MigraineEVIREMIGNCT05947123
Real-life Study of the Efficacy of Management of Migraine Patients After Failure of 2 Prophylactic Treatments
An observational study of Migraine, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This is a real-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Migraine
- What is being tested?
- Patient health care observational follow up after 2 prophylactic tratments
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 127 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2023to 1 Mar 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with Migraine [International Headache Society (IHS) criteria 2013, revised 2018] with or without aura
Who may be able to join
- Patients with Migraine [International Headache Society (IHS) criteria 2013, revised 2018] with or without aura
- Monthly number of attacks ≥ 8 for at least 3 months
- Indication for prophylactic treatment
- For eptinezumab: resistance to at least 2 conventional disease-modifying therapies
- Agrees to use data for research purposes
Who cannot join
- Vascular history: myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina or coronary bypass surgery, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), Peripheral Arterial Disease of the Lower Limbs (PAD), uncontrolled hypertension
- Need for analgesics for a cause other than migraine
- Difficulty in understanding French language or cognitive impairment that compromises completion of self-questionnaires.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Real-life Study of the Efficacy of Management of Migraine Patients After Failure of 2 Prophylactic Treatments: a Retrospective Study
This is a real-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Patients included in the study will be followed up in consultations or day hospitals according to their usual care, and will be asked to complete the MIgraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test short-form (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale and Work and Personal Activities Impairment (WPAI) questionnaires at each visit.
Data describing their care will be extracted from computerized patient records.
- Conditions
- Migraine
- Being tested
- Patient health care observational follow up after 2 prophylactic tratments
- Keywords
- migraine, prophylactic treatment, real life
- Medical subject headings
- Migraine Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patient health care observational follow up after 2 prophylactic tratmentsBehavioural
Real-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Patients included in the study will be followed up in consultations or day hospitals according to their usual care, and will be asked to complete the MIDAS, HIT-6, PGIC, HAD and WPAI questionnaires at each visit. Data describing their care will be extracted from computerized patient records.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Headache Impact Test in patients with migraine at 12 months
Using HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test short-form) questionnaire which addresses six main domains affected by headaches, including pain, social functioning, role functioning, cognitive functioning, vitality and psychological stress. This survey is extremely useful for screening and monitoring how headaches affect patients in their day-to-day lives over time.
Each item is answered on a 5-point Likert scale (6 = never, 8 = rarely, 10 = sometimes, 11 = very often, 13 = always). The scoring of the HIT-6 was derived to approximate the total score obtained from a larger battery of items, using results from item response theory (IRT) [10]. The final score is obtained from simple summation of the six items.
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Secondary outcomes (10)
Headache-related disability in patients with migraine at 12 months
MIDAS scale (Migraine Disability Assessment) measures headache-related disability and improve doctor-patient communication about the functional consequences of migraine. The questionnaire was based on five disability questions that focus on lost time in three domains: schoolwork or work for pay; household work or chores; and family, social, and leisure activities.
This instrument is scored as follows: 5 to 10 indicates little or no disability, 10 to 20 indicates moderate disability, and higher than 20 denotes severe disability.
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Anxiety and Depression state evaluation in patients with migraine at 12 months
Using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) : is a 14-item measure designed to assess anxiety and depression symptoms in medical patients, with emphasis on reducing the impact of physical illness on the total score.
The depression items tend to focus on the anhedonic symptoms of depression. Items are rated on a 4-point severity scale.
The HADS produces two scales, one for anxiety (HADS-A) and one for depression (HADS-D), differentiating the two states. Scores of greater than or equal to 11 on either scale indicate a definitive case.
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Migraine occurence in patients with migraine at 12 months
Number of migraine days
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Crisis treatments in patients with migraine at 12 months
Number of crisis treatments taken
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Patient Global Impression of Change in patients with migraine at 12 months
Using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score: a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement.
Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Work and Personal Activities Impairment in patients with migraine at 12 months
Using Work and Personal Activities Impairment (WPAI) score : a well validated instrument to measure impairments in work and activities.
WPAI scores are based on 1-item (presenteeism, activitity impairment), 2-items (absenteeism) and multiple items (overall work productivity).
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Most Bothersome Symptom in patients with migraine at 12 months
Most Bothersome Symptom (MBS)
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Days off work at 12 months
Number of days off work
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Emergency room visits at 12 months
Number of emergency room visits
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Type of prophylactic treatment used at 12 months
Type of prophylactic treatment
Measured: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2023
- Study start1 Jun 2023
- Primary completion1 Mar 2024
- Study completion1 Mar 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MigraineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 127 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Xavier DUCROCQ, MD, Principal investigator, CHR Metz Thionville Hopital de Mercy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05947123
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-07Obs-CHRMT
- Acronym
- EVIREMIG
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Real-life Study of the Efficacy of Management of Migraine Patients After Failure of 2 Prophylactic Treatments: a Retrospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05947123
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EVIREMIG / 2023-07Obs-CHRMT
- Conditions
- Migraine
- Keywords
- migraine, prophylactic treatment, real life
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 127 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-ThionvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a real-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Patients included in the study will be followed up in consultations or day hospitals according to their usual care, and will be asked to complete the MIgraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test short-form (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale and Work and Personal Activities Impairment (WPAI) questionnaires at each visit.
Data describing their care will be extracted from computerized patient records.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with Migraine [International Headache Society (IHS) criteria 2013, revised 2018] with or without aura
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with Migraine [International Headache Society (IHS) criteria 2013, revised 2018] with or without aura
- Monthly number of attacks ≥ 8 for at least 3 months
- Indication for prophylactic treatment
- For eptinezumab: resistance to at least 2 conventional disease-modifying therapies
- Agrees to use data for research purposes
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Vascular history: myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina or coronary bypass surgery, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), Peripheral Arterial Disease of the Lower Limbs (PAD), uncontrolled hypertension
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patient health care observational follow up after 2 prophylactic tratmentsReal-life, observational, single-center cohort study to describe the efficacy of prophylactic treatment in patients after failure of at least 2 prophylactic treatments. Patients included in the study will be followed up in consultations or day hospitals according to their usual care, and will be asked to complete the MIDAS, HIT-6, PGIC, HAD and WPAI questionnaires at each visit. Data describing their care will be extracted from computerized patient records. | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Headache Impact Test in patients with migraine at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Using HIT-6 (Headache Impact Test short-form) questionnaire which addresses six main domains affected by headaches, including pain, social functioning, role functioning, cognitive functioning, vitality and psychological stress. This survey is extremely useful for screening and monitoring how headaches affect patients in their day-to-day lives over time. Each item is answered on a 5-point Likert scale (6 = never, 8 = rarely, 10 = sometimes, 11 = very often, 13 = always). The scoring of the HIT-6 was derived to approximate the total score obtained from a larger battery of items, using results from item response theory (IRT) [10]. The final score is obtained from simple summation of the six items.
10 secondary outcomes
Headache-related disability in patients with migraine at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Anxiety and Depression state evaluation in patients with migraine at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Migraine occurence in patients with migraine at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Crisis treatments in patients with migraine at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Patient Global Impression of Change in patients with migraine at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Work and Personal Activities Impairment in patients with migraine at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Most Bothersome Symptom in patients with migraine at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Days off work at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Emergency room visits at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Type of prophylactic treatment used at 12 months
Time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Migraine
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Glymphatic System in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
Clinical and Neurophysiological Effects of tDCS to Visual and Motor Cortex in Migraine
Migraine
Active, not recruiting
App-Based Migraine Treatment: The Health enSuite Study
Migraine, Migraine With Aura
Not yet recruiting
A Prospective Study of Rimegepant for Short-term Preventive Treatment of Night-shift-related Migraine in Healthcare Professionals
Migraine Disorders
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Xavier DUCROCQ, MD principal investigator
CHR Metz Thionville Hopital de Mercy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Migraine, run by Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Headache Impact Test in patients with migraine at 12 months (time frame: 12 months after prophylactic treatments). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2024.