023.