Primary Connections for Youth and Families

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

• Ages 12 to 17 years
• All sexes
• Healthy volunteers accepted
• Child

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

About this study

Official title: Adolescent-Only SBI Versus Family-Based SBI in Primary Care for Adolescent Alcohol Use

Conditions

Substance Use

Being tested

Standard Screening, Standard Psychoeducation, Standard Brief Negotiated Interview (BNI), Standard Referral to Treatment (RT), Family Screening

Keywords

adolescent substance use, pediatric primary care, screening, brief intervention, referral to treatment, family-based

Medical subject headings

Substance-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

• Standard ScreeningBehavioural

  All consented youth age 12-17 years complete a patient-facing, well-validated digital screening tool, the CRAFFT (Knight et al., 2003), which assesses number of days during the past year, and then the past 3 months, during which various formulations of AOD were used. If youth report 0 days of AOD use, the tool asks whether they have ridden in a car whose driver was intoxicated; if this response is negative, they are categorized Low Risk. If youth report > 0 days of AOD use, the tool asks five additional questions assessing use risk and consequences; also, youth who report nicotine use in the past 30 days complete a nicotine dependence checklist (DiFranza et al., 2002). Screen data are then combined to sort youth into three risk categories: Riding Risk Only (no reported AOD use but indicated rode in car driven by intoxicated person), Distant Use (reported AOD use in past year but not past 3 months), or Recent Use (reported AOD use in past 3 months).

• Standard PsychoeducationBehavioural

  In the wait area, youth receive a tablet-delivered brief digital AOD education tutorial that includes advice to abstain from or reduce AOD use. The tutorial focuses on adolescent AOD prevalence rates and related behavioral symptoms; AOD use neurobiology and its relation to adolescent health; and common AOD impacts on developmental milestones (see Meredith et al., 2021). Psychoeducation for AOD has shown positive effects as both a universal and selective prevention strategy (Bröning et al., 2021; Das et al., 2016).

• Standard Brief Negotiated Interview (BNI)Behavioural

  In primary care (PC) office, youth and providers together complete a tablet-supported brief negotiated interview (BNI; see Beaton et al., 2016). The BNI is informed by AOD use data gathered during youth screening (O'Grady et al., 2015). The BNI focuses on (a) education about AOD disorders, including youth and family factors that impact AOD use; (b) user-tailored feedback comparing the given youth's AOD use and related problems to national norms, along with information on neurobiological effects and developmental impacts of frequent use (Harris et al., 2012); (c) motivational tools (e.g., reduction readiness rulers) and decisional balance exercises (weighing positive versus negative personal impacts of AOD use) tailored to the youth's use levels (Slavet et al., 2006; King et al., 2009); and (d) AOD reduction goal-setting interventions tailored to the youth's readiness to change AOD use (Walton et al., 2013).

• Standard Referral to Treatment (RT)Behavioural

  In primary care (PC) offices providers and youth discuss the value of attending counseling services to address AOD-related problems (Cucciare et al., 2015); counseling referral links that the PC site curates with local services; and the value of youth talking directly with caregivers about their AOD involvement as a first step toward support-seeking and behavior change (Gayes \& Steele, 2014). Providers directly recommend AOD counseling and facilitate a first appointment for youth who agree.

• Family ScreeningBehavioural

  Screening procedures incorporate procedures for youth described for Standard Screening. They also incorporate two sources of caregiver-report data. First is an estimate of youth AOD use based on the Screening 2 Brief Intervention tool (Levy et al., 2016). Second is a 9-item checklist of youth mental health (MH) problems (Achenbach \& Rescorla, 2001). If both youth and caregiver report no AOD use or clinical-level MH problem, the family is categorized Low Risk. Otherwise, screen data are combined to sort families into three risk categories: Hidden SU Risk (youth reports AOD use in past year; caregiver reports no youth AOD use in past year), Named MH Risk (caregiver reports no youth AOD use in past year; caregiver reports clinical-level score for at least one youth MH domain), Named SU Risk (caregiver reports youth AOD use in past year).

• Family PsychoeducationBehavioural

  Youth proceed as indicated in the SBIRT-A-Standard condition based on youth screen data. In the wait area, caregivers receive a tablet-delivered parenting tutorial that covers two AOD risk domains: education about adolescent AOD including prevalence rates, related behavior problems, neurobiological and health effects, and impacts on developmental milestones; and education and video modeling about parenting strategies that reduce or moderate AOD risk, including positive communication, fair and consistent discipline, and non-judgmental conversations about AOD use (Bo et al., 2018). Positive parenting education has been shown effective as a universal and selective prevention strategy in parent-focused AOD prevention trials (Kuntsche \& Kuntshce, 2016; Ladis et al., 2019; Van Ryzin et al., 2017). Tutorials are tailored for each risk category.

• Family Brief Negotiated Interview (BNI)Behavioural

  Youth proceed as indicated in the SBIRT-A-Standard condition based on youth screen data. In primary care (PC) offices, caregivers and providers together complete a tablet-supported parenting BNI informed by data from the caregiver screen only that parallels the youth BNI (e.g., AOD education, developmental risks) and also includes motivation, modeling, and goal-setting on positive parenting (e.g., non-judgmental conversations; see above) and effective parent-youth communication about AOD use (Carver et al., 2017).

• Family Facilitated Conversation (FC) & Referral to Treatment (RT)Behavioural

  In PC offices, providers meet separately with youth and caregivers to discuss the value of talking directly with the other family member about AOD risk while practicing positive communication strategies. Whenever both youth and caregiver agree to talk together, providers convene a brief facilitated conversation about AOD risk. In this conversation providers (a) emphasize that a positive youth-caregiver relationship is the strongest protective factor for youth development and (b) follow guidelines for brief triadic risk-reduction interventions focused on positive family communication about AOD risk (Guilamo-Ramos et al., 2020). When indicated, providers directly recommend AOD counseling and facilitate a first appointment for families who agree.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

1. Change in Assessment of Liability and Exposure to Substance use and Antisocial Behavior (ALEXSA; Ridenour et al., 2009)

   Youth report audio-assisted self-interview that measures frequency of alcohol and other drug use. This study will use 6 items. The first three items assess whether youth have ever used alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana (yes/no). If use of a substance is reported, a follow-up question is presented regarding frequency of use e.g., "How often do you [use tobacco/drink alcohol/ use marijuana] right now?" with response options of 0 = never to 5 = every day for each substance. For each substance, scores range from 0 to 5 with higher scores indicate more frequent use.

   Measured: Initial and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up

2. Change in Youth Risk Index (ALEXSA; Ridenour et al., 2009)

   Youth and caregiver report measure assessing risk factors associated with youth alcohol and other drug use. The YRI contains 23 items from the ALEXSA measuring risk factors associated with youth substance use including anger coping, impulsivity, distractibility, disinhibition, peer conduct problems, and susceptibility to peer pressure. 17 items are rated on a 4-point likert scale from 0 to 3 and 6 items are measured on a 6-point scale from 0 to 5+. Total score ranges from 0 to 81 with higher scores indicating more risk factors.

   Measured: Initial and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up

3. Change in Brief Problem Monitor (BPM; Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001)

   A 19-item youth and caregiver report component of the well-validated Achenbach youth behavior problem assessment system that yields normed scores with clinical cut levels for three problem domains: internalizing (anxiety, depression, somatic complaints), externalizing (aggression, conduct problems), inattention/impulsivity. Items are rated on a 3-point scale from 0 = never to 2 = often. Total score ranges from 0 to 38 with higher scores representing more problems.

   Measured: Initial and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up

4. Change in Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL 4.0; Children's Hospital and Health Center, San Diego, CA)

   Youth and caregiver report measure assessing youth functioning in different domains. This study will use the Social and School scales. Each scale has 5 items and items are scored on a 5-point scale from 0 = never a problem to 4 = almost always a problem. Some items are reversed scored such that each scale ranges from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

   Measured: Initial and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up

5. Change in Services Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA; Stiffman et al., 2000)

   Caregiver report measure assessing youth's past and current use of inpatient, outpatient, and school-based behavioral health services. Items are dichotomous (yes/no) and the scale ranges from 0 (no services) to 3 (3 types of services) for past and current use such that higher numbers indicate more services.

   Measured: Initial and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up

6. Change in Parent-Teen Alcohol and Other Drug Use Communication Frequency (Koning et al., 2014)

   6-item youth and caregiver report measure assessing frequency of communication about key alcohol and other drug use issues. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 0 = never to 4 = very often. Total score ranges from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater communication frequency.

   Measured: Initial and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up

7. Change in Parent-Teen Alcohol and Other Drug Use Communication Quality (Spijkerman et al., 2008)

   6-item youth and caregiver report measure assessing quality of communication about key alcohol and other drug use issues. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 0 = never to 4 = very often. Total score ranges from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating greater communication quality.

   Measured: Initial and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

1. First posted27 Jul 2023
2. Study start1 Mar 2024
3. Primary completionNov 2028 (estimated)
4. Study completionDec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

• Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
• Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
• Other trials for Substance UseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
• What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.