AzTrials
AzTrials

AnosmiaNCT05912881

Chemosensory Dysfunction and Recovery in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery

A study testing Olfactory training in people with Anosmia and Skull Base Neoplasms, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators hypothesize that patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery experience clinically meaningful and modifiable disruptions in postoperative chemosensory function and quality of life, and the investigators further hypothesize that olfactory training in the postoperative period may… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Anosmia, Skull Base Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Olfactory training
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
41 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2023to 1 Jan 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English Speaking
  • preoperative diagnosis of benign sellar or parasellar skull base pathology

Who cannot join

  • preoperative diagnosis of malignant sellar or parasellar skull base pathology
  • history of endoscopic sinus surgery
  • history of skull base surgery
  • history of radiation therapy or other local treatments for the management of facial, sinonasal, or cranial pathologies
  • history of chronic rhinosinusitis
  • history of neurocognitive disorder
Show all 9Show fewer
  • history of intrinsic chemosensory pathology
  • history of cardiac pacemaker
  • history of gastrectomy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Medicine

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21224

Other trials in United States

About this study

The investigators hypothesize that patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery experience clinically meaningful and modifiable disruptions in postoperative chemosensory function and quality of life, and the investigators further hypothesize that olfactory training in the postoperative period may significantly hasten normalization of patients' chemosensory perturbations. This tailored prospective study seeks to fulfill a significant gap in the understanding of the characteristics, implications, and treatment options for postoperative olfactory and gustatory impairment following endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.

Being tested
Olfactory training, Placebo training
Medical subject headings
Anosmia, Skull Base Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Olfactory trainingOther

    Participants perform olfactory training using sticks filled with scented essential oils.

  • Placebo trainingOther

    Participants perform olfactory training using sticks filled with unscented medium chain triglycerides.

Study groups in NCT05912881
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants receive placebo olfactory training kits that only contain medium chain triglycerides that lack any discernible odor
Receives: Other: Placebo training
TreatmentExperimentalParticipants receive treatment olfactory training kits that contain essential oils that have scents (lavender, lemon, clove, eucalyptus)
Receives: Other: Olfactory training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Olfactory function as assessed by the Sniffin Sticks olfactory testing kit

    Olfactory function as determined using the commercially available "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory testing kit. Olfactory function is tested in three domains: threshold, discrimination, and identification. For threshold testing, the most dilute concentration of odorant that the participant is able to reliably detect is determined. In discrimination testing, the participant is evaluated on their ability to discern the unique scent among three scented sticks. In identification testing, the patient names the smells using a multiple choice form which offers four definitions for every Sniffin' stick, only one of which is correct.

    Measured: Pre-operative visit (baseline), 2 weeks post-operative, 1 month post-operative, 3 months post-operative

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12

    Quality of life questionnaire. Score range 0-60, where higher score is worse and indicates more onerous symptoms.

    Measured: Pre-operative visit (baseline), 2 weeks post-operative, 1 month post-operative, 3 months post-operative, 6 months post-operative

  2. Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the ODOR (Olfactory Dysfunction Outcomes Rating) questionnaire

    Quality of life questionnaire. Score range 0-112, where higher score is worse and indicates greater degree of olfactory dysfunction.

    Measured: Pre-operative visit (baseline), 2 weeks post-operative, 1 month post-operative, 3 months post-operative, 6 months post-operative

  3. Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the Skull Base Inventory

    Quality of life questionnaire. Score range 0-100, where higher score is better, indicative of less burden on quality of life.

    Measured: Pre-operative visit (baseline), 2 weeks post-operative, 1 month post-operative, 3 months post-operative, 6 months post-operative

  4. Change in Quality of smell and taste as assessed by a Visual analog scale

    Quality of smell and taste as indicated on a visual analog scale. Score range 0-100, where higher score is better and indicative of better smell and taste function.

    Measured: Pre-operative visit (baseline), 2 weeks post-operative, 1 month post-operative, 3 months post-operative, 6 months post-operative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2023
  2. Study start1 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2026
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants are enrolled into treatment or placebo groups for the entirety of the study.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05912881
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00311777
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
2 Jun 2023
Last updated
18 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Olfactory training in people with Anosmia and Skull Base Neoplasms, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Olfactory function as assessed by the Sniffin Sticks olfactory testing kit (time frame: Pre-operative visit (baseline), 2 weeks post-operative, 1 month post-operative, 3 months post-operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in