AgingNCT05933798
China Pilot of ICOPE (Integrated Care for Older People) in Chaoyang
A study testing ICOPE in people with Aging and Healthy Aging, run by Pinetree Health Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd. at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The goal of this pilot study is to examine predefined parameters (sample size, capacity building, acceptance by community-dwelling older people (participants) and care providers) to evaluate the feasibility of implementing World Health Organization's ICOPE (integrated care for older people) approach in China. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aging, Healthy Aging, Utilization, Health Care
- What is being tested?
- ICOPE
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,148 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 31 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Screened as positive for intrinsic capacity declines
- Decline in intrinsic capacity confirmed by in-depth assessment in any of the domains described as: MMSE < 27 (for cognition), SPPB ≤ 9 (for locomotion), MNA-SF <12 (for vitality we used nutrition as a proxy), GDS-5 ≥ 2 (for psychology we used depression as a proxy) or any vision impairment
- Signed form of consent and willingly participate in the pilot study
Who cannot join
- Negative results in their intrinsic capacity decline screening
- Severe hearing problems as the study was conducted during COVID-19 pandemics period and relied on telecare or remote sessions of intervention
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: China Pilot of ICOPE (Integrated Care for Older People) in Chaoyang District, Beijing
The goal of this pilot study is to examine predefined parameters (sample size, capacity building, acceptance by community-dwelling older people (participants) and care providers) to evaluate the feasibility of implementing World Health Organization's ICOPE (integrated care for older people) approach in China. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Whether it is feasible to implement the ICOPE approach in China;
- Whether the integrated care approach would make any difference in health outcomes and resource utilization.
Participating older adults receiving integrated care (Intervention Group) are compared to those receiving usual care (Control Group) in order to answer the two questions above.
Read the detailed description
The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing World Health Organization's ICOPE (integrated care for older people) approach in China. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Whether it is feasible to implement the ICOPE approach in China;
- Whether the integrated care approach would make any difference in health outcomes and resource utilization.
For the first question, predefined parameters such as sample size, capacity building, acceptance by community-dwelling older people (participants) and care providers were examined.
Based on literature review and also as evidenced in the background study of the ICOPE guideline development process, a key hypothesis is that implementing integrated care management programs can improve health outcomes while containing costs.
According to the pilot study design, a total of 2000 community-dwelling older persons aged 60 and above at-risk of functional loss in Chaoyang District of Beijing are recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=500) and control group (n=1500).
Chaoyang is the most populated district in Beijing, with subdistricts that are urban, suburban and rural, well representing the city of Beijing. To identify potential participants who are at risk of functional loss, the pilot used ICOPE screening tools in the recruitment process, to screen for any losses in mobility, cognition, vitality, psychological health, vision and hearing.
Screening tools used are:
- Independence is measured by the activities of daily living (ADL) 14-questionnaire scale.
- Cognition is measured by mini-mental status examination (MMSE).
- Vitality or nutrition is measured by by mini-nutritional assessment- short form (MNA-SF) to assess the risk of malnutrition.
- Mobility is measured by short physical performance battery (SPPB).
- Psychological health is measured by geriatric depression scale-five items (GDS-5).
- Conditions
- Aging, Healthy Aging, Utilization, Health Care
- Being tested
- ICOPE, Usual Care
- Keywords
- integrated care, primary care, ICOPE, decade of healthy ageing
- Medical subject headings
- Patient Acceptance of Health Care
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ICOPEOther
The ICOPE approach with locally adapted care pathways was implemented by trained integrated care managers (ICMs) advised by multi-disciplinary teams, delivered in primary care settings
Usual CareOther
Participants in the Control Group would have their care plan after assessment and seek health and care services as usual without additional advice or support on implementing the care plan
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Participants who were actively followed up during the study period with a personalized integrated care plan developed following the ICOPE screening and assessment, identified as "at-risk" for loss in intrinsic capacity. Receives: Other: ICOPE |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Pariticpants who continued receiving usual care during the study period. Receives: Other: Usual Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of implementing the ICOPE program in China
- Sample size (to successfully recruit over 2,000 participants, 500 of whom were to be categorized in the intervention group)
- Capacity building (at least 200 primary care providers to be fully trained and deployed in the pilot program)
- Acceptance (reach more than 90% satisfaction with the pilot by both participants and providers).
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Independence
measured by the activities of daily living (ADL) 14-questionnaire scale, to assess the participant's physical function
Measured: 6 months
Cognition
measured by mini-mental status examination (MMSE) to assess the cognitive health of the participants
Measured: 6 months
Vitality
nutrition measured by mini-nutritional assessment- short form (MNA-SF) to assess the risk of malnutrition
Measured: 6 months
Mobility
measured by short physical performance battery (SPPB) to assess the risk of declining mobility
Measured: 6 months
Psychological health
measured by geriatric depression scale-five items (GDS-5) using a short set of questions to assess possible depressive symptoms
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2023
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion31 Jul 2021
- Study completion31 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,148 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pinetree Health Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ninie Wang, MBA DrPH, Principal investigator, Pinetree Care Group
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05933798
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-QS-001
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Jul 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Access to de-identified data of the China ICOPE Pilot (2020-2021) by other researchers is subject to the approval of an independent review committee and after signing a data access and a data use agreement.
Publications
Tavassoli N, de Souto Barreto P, Berbon C, Mathieu C, de Kerimel J, Lafont C, Takeda C, Carrie I, Piau A, Jouffrey T, Andrieu S, Nourhashemi F, Beard JR, Soto Martin ME, Vellas B. Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Jun;3(6):e394-e404. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00097-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
PubMed 36098317
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jul 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- China Pilot of ICOPE (Integrated Care for Older People) in Chaoyang District, Beijing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05933798
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020-QS-001
- Conditions
- Aging, Healthy Aging, Utilization, Health Care
- Keywords
- integrated care, primary care, ICOPE, decade of healthy ageing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,148 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pinetree Health Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this pilot study is to examine predefined parameters (sample size, capacity building, acceptance by community-dwelling older people (participants) and care providers) to evaluate the feasibility of implementing World Health Organization's ICOPE (integrated care for older people) approach in China. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Whether it is feasible to implement the ICOPE approach in China;
- Whether the integrated care approach would make any difference in health outcomes and resource utilization.
Participating older adults receiving integrated care (Intervention Group) are compared to those receiving usual care (Control Group) in order to answer the two questions above.
Detailed description
The goal of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing World Health Organization's ICOPE (integrated care for older people) approach in China. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Whether it is feasible to implement the ICOPE approach in China;
- Whether the integrated care approach would make any difference in health outcomes and resource utilization.
For the first question, predefined parameters such as sample size, capacity building, acceptance by community-dwelling older people (participants) and care providers were examined.
Based on literature review and also as evidenced in the background study of the ICOPE guideline development process, a key hypothesis is that implementing integrated care management programs can improve health outcomes while containing costs.
According to the pilot study design, a total of 2000 community-dwelling older persons aged 60 and above at-risk of functional loss in Chaoyang District of Beijing are recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention group (n=500) and control group (n=1500).
Chaoyang is the most populated district in Beijing, with subdistricts that are urban, suburban and rural, well representing the city of Beijing. To identify potential participants who are at risk of functional loss, the pilot used ICOPE screening tools in the recruitment process, to screen for any losses in mobility, cognition, vitality, psychological health, vision and hearing.
Screening tools used are:
- Independence is measured by the activities of daily living (ADL) 14-questionnaire scale.
- Cognition is measured by mini-mental status examination (MMSE).
- Vitality or nutrition is measured by by mini-nutritional assessment- short form (MNA-SF) to assess the risk of malnutrition.
- Mobility is measured by short physical performance battery (SPPB).
- Psychological health is measured by geriatric depression scale-five items (GDS-5).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: ICOPEParticipants who were actively followed up during the study period with a personalized integrated care plan developed following the ICOPE screening and assessment, identified as "at-risk" for loss in intrinsic capacity. |
| Control Group | Active comparator | Other: Usual CarePariticpants who continued receiving usual care during the study period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Screened as positive for intrinsic capacity declines
- Decline in intrinsic capacity confirmed by in-depth assessment in any of the domains described as: MMSE < 27 (for cognition), SPPB ≤ 9 (for locomotion), MNA-SF <12 (for vitality we used nutrition as a proxy), GDS-5 ≥ 2 (for psychology we used depression as a proxy) or any vision impairment
- Signed form of consent and willingly participate in the pilot study
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Negative results in their intrinsic capacity decline screening
- Severe hearing problems as the study was conducted during COVID-19 pandemics period and relied on telecare or remote sessions of intervention
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ICOPEThe ICOPE approach with locally adapted care pathways was implemented by trained integrated care managers (ICMs) advised by multi-disciplinary teams, delivered in primary care settings | Other | Intervention Group |
| Usual CareParticipants in the Control Group would have their care plan after assessment and seek health and care services as usual without additional advice or support on implementing the care plan | Other | Control Group |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of implementing the ICOPE program in China
Time frame: 12 months
1. Sample size (to successfully recruit over 2,000 participants, 500 of whom were to be categorized in the intervention group) 2. Capacity building (at least 200 primary care providers to be fully trained and deployed in the pilot program) 3. Acceptance (reach more than 90% satisfaction with the pilot by both participants and providers).
5 secondary outcomes
Independence
Time frame: 6 months
Cognition
Time frame: 6 months
Vitality
Time frame: 6 months
Mobility
Time frame: 6 months
Psychological health
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jul 2023.
- Background: PubMed 36098317Tavassoli N, de Souto Barreto P, Berbon C, Mathieu C, de Kerimel J, Lafont C, Takeda C, Carrie I, Piau A, Jouffrey T, Andrieu S, Nourhashemi F, Beard JR, Soto Martin ME, Vellas B. Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Jun;3(6):e394-e404. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00097-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
- WHO's report on findings from implementing ICOPE pilots in different countriesLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Access to de-identified data of the China ICOPE Pilot (2020-2021) by other researchers is subject to the approval of an independent review committee and after signing a data access and a data use agreement.
Related trials for Aging
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
RecruitingPhase 2
Metformin as an add-on or Monotherapy in Treatment of Aging People With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Validation & Intervention Testing for Aging, Longevity and Healthspan
Aging, Functional Decline
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Obesity on Physical Abilities and Daily Living Activities in Elderly Adults
Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ninie Wang, MBA DrPH principal investigator
Pinetree Care Group
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ICOPE in people with Aging and Healthy Aging, run by Pinetree Health Technologies (Beijing) Co., Ltd. at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of implementing the ICOPE program in China (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05933798, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2023.