AzTrials
AzTrials

Lymphedema, Breast CancerLYMPHNCT05890677

The LYMPH Trial - Microsurgical Versus Conservative Treatment of Chronic Breast Cancer Associated Lymphedema

A study testing Surgical Intervention and Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion Therapy in people with Lymphedema, Breast Cancer, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 36 sites in 15 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to test whether lymphatic surgery provides better QoL (assessed with the Lymph-ICF-UL, (Lymphedema Functioning Disability and health questionnaire for upper limb lymphedema)) 15 months after randomization (and therefore about one year after surgery) compared to conservative treatment only for… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lymphedema, Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
Surgical Intervention and Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion Therapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
280 participants
Where
36 sitesin 15 countries
Study dates
14 Jul 2023to Jun 2036
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent.
  • Patients ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Former diagnosis of breast cancer.
  • Clinical diagnosis of chronic Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) (persisting for more than 3 months) classified as ≥ Stage 1, according to ISL.
  • Minimum of 3 months Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion Therapy.
  • Ability to complete the QoL questionnaires.
  • Willingness to undergo surgery.

Who cannot join

  • No indication for lymphatic surgery according to clinical judgment of the treating surgeon (individual reasons will be specifically documented).
  • Primary congenital Lymphedema or non-BCRL.
  • Previous surgical BCRL treatment on the side intended for intervention.

Trial locations and contacts

36 sites in 15 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Elisabeth Kappos, Prof. Dr. contact

+41 61 328 62 54

elisabeth.kappos@usb.ch

36 sites in 15 countries

Germany9 sites, 9 recruiting
  • BG Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil Bochum

    Bochum, 44789

    Christoph Wallner, PD Dr. med., M.Sc., MHBA, christoph.wallner@bergmannsheil.de

    Recruiting
  • Sana Kliniken Düsseldorf

    Düsseldorf, 40593

    Katrin Seidenstücker, Dr., +49 211 2800 1990, katrin.seidenstuecker@sana.de

    Recruiting
  • Uniklinikum Erlangen

    Erlangen, 91054

    Raymund Horch, Prof. Dr., Raymund.Horch@uk-erlangen.de

    Recruiting
  • KEM Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte

    Essen, 45136

    Björn Behr, Prof. Dr. med., +49 234 302 7152, transchirurgie-zentrum@kem-med.com

    +49 201 174 29006, bjorn.behr@rub.de

    Recruiting
  • BG Klinik Frankfurt am Main

    Frankfurt, 60389

    Christoph Hirche, Prof. Dr. med., +49 69 475 23 23, ulrich.kneser@bgu-ludwigshafen.de

    Recruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Klinik für Plastische und Handchirurgie

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

    Steffen Eisenhardt, Prof. Dr. med., +49 761 270 28170, steffen.eisenhardt@uniklinik-freiburg.de

    bianca.kremer@uniklinik-freiburg.de

    Recruiting
  • BG Klinik Ludwigshafen

    Ludwigshafen am Rhein, 67071

    Ulrich Kneser, Prof. Dr. med., +49 621 681 023 28, ulrich.kneser@bgu-ludwigshafen.de

    Recruiting
  • Klinikum Nürnberg

    Nuremberg, 90419

    Denis Ehrl, MD, denis.ehrl@klinikum-nuernberg.de

    Denis Ehrl, MD

    Recruiting
  • Caritas Krankenhaus St. Josef/ Uniklinik Regensburg

    Regensburg, 93053

    Lukas Prantl, Prof. Dr. med., +49 941 944 6763, Lukas.Prantl@klinik.uni-regensburg.de

    Norbert Heine, Dr. med.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

Switzerland6 sites, 6 recruiting
  • Kantonsspital Aarau

    Aarau, 5001

    Jan Plock, Prof. Dr. med., +41 62 838 47 31, plastischechirurgie@ksa.ch

    Recruiting
  • University Hospital Basel

    Basel, Basel, 4031

    Elisabeth Kappos, Prof. Dr., +41 61 328 62 54, elisabeth.kappos@usb.ch

    Elisabeth Kappos, Prof. Dr.

    Recruiting
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève

    Geneva, 1205

    Daniel Kalbermatten, Prof. Dr. med., +41 22 372 80 12, daniel.kalbermatten@hcuge.ch

    Recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois

    Lausanne, Lausanne, 1011

    Pietro di Summa, PD Dr. med., +41 21 314 25 25, pietro.di-summa@chuv.ch

    Recruiting
  • Kantonsspital Winterthur

    Winterthur, 8401

    Florian Jung, Dr. med., +41 52 266 24 08, Florian.Jung@ksw.ch

    Recruiting
  • Klinik für Plastische, Rekonstruktive, Aesthetische und Handchirurgie

    Zurich, 8091

    Nicole Lindenblatt, Prof. Dr. med., +41 44 255 11 11, nicole.lindenblatt@usz.ch

    Recruiting

Other trials in Switzerland

United States4 sites, 3 recruiting
  • Harvard Medical School

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

    Andrea Pusic, Prof. Dr. med., +16 17 732 53 61, apusic@bwh.harvard.edu

    Erin Taylor, Dr. med.

    Recruiting
  • Yale School of Medicine

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510

    Withdrawn
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

    Vahe Fahradyan, M. D., (507)284-0850

    Vahe Fahradyan, M. D.

    Recruiting
  • Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

    Justin M. Sacks, Prof. Dr., +1 314-454-4894, jmsacks@wustl.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

Austria2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • University Clinics St.Pölten

    Sankt Pölten, Lower Austria

    Klaus Schrögendorfer, 0613285402, lymph.trial@usb.ch

    Christina Glisic

    Recruiting
  • Krankenhaus Göttlicher Heiland GmbH

    Vienna, State of Vienna, A-1170

    Tina Deutinger, MD, PhD

    Tina Deutinger, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Austria

Belgium2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Brussels University Hospital

    Brussels, Jette, 1090

    Mustapha/Alexandru Hamdi/Nistor, MD

    Mustapha Hamdi, MD

    Recruiting
  • University of Ghent

    Ghent, 9000

    Phillip Blondeel, Prof. Dr., Phillip.Blondeel@ugent.be

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

Canada2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital

    Montreal, QC H4A 3J1

    Josh Vorstenbosch, MD PhD FRCSC, +1(514)934-1934 x 35194, joshua.vorstenbosch@mcgill.ca

    Anna Towers, Dr.

    Recruiting
  • University of British Columbia, Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre

    Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9

    Kathryn V. Isaac, Asst. Prof. Dr., +1 604-336-9488, kathryn.isaac@ubc.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Policlinico Tor Vergata: Fondazione PTV

    Rome, 00133

    Benedetto Longo, Dr. med., +39 6 44291148, benedetto.longo@uniroma2.it

    info@benedettolongo.com

    Recruiting
  • Policlinico Universitario Fondazione Agostino Gemelli

    Rome, 00168

    Giuseppe Visconti, Dr. med., +39 06 30151, giuseppe.visconti@policlinicogemelli.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

Sweden2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Karolinska Institutet, K1 Molekylär medicin och kirurgi

    Stockholm, 17176

    Martin Halle, Dr. med., +46 8 123 708 46, martin.halle@ki.se

    Recruiting
  • Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Uppsala University Hospital

    Uppsala, 751 85

    Maria Mani, Dr. med., Maria.Mani@surgsci.uu.se

    Recruiting

Other trials in Sweden

Brazil1 site
  • Hospital Erasto Gaertner

    Paraná, Curitiba, 80730-001

    Withdrawn

Other trials in Brazil

Greece1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Papageorgiou Hospital of Thessaloniki

    Thessaloniki, 55133

    Efterpi Demiri, Prof. Dr. med., +30 231 332 38 38, demirie@auth.gr

    Dimitrios Dionysiou, Dr. med.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Greece

Israel1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Rambam Health Clinic, ISR

    Haifa, 3109601

    Assaf Zeltzer, a_zeltzer@rambam.health.gov.il

    Assaf Zeltzer

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Israel

Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Maastricht University Medical Center

    Maastricht, 6202

    Shao Shan Qiu, Dr., +31(0)43-3877481, shanshan.qiushao@mumc.nl

    Recruiting

Other trials in Netherlands

Romania1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Institute of Oncology ''Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuță'' of Cluj-Napoca

    Cluj-Napoca, 400015

    Maximilian Vlad Muntean, Dr. med., +40 730085422, maximilian.muntean@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Romania

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08025

    Gemma Pons, Dr., +34 935565693, GPonsP@santpau.cat

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, Taiwan, 833

    Johnson Chia-Shen Yang, MD

    Johnson Chia-Shen Yang, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: The LYMPH Trial - Comparing Microsurgical With Conservative Treatment of Chronic Breast Cancer Associated Lymphedema: Study Protocol of a Pragmatic Randomized International Multicentre Superiority Trial

The aim of this study is to test whether lymphatic surgery provides better QoL (assessed with the Lymph-ICF-UL, (Lymphedema Functioning Disability and health questionnaire for upper limb lymphedema)) 15 months after randomization (and therefore about one year after surgery) compared to conservative treatment only for patients with chronic lymphedema (LE)

Read the detailed description

To date, conservative complex physical decongestion therapy (CDT) is the gold standard for BCRL (breast cancer related lymphedema) and includes manual lymphatic drainage, local compression with bandages and garments, physical exercises and meticulous skin care. It is, however, too often ineffective to prevent stage progression in curing BCRL and purely symptomatic. Lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) are two surgical techniques that, in contrast to CDT, are able to actually address the underlying causes and eventually restore the lymphatic drainage. LVA achieves this by creating numerous bypasses between lymphatic vessels and venules allowing the drainage of excessive fluid within the subcutaneous tissues into the venous system, while VLNT usually brings functioning lymph nodes to an area devoid of lymph nodes or with dysfunctional lymph nodes, thus enabling the spontaneous development of new lymphatic pathways. Both techniques have shown very promising results with low complication rates and improved Quality of Life (QoL) for the patients. However, no multicentric randomized controlled trial (RCT) has yet prospectively evaluated the superiority of these surgical techniques over CDT alone, limiting patient's access to most effective treatment available. Requests for cost reimbursement must still be submitted to insurance companies in most countries and are often rejected, thus delaying surgical treatment and resulting in prolonged suffering of affected patients. This is untenable seeing as affected patients suffer from a heavy physical, psychological and financial burden. This pragmatic, randomized, multicenter trial aims to establish a solid scientific basis assessing the superiority of surgical treatment over CDT alone.

Being tested
Surgical Intervention, Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion Therapy
Keywords
lymphatic surgery, breast cancer related lymphedema, sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary lymph node dissection, manual lymphatic drainage, conservative complex physical decongestion therapy
Medical subject headings
Breast Cancer Lymphedema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Surgical InterventionProcedure or surgery

    LVA (Lymphovenous Anastomosis) and VLNT (Vascularised Lymph Node Transfer) are two advanced microsurgical techniques that are increasingly implemented in clinical practice in specialized centers and that are already carried out after health insurance application according to local standard of care. They have been studied in their respective mode of action as well as in their effectiveness in treating chronic BCRL (Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema) in a multitude of mostly observational and single center studies with highly encouraging results. Patients in the interventional arm A will receive surgery with one of the two approaches or a combination of both, in a one or two-stage method, at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Depending on local standards one or both of the above might be combined with liposuction to the affected arm in a one or two-stage approach as well.

  • Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion TherapyProcedure or surgery

    Patients randomized to the control arm will receive CDT (Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion Therapy), which currently is considered as the best available standard of care. For this, patients will be referred to one of the dedicated LE (physical/skin) therapy clinics, if not already treated by one, according to their place of residence for continuation of standard conservative therapy. Recommendations to the procedures and treatment frequency of the conservative therapy will be made, but CDT will be done at the discretion of the treating physiotherapist.

Study groups in NCT05890677
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A : Surgical GroupExperimentalAccording to the pragmatic study design, neither the diagnostic workup nor the surgery will be standardized in order to offer surgeons considerable leeway on how to perform lymphatic surgery, which resembles the flexibility in usual care. The key aspects of the preoperative workup and the surgery including the number of LVAs (Lymphovenous Anastomosis), harvesting of lymph nodes ("donor site"), time of surgery, and practical details will be registered.
Receives: Procedure: Surgical Intervention
Group B: Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion Therapy (control group)Active comparatorCDT (Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion Therapy) will be performed as in usual care, following the pragmatic study design. The key aspects like frequency of lymphatic drainage, time when lymphatic drainage is performed and time and class of compressive garments are used will be documented. CDT incorporates two stages of treatment. The first treatment phase (intensive phase) entails skincare, MLD (manual lymphatic drainage), exercises aimed at improvement of mobility/range of motion in the shoulder, elbow or wrist joints, and compression therapy through bandaging. Most patients undergo this phase shortly after the diagnosis of LE. CDT in the second phase (maintenance phase) aims to maintain the achieved limb volume/ circumference reduction through compression with therapeutic elastic compression garment for the arm. Skincare, mobility exercises and MLD is continued in this phase if needed
Receives: Procedure: Conservative Complex Physical Decongestion Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Quality of Life Questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-UL)

    The LYMPH-ICF-UL-Questionnaire (Lymphedema Functioning Disability and health questionnaire for upper limb lymphedema) is a widely used, rigorously developed, and validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema. It assesses the impairments in function, activity limitations and participation restrictions of patients with upper limb lymphedema (LE). Consisting of 29 items (questions) across five different domains, each item is scored on a VAS (visual analog scale) ranging from 0 to 10. The total score on the LYMPH-ICF is equal to the sum of the item scores divided by the total number of answered items. A higher score on the Lymph-ICF indicates a greater impact on the functioning in daily life related to upper limb LE. This questionnaire helps determine if lymphatic surgery improves quality of life and patient satisfaction compared to conservative therapy.

    Measured: two time assessment at baseline and 15 month after randomization

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change in Quality of Life Questionnaire (Lymph-ICF-UL)

    The LYMPH-ICF-UL-Questionnaire (Lymphedema Functioning Disability and health questionnaire for upper limb lymphedema) is a widely used, rigorously developed, and validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument for chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema. It assesses the impairments in function, activity limitations and participation restrictions of patients with upper limb lymphedema (LE). Consisting of 29 items (questions) across five different domains, each item is scored on a VAS (visual analog scale) ranging from 0 to 10. The total score on the LYMPH-ICF is equal to the sum of the item scores divided by the total number of answered items. A higher score on the Lymph-ICF indicates a greater impact on the functioning in daily life related to upper limb LE. This questionnaire helps determine if lymphatic surgery improves quality of life and patient satisfaction compared to conservative therapy.

    Measured: 13 time assessment up to 10 years after randomization

  2. Change in Quality of Life Questionnaire (LYMPH-Q)

    The Lymph-Q Upper Extremity Module is a new PROM (patient-reported outcome measure) developed to assess patient reported outcomes of BCRL in a concept-driven approach. The complete questionnaire contains 68 questions covering the patient-relevant topics Health-related quality of life (arm appearance, arm function, arm symptoms, psychological), experience of care (information), and treatment (arm sleeve).

    The questionnaire is used to determine whether lymphatic surgery provides better quality of life and patient satisfaction compared to conservative therapy.

    Measured: 15 time assessment up to 10 years after randomization

  3. Change in Quality of Life Questionnaire (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L)

    The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system that comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions (5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems) resulting in a 1-digit number that expresses the level for that dimension. The digits for each dimension can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

    The questionnaire is used to determine whether lymphatic surgery provides better quality of life and patient satisfaction compared to conservative therapy.

    Measured: 15 time assessment up to 10 years after randomization

  4. Change in Pain score (visual analog scale)

    The pain score consists of a VAS (visual analog scale) ranging from 0 (i.e. no pain) to 10 (i.e. worst pain). The VAS was published by the Yale University.

    It is used to determine whether lymphatic surgery provides better quality of life and patient satisfaction compared to conservative therapy.

    Measured: 7 time assessment up to 2 years after randomization

  5. Assessment of (serious) adverse events

    Safety is assessed via a rigorous and detailed examination of (serious) adverse events.

    Measured: 7 time assessment up to 2 years after randomization

  6. Assessment of surgical complications

    For the surgery group only, safety is assessed via a rigorous and detailed examination of complications of surgery. Grading is according to the modified classification of Clavien-Dindo, categorizing them into five levels ranging from minor deviations to life-threatening events.

    The assessment will cover both surgical stages in case of two-staged lymphedema (LE) surgery.

    Measured: 7 time assessment up to 2 years after randomization

  7. Assessment of lymphangitic events (erysipelas)

    The frequency of lymphangitic events (erysipelas) is closely monitored. Lymphangitic events are defined as skin infections at the lymphedema site(s) which can be treated with oral or intravenous antibiotics. The type of antibiotic given, the application form, type of hospital stay and necessity of a surgery will be assessed.

    Measured: 7 time assessment up to 2 years after randomization

  8. Assessment of arm volume

    Arm volume is determined by measuring the circumference of each arm at 10 cm intervals from the wrist to the axilla. The volume of each arm segment is calculated using a truncated cone model, and percentage edema volume is derived from the volume difference between the affected and unaffected arms. Both relative (relative to the unaffected arm) and absolute (volume reduction of the affected arm at the next measurement) volume change are calculated, corrected for BMI and differences between dominant and non-dominant arms.

    Measured: 15 time assessment up to 10 years after randomization

  9. Assessment of the frequency of lymphatic drainage

    The frequency of lymphatic drainage before the start of the study and between the study's follow-up visits is assessed.

    Measured: 15 time assessment up to 10 years after randomization

  10. Assessment of the burden on patients

    To assess the burden on patients, information regarding the total number of operative procedures, length of hospital stays, number of outpatient visits, and absence from work within two years after randomization and during the extended follow-up is collected.

    Measured: 9 time assessment up to 10 years after randomization

  11. Assessment of the economics (for Switzerland)

    To perform an economic evaluation, information regarding the condition-related medical resource use, healthcare costs, indirect costs, productivity losses, and incremental cost-effectiveness (quality-adjusted life-years) is collected.

    The information is based on the responses to the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, the questions asked under burden on patients, and on other medical resource information recorded in the trial primarily for clinical purposes, at the respective visits. In addition, direct extraction of breast cancer-related lymphedema-related in- and outpatient costs, and corresponding key resource use parameters, are collected from the hospital administration systems of the participating Swiss sites, once at the 2 year follow-up visit .

    Measured: 9 time assessment up to 10 years after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Jun 2023
  2. Study start14 Jul 2023
  3. Primary completionSep 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2036 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Pragmatic, randomized, international, multicenter superiority trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
280 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05890677
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-00733; mu21kappos
Other IDs
2023
Acronym
LYMPH
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
23 May 2023
Last updated
22 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Metadata describing the type, size and content of the datasets will be shared along with the study protocol and case report forms on public repositories following FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reuse) principles. The DKF of the University of Basel will act as an independent Data Access Committee, storing the data at time of publication on secure servers, maintained and backed-up by the IT-department of the University Hospital Basel. Researchers can request data reuse by submitting a project synopsis via dkf.unibas.ch/contact. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) standards for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and good publication practice, regardless of outcomes. Authorship for future publications will be based on contributions. An annual safety report is submitted to the local Ethics Committee by the Sponsor-Investigator according to national regulations.

Publications

  • Kappos EA, Haas Y, Schulz A, Peters F, Savanthrapadian S, Stoffel J, Katapodi MC, Mucklow R, Kaiser B, Haumer A, Etter S, Cattaneo M, Staub D, Ribi K, Shaw J, Handschin TM, Eisenhardt S, Visconti G, Franceschini G, Scardina L, Longo B, Vetter M, Zaman K, Plock JA, Scaglioni M, Gonzalez EG, Quildrian SD, Felmerer G, Mehrara BJ, Ayala JM, Pons G, Kalbermatten DF, Sacks JM, Halle M, Muntean MV, Taylor EM, Mani M, Jung FJ, di Summa PG, Demiri E, Dionyssiou D, Groth AK, Heine N, Vorstenborsch J, Isaac KV, Qiu SS, Engels PE, Serre A, Eberhardt AL, Ebner S, Schwenkglenks M, Stoel Y, Leo C, Horch RE, Blondeel P, Behr B, Kneser U, Prantl L, Boll DT, Granziera C, Hemkens L, Lindenblatt N, Haug M, Schaefer DJ, Hirche C, Pusic AL, Seidenstuecker K, Harder Y, Weber W. The LYMPH trial: comparing microsurgical with conservative treatment for chronic breast cancer-associated lymphoedema - study protocol of a pragmatic randomised international multicentre superiority trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 17;15(2):e090662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090662.

    PubMed 39961719

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in