Subjective Cognitive DeclineEarly Phase 1AMoCC-SCDNCT06002477
Attentional Mechanisms in SCD
A Early Phase 1 study testing Mecamylamine Challenge in people with Subjective Cognitive Decline, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will use an anticholinergic pharmacological probe to examine attention network function in SCD using EEG. The overall hypothesis is that in older adults with SCD, normal cognitive performance is maintained by compensatory attention network activity, supported by enhanced cholinergic function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Subjective Cognitive Decline
- What is being tested?
- Mecamylamine Challenge
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Jun 2025to 30 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age ≥ 55
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) > 25 AND Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) rating < 3
- Non-smokers
Who cannot join
- medical contraindications to the drug challenge
- primary neurological disorder (such as stroke, epilepsy, etc.)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
About this study
Official title: Attentional Mechanisms of Cognitive Compensation in Subjective Cognitive Decline
This study will use an anticholinergic pharmacological probe to examine attention network function in SCD using EEG. The overall hypothesis is that in older adults with SCD, normal cognitive performance is maintained by compensatory attention network activity, supported by enhanced cholinergic function. The investigators anticipate that SCD will be associated with greater compensatory attention network activity and that disrupting this compensatory process through anticholinergic challenge will result in a greater negative effect on attentional performance (Attention Network Test, ANT) and attention network functioning (EEG) in older adults with greater subjective cognitive concern.
Read the detailed description
Overview: Cognitively normal older adults with and without subjective cognitive decline (SCD) (n = 80) will complete two study visits that will be double blinded and randomized for anticholinergic challenge (mecamylamine or placebo). Drug challenge visits will include cognitive testing and an electroencephalography (EEG) session.
AIM 1: Test for anticholinergic effects on attentional network function by cognitive concern severity. Under anticholinergic challenge, compared to placebo, greater subjective cognitive concerns will be associated with…:
Hyp. 1a: greater reduction in orienting attention network activity (ERP amplitude for early attention orienting).
Hyp. 1b: greater negative change in orienting attention performance.
Screening Procedures:
We will assure participants do not have MCI using the MoCA and GDS. Participants scoring below 26 on the MoCA or above 3 on the GDS will be excluded.
Medical history and comorbidity will be quantified using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) 90. Self-reported medical histories, and problem lists from electronic medical records will be reviewed for excluded medication and illness. Vital signs (weight, and height) will be assessed. Participants will complete an electrocardiogram and blood samples will be collected for a comprehensive metabolic panel and thyroid stimulating hormone levels.
All participants will be evaluated to exclude individuals with significant psychiatric symptoms using a partial Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR (SCID). Participants will also complete the Beck Depression Rating Scale (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Participants scoring above a BDI of 7 or a BAI of 15 will be excluded.
Study Drug Administration: During challenge drug study visits, participants will receive double-blinded administration of study drug (20 mg oral mecamylamine) or placebo. The order of administration will be randomized across study days. Randomization and dispensing will be managed by VUMC Investigational Drug Services.
Mecamylamine is a centrally and peripherally active non-competitive antagonist of nicotine (and presumably acetylcholine) at C6 (ganglionic) type nicotinic receptors. Peak cognitive and physiologic effects occur by 2-3 hours and dissipate by 4-6 hours after oral administration. At the doses to be used in this study, the expected physiologic effects of mecamylamine include cycloplegia, mydriasis, drowsiness, partial amnesia, decreased bowel motility, tachycardia and decreased salivation. We have used mecamylamine extensively in clinical studies in identical doses to those proposed here.
EEG: Each participant will be tested individually in a quiet private room. EEG signals will be recorded using a 128-channel Geodesic sensor net (EGI, Inc., Eugene, OR). The net is made of Ag/AgCl-coated carbon electrodes embedded in soft electrolytic sponges and arranged into a net using elastomer strings. Each electrode is connected via carbon wiring to a high-impedance (1MOhm) low-noise amplifier that provides analogue-to-digital (A/D) conversion of the EEG signals.
Prior to application, the net is soaked in warm saline (KCl) solution. The electrode impedances will be kept at or below 40 kOhms. The use of high-impedance amplifiers minimizes any decrease in signal-to-noise ratio and allows collection of high-quality data without having to abrade the scalp, thus minimizing any discomfort and reducing infection risks. Tests of this system reported no significant signal loss over a range of EEG frequencies. Another advantage of this system is fast electrode application and impedance adjustments (< 10 minutes). The EEG signals will be sampled every 4ms with filters set at 0.1 Hz - 100 Hz. During data collection, all electrodes will be referred to vertex (Cz). EEG will be continuously monitored and during periods of motor activity or inattention, stimulus presentation will be suspended until behavior quiets. The entire recording session will last approximately 30 minutes.
Attention Network Test (15 minutes): A task designed to test three attentional networks: (1) alerting, (2) orienting, and (3) executive control. The ANT combines attentional and spatial cues with a flanker task (a central stimulus is flanked by distractors that can indicate the same or opposite response to the central stimulus). On each trial a spatial cue is presented, followed by an array of five arrows presented at either the top or the bottom of the computer screen. The participant must indicate the direction of the central arrow in the array of five.
The cue that precedes the arrows can be non-existent, a center cue, a double cue (one presented at each of the two possible target locations), or a spatial cue that deterministically indicates the upcoming target location. The alerting network contrasts performance (RT) with and without cues, the orienting network contrasts performance on the task with a spatial or neutral cue, and executive control (conflict) is measured by assessing interference from congruent and incongruent flankers.
Incidental Memory Task (8 minutes): A passive incidental visual memory paradigm will be used to evaluate changes in basic memory processes. Subjects will be asked to view a slide show of novel color photographs depicting complex natural scenes. A small subset of the stimuli will be presented repeatedly (x5) throughout the session; the rest will be shown once. To encourage attention to the stimulus sequence, 20 attention probes (yellow smiley face) will be presented throughout the test session and require a button press response.
Cognitive Assessments: Following the EEG session participants will complete cognitive assessments of memory, and psychomotor speed. Administration takes approximately 35 minutes. Our group has significant experience using these tests in older adult populations. Tests will be administered in the order indicated below. Participants will be trained to stable performance in the cognitive tasks to reduce learning effects on the repeated testing. Different versions of all tests will be used during training and at each administration to minimize the likelihood of carryover effects.
The tasks chosen are designed to assess a range of cognitive domains including multiple attention, and visual-spatial and verbal memory processes, as well as psychomotor speed. These tasks will be completed under placebo and anticholinergic challenge. The cognitive battery will assess 1)Attention Capacity: Multiple Object Tracking, Digit Symbol Coding; 2) Attention Vigilance: Critical Flicker Fusion; 3)Psychomotor Speed: Choice Reaction Time; 4)Visual Episodic Memory: Picture Sequence Memory Task (NIH Toolbox); 5)Verbal episodic Memory: Buschke Selective reminding Task; 6)Visual-Spatial Working Memory: Visual-Spatial N-Back. The time to complete the cognitive battery will be less than two hours which is well within the 4-6-hour duration of effect of 10 mg mecamylamine.
Statistical Analysis Plan:Power was calculated for the Aim1 primary outcome measure of correlation between CCI score and anticholinergic challenge effect on ANT orienting P1 amplitude. With a sample size of n = 80 and alpha = 0.05, for a weak moderate correlation (r = 0.40) we will have over 95% power. This sample size is also appropriate for the resting-state fMRI analyses.
AIM 1 examines anticholinergic challenge effects on:
Hyp 1a: Peak P1 amplitude in parietal regions for Orienting trials of the Attention Network Test (ANT)
The primary ANT ERP measure will be P1 amplitude for the orienting trials in parietal electrodes. The P1 ERP peak amplitude will be measured between 150 - 250 ms after spatial orienting cue onset. Peak P1 amplitude measured between 150 - 250 ms after the non-spatial cue will be used as the baseline P1 measure. Exploratory analyses will also examine peak P1 amplitude averaged across frontal electrodes and peak Executive P3 amplitude measured between 250 - 500 ms after executive incongruent target onset (compared to P3 amplitude for congruent targets).
Cognitive concern severity will be measured as the number of items endorsed on the 20 item Cognitive Change Index (CCI).
Hyp 1a will be analyzed using a linear mixed effects model analysis, with Orienting P1 amplitude as the dependent variable and drug challenge (mecamylamine or placebo), CCI score, and their interaction, as fixed factors.
- Conditions
- Subjective Cognitive Decline
- Being tested
- Mecamylamine Challenge, Placebo Comparator Challenge
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mecamylamine ChallengeDrug
Mecamylamine 20 mg oral pill administered once
Placebo Comparator ChallengeOther
Matching placebo oral pill administered once
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Anticholinergic Challenge | Experimental | All participants will receive oral mecamylamine for 1 day Receives: Drug: Mecamylamine Challenge |
| Placebo Challenge | Placebo comparator | All participants will receive oral placebo for 1 day Receives: Other: Placebo Comparator Challenge |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Peak P1 amplitude for Orienting
Peak P1 amplitude in parietal regions for Orienting trials of the Attention Network Test (ANT) dyrung anticholinergic challenge
Measured: After administration of second drug challenge, approximately 72 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Aug 2023
- Study start6 Jun 2025
- Primary completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Subjective Cognitive DeclineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Vanderbilt University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kimberly Albert, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Investigators
- Paul Newhouse, MD, Study director, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06002477
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 230736
- Acronym
- AMoCC-SCD
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 4 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Attentional Mechanisms of Cognitive Compensation in Subjective Cognitive Decline
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06002477
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AMoCC-SCD / 230736
- Conditions
- Subjective Cognitive Decline
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will use an anticholinergic pharmacological probe to examine attention network function in SCD using EEG. The overall hypothesis is that in older adults with SCD, normal cognitive performance is maintained by compensatory attention network activity, supported by enhanced cholinergic function. The investigators anticipate that SCD will be associated with greater compensatory attention network activity and that disrupting this compensatory process through anticholinergic challenge will result in a greater negative effect on attentional performance (Attention Network Test, ANT) and attention network functioning (EEG) in older adults with greater subjective cognitive concern.
Detailed description
Overview: Cognitively normal older adults with and without subjective cognitive decline (SCD) (n = 80) will complete two study visits that will be double blinded and randomized for anticholinergic challenge (mecamylamine or placebo). Drug challenge visits will include cognitive testing and an electroencephalography (EEG) session.
AIM 1: Test for anticholinergic effects on attentional network function by cognitive concern severity. Under anticholinergic challenge, compared to placebo, greater subjective cognitive concerns will be associated with…:
Hyp. 1a: greater reduction in orienting attention network activity (ERP amplitude for early attention orienting).
Hyp. 1b: greater negative change in orienting attention performance.
Screening Procedures:
We will assure participants do not have MCI using the MoCA and GDS. Participants scoring below 26 on the MoCA or above 3 on the GDS will be excluded.
Medical history and comorbidity will be quantified using the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) 90. Self-reported medical histories, and problem lists from electronic medical records will be reviewed for excluded medication and illness. Vital signs (weight, and height) will be assessed. Participants will complete an electrocardiogram and blood samples will be collected for a comprehensive metabolic panel and thyroid stimulating hormone levels.
All participants will be evaluated to exclude individuals with significant psychiatric symptoms using a partial Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR (SCID). Participants will also complete the Beck Depression Rating Scale (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Participants scoring above a BDI of 7 or a BAI of 15 will be excluded.
Study Drug Administration: During challenge drug study visits, participants will receive double-blinded administration of study drug (20 mg oral mecamylamine) or placebo. The order of administration will be randomized across study days. Randomization and dispensing will be managed by VUMC Investigational Drug Services.
Mecamylamine is a centrally and peripherally active non-competitive antagonist of nicotine (and presumably acetylcholine) at C6 (ganglionic) type nicotinic receptors. Peak cognitive and physiologic effects occur by 2-3 hours and dissipate by 4-6 hours after oral administration. At the doses to be used in this study, the expected physiologic effects of mecamylamine include cycloplegia, mydriasis, drowsiness, partial amnesia, decreased bowel motility, tachycardia and decreased salivation. We have used mecamylamine extensively in clinical studies in identical doses to those proposed here.
EEG: Each participant will be tested individually in a quiet private room. EEG signals will be recorded using a 128-channel Geodesic sensor net (EGI, Inc., Eugene, OR). The net is made of Ag/AgCl-coated carbon electrodes embedded in soft electrolytic sponges and arranged into a net using elastomer strings. Each electrode is connected via carbon wiring to a high-impedance (1MOhm) low-noise amplifier that provides analogue-to-digital (A/D) conversion of the EEG signals.
Prior to application, the net is soaked in warm saline (KCl) solution. The electrode impedances will be kept at or below 40 kOhms. The use of high-impedance amplifiers minimizes any decrease in signal-to-noise ratio and allows collection of high-quality data without having to abrade the scalp, thus minimizing any discomfort and reducing infection risks. Tests of this system reported no significant signal loss over a range of EEG frequencies. Another advantage of this system is fast electrode application and impedance adjustments (< 10 minutes). The EEG signals will be sampled every 4ms with filters set at 0.1 Hz - 100 Hz. During data collection, all electrodes will be referred to vertex (Cz). EEG will be continuously monitored and during periods of motor activity or inattention, stimulus presentation will be suspended until behavior quiets. The entire recording session will last approximately 30 minutes.
Attention Network Test (15 minutes): A task designed to test three attentional networks: (1) alerting, (2) orienting, and (3) executive control. The ANT combines attentional and spatial cues with a flanker task (a central stimulus is flanked by distractors that can indicate the same or opposite response to the central stimulus). On each trial a spatial cue is presented, followed by an array of five arrows presented at either the top or the bottom of the computer screen. The participant must indicate the direction of the central arrow in the array of five.
The cue that precedes the arrows can be non-existent, a center cue, a double cue (one presented at each of the two possible target locations), or a spatial cue that deterministically indicates the upcoming target location. The alerting network contrasts performance (RT) with and without cues, the orienting network contrasts performance on the task with a spatial or neutral cue, and executive control (conflict) is measured by assessing interference from congruent and incongruent flankers.
Incidental Memory Task (8 minutes): A passive incidental visual memory paradigm will be used to evaluate changes in basic memory processes. Subjects will be asked to view a slide show of novel color photographs depicting complex natural scenes. A small subset of the stimuli will be presented repeatedly (x5) throughout the session; the rest will be shown once. To encourage attention to the stimulus sequence, 20 attention probes (yellow smiley face) will be presented throughout the test session and require a button press response.
Cognitive Assessments: Following the EEG session participants will complete cognitive assessments of memory, and psychomotor speed. Administration takes approximately 35 minutes. Our group has significant experience using these tests in older adult populations. Tests will be administered in the order indicated below. Participants will be trained to stable performance in the cognitive tasks to reduce learning effects on the repeated testing. Different versions of all tests will be used during training and at each administration to minimize the likelihood of carryover effects.
The tasks chosen are designed to assess a range of cognitive domains including multiple attention, and visual-spatial and verbal memory processes, as well as psychomotor speed. These tasks will be completed under placebo and anticholinergic challenge. The cognitive battery will assess 1)Attention Capacity: Multiple Object Tracking, Digit Symbol Coding; 2) Attention Vigilance: Critical Flicker Fusion; 3)Psychomotor Speed: Choice Reaction Time; 4)Visual Episodic Memory: Picture Sequence Memory Task (NIH Toolbox); 5)Verbal episodic Memory: Buschke Selective reminding Task; 6)Visual-Spatial Working Memory: Visual-Spatial N-Back. The time to complete the cognitive battery will be less than two hours which is well within the 4-6-hour duration of effect of 10 mg mecamylamine.
Statistical Analysis Plan:Power was calculated for the Aim1 primary outcome measure of correlation between CCI score and anticholinergic challenge effect on ANT orienting P1 amplitude. With a sample size of n = 80 and alpha = 0.05, for a weak moderate correlation (r = 0.40) we will have over 95% power. This sample size is also appropriate for the resting-state fMRI analyses.
AIM 1 examines anticholinergic challenge effects on:
Hyp 1a: Peak P1 amplitude in parietal regions for Orienting trials of the Attention Network Test (ANT)
The primary ANT ERP measure will be P1 amplitude for the orienting trials in parietal electrodes. The P1 ERP peak amplitude will be measured between 150 - 250 ms after spatial orienting cue onset. Peak P1 amplitude measured between 150 - 250 ms after the non-spatial cue will be used as the baseline P1 measure. Exploratory analyses will also examine peak P1 amplitude averaged across frontal electrodes and peak Executive P3 amplitude measured between 250 - 500 ms after executive incongruent target onset (compared to P3 amplitude for congruent targets).
Cognitive concern severity will be measured as the number of items endorsed on the 20 item Cognitive Change Index (CCI).
Hyp 1a will be analyzed using a linear mixed effects model analysis, with Orienting P1 amplitude as the dependent variable and drug challenge (mecamylamine or placebo), CCI score, and their interaction, as fixed factors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Anticholinergic Challenge | Experimental | Drug: Mecamylamine ChallengeAll participants will receive oral mecamylamine for 1 day |
| Placebo Challenge | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo Comparator ChallengeAll participants will receive oral placebo for 1 day |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- age ≥ 55
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) > 25 AND Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) rating < 3
- Non-smokers
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- medical contraindications to the drug challenge
- primary neurological disorder (such as stroke, epilepsy, etc.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mecamylamine ChallengeMecamylamine 20 mg oral pill administered once | Drug | Anticholinergic Challenge |
| Placebo Comparator ChallengeMatching placebo oral pill administered once | Other | Placebo Challenge |
Primary outcome
Peak P1 amplitude for Orienting
Time frame: After administration of second drug challenge, approximately 72 hours
Peak P1 amplitude in parietal regions for Orienting trials of the Attention Network Test (ANT) dyrung anticholinergic challenge
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Subjective Cognitive Decline
Recruiting
The Efficacy of an IADL-based Non-immersive Virtual Reality Training Program to Enhance ADL Performance and Cognitive Function for Persons at Risk of Dementia
Cognitive Enhancement, Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)
RecruitingObservational study
Fuzhou Aging Brain Health Initiative
Dementia, Alzheimer Dementia (AD)
RecruitingObservational study
InRAD Observational Study
Alzheimer's Disease(AD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Recruiting
Chinese Classics Recitation Training in Subjective Cognitive Decline
Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Subjective Cognitive Decline
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Under-Represented Communities Diagnosed With SCD or MCI Through Tele-Cog
Mild Cognitive Impairment, Subjective Cognitive Decline
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Paul Newhouse, MD study director
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Mecamylamine Challenge in people with Subjective Cognitive Decline, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kimberly Albert, PhD (6159364559, kimberly.albert@vumc.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Peak P1 amplitude for Orienting (time frame: After administration of second drug challenge, approximately 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jun 2026.