CancerTADIG-RNCT05921123
Understanding and Anticipating Therapeutic Response And Immuno-meDIated Adverse Events in Anti-cancer Immune-checkpoint Inhibition: a Tissue Biopsy Based imaGing Study
An observational study of Cancer, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have dramatically changed the management of some types of metastatic cancer, with indications for their use continuing to expand. Despite the hope brought by these new anti-cancer molecules, the response to ICI in these poorly prognosticated cancers is heterogeneous, with a benefit… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 25 Nov 2023to 25 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients with tumors treated by immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI).
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Treated by Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for an advanced cancer
- Treated at Brest University-Hospital, Morlaix Hospital, Quimper Hospital, Clinique Pasteur in Brest or Bordeaux University Hospital
- With a tumor or tissue biopsy (organ target of irAEs) archived in sufficient quantity for Hyperion analysis
- For the control group: patient with an inflammatory disease (autoimmune, autoinflammatory) who had a biopsy at diagnosis
Who cannot join
- Subject of guardianship (tutorship, curatorship)
- Refusal to participate
- Patient not meeting inclusion criteria for each point
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Brest University Hospital
Brest, 29200
Pierre-Guillaume Poureau, +332 98 22 37 40, pierre-guillaume.poureau@chu-brest.fr
About this study
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have dramatically changed the management of some types of metastatic cancer, with indications for their use continuing to expand. Despite the hope brought by these new anti-cancer molecules, the response to ICI in these poorly prognosticated cancers is heterogeneous, with a benefit observed in 20 to 30% of patients, with the combination with chemotherapy or targeted therapies offering new perspectives. By inhibiting natural checkpoints of the immune system, ICI increase the anti-tumor response, but are also responsible for immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can be severe. There are many hypothesized mechanisms for these immune-related adverse events, but no one has ever characterized in detail the immune infiltrate within the irAEs targeted tissues.
In-depth identification of cell subpopulations within the tumor microenvironment, as well as the infiltrate within the irAEs targeted tissues, would allow the identification of new predictive factors of response and toxicity, which could be used in clinical practice at the time of diagnosis. A better understanding of immuno-mediated toxicities would allow to adapt their management, which is currently based on the inflammatory diseases they mimic. The Hyperion technology is an innovative mass cytometry imaging system, allowing the simultaneous analysis of nearly 40 markers within a tissue.
Read the detailed description
Treatment by ICI opens two important fields of investigation: the first concerns the prediction of the efficacy of these treatments, an important public health issue, as they are costly and not without toxicity; and the second concerns the understanding and therefore the management of specific immuno-mediated toxicities, which may be limiting. This project will bring together several investigations, carried out by different investigators and coordinated within the B Lymphocytes, Autoimmunity and Immunotherapies (LBAI), research unit (UMR 1227) in Brest, in order to characterize the tissue actors involved in the response and the immuno-induced toxicities, in order to establish predictive factors.
- Tissue players involved in the anti-tumour response to ICI. Predicting the response to ICI, both before the start of treatment and during the first few months, remains a real challenge, particularly in view of the possibility of pseudo-progression during the first few weeks of treatment. This question is nevertheless of vital importance, as the indications for these molecules continue to expand, with new prospects for their combination with chemotherapies or targeted therapies. The correlation between the tumour immune microenvironment and response to ICI is relatively little studied in digestive cancers, such as gastric cancer, where contradictory data exist, particularly on the prognostic value of intra-tumour lymphocytes (TILs), which may be intra-tumour or present in the stroma. Intratumoral regulatory T cells may have a negative effect on responses to ICI, in contrast to intratumoral CD8+ T cells, with a possible prognostic impact of the regulatory T cells/T cell CD8+ ratio. In contrast, the stromal infiltrate of regulatory T cells could have a positive effect. A high infiltrate of anti-tumour M2 macrophages has been associated with poorer survival in several solid cancers, in contrast to M1 macrophages in gastric cancer. In hepatocellular carcinoma, PDL1 expression by tumour cells is low and heterogeneous, but PDL1 expression by host cells, such as innate immune cells, can inhibit the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells. The role of M1 macrophages remains unclear.
- Tissue players involved in immune-mediated toxicities. By inhibiting the immune system's natural checkpoints, ICI increase the anti-tumour response, but this also leads to a loss of peripheral tolerance mechanisms and therefore to the appearance of immuno-induced side-effects (irAEs), which can affect all organs and mimic genuine autoimmune diseases. Depending on the ICI used, the type and frequency of irAEs differ, with a frequency of up to 70% for anti-PD-(L)-1 and up to 90% for anti-CTLA-4. The digestive tract is the second most frequently affected organ after the skin, with the occurrence of immuno-induced diarrhoea and colitis, sharing macroscopic features with Crohn's disease. Approximately 6% of patients may present with rheumatological involvement, with a variety of phenotypes, most often mimicking polyarthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or oligoarthritis of the large joints. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain the appearance of irAEs, most of which are based on the T cell effector due to the mechanism of action of ICI. The hypothesis of cross-reactivity between a tumour antigen and a self antigen has been put forward to explain the occurrence of irAEs, as for example in cases of vitiligo occurring under immunotherapy in metastatic melanomas, with antigens shared between tumour and non-tumour melanocytes. The role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) has also been suggested. The level of circulating IL17 at the initiation of ICI has also been associated with the risk of colitis. Two recent studies have investigated synovial biopsies from immune-induced arthritis using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry techniques after disaggregation. The first revealed the presence of memory T cells and macrophages, and demonstrated the production of TNF alpha. The other found T cells, with CD4 slightly over-represented compared with CD8, and B cells in equivalent proportion, as well as macrophages. However, no study has ever accurately characterised the inflammatory infiltrate, either within the articular synovium or within the digestive mucosa, via the simultaneous study of numerous markers, with a spatial dimension. Nor has this been done in the skin in the case of cutaneous toxicity of ICI, or in the salivary glands in the case of immuno-induced dry syndrome, for example.
- Hyperion technology. The Hyperion imaging technology is an innovative technology within the LBAI research unit (UMR1227) in Brest, enabling the expression of 37 markers to be assessed on a tissue slide, and thus the sub-populations of immune cells within a tissue to be quantified precisely, at cellular and sub-cellular level with a resolution of 1 µm2.
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Tumor response according to the iRECIST criteria and occurrence of irAE over the duration of the patient's follow-up.
Apparition of irAE is appreciated according the physician definition. The description and grading scales of irAE found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 will be utilized. A copy of the CTCAE version 5.0 can be downloaded from the CTEP web site http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
CTCAE terminology (description of the adverse event) and grade
The description and grading scales of irAE found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 will be utilized.
Measured: 24 months
Survival (PFS et OS)
PFS is defined as the time from random assignment in the clinical trial to disease progression or death from any cause. OS is defined as the time from random assignment in the clinical trial to death.
Measured: 24 months
Basic demographic data, disease history, nature of ICI treatment, treatment schedule
Measured: 24 months
Identification and quantification of cell subpopulations and interactions within the tumor microenvironment, differentiating ICI responders from non-responders
Measured: 24 months
Identification and quantification of cell subpopulations making up the inflammatory infiltrate in irAEs target tissues
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2023
- Study start25 Nov 2023
- Primary completion25 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion25 Nov 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, BrestThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Brest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05921123
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 29BRC22.0219 (TADIG-R)
- Acronym
- TADIG-R
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Understanding and Anticipating Therapeutic Response And Immuno-meDIated Adverse Events in Anti-cancer Immune-checkpoint Inhibition: a Tissue Biopsy Based imaGing Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05921123
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TADIG-R / 29BRC22.0219 (TADIG-R)
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BrestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 25 Nov 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have dramatically changed the management of some types of metastatic cancer, with indications for their use continuing to expand. Despite the hope brought by these new anti-cancer molecules, the response to ICI in these poorly prognosticated cancers is heterogeneous, with a benefit observed in 20 to 30% of patients, with the combination with chemotherapy or targeted therapies offering new perspectives. By inhibiting natural checkpoints of the immune system, ICI increase the anti-tumor response, but are also responsible for immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can be severe. There are many hypothesized mechanisms for these immune-related adverse events, but no one has ever characterized in detail the immune infiltrate within the irAEs targeted tissues.
In-depth identification of cell subpopulations within the tumor microenvironment, as well as the infiltrate within the irAEs targeted tissues, would allow the identification of new predictive factors of response and toxicity, which could be used in clinical practice at the time of diagnosis. A better understanding of immuno-mediated toxicities would allow to adapt their management, which is currently based on the inflammatory diseases they mimic. The Hyperion technology is an innovative mass cytometry imaging system, allowing the simultaneous analysis of nearly 40 markers within a tissue.
Detailed description
Treatment by ICI opens two important fields of investigation: the first concerns the prediction of the efficacy of these treatments, an important public health issue, as they are costly and not without toxicity; and the second concerns the understanding and therefore the management of specific immuno-mediated toxicities, which may be limiting. This project will bring together several investigations, carried out by different investigators and coordinated within the B Lymphocytes, Autoimmunity and Immunotherapies (LBAI), research unit (UMR 1227) in Brest, in order to characterize the tissue actors involved in the response and the immuno-induced toxicities, in order to establish predictive factors.
- Tissue players involved in the anti-tumour response to ICI. Predicting the response to ICI, both before the start of treatment and during the first few months, remains a real challenge, particularly in view of the possibility of pseudo-progression during the first few weeks of treatment. This question is nevertheless of vital importance, as the indications for these molecules continue to expand, with new prospects for their combination with chemotherapies or targeted therapies. The correlation between the tumour immune microenvironment and response to ICI is relatively little studied in digestive cancers, such as gastric cancer, where contradictory data exist, particularly on the prognostic value of intra-tumour lymphocytes (TILs), which may be intra-tumour or present in the stroma. Intratumoral regulatory T cells may have a negative effect on responses to ICI, in contrast to intratumoral CD8+ T cells, with a possible prognostic impact of the regulatory T cells/T cell CD8+ ratio. In contrast, the stromal infiltrate of regulatory T cells could have a positive effect. A high infiltrate of anti-tumour M2 macrophages has been associated with poorer survival in several solid cancers, in contrast to M1 macrophages in gastric cancer. In hepatocellular carcinoma, PDL1 expression by tumour cells is low and heterogeneous, but PDL1 expression by host cells, such as innate immune cells, can inhibit the cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells. The role of M1 macrophages remains unclear.
- Tissue players involved in immune-mediated toxicities. By inhibiting the immune system's natural checkpoints, ICI increase the anti-tumour response, but this also leads to a loss of peripheral tolerance mechanisms and therefore to the appearance of immuno-induced side-effects (irAEs), which can affect all organs and mimic genuine autoimmune diseases. Depending on the ICI used, the type and frequency of irAEs differ, with a frequency of up to 70% for anti-PD-(L)-1 and up to 90% for anti-CTLA-4. The digestive tract is the second most frequently affected organ after the skin, with the occurrence of immuno-induced diarrhoea and colitis, sharing macroscopic features with Crohn's disease. Approximately 6% of patients may present with rheumatological involvement, with a variety of phenotypes, most often mimicking polyarthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) or oligoarthritis of the large joints. Several hypotheses have been put forward to explain the appearance of irAEs, most of which are based on the T cell effector due to the mechanism of action of ICI. The hypothesis of cross-reactivity between a tumour antigen and a self antigen has been put forward to explain the occurrence of irAEs, as for example in cases of vitiligo occurring under immunotherapy in metastatic melanomas, with antigens shared between tumour and non-tumour melanocytes. The role of regulatory T cells (Tregs) has also been suggested. The level of circulating IL17 at the initiation of ICI has also been associated with the risk of colitis. Two recent studies have investigated synovial biopsies from immune-induced arthritis using immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry techniques after disaggregation. The first revealed the presence of memory T cells and macrophages, and demonstrated the production of TNF alpha. The other found T cells, with CD4 slightly over-represented compared with CD8, and B cells in equivalent proportion, as well as macrophages. However, no study has ever accurately characterised the inflammatory infiltrate, either within the articular synovium or within the digestive mucosa, via the simultaneous study of numerous markers, with a spatial dimension. Nor has this been done in the skin in the case of cutaneous toxicity of ICI, or in the salivary glands in the case of immuno-induced dry syndrome, for example.
- Hyperion technology. The Hyperion imaging technology is an innovative technology within the LBAI research unit (UMR1227) in Brest, enabling the expression of 37 markers to be assessed on a tissue slide, and thus the sub-populations of immune cells within a tissue to be quantified precisely, at cellular and sub-cellular level with a resolution of 1 µm2.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients with tumors treated by immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI).
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Treated by Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for an advanced cancer
- Treated at Brest University-Hospital, Morlaix Hospital, Quimper Hospital, Clinique Pasteur in Brest or Bordeaux University Hospital
- With a tumor or tissue biopsy (organ target of irAEs) archived in sufficient quantity for Hyperion analysis
- For the control group: patient with an inflammatory disease (autoimmune, autoinflammatory) who had a biopsy at diagnosis
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject of guardianship (tutorship, curatorship)
- Refusal to participate
- Patient not meeting inclusion criteria for each point
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Tumor response according to the iRECIST criteria and occurrence of irAE over the duration of the patient's follow-up.
Time frame: 24 months
Apparition of irAE is appreciated according the physician definition. The description and grading scales of irAE found in the revised NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 will be utilized. A copy of the CTCAE version 5.0 can be downloaded from the CTEP web site http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm.
5 secondary outcomes
CTCAE terminology (description of the adverse event) and grade
Time frame: 24 months
Survival (PFS et OS)
Time frame: 24 months
Basic demographic data, disease history, nature of ICI treatment, treatment schedule
Time frame: 24 months
Identification and quantification of cell subpopulations and interactions within the tumor microenvironment, differentiating ICI responders from non-responders
Time frame: 24 months
Identification and quantification of cell subpopulations making up the inflammatory infiltrate in irAEs target tissues
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2024.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cancer, run by University Hospital, Brest at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Tumor response according to the iRECIST criteria and occurrence of irAE over the duration of the patient's follow-up. (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2024.