AzTrials
AzTrials

Klatskin TumorNCT05993429

Diagnostic Efficacy of EUS-FNA/B Versus ERCP With or Without POCS-TB in Patients With Suspected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

An observational study of Klatskin Tumor and Cholangiocarcinoma, run by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an observational study with a prospective cohort design. This study enrolled patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma on imaging. This study aims to evaluate the histopathological diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) and endoscopic retrograde… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
The sampling method selected in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
14 Aug 2023to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma who were considered suitable for obtaining histopathological diagnosis by EUS-FNA/B or ERCP with or without POCS-TB by experts

Who may be able to join

  • ≥ 18 years old;
  • Newly diagnosed patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma on imaging examination

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a definite diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma by imaging (enhanced CT, MRI, or MRCP) and surgical candidacy within 3 months;
  • Patients scheduled for liver transplantation;
  • Patients with previous gastroduodenal diversion or biliary surgery;
  • Patients with hilar bile duct stenosis caused by tumor or lesion outside the bile duct;
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Patients who cannot tolerate intravenous general anesthesia due to various reasons;
  • Patients with severe coagulation dysfunction, or patients who cannot stop antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy for a short time and are unsuitable for low molecular weight heparin replacement therapy;
  • Patients who refused to sign informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

    Jinan, Shandong, 250063

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Diagnostic Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration/Biopsy Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography With or Without Peroral Cholangioscopy Targeted Biopsy for Suspected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: an Open Multicenter Prospective Study

This is an observational study with a prospective cohort design. This study enrolled patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma on imaging. This study aims to evaluate the histopathological diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without peroral cholangioscopy targeted biopsy (POCS-TB) in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, the incidence of complications was compared between the EUS-FNA/B and ERCP with or without POCS-TB. The impact of the histopathological diagnosis on survival outcomes in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma was evaluated.

Being tested
The sampling method selected in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Medical subject headings
Klatskin Tumor, Cholangiocarcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The sampling method selected in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinomaDiagnostic test

    The appropriate sampling approach was selected as EUS-FNA/B or ERCP with or without POCS-TB based on experts' overall evaluation. This study will compare the histopathological diagnosis of the selected sampling method with the final diagnosis.

Study groups in NCT05993429
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EUS-FNA/B group; ERCP with or without POCS-TB groupEUS-FNA/B group: Patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma who were considered suitable for obtaining histopathological diagnosis by EUS-FNA/B by experts
Receives: Diagnostic Test: The sampling method selected in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma
ERCP with or without POCS-TB groupERCP with or without POCS-TB group: Patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma who were considered suitable for obtaining histopathological diagnosis by ERCP with or without POCS-TB by experts
Receives: Diagnostic Test: The sampling method selected in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The diagnostic value of EUS-FNA/B versus ERCP with or without POCS-TB in diagnosing hilar cholangiocarcinoma

    The diagnostic value was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. The incidence of complications

    The incidence of complications after EUS-FNA/B versus ERCP with or without POCS-TB

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  2. The cost-effectiveness ratio

    The cost-effectiveness ratio of EUS-FNA/B versus ERCP with or without POCS-TB in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  3. The emergency readmission time

    The emergency readmission time of EUS-FNA versus ERCP with or without POCS-TB

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  4. The proportion of tissue deemed adequate for cytological or histological analysis obtained by EUS-FNA/B and ERCP with or without POCS-TB.

    The proportion of tissue deemed adequate for cytological or histological analysis obtained by EUS-FNA/B and ERCP with or without POCS-TB.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  5. The number of participants whose visual diagnosis by the new generation of Eye Max cholangioscopy was consistent with the pathological and final diagnoses, respectively.

    The number of participants whose visual diagnosis by the new generation of Eye Max cholangioscopy was consistent with the pathological and final diagnoses, respectively.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  6. The number of participants whose management was affected by the new generation of Eye Max cholangioscopy visual diagnosis.

    The number of participants whose management was affected by the new generation of Eye Max cholangioscopy visual diagnosis.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  7. The incidence rate of needle tract metastasis by EUS-FNA/B

    The incidence rate of needle tract metastasis by EUS-FNA/B

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  8. The number of participants whose further treatment strategies were impacted by preoperative pathological diagnosis.

    The number of participants whose further treatment strategies were impacted by preoperative pathological diagnosis.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  9. The number of participants whose survival outcomes were impacted by preoperative pathological diagnosis.

    The number of participants whose survival outcomes were impacted by preoperative pathological diagnosis.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  10. Maximum lesion size

    Maximum lesion size on EUS

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  11. Lesion shape

    Lesion shape (ovoid-to-round, irregular) on EUS.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  12. Lesion composition

    Lesion composition (cystic, partially cystic, solid) on EUS.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  13. Lesion margin

    Lesion margin (ill-defined, microlobulated/spiculated, well-defined) on EUS.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  14. Lesion echogenicity

    Lesion echogenicity (hyperechoic intensity, isoechoic intensity, hypoechoic intensity) on EUS.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  15. Lesion heterogeneity

    Lesion heterogeneity on EUS.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  16. Lesion growth pattern

    Lesion growth pattern on EUS.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  17. Lesion blood flow

    Lesion blood flow (none, poor, moderate, rich) on EUS.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

  18. Lesion elastography

    Lesion elastography (stiff, moderate, soft, unvalued) on EUS.

    Measured: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Aug 2023
  2. Study start14 Aug 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05993429
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023SDU-QILU-3
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
13 Jul 2023
Last updated
26 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Klatskin Tumor and Cholangiocarcinoma, run by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The diagnostic value of EUS-FNA/B versus ERCP with or without POCS-TB in diagnosing hilar cholangiocarcinoma (time frame: 2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in