AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery CalcificationSCALPONCT05973994

Shockwave Induced Attenuation of Calcified Plaques Quantified With OCT

An observational study of Coronary Artery Calcification, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this observational, prospective, multicenter study is to explore local action of coronary calcium fragmentation exerted by endovascular lithotripsy by images acquired with OCT, in patients with coronary artery calcifications responsible for significant stenosis, candidate to PCI. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Calcification
What is being tested?
intravascular lithotripsy with Shockwave coronary system
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
21 Feb 2022to 30 Jun 2025
How long will I take part?
6 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients in the Catheterization Laboratory that undergo coronary angiography, are potentially selected.

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with native coronary artery disease (including stable or unstable angina and silent ischemia) suitable for PCI
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥35% as measured prior to enrollment
  • eGFR ≥45 ml/min (Cockroft-Gault, MDRD)
  • Troponin must be less than or equal to the upper limit of lab normal value within 24 hours prior to the procedure or if troponin is elevated, concomitant CK must be normal
  • Ability to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy (i.e. aspirin and clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor) for at least 6 months (for patient not on oral anticoagulation) and single antiplatelet therapy for life
  • The target lesion must be a de novo coronary lesion that has not been previously treated with any interventional procedure
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Single de novo target lesion stenosis of LAD, RCA or LCX (or of their branches) with stenosis of ≥70% and <100% or stenosis ≥50% and <70% (visually assessed) with evidence of ischemia via positive stress test, or fractional flow reserve value ≤0.80, or iFR <0.89 or IVUS or OCT minimum lumen area ≤4.0 mm²
  • Reference vessel must have 2.5 mm - 4.0 mm diameter and ≤ 30 mm length
  • Evidence of calcification at the lesion site assessed by angiography, with fluoroscopic radio-opacities noted without cardiac motion prior to contrast injection involving both sides of the arterial wall in at least one location and total length of calcium of at least 15 mm and extending partially into the target lesion, or by IVUS or OCT, with presence of ≥270 degrees of calcium on at least 1 cross section
  • Planned treatment of single lesion for every target vessel
  • Ability to pass a 0.014" guide wire across the lesion
  • The target vessel must have a TIMI flow 3 at baseline

Who cannot join

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%
  • Subject is pregnant or nursing
  • eGFR <45 ml/min (Cockroft-Gault, MDRD) or chronic dialysis
  • Untreated pre-procedural haemoglobin <9 g/dL or intention to refuse blood transfusions if one should become necessary
  • Patient has a platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or >750,000 cells/mm3
  • Patient has a known allergy to protocol required medications (clopidogrel, thienopyridines, aspirin, contrast media) that cannot be adequately premedicated
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Uncontrolled diabetes defined as a fasting hyperglycaemia >200 mg/dL or HbA1c greater than or equal to 10%
  • Patient has had a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 6 months, or has any permanent neurologic defect that may cause non-compliance with the protocol
  • Patient has an active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding
  • Patient has a history of coagulopathy
  • Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint
  • Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Subject refusing or not a candidate for emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery
  • Planned use of atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloon, or any investigational device other than lithotripsy
  • Stent implantation in the target vessel within the last year or a stent within 10 mm of the target lesion
  • Definite or possible thrombus (by angiography or intravascular imaging) in the target vessel
  • Angiographic evidence of a dissection in the target vessel at baseline or after guidewire passage

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata - Policlinico

    Roma, Rome, 00133

Other trials in Italy

About this study

The goal of this observational, prospective, multicenter study is to explore local action of coronary calcium fragmentation exerted by endovascular lithotripsy by images acquired with OCT, in patients with coronary artery calcifications responsible for significant stenosis, candidate to PCI. The main question it aims to answer, is the ability of Shockwave System to reduce calcium density in the Region of Interest (ROI) of the vessel wall.

Read the detailed description

Coronary arteries with calcific lesions will undergo intravasculary lithotripsy (IVL) treatment; OCT acquisition will be performed before IVL treatment, after IVL treatment and after stent-implantation. All OCT frames will be uploaded on the image processing and analysis program ImageJ (US National Institutes of Health). ROI will be selected as part of image where calcium is located. Image analysis will be performed using frequency histogram of pixel density in the ROI pre- and post-IVL, as a measure of calcium density. Mean pixel density of the ROI before IVL will be compared with mean pixel density of the ROI after IVL, measuring delta pixel density.

Being tested
intravascular lithotripsy with Shockwave coronary system
Keywords
Coronary artery calcification, Intravascular Lithotripsy, Optical Coherence Tomography, Calcium density

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • intravascular lithotripsy with Shockwave coronary systemDevice

    Also called OCT acquisition with FD-OCT imaging catheter

    OCT acquistion is performed at baseline. Then the IVL catheter will be passed across the lesion over the guidewire. Atherectomy or cutting/scoring balloons is not permitted per protocol. The IVL procedure is considered successful when a residual stenosis <50% by visual estimate after IVL alone is achieved. After IVL procedure, one OCT imaging acquisition must be performed. If the residual stenosis is ≥50% following IVL, noncompliant balloon dilatation will be performed prior to stenting and OCT images repeated accordingly. Subsequent stent implantation will be performed per local standard of care at the discretion of the operator. Following stent implantation, high pressure post-dilatation is recommended and OCT imaging acquisition must be performed to assess stent apposition for secondary end point.

Study groups in NCT05973994
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with significant calcific coronary artery stenosis candidate to PCIPatients with coronary artery calcifications responsible for significant stenosis will undergo basal OCT acquistion. After intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) application, a second OCT acquisition will be made. The mean calcium density of the vessel's ROI before IVL and after IVL will be compared. Stent implantation will be performed after the second OCT acquisition.
Receives: Device: intravascular lithotripsy with Shockwave coronary system

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction of calcium density in the Region of Interest (ROI) of the vessel after lithotripsy treatment

    Calcium density is measured as delta pixel-density between calcific lesions images before and after lithotripsy at OCT acquisition

    Measured: five-ten minutes

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Reduction of stent malapposition after intracoronary lithotripsy application

    Sten malapposition is measured as the distance between the abluminal surface of the strut and the luminal surface of the artery wall in the frames of lesion acquired by OCT after stent implantation.

    Measured: five minutes after stent impantation

  2. Incidence of acute vessel dissection and acute stent thrombosis or subacute vessel thrombosis after index procedure

    Safety endpoint

    Measured: one, six months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2023
  2. Study start21 Feb 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
Target duration
6 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05973994
Sponsor's protocol ID
75/21
Acronym
SCALPO
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
25 Jul 2023
Last updated
4 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • Abdel-Wahab M, Richardt G, Joachim Buttner H, Toelg R, Geist V, Meinertz T, Schofer J, King L, Neumann FJ, Khattab AA. High-speed rotational atherectomy before paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions: the randomized ROTAXUS (Rotational Atherectomy Prior to Taxus Stent Treatment for Complex Native Coronary Artery Disease) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jan;6(1):10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.07.017. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

    PubMed 23266232
  • Agarwal S, Cox AJ, Herrington DM, Jorgensen NW, Xu J, Freedman BI, Carr JJ, Bowden DW. Coronary calcium score predicts cardiovascular mortality in diabetes: diabetes heart study. Diabetes Care. 2013 Apr;36(4):972-7. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1548. Epub 2012 Dec 10.

    PubMed 23230101
  • Ali ZA, Brinton TJ, Hill JM, Maehara A, Matsumura M, Karimi Galougahi K, Illindala U, Gotberg M, Whitbourn R, Van Mieghem N, Meredith IT, Di Mario C, Fajadet J. Optical Coherence Tomography Characterization of Coronary Lithoplasty for Treatment of Calcified Lesions: First Description. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Aug;10(8):897-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.012.

    PubMed 28797412
  • Ali ZA, Nef H, Escaned J, Werner N, Banning AP, Hill JM, De Bruyne B, Montorfano M, Lefevre T, Stone GW, Crowley A, Matsumura M, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, Fajadet J, Di Mario C. Safety and Effectiveness of Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Stenoses: The Disrupt CAD II Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct;12(10):e008434. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008434. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

    PubMed 31553205
  • Allison MA, Criqui MH, Wright CM. Patterns and risk factors for systemic calcified atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004 Feb;24(2):331-6. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000110786.02097.0c. Epub 2003 Dec 4.

    PubMed 14656730
  • Barbato E, Shlofmitz E, Milkas A, Shlofmitz R, Azzalini L, Colombo A. State of the art: evolving concepts in the treatment of heavily calcified and undilatable coronary stenoses - from debulking to plaque modification, a 40-year-long journey. EuroIntervention. 2017 Aug 25;13(6):696-705. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00473.

    PubMed 28844031
  • Baumbach A, Bittl JA, Fleck E, Geschwind HJ, Sanborn TA, Tcheng JE, Karsch KR. Acute complications of excimer laser coronary angioplasty: a detailed analysis of multicenter results. Coinvestigators of the U.S. and European Percutaneous Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty (PELCA) Registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 May;23(6):1305-13. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90371-9.

    PubMed 8176087
  • Benezet J, Diaz de la Llera LS, Cubero JM, Villa M, Fernandez-Quero M, Sanchez-Gonzalez A. Drug-eluting stents following rotational atherectomy for heavily calcified coronary lesions: long-term clinical outcomes. J Invasive Cardiol. 2011 Jan;23(1):28-32.

    PubMed 21183767
  • Bhatt P, Parikh P, Patel A, Chag M, Chandarana A, Parikh R, Parikh K. Long-term safety and performance of the orbital atherectomy system for treating calcified coronary artery lesions: 5-Year follow-up in the ORBIT I trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Jun;16(4):213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.03.007. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

    PubMed 25866032
  • Bourantas CV, Zhang YJ, Garg S, Iqbal J, Valgimigli M, Windecker S, Mohr FW, Silber S, Vries Td, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia HM, Morel MA, Serruys PW. Prognostic implications of coronary calcification in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: a patient-level pooled analysis of 7 contemporary stent trials. Heart. 2014 Aug;100(15):1158-64. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305180. Epub 2014 May 20.

    PubMed 24846971
  • Brinton TJ, Ali ZA, Hill JM, Meredith IT, Maehara A, Illindala U, Lansky A, Gotberg M, Van Mieghem NM, Whitbourn R, Fajadet J, Di Mario C. Feasibility of Shockwave Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Calcified Coronary Stenoses. Circulation. 2019 Feb 5;139(6):834-836. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036531. No abstract available.

    PubMed 30715944
  • Brodmann M, Holden A, Zeller T. Safety and Feasibility of Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Below-the-Knee Arterial Stenoses. J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Aug;25(4):499-503. doi: 10.1177/1526602818783989. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

    PubMed 29911480
  • Brodmann M, Werner M, Brinton TJ, Illindala U, Lansky A, Jaff MR, Holden A. Safety and Performance of Lithoplasty for Treatment of Calcified Peripheral Artery Lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;70(7):908-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.022. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28797363
  • Brodmann M, Werner M, Holden A, Tepe G, Scheinert D, Schwindt A, Wolf F, Jaff M, Lansky A, Zeller T. Primary outcomes and mechanism of action of intravascular lithotripsy in calcified, femoropopliteal lesions: Results of Disrupt PAD II. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 1;93(2):335-342. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27943. Epub 2018 Nov 25.

    PubMed 30474206
  • Budoff MJ, Young R, Burke G, Jeffrey Carr J, Detrano RC, Folsom AR, Kronmal R, Lima JAC, Liu KJ, McClelland RL, Michos E, Post WS, Shea S, Watson KE, Wong ND. Ten-year association of coronary artery calcium with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Eur Heart J. 2018 Jul 1;39(25):2401-2408. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy217.

    PubMed 29688297

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Artery Calcification, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction of calcium density in the Region of Interest (ROI) of the vessel after lithotripsy treatment (time frame: five-ten minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT05973994, which also lists 76 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in