Shoulder ArthritisNCT05908851
Perioperative Pain Management for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Pilot Non-Inferiority Trial
A study testing 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml) in people with Shoulder Arthritis and Anesthesia, Local, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common and effective treatment for end-stage shoulder pathologies. Over the past 25 years, implant designs have evolved and the indications for joint replacement have expanded significantly to include arthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, complex shoulder trauma and trauma… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Shoulder Arthritis, Anesthesia, Local, Local Infiltration
- What is being tested?
- 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2023to 1 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty for:
- Osteoarthritis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Rotator cuff arthropathy
- Acute fracture
- Fracture sequelae.
Who cannot join
- Patients with known allergy to study medications
- Patients with obstructive sleep apnea
- Prior TSA
- patients previously on chronic narcotic medication
- patients who are unable to read English
- patients not able/willing to follow up for the study period of 12 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
St. Josephs Healthcare London
London, Ontario, N6A4V2
Kenneth J Faber, MD, 5196466312, ken.faber@sjhc.london.on.ca
Kristen Barton, MD, kbarto@uwo.ca
About this study
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common and effective treatment for end-stage shoulder pathologies. Over the past 25 years, implant designs have evolved and the indications for joint replacement have expanded significantly to include arthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, complex shoulder trauma and trauma sequelae. This has resulted in a worldwide increase in rates of shoulder replacement surgery. The concomitant increased treatment burden for health care systems has prompted interest in strategies to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of patient care such as streamlining intraoperative procedures, mitigating complications, and reducing length of stay by providing outpatient surgical care. Outpatient lower extremity arthroplasty is commonplace and provides helpful information that can guide the development of outpatient TSA such as careful patient selection and the use of standardized perioperative pain management protocols. In lower extremity arthroplasty, several authors have described challenges associated with nerve blockade and the advantages of high-volume local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for outpatient arthroplasty. Proponents of outpatient TSA also describe the importance of patient selection, standardized perioperative protocols and implementation of comprehensive perioperative pain management strategies that can include the use of perioperative ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade with a "single shot" injection, ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade with a temporary indwelling catheter (ISB), LIA near the surgical site, and multimodal postoperative analgesics.
Read the detailed description
A noninferiority clinical trial will be utilized for the study. Eighty patients undergoing primary TSA (anatomic or reverse TSA) with an orthopaedic surgeon at the Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre will be recruited into the study. The study participants (n=80) will be randomized preoperatively into either 1) the ultrasound guided ISB group (n=40) or 2) the high-volume LIA group (n=40). For the pilot study, the investigators will also measure recruitment rates, time to study completion, and drop-out rates.
All patients will undergo TSA through a standard deltopectoral approach. Postoperative rehabilitation will include routine protocols including sling protection for 6 weeks and the following progressive exercises: sling, pendulum, active-assisted range of motion, active range of motion, passive range of motion and shoulder girdle strengthening. Patients randomized to the ultrasound guided ISB group will receive brachial plexus blockade with 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine using a high frequency linear array transducer (Sonosite Edge II, FUJIFILM Sonsonite, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). Patients randomized to the high-volume LIA group will receive 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml) divided equally into a 20 ml five-zone field infiltration into the suprascapular notch/posterior capsule (suprascapular and axillary nerves), coracobrachialis muscle, anterior deltoid muscle, superior pectoralis major muscle, and skin incision at the conclusion of the procedure by the treating surgeon. Patients will be discharged with a standard prescription of multimodal analgesics including acetaminophen, ibuprofen, sustained release morphine, and short acting opioid.
In this case, because the LIA option is likely associated with lesser cost and lower risk of adverse events, non-inferior effectiveness for pain control would provide sufficient and clear evidence that the LIA is the preferred choice. The trial will follow CONSORT reporting guidelines . All measures will be administered though our Methods Centre web-based data collection and will be completed in clinic under the direction of a study coordinator. If a patient misses a follow-up, the web-based system will allow us to capture the outcome measures remotely. While investigators have selected multiple secondary outcome measures, they reflect important secondary dimensions and are measured with well-validated short forms that have low response burden. Potential mediators: Sex, age, gender-related pain expectations, occupation, and comorbid health status will be recorded as potential covariates. Sample size estimation: The criteria for sample size requirements for noninferiority trials is based on the smallest difference that is considered clinically relevant and the standard deviation expected from the sample. n=80 participants (n=40 per group) is a conservative estimate based on the ability to detect a moderate effect between study groups for a mean between-groups difference in the primary outcome .
- Conditions
- Shoulder Arthritis, Anesthesia, Local, Local Infiltration
- Being tested
- 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml)Drug
Also called High volume local infiltration anesthesia
Ultrasound guided brachial plexus blockade
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Brachial Plexus Blockade | No intervention | Ultrasound guided brachial plexus blocade with 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine using a high frequency linear array transducer. |
| Local Infiltration Anesthesia | Experimental | High volume local infiltration anesthesia with 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml) divided equally into a 20 ml five-zone field infiltration into the suprascapular notch/posterior capsule (suprascapular and axillary nerves), coracobrachialis muscle, anterior deltoid muscle, superior pectoralis major muscle, and skin incision at the conclusion of the procedure by the treating surgeon. Receives: Drug: 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain VAS
Pain visual analogue scale - 10 point scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
ASES Shoulder Score
ASES - Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating a worse shoulder condition and 100 indicating a better shoulder condition.
Measured: 12 months
EQ5D
Patient Rated general health measure - 100 point scale: 0 = poor health, 100 = excellent health.
Measured: 12 months
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Patient Rated Outcome: 0 - 130 rating scale - 0 = low pain and disability, 130 = high pain and disability.
Measured: 12 months
Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand: Q-DASH
Patient Rated Outcome: 100 point scale: 0 = disability, 100 = no disability
Measured: 12 months
Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder Score (WOOS)
Patient Rated Outcome - 1900 point scale: 0 = excellent function, 1900 = poor function.
Measured: 12 months
Constant Score
Patient Rated Outcome: 0 - 100 point rating scale: 0 = poor function, 100 = normal function
Measured: 12 months
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation: SANE Score
Patient Rated Outcome - 100 point rating scale: 0 = poor function, 100 = perfect function
Measured: 12 months
Analgesia Diary
record of analgesics used
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2023
- Study start1 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Shoulder ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05908851
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 120986
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2023
- Last updated
- 5 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Perioperative Pain Management for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Pilot Non-Inferiority Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05908851
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 120986
- Conditions
- Shoulder Arthritis, Anesthesia, Local, Local Infiltration
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a common and effective treatment for end-stage shoulder pathologies. Over the past 25 years, implant designs have evolved and the indications for joint replacement have expanded significantly to include arthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, complex shoulder trauma and trauma sequelae. This has resulted in a worldwide increase in rates of shoulder replacement surgery. The concomitant increased treatment burden for health care systems has prompted interest in strategies to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of patient care such as streamlining intraoperative procedures, mitigating complications, and reducing length of stay by providing outpatient surgical care. Outpatient lower extremity arthroplasty is commonplace and provides helpful information that can guide the development of outpatient TSA such as careful patient selection and the use of standardized perioperative pain management protocols. In lower extremity arthroplasty, several authors have described challenges associated with nerve blockade and the advantages of high-volume local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for outpatient arthroplasty. Proponents of outpatient TSA also describe the importance of patient selection, standardized perioperative protocols and implementation of comprehensive perioperative pain management strategies that can include the use of perioperative ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade with a "single shot" injection, ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus blockade with a temporary indwelling catheter (ISB), LIA near the surgical site, and multimodal postoperative analgesics.
Detailed description
A noninferiority clinical trial will be utilized for the study. Eighty patients undergoing primary TSA (anatomic or reverse TSA) with an orthopaedic surgeon at the Roth McFarlane Hand and Upper Limb Centre will be recruited into the study. The study participants (n=80) will be randomized preoperatively into either 1) the ultrasound guided ISB group (n=40) or 2) the high-volume LIA group (n=40). For the pilot study, the investigators will also measure recruitment rates, time to study completion, and drop-out rates.
All patients will undergo TSA through a standard deltopectoral approach. Postoperative rehabilitation will include routine protocols including sling protection for 6 weeks and the following progressive exercises: sling, pendulum, active-assisted range of motion, active range of motion, passive range of motion and shoulder girdle strengthening. Patients randomized to the ultrasound guided ISB group will receive brachial plexus blockade with 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine using a high frequency linear array transducer (Sonosite Edge II, FUJIFILM Sonsonite, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA). Patients randomized to the high-volume LIA group will receive 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml) divided equally into a 20 ml five-zone field infiltration into the suprascapular notch/posterior capsule (suprascapular and axillary nerves), coracobrachialis muscle, anterior deltoid muscle, superior pectoralis major muscle, and skin incision at the conclusion of the procedure by the treating surgeon. Patients will be discharged with a standard prescription of multimodal analgesics including acetaminophen, ibuprofen, sustained release morphine, and short acting opioid.
In this case, because the LIA option is likely associated with lesser cost and lower risk of adverse events, non-inferior effectiveness for pain control would provide sufficient and clear evidence that the LIA is the preferred choice. The trial will follow CONSORT reporting guidelines . All measures will be administered though our Methods Centre web-based data collection and will be completed in clinic under the direction of a study coordinator. If a patient misses a follow-up, the web-based system will allow us to capture the outcome measures remotely. While investigators have selected multiple secondary outcome measures, they reflect important secondary dimensions and are measured with well-validated short forms that have low response burden. Potential mediators: Sex, age, gender-related pain expectations, occupation, and comorbid health status will be recorded as potential covariates. Sample size estimation: The criteria for sample size requirements for noninferiority trials is based on the smallest difference that is considered clinically relevant and the standard deviation expected from the sample. n=80 participants (n=40 per group) is a conservative estimate based on the ability to detect a moderate effect between study groups for a mean between-groups difference in the primary outcome .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Regional Brachial Plexus Blockade | No intervention | –Ultrasound guided brachial plexus blocade with 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine using a high frequency linear array transducer. |
| Local Infiltration Anesthesia | Experimental | Drug: 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml)High volume local infiltration anesthesia with 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml) divided equally into a 20 ml five-zone field infiltration into the suprascapular notch/posterior capsule (suprascapular and axillary nerves), coracobrachialis muscle, anterior deltoid muscle, superior pectoralis major muscle, and skin incision at the conclusion of the procedure by the treating surgeon. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Osteoarthritis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Rotator cuff arthropathy
- Acute fracture
- Fracture sequelae.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients with known allergy to study medications
- Patients with obstructive sleep apnea
- Prior TSA
- patients previously on chronic narcotic medication
- patients who are unable to read English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml)Also: High volume local infiltration anesthesiaUltrasound guided brachial plexus blockade | Drug | Local Infiltration Anesthesia |
Primary outcome
Pain VAS
Time frame: 12 months
Pain visual analogue scale - 10 point scale: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable.
8 secondary outcomes
ASES Shoulder Score
Time frame: 12 months
EQ5D
Time frame: 12 months
Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
Time frame: 12 months
Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand: Q-DASH
Time frame: 12 months
Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Shoulder Score (WOOS)
Time frame: 12 months
Constant Score
Time frame: 12 months
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation: SANE Score
Time frame: 12 months
Analgesia Diary
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Oct 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Shoulder Arthritis
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Recruiting
SMR Stemless Reverse vs SMR Reverse Shoulder System
Arthroplasty, Replacement
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Digital Therapeutics for Improving Shoulder Function After Rotator Cuff Repair
Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy, Repair of a Cuff Tear
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Validation of SMARTDIAGO for Remote Functional Assessment of Musculoskeletal Conditions
Knee Osteoarthristis, Hip Osteoarthritis
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluating Hemidiaphragmatic Paralysis With Prolonged Neural Blockade From an Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
Shoulder Surgery, Shoulder Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline (57ml), 0.5% ropivacaine (40 ml), 10 mg morphine (10 mg/ml), 0.1 mg of epinephrine (0.1 mg/ml), and 30 mg of ketorolac (30 mg/ml) in people with Shoulder Arthritis and Anesthesia, Local, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain VAS (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Oct 2023.