Healthy AgingAACSNCT05908487
African Americans (AA) Communities Speak
A study testing AA Communities Speak to Healthcare Professionals in people with Healthy Aging and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
African Americans are less likely to receive quality end-of-life (EoL) care. Addressing disparities in EoL care will need efforts to support a better understanding of African American patients' EoL cultural values and preferences for EoL communication and the impact of historical and ongoing care delivery inequities… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Aging, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Social Responsibility
- What is being tested?
- AA Communities Speak to Healthcare Professionals
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Feb 2025to Jul 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Person with serious Illness:
- Self-identified as African American (i.e., born, raised, and lived primarily in the US)
- Non-Hispanic or Latino
- Age ≥60 years
- English-speaking
- Has been diagnosed with a condition that fits into one of 3 illness paradigms including cancer, cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, neuro-degenerative disease, renal disease, stroke, sepsis, hepatic disease)
Show all 31Show fewer
- Callahan Six-Item Screener score ≥4
- Able to complete baseline surveys.
- Bereaved family member:
- Self-identified as African American (i.e., born, raised, and lived primarily in the US)
- Non-Hispanic or Latino
- Age ≥60 years
- English-speaking
- Loved one dies in the last 12 months and was diagnosed with a condition that fits into one of 3 illness paradigms including cancer, cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, neuro- degenerative disease, renal disease, stroke, sepsis, hepatic disease)
- Callahan Six-Item Screener score ≥4
- Able to complete baseline surveys.
- Bereaved Family member:
- Self-identified as African American (i.e., born, raised, and lived primarily in the US)
- Non-Hispanic or Latino
- Age ≥60 years
- English-speaking
- Loved one dies in the last 12 months and was diagnosed with a condition that fits into one of 3 illness paradigms including cancer, cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, neuro- degenerative disease, renal disease, stroke, sepsis, hepatic disease)
- Callahan Six-Item Screener score ≥4
- Able to complete baseline surveys
- Pastors:
- Self-identifying as African American
- White, Non-Hispanic or Latino
- Sged ≥18 years old.
- Clinician eligibility:
- Practice at a University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) or Montefiore/Einstein site that provides care to patients eligible for outcomes surveys
- At least 3 months of clinical practice at the study site prior to the intervention training to measure pre-intervention patient surveys
Who cannot join
- Person with serious illness:
- -Cannot be receiving hospice care
- Bereaved Family Member:
- -Cannot be a paid "sitter"
- -Lack of at least 3 months of clinical practice at the study site prior to the intervention training.
- Patient eligibility:
Show all 18Show fewer
- Self-identified as African American (i.e., born, raised, and lived primarily in the US)
- Non-Hispanic or Latino, 3. age ≥60 years
- English-speaking
- Has been diagnosed with a condition that fits into one of 3 illness paradigms including cancer, cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, neuro-degenerative disease, renal disease, stroke, sepsis, hepatic disease)
- Callahan Six-Item Screener score ≥4
- Able to complete baseline surveys.
- -Currently receiving hospice care.
- Family member eligibility:
- Age ≥ 18 years
- English-speaking
- Community-dwelling
- Unpaid care provider of a person with a serious illness.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
UAB
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Ronit Elk, PhD, 205.996.1702, relk@uabmc.edu
Tametria Heard, PhD, 205.934.7905, tvheard@uabmc.edu
- Recruiting
Albert Einstein/Montefiore
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Elizabeth Chuang, MD, 718-920-4630, Echuang@montefiore.org
Elizabeth Chuang, MD
About this study
Official title: African Americans (AA) Communities Speak: Partnering With AA in the North and South to Train Palliative Care Clinicians to Address Interpersonal and Systemic Racism and Provide Culturally Aligned Care.
African Americans are less likely to receive quality end-of-life (EoL) care. Addressing disparities in EoL care will need efforts to support a better understanding of African American patients' EoL cultural values and preferences for EoL communication and the impact of historical and ongoing care delivery inequities in healthcare settings.
Our proposed "Caring for Older African Americans" training program is designed to empower clinicians to improve goal-concordant EoL care delivery by using community-developed storytelling videos to create empathy with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and an implicit bias recognition and management training to mitigate bias in goals of care communication.
Read the detailed description
African Americans (AA) are less likely to receive quality end-of-life (EoL) care. For example, goals of care conversations, which are critical discussions between clinicians, patients, and families near the end of life, are less likely to occur for AAs than for Whites, and preferences are less likely to be followed when they do occur. Instead, families are more likely to be labeled as "difficult" if their decisions are incongruent with clinicians' recommendations. EoL decisions for many AA persons are rooted in both culture and a lifetime of experiences of structural racism. Efforts to address disparities need to address multiple factors such as patient-level cultural identity and EoL care values, interpersonal- and community-level norms for EoL communication and treatment, and healthcare institutional contexts for delivering EoL care in a setting affected by institutional racism.
Our research group began to address this need with 'African American Community Speaks', a proof-of-concept prototype of a community-developed training program for clinicians caring for AA older adults with serious illnesses. The program originally focused on rural Southern older AAs and is not broadly generalizable across the US due to geographic differences in culture, attitudes, and communication preferences among AA persons in the US. Thus, we propose to adapt our prototype program to urban-dwelling Southern and Northern older AA adults using our established platform of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) in two geographically diverse regions: Birmingham, Alabama, and the Bronx, New York. To create the new training program called 'Caring for Older African Americans', our team of experts in CBPR, medical sociology, and clinical trials will work with local Community Advisory Boards to: 1. Conduct a comparative ethnographic study of urban dwelling AAs in the North and South to describe AA community values and preferences related to EoL care; 2. Adaptation of our prior community-developed training program by integrating community-developed storytelling videos for empathizing with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and adapting an existing implicit bias management program to goals of care communication; and 3. Conduct a cluster randomized trial in which we will randomize training times to 1 of 4 start dates using a stepped wedge design to accommodate the training of all clinicians and to mitigate the effect of secular trends.
Patients' personal experience of racism will be measured using the discrimination subscale of the Group Based Mistrust Scale. The primary outcome will be patient/family's perception of therapeutic alliance using The Human Connection Scale. Secondary outcomes will be family-reported goal-concordant care, and clinicians' knowledge of cultural values, awareness of implicit bias, and confidence to change practice. This innovative effort will be the first training program that: 1. addresses culturally concordant care, systemic racism, and implicit bias management, the three key elements in enhancing the provision of equitable care; and 2. is designed and implemented in full partnership with two distinct AA communities in the South and the North of the US.
- Conditions
- Healthy Aging, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Social Responsibility, Care Eliciting Behavior, Racism, Systemic
- Being tested
- AA Communities Speak to Healthcare Professionals
- Keywords
- goal concordant care older African American CBPR end-of-life
- Medical subject headings
- Behavior, Systemic Racism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AA Communities Speak to Healthcare ProfessionalsBehavioural
Also called Clinician Training
The training program is designed to empower clinicians to improve goal-concordant EoL care delivery by using community-developed storytelling videos to create empathy with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and implicit bias recognition and management training to mitigate bias in goals of care communication.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Clinician Trainees- Cluster 1 | Other | Within each participating institution, clinician clusters are randomized to 1 of 4 start date training times for the African American Communities Speak (AACS) Education Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period. Receives: Behavioral: AA Communities Speak to Healthcare Professionals |
| Clinician Trainees- Cluster 2 | Other | Within each participating institution, clinician clusters are randomized to 1 of 4 start date training times for the African American Communities Speak (AACS) Education Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period Receives: Behavioral: AA Communities Speak to Healthcare Professionals |
| Clinician Trainees- Cluster 3 | Other | Within each participating institution, clinician clusters are randomized to 1 of 4 start date training times for the African American Communities Speak (AACS) Education Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period Receives: Behavioral: AA Communities Speak to Healthcare Professionals |
| Clinician Trainees- Cluster 4 | Other | Within each participating institution, clinician clusters are randomized to 1 of 4 start date training times for the African American Communities Speak (AACS) Education Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period Receives: Behavioral: AA Communities Speak to Healthcare Professionals |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Human Connection Scale (patient/family reported)
The Human Connection (THC) Scale is a summary score of item responses such that a higher total score indicates greater therapeutic alliance. Possible scores range from 16 to 64. The 16-item THC scale had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach α= 90).
Measured: up to 3 months before the intervention
Human Connection Scale (patient/ family reported)
The Human Connection (THC) Scale is a summary score of item responses such that a higher total score indicates greater therapeutic alliance. Possible scores range from 16 to 64. The 16-item THC scale had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach α= 90).
Measured: up to 3 months after intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Goal Concordant Care (patient/family reported)
Goal Concordant Care will be measured based on responses to the following two questions, each with a dichotomous outcome: 1. Family member reports that the patient's end-of-life wishes were adequately discussed with the family respondent 2. Family member's satisfaction that patient's end-of-life were met.
Johnson, S.B., Butow, P.N., Bell, M.L. et al. A randomized controlled trial of an advance care planning intervention for patients with incurable cancer. Br J Cancer 119, 1182-1190 (2018).
https://doi.org.10.1038/s41416-018-0303-7
Measured: up to 3 months before the intervention
Goal Concordant Care (patient/family reported)
Goal Concordant Care will be measured based on responses to the following two questions, each with a dichotomous outcome: 1. Family member reports that the patient's end-of-life wishes were adequately discussed with the family respondent 2. Family member's satisfaction that patient's end-of-life were met.
Johnson, S.B., Butow, P.N., Bell, M.L. et al. A randomized controlled trial of an advance care planning intervention for patients with incurable cancer. Br J Cancer 119, 1182-1190 (2018).
https://doi.org.10.1038/s41416-018-0303-7
Measured: up to 3 months after the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2023
- Study start27 Feb 2025
- Primary completionJul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Healthy AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Montefiore Medical Center, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, National Institute on Aging (NIA), Hospice of Henderson County, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ronit Elk, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Jennifer Tjia, MD, MSCE, Principal investigator, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05908487
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB300007677
- Other IDs
- R01AG078255
- Acronym
- AACS
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 7 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- African Americans (AA) Communities Speak: Partnering With AA in the North and South to Train Palliative Care Clinicians to Address Interpersonal and Systemic Racism and Provide Culturally Aligned Care.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05908487
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AACS / IRB300007677
- Conditions
- Healthy Aging, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Social Responsibility, Care Eliciting Behavior, Racism, Systemic
- Keywords
- goal concordant care older African American CBPR end-of-life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Montefiore Medical Center, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, National Institute on Aging (NIA), Hospice of Henderson County, Inc.
- Study start
- 27 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
African Americans are less likely to receive quality end-of-life (EoL) care. Addressing disparities in EoL care will need efforts to support a better understanding of African American patients' EoL cultural values and preferences for EoL communication and the impact of historical and ongoing care delivery inequities in healthcare settings.
Our proposed "Caring for Older African Americans" training program is designed to empower clinicians to improve goal-concordant EoL care delivery by using community-developed storytelling videos to create empathy with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and an implicit bias recognition and management training to mitigate bias in goals of care communication.
Detailed description
African Americans (AA) are less likely to receive quality end-of-life (EoL) care. For example, goals of care conversations, which are critical discussions between clinicians, patients, and families near the end of life, are less likely to occur for AAs than for Whites, and preferences are less likely to be followed when they do occur. Instead, families are more likely to be labeled as "difficult" if their decisions are incongruent with clinicians' recommendations. EoL decisions for many AA persons are rooted in both culture and a lifetime of experiences of structural racism. Efforts to address disparities need to address multiple factors such as patient-level cultural identity and EoL care values, interpersonal- and community-level norms for EoL communication and treatment, and healthcare institutional contexts for delivering EoL care in a setting affected by institutional racism.
Our research group began to address this need with 'African American Community Speaks', a proof-of-concept prototype of a community-developed training program for clinicians caring for AA older adults with serious illnesses. The program originally focused on rural Southern older AAs and is not broadly generalizable across the US due to geographic differences in culture, attitudes, and communication preferences among AA persons in the US. Thus, we propose to adapt our prototype program to urban-dwelling Southern and Northern older AA adults using our established platform of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) in two geographically diverse regions: Birmingham, Alabama, and the Bronx, New York. To create the new training program called 'Caring for Older African Americans', our team of experts in CBPR, medical sociology, and clinical trials will work with local Community Advisory Boards to: 1. Conduct a comparative ethnographic study of urban dwelling AAs in the North and South to describe AA community values and preferences related to EoL care; 2. Adaptation of our prior community-developed training program by integrating community-developed storytelling videos for empathizing with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and adapting an existing implicit bias management program to goals of care communication; and 3. Conduct a cluster randomized trial in which we will randomize training times to 1 of 4 start dates using a stepped wedge design to accommodate the training of all clinicians and to mitigate the effect of secular trends.
Patients' personal experience of racism will be measured using the discrimination subscale of the Group Based Mistrust Scale. The primary outcome will be patient/family's perception of therapeutic alliance using The Human Connection Scale. Secondary outcomes will be family-reported goal-concordant care, and clinicians' knowledge of cultural values, awareness of implicit bias, and confidence to change practice. This innovative effort will be the first training program that: 1. addresses culturally concordant care, systemic racism, and implicit bias management, the three key elements in enhancing the provision of equitable care; and 2. is designed and implemented in full partnership with two distinct AA communities in the South and the North of the US.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Clinician Trainees- Cluster 1 | Other | Behavioral: AA Communities Speak to Healthcare ProfessionalsWithin each participating institution, clinician clusters are randomized to 1 of 4 start date training times for the African American Communities Speak (AACS) Education Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period. |
| Clinician Trainees- Cluster 2 | Other | Behavioral: AA Communities Speak to Healthcare ProfessionalsWithin each participating institution, clinician clusters are randomized to 1 of 4 start date training times for the African American Communities Speak (AACS) Education Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period |
| Clinician Trainees- Cluster 3 | Other | Behavioral: AA Communities Speak to Healthcare ProfessionalsWithin each participating institution, clinician clusters are randomized to 1 of 4 start date training times for the African American Communities Speak (AACS) Education Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period |
| Clinician Trainees- Cluster 4 | Other | Behavioral: AA Communities Speak to Healthcare ProfessionalsWithin each participating institution, clinician clusters are randomized to 1 of 4 start date training times for the African American Communities Speak (AACS) Education Intervention. Each arm has a pre-intervention (control) period and a post-intervention (exposure) period |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Self-identified as African American (i.e., born, raised, and lived primarily in the US)
- Non-Hispanic or Latino
- Age ≥60 years
- English-speaking
- Has been diagnosed with a condition that fits into one of 3 illness paradigms including cancer, cardiac disease, pulmonary disease, neuro-degenerative disease, renal disease, stroke, sepsis, hepatic disease)
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- -Cannot be receiving hospice care
- -Cannot be a paid "sitter"
- -Lack of at least 3 months of clinical practice at the study site prior to the intervention training.
- Self-identified as African American (i.e., born, raised, and lived primarily in the US)
- Non-Hispanic or Latino, 3. age ≥60 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AA Communities Speak to Healthcare ProfessionalsAlso: Clinician TrainingThe training program is designed to empower clinicians to improve goal-concordant EoL care delivery by using community-developed storytelling videos to create empathy with experiences of racism in EoL care, guidelines for culturally concordant EoL care delivery, and implicit bias recognition and management training to mitigate bias in goals of care communication. | Behavioural | Clinician Trainees- Cluster 1, Clinician Trainees- Cluster 2, Clinician Trainees- Cluster 3, Clinician Trainees- Cluster 4 |
Primary outcome
Human Connection Scale (patient/family reported)
Time frame: up to 3 months before the intervention
The Human Connection (THC) Scale is a summary score of item responses such that a higher total score indicates greater therapeutic alliance. Possible scores range from 16 to 64. The 16-item THC scale had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach α= 90).
Human Connection Scale (patient/ family reported)
Time frame: up to 3 months after intervention
The Human Connection (THC) Scale is a summary score of item responses such that a higher total score indicates greater therapeutic alliance. Possible scores range from 16 to 64. The 16-item THC scale had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach α= 90).
2 secondary outcomes
Goal Concordant Care (patient/family reported)
Time frame: up to 3 months before the intervention
Goal Concordant Care (patient/family reported)
Time frame: up to 3 months after the intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2026.
Related trials for Healthy Aging
Recruiting
Effect of Vestibular Perceptual Learning on Vestibular Thresholds and Balance
Healthy Aging
Not yet recruiting
Intervention Program for Psychological Well-Being in Institutionalized Older Adults Through Virtual Reality
Healthy Volunteers, Aging, Healthy
Active, not recruiting
Effects of a Multi-Targeted Oral Supplement on Skin, Hair, Sleep, Energy, Cognition, Libido and Epigenetic Biological Clock Age
Skin Ageing, Healthy Ageing
Not yet recruiting
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Healthy Beat Acupunch Regimen on Physical Fitness, Sleep Quality, and Quality of Life Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
Healthy Aging, Health Promotion
Recruiting
Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Supplementation for Exercise Tolerance Improvement in Healthy Older Adults
Aging, Frailty
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jennifer Tjia, MD, MSCE principal investigator
University of Massachusetts, Worcester
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing AA Communities Speak to Healthcare Professionals in people with Healthy Aging and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 31 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ronit Elk, PhD (205.996.1702, relk@uabmc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Human Connection Scale (patient/family reported) (time frame: up to 3 months before the intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.