Multiple MyelomaPASCA -MMNCT05947136
PASCA-MM Study. Impact of the PASCA (PArcours de Santé au Cours du CAncer) Program on Complications Associated With Multiple Myeloma and/or Its Treatments in the Context of a First Hematopoietic Stem Cell Autograft, in Adults Aged 18 to 70.
A study testing Interpretation of the results from the detection visit, Explaining detection results and referrals to the patient and Early medical care through the network in people with Multiple Myeloma and Complication, run by Centre Leon Berard at 6 sites in France.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, multicentre, phase III, randomised, controlled intervention study. Two groups of patients with equal numbers will be studied and each patient will be allocated to one of the two groups described below by randomisation (ratio 1:1). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma, Complication
- What is being tested?
- Interpretation of the results from the detection visit, Explaining detection results and referrals to the patient and Early medical care through the network
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 204 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 19 Jan 2024to 14 Sep 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years old and ≤ 70 years old.
- Patient treated in an investigation center.
- Symptomatic multiple myeloma eligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
- In complete response, complete response, very good complete response, or partial before HSCT.
- First induction-type treatment (Isa-KRD/dara-VRD/dara-VTD/VRD/VTD/dara-VRD), intensification therapy with melphalan, HSCT, consolidation, maintenance including at least one drug immunomodulator.
- ECOG performance status WHO ≤ 2.
Show all 9Show fewer
- No history or coexistence of other primary cancer apart from basal cell cancer cutaneous
- Able to understand, read and write French.
- Having signed and dated the informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Unable to be monitored for medical, social, family, geographical or psychological, throughout the duration of the study.
- Deprived of liberty by court or administrative decision.
- Not affiliated with a health insurance plan.
- Not having declared an attending physician.
- Not domiciled in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region or in the Saône-et-Loire department.
- Not available and/or not willing to participate in the project for the entire duration of the study.
- Pregnant women, breastfeeding women, people in emergency situations, people incapable of personally giving their consent including adults under guardianship
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
6 sites in 1 country
France6 sites, 6 recruiting
- Recruiting
CH Annecy Genevois
Épagny, 74370
Marie Lebouc, mlebouc@ch-annecygenevois.fr
Adrien CONTEJEAN
- Recruiting
CHU La Tronche
Grenoble, 38300
Marie Moreau, mmoreau2@chu-grenoble.fr
Clara Mariette
- Recruiting
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69373
Mauricette MICHALLET, MD, +3346998566358, mauricette.michallet@lyon.unicancer.fr
Amine BELHABRI
- Recruiting
CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE de MONTPELLIER
Montpellier, 34295
Aude Cavailles, aude.cavailles@chu-montpellier.fr
Laure VINCENT
- Recruiting
CHU de St-Etienne
Saint-Etienne
Coralie Durieux, Coralie.Durieux@chu-st-etienne.fr
Manon Sapet
- Recruiting
Le Centre Hôpitaux Nord-Ouest Villefranche-sur-Saône
Villefranche-sur-Saône, 69655
Manon Collaudin, MCollaudin@hno.fr
Jean-François Brantus
About this study
This is a prospective, multicentre, phase III, randomised, controlled intervention study.
Two groups of patients with equal numbers will be studied and each patient will be allocated to one of the two groups described below by randomisation (ratio 1:1).
Read more
Each patient will be allocated to one of the two groups described below by randomisation (ratio 1:1).
- PASCA interventional group
For both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective), a specific and proactive referral will be made systematically after each screening assessment, depending on the level of risk, estimated according to decision trees (management guide) and through the dedicated PASCA network of healthcare professionals, in order to initiate early treatment and follow-up if necessary.
- Control group
For the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) as well as for the 13 complications (secondary objective): all the data from each identification check-up will be sent to the onco-haematological transmitted to the referring onco-haematologists, so that they can initiate their own management.
=> For all patients, regardless of group
All patients will receive four screening assessments covering the 7 complications of interest and 13 secondary complications:
- Visit No.1 (T1), 1-2 months after the autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT), corresponding to the patient's visit to his or her Multiple Myeloma (MM) monitoring consultation and/or the start of his or her consolidation treatment.
- Visit No.2 (T2), 4 months after aHSCT, corresponding to a patient's visit for the end of consolidation treatment;
- Visit No.3 (T3), 14 months after the last aHSCT, corresponding to a visit by the patient during his or her maintenance treatment;
- Visit No.4 (T4), 24 months after the last aHSCT, corresponding to a visit by the patient for a MM monitoring consultation.
Read the detailed description
After each screening visit, all patients randomised to the intervention group will receive the PASCA intervention:
- An interpretation of the results of the screening tests concerning
- the 7 complications of interest assessed at T1, T2, T3 and T4 ;
- the 13 secondary complications assessed at T1, T3 and T4. This interpretation will be based on decision trees (1 tree/complication) to guide investigators in their decision-making and to standardise orientations;
- Explanation of results and referrals to the patient using plain language, by a phone call, ;
- Early, proactive care via a dedicated network of healthcare professionals.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma, Complication
- Being tested
- Interpretation of the results from the detection visit, Explaining detection results and referrals to the patient, Early medical care through the network, Transmission of results from each detection visit to the referring onco-haematologists - Control Group
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Complications, Detection, Intervention, Autologous stem cell transplant, Randomized controlled trials
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Interpretation of the results from the detection visitBehavioural
- An interpretation of the results of the detection tests concerning
- the 7 complications of interest assessed at T1, T2, T3 and T4 ;
- the 13 secondary complications assessed at T1, T3 and T4. This interpretation will be based on decision trees (1 tree/complication) to guide investigators in their decision-making and to standardise orientations;
Explaining detection results and referrals to the patientBehavioural
Explanation of results and directions to the patient using plain language;The aims of this call are as follows:
- Clearly explain the results of the detection visit and the action to be taken for each referral;
- Evaluate the help to be given to the patient. This help will consist of making bookings with a healthcare professional in the PASCA network;
- Reassure patients about their results, but also make them aware of the importance of taking action to improve or prevent the onset of complications.
Early medical care through the networkBehavioural
Early, proactive medical care through a network of dedicated healthcare professionals.
Transmission of results from each detection visit to the referring onco-haematologists - Control GroupBehavioural
For both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective): all the data from each detection visit will be sent to the referring onco-haematologists, so that they can initiate their own management.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | For both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective), specific and proactive referrals will be made systematically after each detection visit according to the level of risk, estimated on the basis of decision trees (management guide) and via the dedicated PASCA network of healthcare professionals, to initiate early treatment and follow-up where necessary. Receives: Behavioral: Interpretation of the results from the detection visit; Behavioral: Explaining detection results and referrals to the patient; Behavioral: Early medical care through the network |
| Control group | Active comparator | For both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective): all the data from each detection visit will be sent to the referring forwarded to the referring onco-haematologists, so that they can initiate their own management. Receives: Behavioral: Transmission of results from each detection visit to the referring onco-haematologists - Control Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change from Baseline high blood pressure
blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg measured in the investigating center and persisting over time
Measured: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline chronic kidney failure incidence at 24 months
diagnosed on the basis of 2 blood tests carried out within 3 months with the same technique showing either:
- a decrease in GFR to < 60ml/min/1.73m2, estimated from serum creatinine using the CKD-EPI equation (Chronic Kidney Disease EPIdemiology collaboration, Levey, 2009),
- positive proteinuria or albuminuria (albuminuria/creatinine ratio),
- haematuria with a GR > 10/mm3 or 10,000/ml (after eliminating a urological cause),
- leucocyturia with a WBC >10/mm3 or 10,000/ml (in the absence of infection),
- a morphological abnormality on renal ultrasound: size asymmetry, bumpy contours, small kidneys or large polycystic kidneys, nephrocalcinosis, cyst.
The evolutionary character corresponds to one of the following situations:
- Annual decline in GFR ≥ 5 ml/min/1.73 m²/year: GFR year n - GFR year n+1
- Presence of albuminuria,
- Poorly controlled arterial hypertension
Measured: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline chronic pain incidence at 60 months
pain felt for more than 3 months by the patient with an intensity on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≥ 3
Measured: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline sexual disorders incidence at 24 months
at least one perceived problem among the following:
- disorders of desire,
- arousal/erection disorders in men,
- arousal disorders (insufficiency) in women,
- Orgasm disorders in women
Measured: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline osteoporosis incidence at 24 months
T-score evaluated by osteodensitometry, on the lumbar spine and upper end of the femur
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline chronic fatigue incidence at 24 months
Questionnaire "MFI-20" (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory)
Measured: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline severe anxiety disorder incidence at 24 months
Questionnaire "HADS-D" (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale)
Measured: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change from Baseline depressive events incidence at 24 months
Defined by at least two main depressive symptoms, associated with at least two symptoms additional information, according to the 2017 HAS recommendation "Characterized depressive episode in adults
: care in first resort".
Measured: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline physical deconditioning incidence at 24 months
Defined by at least two tests among the 6 min Walk Test (TDM6), Handgrip-test, 60s Sit-to-stand, Flamingo test, with usual values below the norms defined by their authors, according to age and sex
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline cognitive problems incidence at 24 months
Positive score on at least one of the sub-dimensions of the Functional questionnaire Cancer Therapy Assessment - Cognitive Function (FACT-COG)
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline hypogonadism incidence at 24 months
Presence of clinical signs as defined by the International Society for Sexual Medicine
A value below the lower limit on at least one of the following blood assay:
- level of total testosterone
- level of bioavailable testosterone
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline obesity incidence at 24 months
BMI value:
- [25-30[ kg/m2 with a waist circumference above the norm (≥ 94cm for men or ≥ 80cm for women)
- ≥ 30 kg/m2
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline hypothyroidism incidence at 24 months
- level of thyroid-stimulating hormone
- level of total thyroxine
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline dyslipidemias incidence at 24 months
hypercholesterolemia (LDL) ≥ 1.6 g/L estimated by the Friedewald formula and/or a hypertriglyceridemia ≥ 4 g/L
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline Heart failure markers incidence at 24 months
NT-proBNP and/or troponin I level above the threshold values.
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline Atrial fibrillation incidence at 24 months
equivocal electrocardiogram, interpreted by an experienced physician
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline of respiratory failure markers incidence at 24 months
FVC, FVC, FEV1, FEF25-75, FEF50, FEF25 (established by spirometric test) ≤ 80% of the predicted values (abacus on age, sex, height and origin ethnic)
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline return to work issues incidence at 24 months
Diagnosed by a social worker
Measured: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline of Lifestyle risk factors ( tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis) incidence at 24 months
consumption :
- smoking and/or active cannabis
- alcohols higher than the latest recommendations
Measured: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from baseline Myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute leukemia incidence at 24 months
confirmed by the reference diagnosis
Measured: month 4, month 14 and month 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2023
- Study start19 Jan 2024
- Primary completion14 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion14 Sep 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Leon BerardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon Berard
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mauricette MICHALLET, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Leon Berard
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05947136
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PASCA-MM (ET22000285)
- Acronym
- PASCA -MM
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2023
- Last updated
- 11 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PASCA-MM Study. Impact of the PASCA (PArcours de Santé au Cours du CAncer) Program on Complications Associated With Multiple Myeloma and/or Its Treatments in the Context of a First Hematopoietic Stem Cell Autograft, in Adults Aged 18 to 70.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05947136
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PASCA -MM / PASCA-MM (ET22000285)
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma, Complication
- Keywords
- Multiple Myeloma, Complications, Detection, Intervention, Autologous stem cell transplant, Randomized controlled trials
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 204 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon BerardUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute, France
- Study start
- 19 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 14 Sep 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, multicentre, phase III, randomised, controlled intervention study.
Two groups of patients with equal numbers will be studied and each patient will be allocated to one of the two groups described below by randomisation (ratio 1:1).
Each patient will be allocated to one of the two groups described below by randomisation (ratio 1:1).
- PASCA interventional group
For both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective), a specific and proactive referral will be made systematically after each screening assessment, depending on the level of risk, estimated according to decision trees (management guide) and through the dedicated PASCA network of healthcare professionals, in order to initiate early treatment and follow-up if necessary.
- Control group
For the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) as well as for the 13 complications (secondary objective): all the data from each identification check-up will be sent to the onco-haematological transmitted to the referring onco-haematologists, so that they can initiate their own management.
=> For all patients, regardless of group
All patients will receive four screening assessments covering the 7 complications of interest and 13 secondary complications:
- Visit No.1 (T1), 1-2 months after the autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT), corresponding to the patient's visit to his or her Multiple Myeloma (MM) monitoring consultation and/or the start of his or her consolidation treatment.
- Visit No.2 (T2), 4 months after aHSCT, corresponding to a patient's visit for the end of consolidation treatment;
- Visit No.3 (T3), 14 months after the last aHSCT, corresponding to a visit by the patient during his or her maintenance treatment;
- Visit No.4 (T4), 24 months after the last aHSCT, corresponding to a visit by the patient for a MM monitoring consultation.
Detailed description
After each screening visit, all patients randomised to the intervention group will receive the PASCA intervention:
- An interpretation of the results of the screening tests concerning
- the 7 complications of interest assessed at T1, T2, T3 and T4 ;
- the 13 secondary complications assessed at T1, T3 and T4. This interpretation will be based on decision trees (1 tree/complication) to guide investigators in their decision-making and to standardise orientations;
- Explanation of results and referrals to the patient using plain language, by a phone call, ;
- Early, proactive care via a dedicated network of healthcare professionals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Interpretation of the results from the detection visit, Behavioral: Explaining detection results and referrals to the patient, Behavioral: Early medical care through the networkFor both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective), specific and proactive referrals will be made systematically after each detection visit according to the level of risk, estimated on the basis of decision trees (management guide) and via the dedicated PASCA network of healthcare professionals, to initiate early treatment and follow-up where necessary. |
| Control group | Active comparator | Behavioral: Transmission of results from each detection visit to the referring onco-haematologists - Control GroupFor both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective): all the data from each detection visit will be sent to the referring forwarded to the referring onco-haematologists, so that they can initiate their own management. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years old and ≤ 70 years old.
- Patient treated in an investigation center.
- Symptomatic multiple myeloma eligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
- In complete response, complete response, very good complete response, or partial before HSCT.
- First induction-type treatment (Isa-KRD/dara-VRD/dara-VTD/VRD/VTD/dara-VRD), intensification therapy with melphalan, HSCT, consolidation, maintenance including at least one drug immunomodulator.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Unable to be monitored for medical, social, family, geographical or psychological, throughout the duration of the study.
- Deprived of liberty by court or administrative decision.
- Not affiliated with a health insurance plan.
- Not having declared an attending physician.
- Not domiciled in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region or in the Saône-et-Loire department.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Interpretation of the results from the detection visit- An interpretation of the results of the detection tests concerning * the 7 complications of interest assessed at T1, T2, T3 and T4 ; * the 13 secondary complications assessed at T1, T3 and T4. This interpretation will be based on decision trees (1 tree/complication) to guide investigators in their decision-making and to standardise orientations; | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| Explaining detection results and referrals to the patientExplanation of results and directions to the patient using plain language;The aims of this call are as follows: * Clearly explain the results of the detection visit and the action to be taken for each referral; * Evaluate the help to be given to the patient. This help will consist of making bookings with a healthcare professional in the PASCA network; * Reassure patients about their results, but also make them aware of the importance of taking action to improve or prevent the onset of complications. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| Early medical care through the networkEarly, proactive medical care through a network of dedicated healthcare professionals. | Behavioural | Intervention group |
| Transmission of results from each detection visit to the referring onco-haematologists - Control GroupFor both the 7 complications of interest (primary objective) and the 13 secondary complications (secondary objective): all the data from each detection visit will be sent to the referring onco-haematologists, so that they can initiate their own management. | Behavioural | Control group |
Primary outcome
change from Baseline high blood pressure
Time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg measured in the investigating center and persisting over time
Change from Baseline chronic kidney failure incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
diagnosed on the basis of 2 blood tests carried out within 3 months with the same technique showing either: * a decrease in GFR to < 60ml/min/1.73m2, estimated from serum creatinine using the CKD-EPI equation (Chronic Kidney Disease EPIdemiology collaboration, Levey, 2009), * positive proteinuria or albuminuria (albuminuria/creatinine ratio), * haematuria with a GR > 10/mm3 or 10,000/ml (after eliminating a urological cause), * leucocyturia with a WBC >10/mm3 or 10,000/ml (in the absence of infection), * a morphological abnormality on renal ultrasound: size asymmetry, bumpy contours, small kidneys or large polycystic kidneys, nephrocalcinosis, cyst. The evolutionary character corresponds to one of the following situations: * Annual decline in GFR ≥ 5 ml/min/1.73 m²/year: GFR year n - GFR year n+1 * Presence of albuminuria, * Poorly controlled arterial hypertension
Change from Baseline chronic pain incidence at 60 months
Time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
pain felt for more than 3 months by the patient with an intensity on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≥ 3
Change from Baseline sexual disorders incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
at least one perceived problem among the following: * disorders of desire, * arousal/erection disorders in men, * arousal disorders (insufficiency) in women, * Orgasm disorders in women
Change from Baseline osteoporosis incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
T-score evaluated by osteodensitometry, on the lumbar spine and upper end of the femur
Change from Baseline chronic fatigue incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Questionnaire "MFI-20" (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory)
Change from Baseline severe anxiety disorder incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Questionnaire "HADS-D" (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale)
13 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline depressive events incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline physical deconditioning incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline cognitive problems incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline hypogonadism incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline obesity incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline hypothyroidism incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline dyslipidemias incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline Heart failure markers incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline Atrial fibrillation incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline of respiratory failure markers incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline return to work issues incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 14 and month 24
Change from Baseline of Lifestyle risk factors ( tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis) incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24
Change from baseline Myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute leukemia incidence at 24 months
Time frame: month 4, month 14 and month 24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jun 2026.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mauricette MICHALLET, PhD, MD principal investigator
Centre Leon Berard
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interpretation of the results from the detection visit, Explaining detection results and referrals to the patient and Early medical care through the network in people with Multiple Myeloma and Complication, run by Centre Leon Berard at 6 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Romain BUONO, PharmaD, MPH (+33469856358, romain.buono@lyon.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change from Baseline high blood pressure (time frame: month 2, month 4, month 14 and month 24). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2026.