AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic DissectionAoArchNCT05912634

Repair Versus Non-repair of the Aortic Arch in Type A Aortic Dissection

An observational study of Aortic Dissection and Aortic Arch, run by Centre Cardiologique du Nord at 1 site in France.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening clinical status requiring surgery that is usually performed as a salvage procedure.We planned a multicenter study to evaluate the balance between the patient's condition and those therapeutic strategies that may limit the risk of late adverse events… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Conservative TAAD-R and Extensive TAAD- R
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
900 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2014to 30 Dec 2026
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The retrospective multicenter study including patients who underwent surgery for acute TAAAD at 5 centers of cardiac surgery located in 2 European countries and Japan (2 France, 2 Italy and 1 Hokkaido ). Data will be prospectively collected fron patients (conservative vs estensive TAAD- R) treated during the study period and the aim will be to gather further data for future clinical research on this topic. Preoperative and postoperative variables will be included during in-hospital stay and follow-up data instead they will be included on subsequent encounters for all other patients who will be hospitalized. Data on consecutive patients with acute TAAD will be collected with pre-specified baseline, operative and outcome variables.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged > 18 years
  • TAAD or intramural hematoma involving the ascending aorta
  • Symptoms started within 7 days from surgery
  • Primary surgical repair of acute TAAD
  • Any other major cardiac surgical procedure concomitant with surgery for TAAD.

Who cannot join

  • Patients aged < 18 years
  • Onset of symptoms > 7 days from surgery
  • Prior procedure for TAAD
  • Concomitant endocarditis;
  • TAAD secondary to blunt or penetrating chest trauma.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site
  • Francesco Nappi

    Saint-Denis, France, 93200

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Early Complication and Outcomes in Surgical vs no Surgical Involvement of Aortic Arch in Type A Aortic Dissection

Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening clinical status requiring surgery that is usually performed as a salvage procedure.We planned a multicenter study to evaluate the balance between the patient's condition and those therapeutic strategies that may limit the risk of late adverse events in patients who will be underwent surgery for appropriate management of TAAD

Read the detailed description

Substantial evidence has suggested a decrease of early mortality during the last years, however recently the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection registry recorded 18% of 30-day mortality after surgery for ATAAD. Similarly, the prospective German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A confirmed this data reporting a 30-day mortality of 16.9%. Again, results from recent analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeon database that report 7353 procedures from 2014 and 2017 for acute TAAD revealed a 30-day mortality of 17%. Understanding the balance between the patient's conditions which may not allow extensive procedure and those treatment strategies which may limit the risk of late adverse events in patients who remain alive long after the surgery is essential for an appropriate management of ATAAD. The best treatment option in patients with ATAAD is dictated by the balance between patient conditions that may not allow for extensive procedures and those more conservative treatment strategies that limit the risk of late adverse events in patients who remain alive long after surgery. surgery. However, previous evidence from large series of patients do not provide information on the long-term durability of these procedures.

Here investigators planned a multicenter study to evaluate the contemporary early outcomes and duration of different surgical strategies for 15-year acute ATAAD in a large study population.

Being tested
Conservative TAAD-R, Extensive TAAD- R
Keywords
Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAAD), Root-Sparing Replacement, Ascending Aorta Replacement, Partial Arch Repair, Total Arch Replacement (TARP), Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET), Hemiarch Procedures
Medical subject headings
Aortic Dissection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Conservative TAAD-RProcedure or surgery

    Also called Ascending Aortic Root Sparing Replacement with or without Hemiarch Repair

    Cardiac arrest will be ensured using antegrade potassium-rich cardioplegia solution delivered directly into the coronary ostium or after coronary sinus cannula insertion, in patients with aortic regurgitation aorta will be resected down to the sinotubular junction and the thrombus located in the false lumen of the aortic root will be removed so that the aortic lesion could be visualized. The commissures will be resuspended using 4-0 or 5-0 sutures reinforced with a Teflon pledget over each commissure. A 4-0 or 5-0 polypropylene suture will be chosen to seal the proximal anastomosis and this suture line will also be used to secure the intima to the adventitia. In patients revealing normal-sized aortic roots associated with poor-quality valve leaflets, concomitant aortic valve replacement with conventional xenograft or mechanical prosthesis will be preferred.

  • Extensive TAAD- RProcedure or surgery

    Also called Aortic root procedures.TARP procedures. Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) procedure

    Patients who experienced dilatation of the sinuses of Valsalva >4.5 cm in diameter on computed tomography imaging, those with connective tissue disease, or those in whom intimal tears extended into the sinuses, will undergoing replacement of the aortic root using a biologic or mechanical composite valve graft or valve-sparing root reimplantation procedure.Total arch replacement procedures (TARP) will fulfilled with the use of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest and with either antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion, maintaining systemic cooling between 19°C to 25°C and depending on the surgeon's practice.TARPs will be carried out using 1- and 4-branch grafts and involved the resection of all the aortic tissue up to the left common carotid artery (total arch)

Study groups in NCT05912634
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conservative Type A Aortic Dissection Repair (TAAD-R)The Conservative procedure will include patients receiving ascending aortic root sparing replacement with or without the implantation of the aortic hemiarch
Receives: Procedure: Conservative TAAD-R
Extensive Type A Acute Aortic Dissection Repair (TAAD-R)The extensive procedure will include patients receiving ascending aorta replacement associated to TARP
Receives: Procedure: Extensive TAAD- R

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Operative Mortality (OM)

    Patients who died within 30 days

    Measured: 30-day

  2. Rate of acute heart failure

    Number of participants with postoperative heart failure who will require prolonged use of concentration of inotropes for a period greater than 24 h and/or the insertion of any mechanical circulatory support device.

    Measured: 30-day

  3. Stroke

    Number of participants with acute episode of a focal or global neurological deficit. Rates of alteration of degree of consciousness, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, numbness or sensory loss affecting one side of the body, dysphasia or aphasia, hemianopsia, amaurosis fugax. To consider rate of other neurologic signs or symptoms consistent with stroke duration of focal or global neurologic deficit greater than 24 hours.

    Measured: 30-day

  4. Rate of global brain ischemia

    Rate of diffuse hypoxic damage as diagnosed at brain imaging and electroencephalography.

    Measured: 30-days

  5. Rate of mesenteric ischemia

    Rate of abdominal pain with or without nausea and vomiting and rectal bleeding or bloody diarrhea

    Measured: 30-days

  6. Rate of acute kidney injury

    Number of participants with postoperative change in serum creatinine concentration. Severity will be stratified on the basis of number of participants with the KDIGO (Kney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) criteria.

    Measured: 30-days

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Rate of paraplegia/paraparesis

    Rate of bilateral weakness and/or multimodality sensory disturb- ance below the level of the ischemic spinal lesion.

    Measured: 30-day

  2. Rate of perioperative bleeding

    Number of participants will receive postoprative transfused red blood cell units. The E-CABG ( coronary artery by pass grafting) classification of bleeding rate has been proposed as a simple classification of perioperative bleeding

    Measured: 30-day

  3. Rate of reoperation for bleeding

    Number of participants who will receive postoperative chest reopening for excessive bleeding.

    Measured: 30-day

  4. Rate of mechanical circulatory support

    Number of participants who will receive the use of intra-aortic balloon pump and/or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for postoperative acute heart failure.

    Measured: 30-day

  5. Late outcomes

    Data on patient's survival status will be collected

    Measured: 18 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Jan 2014
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2025
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
900 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05912634
Sponsor's protocol ID
CN-202201173-2
Other IDs
CN-23-27
Acronym
AoArch
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
30 May 2023
Last updated
19 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Geirsson A, Shioda K, Olsson C, Ahlsson A, Gunn J, Hansson EC, Hjortdal V, Jeppsson A, Mennander A, Wickbom A, Zindovic I, Gudbjartsson T. Differential outcomes of open and clamp-on distal anastomosis techniques in acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1750-1758. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 29.

    PubMed 30401530
  • Harris KM, Nienaber CA, Peterson MD, Woznicki EM, Braverman AC, Trimarchi S, Myrmel T, Pyeritz R, Hutchison S, Strauss C, Ehrlich MP, Gleason TG, Korach A, Montgomery DG, Isselbacher EM, Eagle KA. Early Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection. JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Oct 1;7(10):1009-1015. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.2718.

    PubMed 36001309
  • Benedetto U, Dimagli A, Kaura A, Sinha S, Mariscalco G, Krasopoulos G, Moorjani N, Field M, Uday T, Kendal S, Cooper G, Uppal R, Bilal H, Mascaro J, Goodwin A, Angelini G, Tsang G, Akowuah E. Determinants of outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection: the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgical Audit. Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 28;43(1):44-52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab586.

    PubMed 34468733
  • O'Hara D, McLarty A, Sun E, Itagaki S, Tannous H, Chu D, Egorova N, Chikwe J. Type-A Aortic Dissection and Cerebral Perfusion: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov;110(5):1461-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.04.144. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

    PubMed 32599034
  • Czerny M, Schoenhoff F, Etz C, Englberger L, Khaladj N, Zierer A, Weigang E, Hoffmann I, Blettner M, Carrel TP. The Impact of Pre-Operative Malperfusion on Outcome in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Results From the GERAADA Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 23;65(24):2628-2635. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.030.

    PubMed 26088302

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in