First-Episode PsychosisEarly Phase 1NCT05967195
Trial to Increase FEP Attendance
A Early Phase 1 study testing Financial Incentive and Text-Messages in people with First-Episode Psychosis, run by University of Pennsylvania at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) are at high-risk for several poor functional and clinical outcomes, including suicide. Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) is a multidisciplinary, team-based intervention known to improve such outcomes, including suicide risk. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- First-Episode Psychosis
- What is being tested?
- Financial Incentive and Text-Messages
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2025to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- For all participants, age ≥ 18 years old.
- For intervention trial and patient feasibility and acceptability measurement: Patients with first-episode psychosis, enrolled in Coordinated Specialty Care at the Psychosis Education, Assessment, Care and Empowerment (PEACE) clinic and Psychosis Evaluation and Recovery Center (PERC).
- For clinician feasibility and acceptability measurement at intervention sites: Clinicians working at PEACE and PERC where the intervention will be piloted.
- For clinician implementation facilitator and barrier assessment at other Connection LHS sites to assess for scalability: Clinicians in Connection LHS who work at sites other than PEACE and PERC.Participants must sign the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- For intervention trial and patient feasibility and acceptability measurement: Expectation of leaving coordinated specialty care programing within 6 months (which will exclude all of the PI's patient panel) and/or intellectual disability of sufficient degree that the patient's primary psychiatrist expects to compromise capacity to consent to this research and/or psychosis secondary to another medical condition (which may not share the same motivational features that are otherwise understood about the primary psychiatric conditions with psychosis).
- For clinician feasibility and acceptability measurement at intervention sites: Study investigators who work at these clinics will be excluded from participation in the feasibility and acceptability study component given their role in the trial planning and execution.
- For clinician implementation facilitator and barrier assessment at other Connection LHS sites to assess for scalability: none.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
PEACE Program, Horizon House, Inc.
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19123
University of Pennsylvania
Philadephia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (ENCOMPASS Program)
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27608
About this study
Official title: Financial Incentives to Increase Treatment Attendance in First-Episode Psychosis Care: A Non-Randomized, Adaptive Pilot Study
Individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) are at high-risk for several poor functional and clinical outcomes, including suicide. Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) is a multidisciplinary, team-based intervention known to improve such outcomes, including suicide risk. However, 30-50% of patients disengage from CSC, thereby limiting its impact. This pilot study will develop and test feasibility of a behavioral change program that uses moderate financial incentives to encourage treatment engagement in 2 CSC programs. A single-arm of 80 patient-participants at these two clinics will be recruited to assess feasibility and acceptability from patient perspectives. Additionally,15 clinicians at these two clinics will be recruited to assess feasibility and acceptability from clinician perspectives, and 50 clinicians from peer clinics not involved in the intervention will be recruited to assess scalability of the intervention. The trial will feature an three-month period for recruitment and baseline data collection and will subsequently feature three intervention periods (3 months each) where modifications to the interventions will be tested (each informed by the feasibility and acceptability findings of the prior period) with the aim of sequentially improving it.
- Conditions
- First-Episode Psychosis
- Being tested
- Financial Incentive and Text-Messages
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Financial Incentive and Text-MessagesBehavioural
Patient-participants will receive modest financial incentive for attending therapy or medication management appointments combined with text messages to encourage attendance at these appointments. Text messages will be informed by principles of behavioral economics. Maximum incentive = $50/month if all appointments attended. Incentives will be pro-rated by percentage of appointments attended. Pro-rating strategies (e.g., uniform amount per appointment, escalating [aka, 'back-loaded'], or decreasing [aka 'frontloaded'] will be sequentially changed based on acceptability and other intervention-related data gathered from participants during the trial.
Clinician-participants will not receive any intervention, but will receive surveys and interviews to assess their perceptions about the optimization, acceptability, scalability, and other implementation barriers/facilitators for the intervention.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM)
The AIM is a 4-item scale measuring acceptability. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater acceptability. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Measured: Change at 8 months
Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM)
The AIM is a 4-item scale measuring acceptability. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater acceptability. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Measured: Change at 6 months
Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM)
The AIM is a 4-item scale measuring acceptability. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater acceptability. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Measured: Change at 4 months
Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM)
The FIM is a 4-item scale measuring feasibility. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater feasibility. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Measured: Change at 8 months
Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM)
The FIM is a 4-item scale measuring feasibility. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater feasibility. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Measured: Change at 6 months
Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM)
The FIM is a 4-item scale measuring feasibility. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater feasibility. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Measured: Change at 4 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Implementation Survey Response
Implementation survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from implementation perspective.
Measured: Change at 8 months
Implementation Survey Response
Implementation survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from implementation perspective.
Measured: Change at 6 months
Implementation Survey Response
Implementation survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from implementation perspective.
Measured: Change at 4 months
Motivation Survey Response
Motivation survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from motivation perspective.
Measured: Change at 8 months
Motivation Survey Response
Motivation survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from motivation perspective.
Measured: Change at 6 months
Motivation Survey Response
Motivation survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from motivation perspective.
Measured: Change at 4 months
Ethical Concern Survey Response
Ethical concern survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from ethical acceptability perspective.
Measured: Change at 8 months
Ethical Concern Survey Response
Ethical concern survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from ethical acceptability perspective.
Measured: Change at 6 months
Ethical Concern Survey Response
Ethical concern survey. Results will be used to optimize intervention from ethical acceptability perspective.
Measured: Change at 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2023
- Study start1 Feb 2025
- Primary completion18 Dec 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for First-Episode PsychosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PennsylvaniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pennsylvania
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Penn Innovation in Suicide Prevention for Implementation Research (INSPIRE) Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, William Smith, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05967195
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-03
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Jun 2023
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Financial Incentives to Increase Treatment Attendance in First-Episode Psychosis Care: A Non-Randomized, Adaptive Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT05967195
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023-03
- Conditions
- First-Episode Psychosis
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PennsylvaniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Penn Innovation in Suicide Prevention for Implementation Research (INSPIRE) Center
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP) are at high-risk for several poor functional and clinical outcomes, including suicide. Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) is a multidisciplinary, team-based intervention known to improve such outcomes, including suicide risk. However, 30-50% of patients disengage from CSC, thereby limiting its impact. This pilot study will develop and test feasibility of a behavioral change program that uses moderate financial incentives to encourage treatment engagement in 2 CSC programs. A single-arm of 80 patient-participants at these two clinics will be recruited to assess feasibility and acceptability from patient perspectives. Additionally,15 clinicians at these two clinics will be recruited to assess feasibility and acceptability from clinician perspectives, and 50 clinicians from peer clinics not involved in the intervention will be recruited to assess scalability of the intervention. The trial will feature an three-month period for recruitment and baseline data collection and will subsequently feature three intervention periods (3 months each) where modifications to the interventions will be tested (each informed by the feasibility and acceptability findings of the prior period) with the aim of sequentially improving it.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- For all participants, age ≥ 18 years old.
- For intervention trial and patient feasibility and acceptability measurement: Patients with first-episode psychosis, enrolled in Coordinated Specialty Care at the Psychosis Education, Assessment, Care and Empowerment (PEACE) clinic and Psychosis Evaluation and Recovery Center (PERC).
- For clinician feasibility and acceptability measurement at intervention sites: Clinicians working at PEACE and PERC where the intervention will be piloted.
- For clinician implementation facilitator and barrier assessment at other Connection LHS sites to assess for scalability: Clinicians in Connection LHS who work at sites other than PEACE and PERC.Participants must sign the informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- For intervention trial and patient feasibility and acceptability measurement: Expectation of leaving coordinated specialty care programing within 6 months (which will exclude all of the PI's patient panel) and/or intellectual disability of sufficient degree that the patient's primary psychiatrist expects to compromise capacity to consent to this research and/or psychosis secondary to another medical condition (which may not share the same motivational features that are otherwise understood about the primary psychiatric conditions with psychosis).
- For clinician feasibility and acceptability measurement at intervention sites: Study investigators who work at these clinics will be excluded from participation in the feasibility and acceptability study component given their role in the trial planning and execution.
- For clinician implementation facilitator and barrier assessment at other Connection LHS sites to assess for scalability: none.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Incentive and Text-MessagesPatient-participants will receive modest financial incentive for attending therapy or medication management appointments combined with text messages to encourage attendance at these appointments. Text messages will be informed by principles of behavioral economics. Maximum incentive = $50/month if all appointments attended. Incentives will be pro-rated by percentage of appointments attended. Pro-rating strategies (e.g., uniform amount per appointment, escalating [aka, 'back-loaded'], or decreasing [aka 'frontloaded'] will be sequentially changed based on acceptability and other intervention-related data gathered from participants during the trial. Clinician-participants will not receive any intervention, but will receive surveys and interviews to assess their perceptions about the optimization, acceptability, scalability, and other implementation barriers/facilitators for the intervention. | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM)
Time frame: Change at 8 months
The AIM is a 4-item scale measuring acceptability. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater acceptability. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM)
Time frame: Change at 6 months
The AIM is a 4-item scale measuring acceptability. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater acceptability. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM)
Time frame: Change at 4 months
The AIM is a 4-item scale measuring acceptability. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater acceptability. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM)
Time frame: Change at 8 months
The FIM is a 4-item scale measuring feasibility. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater feasibility. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM)
Time frame: Change at 6 months
The FIM is a 4-item scale measuring feasibility. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater feasibility. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
Feasibility of intervention measure (FIM)
Time frame: Change at 4 months
The FIM is a 4-item scale measuring feasibility. Each item is scored 1-5 with 5 indicating greater feasibility. Minimum score is 4; maximum is 20.
9 secondary outcomes
Implementation Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 8 months
Implementation Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 6 months
Implementation Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 4 months
Motivation Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 8 months
Motivation Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 6 months
Motivation Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 4 months
Ethical Concern Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 8 months
Ethical Concern Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 6 months
Ethical Concern Survey Response
Time frame: Change at 4 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2026.
Related trials for First-Episode Psychosis
RecruitingObservational study
The ATP Project (Antipsychotic-TEP-Psychosis)
First Episose Psychosis, Metabolic Disease
Recruiting
French Minds Cohort: a French Longitudinal and Multimodal Cohort of Patients With Major Mood Disorders, Psychotic Disorders, Autism Spectrum Disorders, and Healthy Controls
Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder, First Episode Psychosis (FEP)
Recruiting
On Track for Wellness (OTW) Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial
Sleep, Physical Activity
RecruitingPhase 3
Stratification and Treatment in Early Psychosis Study - ENHANCE
Psychosis, First Episode Psychosis
RecruitingObservational study
Early Identification of Patients Presenting a First Psychotic Episode, Non Answering to First Line Support Strategies
Schizophrenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Financial Incentive and Text-Messages in people with First-Episode Psychosis, run by University of Pennsylvania at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of intervention measure (AIM) (time frame: Change at 8 months). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2026.